safety score card
Post on 25-Jun-2015
2.190 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
© LANCO Group, All Rights Reserved
Om Prakash MisraSafety Score Card
© LANCO Group, All Rights Reserved
2
Expected Outcomes– Understand the difference between performance indicators and measures– Understand the difference between process and leading metrics– Look at some industry standards for generating Safety “Process Metrics”– Understand some metrics that can be used for a Safety “Balanced Scorecard”
© LANCO Group, All Rights Reserved
3
Definitions– Data - The numbers themselves– Metrics - the collection of data into a meaningful
boundaries and targets• Leading and Lagging• Activity or Progress• Process vs. Outcome
– Performance Indicators - indirect indicators of a result– Performance Measures - The actual measurement of a
result
© LANCO Group, All Rights Reserved4
Leading vs. Lagging?
Some of the more typical examples
Leading Lagging
– Event index– Medical
treatment report
– Occupational health inspection findings
– Program implementation
– Training– Behavior
LaggingHazardous materialOverexposureWorkers
compensation loss experience
Illness rate
© LANCO Group, All Rights Reserved
5
Problems With Current Measure(s)• Incidence rates do not drive superior
health and safety performance– Overly inclusive– Not very accurate– The more pressure, the less accurate
they get
© LANCO Group, All Rights Reserved
6
Problems With Current Measure(s)• Incidence rates are an Indicator, NOT a true Measure of program performance
– Retrospective, little predictive value– #’s and reports can be driven underground– Root causes seldom identified– No relationship between program and effect
© LANCO Group, All Rights Reserved
7
Problems With Current Measure(s)• The historical Health & Safety measurement mindset is:
– One of tracking failure – Showing loss avoidance – Not positive contribution to the business
© LANCO Group, All Rights Reserved
8
• Short term results are unsustainable– Law of averages– Hawthorne effect– Delivering to expectations
Goals like “Cut Rates 20%” Don’t Work
© LANCO Group, All Rights Reserved
9
Leading or Lagging
– Exam scores– Training program assessment– # of inspections performed– # of qualified inspectors – % reduction in accidents– # of employee concerns reports– # of safety work orders completed within 7 days– # of equipment installed without proper guards– # of industrial hygiene over-exposures– % of reduction in people exposed to noise– Assessment of the performance appraisal process
© LANCO Group, All Rights Reserved
10
The Committee implemented 10 corrective actions.
Activity(good) “or”
Progress(better)
The Committee held 12 meetings
Do we measure progress or activity?
© LANCO Group, All Rights Reserved
11
Progress or Activity?
Exam scoresTraining program assessment# of inspections performed# of qualified inspectors % reduction in accidents# of employee concerns reports# of safety work orders completed within 7 days# of equipment installed without proper guards# of industrial hygiene over-exposures% of reduction in people exposed to noiseAssessment of the performance appraisal process
© LANCO Group, All Rights Reserved
12
Process and Outcome
Product
Service
Input Output Outcome
Theory
Mission ProgressCommitments MetSafety (IIR)SatisfactionComplianceCitationsWaste
Process
ManpowerDesignProceduresMaterialsTraining
Rework
© LANCO Group, All Rights Reserved
13
Job Hazard Analysis
Perform JSAPerform JSA
Training and Communication
Training and Communication
Program Assessment
Program Assessment
RecordkeepingRecordkeeping
1. Define Steps1. Define Steps
3. Develop and Integrate Safe Working Procedures
3. Develop and Integrate Safe Working Procedures
Follow-Up Follow-Up
2. Identify Hazards2. Identify Hazards
Interview Employee(s)
Interview Employee(s)
Review Job TaskReview Job Task
Injury/Illness History
Injury/Illness History
“High” Hazard Tasks
“High” Hazard Tasks
Identify “Priority” Schedule for JSA
Identify “Priority” Schedule for JSA
Establish JSA TeamEstablish JSA Team
Job Safety Analysis (JSA) Program
Job Safety Analysis (JSA) Program
TrainingTraining
© LANCO Group, All Rights Reserved
14
Manpower = Diversity of teamDesign = BenchmarkProcedures = Field TestedMaterials = ?Training = Quality (student evaluation)
Measuring JHA Success
Input Output OutcomeProcess
Theory
© LANCO Group, All Rights Reserved
15
Assessment Score% Actions Met % Actions Met on time?
Waste = % failed after QC
Rework = % modified after QC
Measuring JHA Success
Input Output OutcomeProcess
Theory
© LANCO Group, All Rights Reserved
16
Measuring JHA Success
Product = # of JSAs Service = # of ChangesTraining AttendanceTraining Retention
Input Output OutcomeProcess
Theory
© LANCO Group, All Rights Reserved
17
# of incidents with Hazard Analysis as a Root Cause or Contributing Factor% of behavior observations in Compliance to procedures
Measuring JHA Success
Input Output Outcome
Theory
Process
© LANCO Group, All Rights Reserved
18
Input, Process, Output or Outcome?
Exam scoresTraining program assessment# of inspections performed# of qualified inspectors % reduction in accidents# of employee concerns reports# of safety work orders completed within 7 days# of equipment installed without proper guards# of industrial hygiene over-exposures% of reduction in people exposed to noiseAssessment of the performance appraisal process
© LANCO Group, All Rights Reserved
19
Metrics
• “What Gets Measured Gets Done.”
• “What Gets Celebrated Gets Done Well.”
© LANCO Group, All Rights Reserved
20
– Measure Results, not Activities
– Must be Visible– Must be Kept Current– Provides Feedback– Must be Compared to
Something
– Is Shown in Context– Uncluttered– At the Point of Work– Realistic and Attainable Goals– Don’t Change Often– Result in Action Plans
Critical Metric Concepts
Key Principles of Effective Measurement
© LANCO Group, All Rights Reserved
21
Dan Petersen – Safety System Metrics
• Incidence Rates (frequency and severity)
• Management System Assessment Score• Employee Opinion (Perception) Surveys
• Behavior• % to goal on system improvements• WC $$$
Essential
Suggested
Occupational Hazards, 2001
© LANCO Group, All Rights Reserved
22
Balanced Scorecard• The balanced scorecard is an integrated systems to measure performance
Kaplan and Norton
– Financial– Customer– Internal Business Processes and Operations– Organizational and Individual Learning and Growth
Assumes no single measure is adequate for managing
© LANCO Group, All Rights Reserved
23
Balanced Scorecard
© LANCO Group, All Rights Reserved
24
S&H Balanced Scorecard• Customer (employees)
– Worker Perception Surveys– Injury and Illness Rates– IH Overexposures– Employee Involvement
• Learning and Growth– Continuous Improvement (Closure Rates)
• Inspections, investigations, notices, hazard analysis, IH, SWOs, etc.
– Training Retention– Activities
• Training Completed, etc.• Programs performed
– Trend Analysis
H&S equivalent of a Balanced ScorecardTranslates mission and strategy into objectives and
measures
© LANCO Group, All Rights Reserved
25
S&H Balanced Scorecard
• Internal Business Processes– Management Systems Assessment Scores– Process-Specific Implementation
• Action Plans/Objective completion – Risk Reduction
• Increase use of Engineering Controls • Financial
– Workers Compensation– Program Implementation Budget
H&S equivalent of a Balanced ScorecardTranslates mission and strategy into objectives and
measures
© LANCO Group, All Rights Reserved
26
– If you want a Safety Contact process to stimulate new ideas, measure the # of new Ideas, not the # of Safety Contacts.
– If you want employees to retain course materials, measure their retention, not their attendance.
– If you want reduce incidents, measure exposure reduction, both conditions and behaviors, not just incident #’s
– If you want management to use your safety programs, measure how much they use the programs, not the # of people who get hurt.
– If you want safety committees to get involved, measure how often each of them get involved, not how often they meet.
Measure What You Ask For
© LANCO Group, All Rights Reserved
27
Scorecards• Departments
– Tied to performance appraisals– Tied to recognition programsCorporate/Site– Balanced scorecardCulture– Perception surveys
© LANCO Group, All Rights Reserved
28
Expected OutcomesUnderstand the difference between
Performance Indicators and Measures.– Incidence Rates are only indicators, programs
are measures• Understand the difference between
Process and Leading Metrics– Process is defined as input, output and outcome
metrics– Leading can be lagging, depending on your
perspective
© LANCO Group, All Rights Reserved
29
Expected Outcomes• Look at some industry standards for generating Safety “Process Metrics”
– Job Hazard Analysis examples
• Understand some metrics that can be used for a Safety “Balanced Scorecard”– Process, Customer, Learning and Growth, and Financial
© LANCO Group, All Rights Reserved
30
References
– Balanced Scorecard – Kaplan and Norton– Organizational Resource Council www.orc-dc.com– Department of Energy www.eh.doe.gov/EH_Strategic_Plan2003_2006.pdf– “The Safety Scorecard.” Dan Petersen. Occupational Hazard Magazine. May 2004. – “How Do You Measure Safety?” Kyle Dotson. Executive Strategies, Industrial Hygiene, and Safety News. – “Selling Safety to Management Using Metrics.” Paul Esposito. Industrial Hygiene and Safety News. June 2002.
© LANCO Group, All Rights Reserved
top related