safe states alliance full-member webinar - c.ymcdn.com · finkelstein ea, corso ps, miller tr,...
Post on 15-Feb-2019
218 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
Safe States Alliance Full-Member Webinar
February 18, 2015
Agenda
Welcome
State of the States
Evaluation Community of Practice
Workforce Development Efforts
Advocacy Updates
2015 Safe States Annual Meeting
Q&A
STATE OF THE STATES
Background
• Background
• Methodology
• Core Components
• Infrastructure
• Surveillance
• Program & Policy
Strategies
• Partnerships
• Communication
• Training & Technical
Assistance
Injuries and violence have a significant impact on the overall
health of Americans including:
• Premature death,
• Disability, and
• Burden placed on the health care system.
1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control. Web-based Injury Statistics Query
and Reporting System (WISQARS) [online] (2012) [accessed 2014 Aug 4]. Available from URL: http://www.cdc.gov/injury/wisqars.
2. Finkelstein EA, Corso PS, Miller TR, Associates. Incidence and Economic Burden of Injuries in the United States. New York: Oxford
University Press; 2006.
in Emergency Departments for injury1 Over 31.7 million
people treated
related to injury1 Over 2.3 million hospitalizations
related to injury— nearly 1 person every 3 minutes1
More than 180,000 deaths
on medical costs and lost productivity due to injuries2
$406 billion ultimately spent in a single year
Methodology
• Background
• Methodology
• Core Components
• Infrastructure
• Surveillance
• Program & Policy
Strategies
• Partnerships
• Communication
• Training & Technical
Assistance
5th administration of the Safe States Alliance
State of the States (SOTS) Survey
Administered biennially since 2005
2013 SOTS was administered in early 2014
41 states participated
The results presented in this report were
analyzed using:
• SPSS Version 16.0,
• SAS Enterprise Guide 5.1, and
• ArcGIS 10.1.
Core Components
• Background
• Methodology
• Core Components
• Infrastructure
• Surveillance
• Program & Policy
Strategies
• Partnerships
• Communication
• Training & Technical
Assistance
Collect, analyze, and disseminate
injury and violence data
Select, implement, and
evaluate effective program
and policy strategies
Effectively communicate
information to key
stakeholders
Provide training
and technical
assistance
Build and sustain a solid
stable infrastructure
Engage partners for
collaboration
Core Components
• Background
• Methodology
• Core Components
• Infrastructure
• Surveillance
• Program & Policy
Strategies
• Partnerships
• Communication
• Training & Technical
Assistance
Collect, analyze, and disseminate
injury and violence data
Select, implement, and
evaluate effective program
and policy strategies
Effectively communicate
information to key
stakeholders
Provide training
and technical
assistance
Build and sustain a solid
stable infrastructure
Engage partners for
collaboration
Build a Solid Infrastructure
• Background
• Methodology
• Core Components
• Infrastructure – Program Location
– Funding
– FTEs
– Centralized
IVP Program
• Surveillance
• Program & Policy
Strategies
• Partnerships
• Communication
• Training & Technical
Assistance
BUILD A SOLID INFRASTRUCTURE FOR INJURY AND VIOLENCE PREVENTION INCLUDES…
Program Location
Funding
Full Time Equivalents (FTEs)
Centralized IVP Program
Program Location
• Background
• Methodology
• Core Components
• Infrastructure – Program Location
– Funding
– FTEs
– Centralized
IVP Program
• Surveillance
• Program & Policy
Strategies
• Partnerships
• Communication
• Training & Technical
Assistance
Location of Injury and Violence Prevention Programs in
State Health Departments
60%
13% 13% 9%
2% 2%
59%
8% 12%
6% 2%
13%
50%
16% 12%
4% 2%
16%
57%
19%
6% 4%
2%
11%
55%
14% 10%
5% 5%
12%
Health Promotion/
Disease Prevention/ Community
Health/ Behavioral Health
Maternal Child Health/Family
Health
Emergency Medical Services
(EMS)
Epidemiology Environmental Health
Other
2005 (N=45) 2007 (N=50) 2009 (N=49) 2011 (N=47) 2013 (N=41)
Program Location
• Background
• Methodology
• Core Components
• Infrastructure – Program Location
– Funding
– FTEs
– Centralized
IVP Program
• Surveillance
• Program & Policy
Strategies
• Partnerships
• Communication
• Training & Technical
Assistance
States with an Identified
Injury and Violence Prevention
Program
77%
89% 90%
2009 (N=49) 2011 (N=47) 2013 (N=41)
71%
57% 59%
6% 32% 31%
2009 (N=49) 2011 (N=47) 2013 (N=41)
Primarily Responsible for IVP Activities
IVP Activities are Decentralized
Centralization of Injury and
Violence Prevention Activities
Funding
• Background
• Methodology
• Core Components
• Infrastructure – Program Location
– Funding
– FTEs
– Centralized
IVP Program
• Surveillance
• Program & Policy
Strategies
• Partnerships
• Communication
• Training & Technical
Assistance
Number of States Reporting Spending Funding Sources
vs. Total Provided by Each Funding Source ($Millions) in FFY 2013
Funding
• Background
• Methodology
• Core Components
• Infrastructure – Program Location
– Funding
– FTEs
– Centralized
IVP Program
• Surveillance
• Program & Policy
Strategies
• Partnerships
• Communication
• Training & Technical
Assistance
State Health Department Injury and Violence Prevention
FFY 2013 Funding per Capita: State Funding per Capita Compared to National Funding per Capita ($0.45 per capita)
Full Time Equivalents (FTEs)
• Background
• Methodology
• Core Components
• Infrastructure – Program Location
– Funding
– FTEs
– Centralized
IVP Program
• Surveillance
• Program & Policy
Strategies
• Partnerships
• Communication
• Training & Technical
Assistance
Distribution of FTE Primary Roles in
State Injury and Violence Prevention Programs, FFY 2013
Full Time Equivalents (FTEs)
• Background
• Methodology
• Core Components
• Infrastructure – Program Location
– Funding
– FTEs
– Centralized
IVP Program
• Surveillance
• Program & Policy
Strategies
• Partnerships
• Communication
• Training & Technical
Assistance
Distribution of FTEs Working in
State Injury and Violence Prevention Programs, FFY 2013
2
15
8 9
5
1 1
Less than 1.00
1.00-5.00 5.01-10.00 10.01-15.00 15.01-20.00 20.01-25.00 25.01-30.00
Nu
mb
er o
f St
ate
IVP
Pro
gram
s
FTEs Working within State IVP Programs
Median = 7.50 FTEs
Average = 8.54 FTEs
Centralized IVP Programs
• Background
• Methodology
• Core Components
• Infrastructure – Program Location
– Funding
– FTEs
– Centralized
IVP Program
• Surveillance
• Program & Policy
Strategies
• Partnerships
• Communication
• Training & Technical
Assistance
• Four (4) states reported not having an identified IVP
program and IVP activities were decentralized
throughout their state.
• One (1) state not included in the survey response,
reported not have an IVP program in their state at all.
States Lacking a Centralized IVP Program
• Limited or no staff
• Internal bureaucracies in hiring new staff
• Lack of staff to compete for new funding
• Lack of funding to support existing infrastructures
• Competing divisions for same funding source
Barriers to Forming a Centralized IVP Program
Collect and Analyze Data
• Background
• Methodology
• Core Components
• Infrastructure
• Surveillance – Use of Core
Datasets
– Access to and Use
of IVP Data
– Access to Data
Professionals
• Program & Policy
Strategies
• Partnerships
• Communication
• Training & Technical
Assistance
COLLECT AND ANALYZE INJURY AND VIOLENCE DATA INCLUDES…
Use of Core Datasets
Access to and Use of Injury and Violence Data
Access to a Data Professional
Use of Core Datasets
• Background
• Methodology
• Core Components
• Infrastructure
• Surveillance – Use of Core
Datasets
– Access to and Use
of IVP Data
– Access to Data
Professionals
• Program & Policy
Strategies
• Partnerships
• Communication
• Training & Technical
Assistance
Accessed
Dataset (N)
Used the Data N
(%)
Vital Records 39 39 (100%)
Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) 37 36 (97%)
Hospital Discharge Data (HDD) 37 37 (100%)
Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System (YRBSS) 34 32 (94%)
Child Death Review (CDR) 28 26 (92%)
Emergency Department (ED) 26 26 (100%)
Fatality Analysis Reporting System (FARS) 24 21 (87%)
Emergency Medical Services (EMS) 22 21 (95%)
Medical Examiner 22 20 (90%)
Uniform Crime Reporting System (UCR) 21 20 (95%)
National Occupant Protection Use Survey (NOPUS) 20 19 (95%)
Access to Core Datasets and
Use of Core Datasets for Programmatic Decisions
Use of Core Datasets
• Background
• Methodology
• Core Components
• Infrastructure
• Surveillance – Use of Core
Datasets
– Access to and Use
of IVP Data
– Access to Data
Professionals
• Program & Policy
Strategies
• Partnerships
• Communication
• Training & Technical
Assistance
Accessed
Dataset (N)
Used the Data N
(%)
Vital Records 39 39 (100%)
Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) 37 36 (97%)
Hospital Discharge Data (HDD) 37 37 (100%)
Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System (YRBSS) 34 32 (94%)
Child Death Review (CDR) 28 26 (92%)
Emergency Department (ED) 26 26 (100%)
Fatality Analysis Reporting System (FARS) 24 21 (87%)
Emergency Medical Services (EMS) 22 21 (95%)
Medical Examiner 22 20 (90%)
Uniform Crime Reporting System (UCR) 21 20 (95%)
National Occupant Protection Use Survey (NOPUS) 20 19 (95%)
Access to Core Datasets and
Use of Core Datasets for Programmatic Decisions
Access to and Use of IVP Data
• Background
• Methodology
• Core Components
• Infrastructure
• Surveillance – Use of Core
Datasets
– Access to and Use
of IVP Data
– Access to Data
Professionals
• Program & Policy
Strategies
• Partnerships
• Communication
• Training & Technical
Assistance
Top 5 Datasets Used to Identify Injury and Violence
Prevention Topics or Populations
90%
68%
95%
76% 86%
95%
76% 84% 76%
64% 56%
73%
51%
68% 79%
90%
27%
73%
26%
57%
Vital Records (N=39)
Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance
System (BRFSS) (N=37)
Hospital Discharge Data (HDD) (N=37)
Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System
(YRBSS) (N=34)
Child Death Review (CDR) (N=28)
Identify topic-specific injury and violence issues
Identify specific population groups
Identify risk and/or protective factors
Identify geographic regions
Access to Data Professionals
• Background
• Methodology
• Core Components
• Infrastructure
• Surveillance – Use of Core
Datasets
– Access to and Use
of IVP Data
– Access to Data
Professionals
• Program & Policy
Strategies
• Partnerships
• Communication
• Training & Technical
Assistance
Access to Data Professionals
56% 59%
41%
10% 9%
4%
20%
30%
51%
14% 2% 4%
2013 (N=41) 2011 (N=47) 2009 (N=49)
0% of the time
1 - 50% of the time
51 - 99% of the time
100% or more of the time (i.e., equivalent to one or more FTE)
Program & Policy Strategies
• Background
• Methodology
• Core Components
• Infrastructure
• Surveillance
• Program &
Policy Strategies – Areas of Program and
Policy Focus
– Implementation &
Evaluation Activities
– Methods to Inform
Policy
• Partnerships
• Communication
• Training & Technical
Assistance
SELECT, IMPLEMENT, AND EVALUATE PROGRAMS AND POLICES INCLUDES…
Areas of Program and Policy Focus
Implementation & Evaluation Activities
Methods to Inform Policy
Areas of Program Focus
• Background
• Methodology
• Core Components
• Infrastructure
• Surveillance
• Program & Policy
Strategies – Areas of Program and
Policy Focus
– Implementation &
Evaluation Activities
– Methods to Inform
Policy
• Partnerships
• Communication
• Training & Technical
Assistance
Top
Primary
Focus
Areas
2013 2011 2009 2007 2005
1 Motor vehicle
injury
Motor vehicle
injury
Motor vehicle
injury Suicide attempts Suicide attempts
2 Fall injury Fall injury Child passenger
safety
Child passenger
safety
Sexual
assault/rape
3
Poisoning/
Prescription Drug
Overdose
Sexual
assault/rape Fall injury
Motor vehicle
safety
Child passenger
safety
4 Sexual
assault/rape
Injuries to
children
Injuries to
children
Sexual
assault/rape
Traumatic brain
injury
5 Child passenger
safety
Child passenger
safety
Sexual
assault/rape
Injuries to
children
Injuries to
children
Primary Programmatic Focus Areas 2005, 2007, 2009, 2011, & 2013
Areas of Program Focus
Top
Primary
Focus
Areas
2013 2011 2009 2007 2005
1 Motor vehicle
injury
Motor vehicle
injury
Motor vehicle
injury Suicide attempts Suicide attempts
2 Fall injury Fall injury Child passenger
safety
Child passenger
safety
Sexual
assault/rape
3
Poisoning/
Prescription Drug
Overdose
Sexual
assault/rape Fall injury
Motor vehicle
safety
Child passenger
safety
4 Sexual
assault/rape
Injuries to
children
Injuries to
children
Sexual
assault/rape
Traumatic brain
injury
5 Child passenger
safety
Child passenger
safety
Sexual
assault/rape
Injuries to
children
Injuries to
children
Primary Programmatic Focus Areas 2005, 2007, 2009, 2011, & 2013
• Background
• Methodology
• Core Components
• Infrastructure
• Surveillance
• Program & Policy
Strategies – Areas of Program and
Policy Focus
– Implementation &
Evaluation Activities
– Methods to Inform
Policy
• Partnerships
• Communication
• Training & Technical
Assistance
Areas of Program Focus
Top
Primary
Focus
Areas
2013 2011 2009 2007 2005
1 Motor vehicle
injury
Motor vehicle
injury
Motor vehicle
injury Suicide attempts Suicide attempts
2 Fall injury Fall injury Child passenger
safety
Child passenger
safety
Sexual
assault/rape
3
Poisoning/
Prescription Drug
Overdose
Sexual
assault/rape Fall injury
Motor vehicle
safety
Child passenger
safety
4 Sexual
assault/rape
Injuries to
children
Injuries to
children
Sexual
assault/rape
Traumatic brain
injury
5 Child passenger
safety
Child passenger
safety
Sexual
assault/rape
Injuries to
children
Injuries to
children
Primary Programmatic Focus Areas 2005, 2007, 2009, 2011, & 2013
• Background
• Methodology
• Core Components
• Infrastructure
• Surveillance
• Program & Policy
Strategies – Areas of Program and
Policy Focus
– Implementation &
Evaluation Activities
– Methods to Inform
Policy
• Partnerships
• Communication
• Training & Technical
Assistance
Areas of Program Focus
Top
Primary
Focus
Areas
2013 2011 2009 2007 2005
1 Motor vehicle
injury
Motor vehicle
injury
Motor vehicle
injury Suicide attempts Suicide attempts
2 Fall injury Fall injury Child passenger
safety
Child passenger
safety
Sexual
assault/rape
3
Poisoning/
Prescription Drug
Overdose
Sexual
assault/rape Fall injury
Motor vehicle
safety
Child passenger
safety
4 Sexual
assault/rape
Injuries to
children
Injuries to
children
Sexual
assault/rape
Traumatic brain
injury
5 Child passenger
safety
Child passenger
safety
Sexual
assault/rape
Injuries to
children
Injuries to
children
Primary Programmatic Focus Areas 2005, 2007, 2009, 2011, & 2013
• Background
• Methodology
• Core Components
• Infrastructure
• Surveillance
• Program & Policy
Strategies – Areas of Program and
Policy Focus
– Implementation &
Evaluation Activities
– Methods to Inform
Policy
• Partnerships
• Communication
• Training & Technical
Assistance
Areas of Program Focus
Motor Vehicle Injury Prevention
30 States identified Motor vehicle
injury prevention as a
primary focus area
76%
76%
74%
68%
68%
50%
50%
44%
24%
Child restraint/booster seat policy
Graduated Driver Licensing (GDL) policy
Child safety seat distribution program
Distracted driving policies
Primary seat belt policy
Alcohol-impaired driving policies
Bicycle helmet policy
Motorcycle helmet policy
Complete Streets Policy
• Background
• Methodology
• Core Components
• Infrastructure
• Surveillance
• Program & Policy
Strategies – Areas of Program and
Policy Focus
– Implementation &
Evaluation Activities
– Methods to Inform
Policy
• Partnerships
• Communication
• Training & Technical
Assistance
Areas of Program Focus
Fall Injury Prevention
27 States identified Fall injury
prevention as a primary
focus area
74%
59%
59%
26%
Exercise-based fall prevention programs
Multi-faceted fall prevention program
Policy that establishes commissions, coalitions, and programs for fall prevention
Home modification program
• Background
• Methodology
• Core Components
• Infrastructure
• Surveillance
• Program & Policy
Strategies – Areas of Program and
Policy Focus
– Implementation &
Evaluation Activities
– Methods to Inform
Policy
• Partnerships
• Communication
• Training & Technical
Assistance
Areas of Program Focus
Poisoning and Prescription Drug Overdose Prevention
27 States identified Poisoning and
Prescription Drug
Overdose prevention as
a primary focus area
78%
52%
Prescription Drug Monitoring Program PDMP
Other prescription drugrelated policies
• Background
• Methodology
• Core Components
• Infrastructure
• Surveillance
• Program & Policy
Strategies – Areas of Program and
Policy Focus
– Implementation &
Evaluation Activities
– Methods to Inform
Policy
• Partnerships
• Communication
• Training & Technical
Assistance
Implementing Policy Strategies
Policy Strategies Implemented by State Injury and
Violence Prevention Programs
• Background
• Methodology
• Core Components
• Infrastructure
• Surveillance
• Program & Policy
Strategies – Areas of Program and
Policy Focus
– Implementation &
Evaluation Activities
– Methods to Inform
Policy
• Partnerships
• Communication
• Training & Technical
Assistance
66%
66%
60%
49%
46%
43%
34%
31%
31%
29%
Motor vehicle injury
Poisoning/Prescription Drug Overdose
Child passenger safety
Fall injuries
Traumatic brain injury
Sexual assault/rape
Childhood injury
Domestic/intimate partner violence
Suicide/self-inflicted
Teen Dating Violence
Areas of Program Focus
Methods for Selecting IVP Topic Areas • Background
• Methodology
• Core Components
• Infrastructure
• Surveillance
• Program & Policy
Strategies – Areas of Program and
Policy Focus
– Implementation &
Evaluation Activities
– Methods to Inform
Policy
• Partnerships
• Communication
• Training & Technical
Assistance
Implementation & Evaluation
Topic Areas with Funding Allocated to Support Evaluation • Background
• Methodology
• Core Components
• Infrastructure
• Surveillance
• Program & Policy
Strategies – Areas of Program and
Policy Focus
– Implementation &
Evaluation Activities
– Methods to Inform
Policy
• Partnerships
• Communication
• Training & Technical
Assistance
55%
45%
40%
40%
31%
24%
21%
19%
19%
14%
12%
12%
10%
7%
7%
7%
7%
5%
5%
5%
2%
Sexual assault/rape
Fall injuries
Motor vehicle injury
Poisoning/Prescription Drug Overdose
Suicide/self-inflicted
Child passenger safety
Suicide attempts
Child abuse/neglect
Traumatic brain injury
Teen Dating Violence
Spinal cord injury
Submersion injuries/drowning
Domestic/intimate partner violence
Fire and burns injury
Homicide
Occupational injury
Pedestrian injury
All Terrain Vehicle injury
Motorcycle/motorized scooter injury
School-based injury
Rural/agricultural injury
Methods to Inform Policy
2013 Methods Used by State Injury and Violence
Prevention Programs to Inform Public Policy and Change
• Background
• Methodology
• Core Components
• Infrastructure
• Surveillance
• Program & Policy
Strategies – Areas of Program and
Policy Focus
– Implementation &
Evaluation Activities
– Methods to Inform
Policy
• Partnerships
• Communication
• Training & Technical
Assistance
Methods to Inform Policy
2013 Methods Used by State Injury and Violence
Prevention Programs to Inform Public Policy and Change
• Background
• Methodology
• Core Components
• Infrastructure
• Surveillance
• Program & Policy
Strategies – Areas of Program and
Policy Focus
– Implementation &
Evaluation Activities
– Methods to Inform
Policy
• Partnerships
• Communication
• Training & Technical
Assistance
Increase use of method in comparison to 2011 Decrease use of method in comparison to 2011
Methods to Inform Policy
Mechanisms or Protocols for Communicating with Policy
Makers about Injury and Violence Prevention Issues 2005, 2007, 2009, 2011 and 2013
• Background
• Methodology
• Core Components
• Infrastructure
• Surveillance
• Program & Policy
Strategies – Areas of Program and
Policy Focus
– Implementation &
Evaluation Activities
– Methods to Inform
Policy
• Partnerships
• Communication
• Training & Technical
Assistance
81% 82% 89%
74% 73%
2005 (N=45) 2007 (N=50) 2009 (N=49) 2011 (N=47) 2013 (N=40)
Engage Partnerships for Collaboration
Partnerships among different organization types: Agencies within the state health department (23 entities)
Other state agencies (16 entities)
Non-governmental organization (23 entities)
Federal Agencies (7 entities)
Description of the nature of the partnership: Sharing data;
Program planning;
Exchange of funding;
Collaborate on policy efforts;
Collaborate on evaluation activities;
Collaborate on communication activities; and
Training/technical assistance.
Overview of Partnerships • Background
• Methodology
• Infrastructure
• Data
• Program & Policy
Strategies
• Partnerships
• Communication
• Training & Technical
Assistance
Partnerships & Collaboration
Top Injury and Violence Partnerships Across all Agency
Types by Strength
• Background
• Methodology
• Infrastructure
• Data
• Program & Policy
Strategies
• Partnerships
• Communication
• Training & Technical
Assistance
70% 78% 81% 88%
13% 6% 7%
7% 10% 6%
12% 5% 8% 9%
Highway Safety Safe Kids Coalitions Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Vital Statistics
Strong New and Developing Needs Improvement No Relationship
within health
department
federal
non-
government
state
government
Effectively Communicate Information
• Background
• Methodology
• Infrastructure
• Data
• Program & Policy
Strategies
• Partnerships
• Communication
• Training & Technical
Assistance
EFFECTIVELY COMMUNICATING INFORMATION TO KEY STAKEHOLDERS INCLUDES…
100% of the state IVP programs surveyed provided some form of communication to target populations, partners, local groups, or others engaged in injury and violence prevention in 2013.
However, when states were asked if their
IVP program had an “official”
communications plan, only four states
(9%) reported that such a plan existed.
Effectively Communicate Information
• Background
• Methodology
• Infrastructure
• Data
• Program & Policy
Strategies
• Partnerships
• Communication
• Training & Technical
Assistance
Methods to Communicate
Injury and Violence-Related Information
88% 93%
48% 46%
72%
93% 93%
61%
38%
92% 87% 87%
75% 72%
Website Participation in professional
meetings
Reports, articles, presentations, data briefs, fact sheets
Listservs Interviews with local media
2009 2011 2013
Provide Technical Support & Training
• Background
• Methodology
• Infrastructure
• Data
• Program & Policy
Strategies
• Partnerships
• Communication
• Training & Technical
Assistance
– Topics for Technical
Assistance & Training
– Technical Assistance
Resources
PROVIDING TECHNICAL SUPPORT & TRAINING INCLUDES…
Topics for Technical Assistance & Training
Technical Assistance Resources Used by States
Provide Technical Support & Training
Topics for Technical Assistance and Training
Provided/Received by the State IVP Programs
• Background
• Methodology
• Infrastructure
• Data
• Program & Policy
Strategies
• Partnerships
• Communication
• Training & Technical
Assistance
– Topics for Technical
Assistance & Training
– Technical Assistance
Resources
83%
73%
54%
49%
46%
41%
12%
10%
76%
68%
32%
68%
71%
66%
27%
29%
Program strategies and interventions
Data collection, analysis, reporting, and quality improvement
Coalition building and collaboration
Policy and legislation
Evaluation methods and processes
Communication
Social determinants of health
Management and leadership strategies
IVP Provided TA on th Topic IVP Received TA on the Topic
Provide Technical Support & Training
Top Technical Assistance Resources Used 2011 and 2013
• Background
• Methodology
• Infrastructure
• Data
• Program & Policy
Strategies
• Partnerships
• Communication
• Training & Technical
Assistance
– Topics for Technical
Assistance & Training
– Technical Assistance
Resources
82%
80%
73%
63%
58%
51%
51%
87%
83%
72%
68%
64%
51%
47%
90%
90%
71%
74%
42%
55%
55%
Federal Agencies
Safe States Alliance
Resource Centers
Peer to Peer
Regional Networks
University/Academic Institutions
Injury Control Research Centers (ICRCs)
2013 2011 2009
Provide Technical Support & Training
Top Technical Assistance Resources Used 2011 and 2013
• Background
• Methodology
• Infrastructure
• Data
• Program & Policy
Strategies
• Partnerships
• Communication
• Training & Technical
Assistance
– Topics for Technical
Assistance & Training
– Technical Assistance
Resources
82%
80%
73%
63%
58%
51%
51%
87%
83%
72%
68%
64%
51%
47%
90%
90%
71%
74%
42%
55%
55%
Federal Agencies
Safe States Alliance
Resource Centers
Peer to Peer
Regional Networks
University/Academic Institutions
Injury Control Research Centers (ICRCs)
2013 2011 2009
Shenée Bryan Safe States Alliance
Shenee.Reid@SafeStates.org
Download full
2013 State of the States Report
www.safestates.org/sots
• Background
• Methodology
• Infrastructure
• Data
• Program & Policy
Strategies
• Partnerships
• Communication
• Training & Technical
Assistance
Evaluation “Community of Practice”
Safe States Full-Member Webinar
Wednesday, February 18, 2015
4:00 PM – 5:00 PM
Evaluation Community of Practice:
Overview
The Evaluation Community of Practice
is open to all members of the Safe States
Alliance and the American Public Health
Association (APHA), as well as
practitioners that are involved in
evaluations of injury and violence
prevention programs and policies.
Evaluation Community of Practice:
Purpose
Through this Community of Practice,
participants are able to exchange ideas,
information, resources, and experiences
related to the evaluation of injury and
violence prevention-related programs
and policies.
Evaluation Community of Practice:
Evaluation Forums
Evaluation Community of Practice:
How Can You Join?
If you are interested in being added to the
Community of Practice, please utilize the
following link:
http://www.safestates.org/event/EvalCoP
Registration to complete the registration
form and be added to the Community.
Upon the processing of your registration
form, you will receive directions for
accessing and logging into the community.
Any Questions?
Ina I. Allicott, MPH
Evaluation &Technical Assistance Coordinator
Safe States Alliance
ina.allicott@safestates.org
IVP Workforce Development Strategic Plan 2015-2019
PL
AN
• Form Steering Committee
• Met 9 times throughout 2014
• ID target audiences, framework, partners to engage
• IVP WFD working definition
DE
VE
LO
P
• Develop/implement IVP WFD survey - Role - Existing opps. - Challenges - Needs
• Environmental scan
• SWOT analysis
• Top 3 goals
• Draft plan
FIN
AL
E
• Steering Committee feedback (Oct)
• Partner feed-back (Nov/Dec)
• Updated plan (Dec)
• Safe States feedback, final plan (Jan)
PLAN DEVELOP FINALIZE
IMPLEMENT
IVP WFD Strategic Plan Overview
Executive Summary (1 page) Purpose, Collaboration, Actionable next steps, Goals
Detailed plan Introduction w/background
How to translate plan into action
Definitions: IVP & WFD
Goals & strategies + suggested next steps
Resources
Steering Committee members
IVP WFD Strategic Plan Goals & Strategies GOAL 1: Demand Increase the demand for IVP workforce development.
IVP WFD Strategic Plan Goals & Strategies GOAL 2: Supply Increase the number of cross-cutting, competency- and evidence-based IVP workforce development opportunities that are widely available at national, state, tribal, and local levels.
GOAL 3: Access Explore strategies for establishing a central clearinghouse (or multiple “hubs”) for cross-cutting, competency- and evidence-based IVP workforce development opportunities that are widely available at national, state, tribal, and local levels.
IVP WFD Strategic Plan Goals & Strategies GOAL 4: Quality Assure quality in the supply of new and/or existing IVP workforce development opportunities.
GOAL 5: Sustainability Leverage existing resources to support leveraged, revised and/or new IVP workforce development opportunities.
Partnerships and collaboration Central and necessary component to making progress in all areas of the strategic plan through the expansion of cross-cutting collaboration with existing and new prevention partners around IVP workforce development at national, state, tribal, and local levels.
IVP WFD Strategic Plan Implementation Develop/implement communication plan & products
Calls with IVP WFD Steering Committee in 2015
Share Strategic Plan with their organization/agency
ID current activities that align with plan
ID FY 2015 priorities that align with plan
ID & then collaboration on common 2015 goals/strategies/next steps
ID potential 2016 goals/strategies/next steps (for CDC application)
IVP WFD Strategic Plan Implementation Develop Safe States 2015 Implementation Plan
Develop a web-based clearinghouse for existing training opportunities related to Core Comps for IVP Professionals o Solicit proposals for web developer & map existing IVP & PH trainings
Increase availability of continuing education credits for existing Safe States trainings for professionals with designations as Certified Health Education Specialists (CHES) and Certified in Public Health (CPH) o Map trainings to CHES & CPH areas/domains; upload trainings to www.train.org
Relevant recommendations from recent WFD Report
Evaluation?
Government Relations/Advocacy Updates
New Position Statements
2015 Safe States Alliance Policy Agenda
Increase funding to CDC for the Core Violence and Injury Prevention Program (VIPP) by $13M
Support continued funding of $20M to CDC for Prescription Drug Overdose prevention
Increase funding for the CDC’s National Violent Death Reporting System (NVDRS) to $25M to expand implementation nationwide.
Injury and Violence Prevention Network
AAA
Afterschool Alliance
American Academy of Pediatrics
American Association of Poison Control Centers
American College of Emergency Physicians
American College of Sports Medicine
American College of Preventive Medicine
American Foundation for Suicide Prevention
American Medical Association
American Occupational Therapy Association
American Physical Therapy Association
American Public Health Association
American Psychological Association
American Trauma Society
Association of Maternal and Child Health Programs
Association of State and Territorial Health Officials
Brain Injury Association of America
Brain Trauma Foundation
Break the Cycle
California Coalition Against Sexual Assault
Center of Excellence on Elder Abuse and Neglect
Child Injury Prevention Alliance
Children's Hospital Association
Children's Safety Network, Education Development Center
Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists
Directors of Health Promotion and Education
FIA Foundation
Futures Without Violence
Harm Reduction Coalition
Menswork
National Association of County and City Health Officials
National Alliance to End Sexual Violence
NAPHSIS
National Association of State EMS Officials
National Association of State Head Injury Administrators
National Association of Students Against Violence Everywhere
National Center on Domestic and Sexual Violence (NCDSV)
National Council on Aging
National Child Abuse Coalition
National Safety Council
National Sexual Violence Resource Center
National Network to End Domestic Violence
National Physicians Alliance
National Violence Prevention Network
Pennsylvania Coalition Against Rape
Prevent Child Abuse America
Prevention Institute
Safe Kids Worldwide
Safe States Alliance
Society for Advancement of Violence and Injury Research
Society for Public Health Education
Suicide Prevention Resource Center
The Safety Institute
Trust for America's Health
YMCA of the USA
2015 Hill Day
March 16, 2015
Washington, D.C.
*Limited travel support still available to
attend
Office of Policy and Partnership
FY 2016 President’s Budget &
Updated NCIPC Focus Areas
Elizabeth Zurick Health Policy Team Lead
Office of Policy and Partnerships
National Center for Injury Prevention and Control
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Safe States Alliance All Member Call
February 18, 2015
National Center for Injury Prevention and Control
Agenda
Overview of the FY 2016 President’s Budget
Updated NCIPC Focus Areas
Q & A
Overview of the FY 2016 President’s Budget
FY 2016 President’s Budget – CDC Highlights
Total CDC- wide funding: $11 billion
Program level: $7 billion
Budget authority: $6 billion
Major initiatives:
Combatting Antibiotic Resistance (+$264.3M)
Prescription Drug Overdose Prevention (+53.6M)
Decreases:
public health scientific services, immunizations, chronic disease,
and occupational and environmental health.
FY 2016 President’s Budget - NCIPC
Total Funding: $256.9 million
Increase of $86.5 million over FY 2015 levels.
The proposed increase includes
$5 million for a new initiative to begin a national concussion
surveillance system to determine the incidence of sports-related
concussions.
Support to address the PDO epidemic and heroin-related
overdoes:
$48 million above FY 2015 levels to address PDO within
states.
$5.6 million to address the rising rate of heroin-related
overdose deaths.
The proposed increase includes (cont.):
Support for the Now is the Time Plan
$10 million for an initiative to support research into the
causes and prevention of gun violence.
$12 million above FY 2014 for NVDRS to expand the system
nationwide.
$5.6 million for Sexual Violence Prevention/RPE Evaluation
transferred to budget authority.
FY 2016 President’s Budget - NCIPC
Injury Prevention and Control 2015 2016 PB
-- Intentional Injury $ 92,001 $ 107,611
-- Unintentional Injury $8,598 $ 8,598
--Injury Prevention Activities $48,950 $107,602
-- Injury Control Research Centers $ 9,596 $ 9,596
-- NVDRS $ 11,302 $ 23,570
Total (in thousands) $170,447 $256,977
FY 2015 Appropriation vs. FY 2016 President’s Budget - NCIPC
Updated NCIPC Priorities
NCIPC Focus Areas
CDC and NCIPC priorities:
Prescription Drug Overdose
Motor Vehicle Injuries
Growth and Development over next two years:
Child abuse and neglect
Older adult falls
Sexual violence
Youth sports concussion
2015 Safe States Annual Meeting April 29 – May 1, 2015 at the Embassy Suites Centennial Park in Atlanta, Georgia
Early registration closes February 27, 2015
Now accepting nominations for Awards and Innovative Initiatives
http://www.safestates.org/?2015AnnualMeeting
Question & Answer
top related