rv 2014: rail~volution 101 by gb arrington

Post on 26-Jun-2015

533 Views

Category:

Lifestyle

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

DESCRIPTION

Rail~Volution 101 AICP CM 2 What have we learned during Rail~Volution’s first twenty years? How can we make a place better? What are the fundamental principles of building livable communities with transit? What have we learned across disciplines in the public, private, nonprofit and philanthropic sectors? How can transit-oriented design be a catalyst for positive solutions, as well as meeting energy and environmental challenges? How do green design, reduced trips and energy usage, and a smaller carbon footprint come into play? How can we promote long-term sustainable economic growth in our neighborhoods? Hear the voices of experience from Rail~Volution’s first two decades. Participate in an in-depth discussion on where we’ve been and where we go from here. What’s changed? What’s happening? What’s ahead? Moderator: Tim Baldwin, Principal, Rocky Mountain West Transit & Urban Planning; Associate, Steer Davies Gleave, Denver, Colorado Dan Bartholomay, Chief Executive Officer, Rail~Volution, Minneapolis, Minnesota Shelley Poticha, Director, Urban Solutions, Natural Resources Defense Council, Washington, DC Scot Spencer, Associate Director for Advocacy and Influence, Annie E Casey Foundation, Baltimore, Maryland Peter McLaughlin, County Commissioner, Hennepin County, Minneapolis, Minnesota Earl Blumenauer, 3rd District, Oregon, United States Congress, Washington, DC GB Arrington, Principal, GB Place Making, Portland, Oregon

TRANSCRIPT

MAKING PLACE BETTER Reflec%ons:    

Rail~Volu%on  @20        

Arrington.gb@gmail.com  ar r ington .gb@gmai l .com gbp lacemak ing .com

OVERVIEW

§  20 years §  Beyond myths §  Tomorrows stations §  TOD principals §  Creating value §  TOD market §  Case studies §  Conclusions

Topics

LOOKING BACK QUICKLY

What’s changed fromRail~Volution 1 to Rail~Volution 20

Circa 1980 Portland LRT & Transit Station Area Planning renderings "

LOOKING BACK QUICKLY

What’s changed TOD cartoons  to  1,000’s  of  built  TOD  projects  

Portland Cartoon " Portland, Dallas, Cleveland Washington DC, San Francisco, Minneapolis TODs "

LOOKING BACK QUICKLY

What’s changed Export  Portland  TOD  to  a  na%onal  movement                

Minneapolis, Phoenix, Charlotte, Boston, Seattle, Miami "

VP Gore, Rail~Volution 1998 Orenco Station "

LOOKING BACK QUICKLY

What’s changed Educa%on  &  advocacy  to  a  growing  lifestyle    

West Baltimore, Denver, Chicago, California, Brisbane AU "

My home,Portland Urban Infill TOD"

LOOKING BACK QUICKLY

What’s changed Planning  is  sufficient  to  an  implementa%on  focus      

Garland, TX"Miami "

LOOKING BACK QUICKLY

What’s changed Any  TOD  is  ok  to  equitable  +  sustainable  +  jobs  TOD        

Affordable TOD 10th & Osage Denver "

Arlington VA, San Jose, Vancouver BC "

LOOKING BACK QUICKLY

What’s changed Transit  a  “good”  to  transit  designed  for  development            

Seattle Streetcar "60th & I-84 Portland "

LOOKING BACK QUICKLY

What’s changed A  residen%al  project  to  a  mixed  use  district          

Pearl District, Portland "Del Mar, Pasadena "

LOOKING BACK QUICKLY

What’s changed Limited  TOD  examples  to  a  market  preference              

SW Waterfront, Portland "Mockingbird Station, Dallas "

             

Development  next  to  transit  is  TOD    

TOD MYTHS

TOD or TAD?

§  Majority of development at US transit stations are not TODs

§  TOD is still illegal in at most US transit stops

§  Not enough to be next to transit, must be shaped by transit

LRT Station"

Transit-Oriented Development Transit Adjacent Development Cisco Systems TAD

San Jose, CA"

Street Car TOD Portland, OR"

SHAPED BY TRANSIT

§  Greater density §  Less parking §  Better public realm §  Mix of uses §  Very walkable §  Tame the car

San Diego, Portland, San Francisco, Washington, DC, Denver San Francisco, Dallas"

LRT Station

ORENCO STATION

§  Safe streets §  Strong center §  Local services §  Parks & open space §  Housing choices §  Good jobs

a great neighborhood for a successful TOD ~ The fundamentals

Hillsboro, OR"

             

geSng  the  planning  right  is  sufficient      

TOD MYTHS

KEYS TO TOD SUCCESS: IMPLEMENTATION FOCUS §  Planning  based  in  development  reality    

§  Apply  the  power  of  partnerships  

§  Market  driven,  not  transit  driven  TOD  

§  Designed  for  the  pedestrian      

41st & Fox Commuter Rail Station Denver "

VISION FOR WHAT YOU WANT

Overlake Transit Village, Redmond, WA"

CLEAR PATH & ROLES TO GET THERE

Overlake Transit Village, Implementation Plan, Redmond, WA"

             

This  is  a    great  TOD  project    

TOD MYTHS

Active defined center

§  Series of projects "§  18 hours of activity "§  Quality public realm /

sense of place "§  Employment closest to transit"§  Compact & dense "

PRINCIPLES FOR TOD a successful

TOD: A DISTRICT NOT A PROJECT

T!

Orenco StationA District

The RoundA Project

T!

§  Mission Bay redevelopment

§  University Campus §  High Density Housing §  Mixed-use §  Station at

SF Giants ball park

MISSION BAYSAN FRANCISCO

             

Transit  enables    TOD    

TOD MYTHS

LINK TO A BROADER STRATEGY

State Center TOD Strategy, Baltimore MD"

§  More than transit §  Part of community’s

vision for growth §  Building partnerships

essential §  Basis to gain greater broader

support & success

TOD: a “means to an end” to achieving community objectives

City shaping with transit requiresa new approach to transit.

21ST CENTURY STATIONS

Quality designMake transit workCreate a placeConnect to the community

Navy Yard StationWashington, DC

             

Transit  riders:  the  market  for  TOD    

TOD MYTHS

UNDERSTANDING YOUR MARKET

§  Emerging Trends in Real Estate ‘10: –  "The future is about

green development, infill, & TOD" §  Majority of TOD residents

are childless –  Empty-nesters &

young urban professionals §  TOD households tend

to be higher income –  Reflects newer construction

Portland TOD Condo"

MILLENNIALS WANT URBAN

§  88% of Gen Y want to be in an urban setting §  1/3rd willing to pay for the ability to walk §  Huge market: 80m Gen Y v 76m Boomers

2011 National Association of Home Builders:

WHAT TOD RESIDENTS WANT

From Transit Community Resident Surveys:

§  Well designed communities §  Easy access to a center §  High quality residence §  Quality transit service §  Pedestrian Friendly §  Good price value

The Merrick"

Orenco Town Center"

“The ability to walk to a pint of milk”

             

TOD    needs  less  parking    

TOD MYTHS

Limited, managed parking §  Always  a  challenging  issue  §  Consider:  size,  loca%on,    

design  &  management  §  No  minimum  ra%os,  maximums    §  Disconnect  parking  from  buildings,  

manage  by  district      §  Park  ‘for  sale’  nearly  conven%onally    

PRINCIPLES FOR TOD a successful

10 Trips "

6.67 Trips "

3.55 Trips "

Single Family"

Multifamily "Multifamily TOD "

TODS BEHAVE DIFFERENTLY

T O D h o u s i n g g e n e r a t e s 5 0 % l e s s a u t o t r a ffi c t h a n c o n v e n t i o n a l h o u s i n g

Dai

ly V

ehic

le T

rips "

TODS CREATE LESS TRAFFIC TOD residents are:

§  Twice as likely not to own a car as US Households

§  5 times more likely to commute by transit than others in region

Self-selection: §  Responsible for up to 40%

of TOD ridership bonus

Rio Vista, San Diego"

Columbia City, Seattle"

             

½  mile  is    the  TOD    walkshed    

TOD MYTHS

Compact pedestrian-oriented §  Block sizes for 5-minute walk"

•  Max of 400 ft block face"§  Orient buildings to sidewalks "§  Calm streets "§  Active street edges with wider

sidewalks "§  Retail & office closet to transit"

PRINCIPLES FOR TOD a successful

DISTANCE, USE & MODE SHARE

WMATA Survey – transit share decreases with distance §  First 600 ft really matters §  Office mode share drops about 1% every 100 ft §  ½ mile residential share 200% higher than office

Lesson: put office & retail closest to station "

             

Density  makes  TOD    viable      

TOD MYTHS

Medium to higher density §  Greater than community average"§  Distance to transit matters"§  To support transit on average:"

– 6 to 7 du/ac for frequent bus"– 9 to 25 du/ac for rapid transit"

§  Minimum density effective tool "

PRINCIPLES FOR TOD a successful

TRANSIT ALONE DOES NOT CREATE VALUE Value results from: §  Overall development market §  Land available for development §  Supportive plans & policies §  Designing transit for value

West Corridor, Denver"New Lynn Station, Auckland, NZ"

TRANSIT RENT PREMIUM

Locations within ½ mile of transit command much higher rents §  Washington D.C.

+28% rent premium §  Northern Virginia &

Montgomery Co + 40% rent premium

CoStar  Group  2011  

Navy  Yard  &  Waterfront  Metro  Stops    

RAIL DEVELOPMENT PREMIUM TriMet Blue Line study – Hillsboro to Gresham §  Found a 36% premium

over & above what could otherwise be expected without LRT –  Blue Line LRT:

36% increased rate of & density of development

Blue Line TOD"

             

TODs  maximize    mixed  use        

TOD MYTHS

Mix of uses §  Planners require it too often "§  Vertical or Horizontal"§  Most difficult TOD element"§  Great TOD benefits"

– More walking + ridership"– Reduced auto-use"

§  Prohibit auto-oriented uses closest to transit "

PRINCIPLES FOR TOD a successful

PEARL DISTRICT PORTLAND

Mixed-Use TOD Public & private partnership

–  Housing –  Infrastructure –  Parks

§  Since1997 –  $1B+ Devlp –  3,000+ units

§  Tight parking §  22% affordable

               

We  need    rail  before    we  do  TOD    

TOD MYTHS

DON’T NEED TO WAIT FOR TRANSIT

§  Transit-Oriented

§  Pedestrian-Oriented

§  Development-Oriented

""

T    O    D                                P    O    D                            D    O    T    

       

Same planning & development fundamentals apply

               

These      ideas  won’t  work  here  

TOD MYTHS

FIRM BASE TO DRAW ON

§  Market  preference    for  urban  housing  

§  Lot’s  of  experience    to  draw  from    

§  Demographics  trends    are  favorable    

§  Federal  policy  support        

Blue Line, Twin Cities"

COMMUNITY BUILDING + PEOPLE MOVING

§  Trends are on your side §  Plan for the pedestrian §  Leverage the power of partnerships §  Raise your aspirations §  Make TOD legal & easy §  Develop a strategy equal to the task

Melbourne AU, Seattle, Portland"

ar r ington .gb@gmai l .com gbp lacemak ing .com 971-282-5118

THANK YOU

top related