rv 2014: looks like a brt. must be a brt. or is it?

Post on 05-Jul-2015

162 Views

Category:

Automotive

2 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

DESCRIPTION

Looks like a BRT. Must be a BRT. Or is it? Bus rapid transit, or BRT, is a growing mode of choice given its flexibility and lower capital cost compared to rail alternatives. But what does a BRT need to look like to qualify for FTA funding? What are the major considerations for BRT design when it comes to serving your community? How can you tailor your BRT to a specific corridor? Hear up-to-date information on the current FTA definition of BRT and how it impacts potential funding for BRT projects. Then listen to three practitioners who've planned and defined their BRT projects to meet both their funding goals and the needs of their communities. Moderator: Art Guzzetti, Vice President, Policy, American Public Transportation Association, Washington, DC Rick Kiegel, Project Manager, Maryland Transit Administration, Baltimore, Maryland Katie Roth, AICP, Senior Planner, Metro Transit, BRT/Small Starts Project Office, Minneapolis, Minnesota John Myers, PE, Associate Vice President, HNTB Corporation, Indianapolis, Indiana Jeffrey F. Boothe, Chair, New Starts Working; Partner, Holland & Knight, Washington, DC

TRANSCRIPT

1

The Right Tools for the Problem: Arterial BRT in the Twin Cities

Katie Roth, AICP Metro Transit

September 22, 2014 Rail~Volution

2

Define the problem

Use the right tools to solve the problem

Defend the solution & overcome challenges

2

3

12 Workhorse Corridors • Core frequent service network • 90,000 daily rides • Growing urban neighborhoods • Speed & reliability challenges • Transit market growth potential

4

• 10 miles, Rosedale to METRO Blue Line 46th Street Station

• 20 stations, roughly 1/2 mile apart • Frequent service:

A Line every 10 minutes + Local underlay every 30 minutes

• Fast: 27% faster than local bus • 4,000 current daily rides,

9,000 by 2030 with A Line

First Line Coming in 2015 ROSEVILLE

FALCON HEIGHTS

SAINT PAUL

MINNEAPOLIS

Define the problem

5

42% Moving

32% Boarding

23% Red Light

Frequent, long stops & red light delays hamper service speed.

Traffic delays make up just 3% of travel time.

Buses are moving less than half the time.

Define the problem

6

Inadequate bus facilities belie service quality.

7

Critical Tool: 100% Off-Board Fare Payment

St. P

aul Pioneer P

ress

8

Critical Tool: Bumpouts for Speed & Space 6’ clear zone for snow clearance & all-door boarding 5’ shelter depth Unobstructed sidewalk

Bus stops in travel lane

9

Critical Tool: Scalable, High-Amenity Stations

9

Visible Branding

Station Name

Real-Time “Next Bus” Information

Roof-Mounted Heaters & Lights Destination Sign

Ticket machines & Fare validator

Security Cameras

Detectable warning edge

4’ Clear Zone

Information & Maps

Foundation Wall

Near-level platform height

Emergency Phone

10

Building more, faster, for less…but how?

10

$450 million

System of 4 LRT lines: $4+ billion

System of 12 arterial

BRT lines:

FFGA

FFGA

FFGA

FFGA

????

11

State Bonds (One-Time)

Challenge: Filling in the gaps

• Stable, dedicated source critical to system buildout

Federal CMAQ (One-Time)

Federal Formula

Funds

Local Funds

State Competitive (One-Time)

Trunk Highway Bonds

Fleet TSP Stations Technology Design & Soft Costs

State Appropriation

(One-Time)

$25 Million Total A Line Project Cost

Challenge: Is it or isn’t it?

12

A toolbox, not a package.

13

Fast Frequent Reliable

Comfortable Predictable

THE RIGHT TOOLS

Contact

14

More information: metrotransit.org/snelling-brt Katie Roth, AICP katie.roth@metrotransit.org

top related