response to intervention in north carolina implementation of a problem solving model exceptional...

Response to InterventionIn North Carolina

Implementation of a Problem Solving Model

Exceptional Children Division

NC Department of Public Instruction

• RTI = PSM + CBM

• SST

What is the definition of a Specific Learning Disability

• For the purpose of special education services, students classified as learning disabled are those who, after receiving instructional intervention in the regular education setting, have a substantial discrepancy between ability and achievement.

What are the challenges and criticisms of the IQ Discrepancy

Model? • Use of the IQ Discrepancy Model often

results in the wrong students being identified for special education and many who need help are excluded

• Requires that students wait to fail before receiving needed special education services

• Evaluation, as it currently exists, has little instructional utility

Reauthorization of Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (“IDEA”)

– December 2004

• The LEA shall not be required to take into consideration whether a child has a severe discrepancy between achievement and intellectual ability

• In determining whether a child has a specific learning disability, a LEA may use a process which determines if a child responds to a scientific, research based intervention”

What is Response to Intervention?

• Response to Intervention is …

the effect of the implementation of research-based intervention provided with the intent of addressing a need of a struggling student

Fundamental Principles of RTI

High quality instruction(Requires application of research-based practices/interventions)

Frequent Assessment (Requires data collection that is immediate, frequent,

and specific to a defined problem)

Data-based decision making

(data is used to inform instruction)

Response to Intervention is also:

…a focus on intervention rather than on what is wrong with the child

… a focus on the solution rather than the problem

… a focus on addressing the needs of all students having difficulty, not just those with labels

… a focus on positive outcomes for all students

… a focus on all educators being responsible for all children

“The NC Problem Solving Model”

Fundamentals of a Problem- Solving process

• Identifying and analyzing the problem, including the collection of baseline data

• Generating possible strategies or interventions

• Implementing the intervention plan• Monitoring student progress to determine

success• Evaluating, reviewing, and revising the

plan

Level IConsultation

Between Teachers-Parents

Level II Consultation With OtherResources

Intensity of Problem

Am

oun

t of R

eso

urce

s Needed to

Solv

e P

roble

m

Level IIIConsultation with

the Problem Solving Action Team

Level IVIEP

Consideration

Where we started…

Define the problem

Implement Plan

Evaluate

Develop a Plan

If we believe that a School-Wide System of Support for student

achievement should look like this:

Intensive Intervention 5%

Strategic Interventions 15%

Core Curriculum 80%

Level IConsultation

Between Teachers-Parents

Level II Consultation With OtherResources

Intensity of Problem

Am

oun

t of R

eso

urce

s Needed to

Solv

e P

roble

m

Benchmark

Strategic

Intensive

Level IIIConsultation with

the Problem SolvingAction Team

Level IVEntitlement

Consideration

North Carolina Problem Solving Approach

Where we are going…..

Progress Monitoring with Curriculum Based Measurement

(“CBM”)• Data collection tools derived directly from the curriculum

that student is expected to learn• Studies have shown that CBM aids teachers in

generating superior student achievement regardless of whether the students are identified as learning disabled, low achieving, or achieving in the average range (Fuchs et al., 1994)

• Improved communication among school staff and between school staff and parents

• CBM provides data that clearly, simply, and meaningfully relate to educational decisions (Deno, 1985)

How does this initiative “fit” with No Child Left

Behind?

RTI, NCLB, and IDEIA• NCLB and IDEIA both require evidence based practices

• NCLB requires that states submit evidence of how they will instruct and assess student reading across the five domains identified by the NRP

• NCLB requires a three tier prevention model: primary, secondary, tertiary

• IDEIA calls for:– A requirement for the use of scientifically based reading

instruction– Evaluation of how well a student responds to intervention– An emphasis on the role of data for decision making

• (Brown-Chidsey, R. & Steege, M., 2005)

Final Thoughts

• The RTI/PS Model meets requirements of the law (NCLB and IDEIA)

• The RTI/PS Model is a model that doesn’t wait until children fail

• The RTI/PS Model is an “all children” initiative – every child gets help

• The RTI/PS Model is a way to address disproportionality

• The RTI/PS Model is a way to increase AYP

Final Thoughts

• The RTI/PS Model is a way to gather and use instructionally relevant information

• The RTI/PS Model is a model that utilizes the expertise of many disciplines (reg ed., spec ed., psychology, sp/lang, etc.)

• The RTI/PS Model offers the opportunity to do something good for children

• The RTI/PS Model is a focus on ensuring all children learn and have that opportunity within the regular class environment

Resources

• http://www.ncpublicschools.org/ec/exceptionality/learning/intervention/

• http://www.nrcld.org/research/rti.shtml

• http://www.wested.org/nerrc/rti.htm

• http://www.interventioncentral.org/

• http://www.w-w-c.org/

“Behavior change is like a kaleidoscope:

Once the tube is turned even a fraction of an inch, the entire pattern

changes.” -John

Maag

Questions