qm philosophy talk

Post on 10-May-2015

239 Views

Category:

Technology

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

DESCRIPTION

Philosophy of quantum mechanics talk for Philosophers Corner group (Sydney, 2nd October 2012)

TRANSCRIPT

How We See the

Matter That Makes

All Things

Steven Spencer

Applied Mathematician

Philosophers Corner

2nd October 2012 1

Outline

• The world of classical physics

• Things don’t quite add up!

• Enter the quantum

• The mechanics and the quantum

• Stranger and stranger

• What does it mean?

• Where is the mind in all this?

• Are you sure?2

The world of classical physics

• Deterministic (Laplace 1749 - 1827)

• External observer and isolated experimental

systems

• Particles (Newton 1642 -1727)

• Waves (Hooke, Huygens, Young, Maxwell)

• Atomic theory (Dalton)3

Things don’t quite add up

• Black-body thermal radiation → colours

• Stable atoms

• Line emission spectra

• Photoelectric effect

4

Enter the Quantum

• The physics of atomic and sub-atomic scales?

• Energy is emitted in ‘bits’ (quanta) (Planck,

1900) → tricky maths?

• Energy in light is in ‘grainy bits’ (photons)

which are particles with wave properties →photoelectric effect (Einstein, 1905)

5

Two views of EM radiation

• Light is a wave! Light is a particle!

6

The Mechanics and the Quantum• Orbital atomic theory (Rutherford, 1911)

• Quantised electron orbit atomic model

(Bohr, 1913) → ‘flights and perchings’

• Particles are waves! (de Broglie, 1924) →orbiting electrons have integer

wavelengths!

• Matrix mechanics (Heisenberg, 1925) →unanschaulich atomic world! 7

• Wave mechanics (Schrodinger, 1926) → how the

quantum state of a system evolves with time.

Anschaulich atomic world?

• Complementarity – wave-particle duality

• Deterministic description for wave functions +

Statistical description of matter and energy.

• Uncertainty principle (Heisenberg, 1927)

Momentum and position cannot be simultaneously

measured with unlimited precision. 8

The observer and the system

• The role of the classical observer

(measurement) of a quantum system becomes

central and hotly contested –

“We are not only observers. We are

participators. In some strange sense, this is a

participatory universe.” – John A. Wheeler

9

The Quantum World?

• Wave function evolution U(objective &

deterministic) + measurement R(subjective) =

confusion?!?

10

Electron Double Slit Experiment

(Feynman)

• Detector ‘D’ turned

on or off by observer

→ affects pattern on

screen by double slit.

Observer affects

outcome of experiment!

11

Stranger and stranger• Superposition of states → possible in quantum

but not classical world (Schrodinger’s cat).

• Quantum emtanglement → Many particle

systems have a complicated combined

wavefunction even at ‘large’ distances!

• Einstein-Podolski-Rosen (EPR) effect – QM is

either ‘non-local’ (faster than light influences)

or is not a complete theory!

• Bell inequalities – QM wins again!

12

Schrodinger’s Cat Thought Experiment!

• Quantum

superposition

affects the

classical

world?

13

• Before detection the electron wave is

‘everywhere’, at detection the wave function

collapses throughout the universe!

‘Spooky action at a distance’ (Einstein)

14

• Single source of two photons – ‘spin’

observation method at one end affects

observation at a distant point! Do particles

communicate with one another or are they

one entity ?!? 15

• Standard QM violates Bell’s theorem. Separated particles are connected (entanglement)!?!

• Result confirmed by experiment (Aspect, 1982)!!16

What does it mean?

• Starting point – no experiment has ever been

found that concludes against QM maths!

• Whatever happened to determinism?

“God does not play dice” – A. Einstein

vs

“A physical object has an ontologically

undetermined component that is not due to

the epistemological limitations of physicists’

understanding” – A. Eddington 17

• Ontologies (interpretations) –

a) Copenhagen (Bohr, Heisenberg and Born, 1927) –

Complementarity + uncertainty principle +

measurement + correspondence principle.

QM describes knowledge NOT reality!

“There is no quantum world. There is only an

abstract physical description.” - N. Bohr

“The idea of intermediate kinds of reality was just

the price one had to pay” – W. Heisenberg18

b) Many-worlds / relative state (Everett, 1957) –

universal wavefunction never collapses → multiverse

c) Environmental decoherence – rapid disappearance

of quantum superpositions by interaction with

environment (useful for many interpretations).

d) Ensemble (Einstein) – Minimalist, statistical –

wavefunction for large numbers of particles only.

e) Relational – different observers see different

quantum states.

19

f) Pilot-wave (de Broglie, Bohm) – Particles guided by

wavefunction. Non-local, holistic universe, hidden

variables.

g) Objective collapse (Penrose) – physical mechanism

of collapse – extended QM.

h) Conciousness collapse - subjective reduction (von

Neumann/Wigner) & participatory anthropic principle

(J.A. Wheeler)

g) New theories (many!) – objective R wave function

collapse / non-linear U function. 20

Where is the mind in all this?• What is a brain?

• Dense network – more

than 104 cell bodies and

km of wiring per cubic mm!

• Multiple cell types: spiking

neurons (1011 cells) for info

processing, analog neurons

& ‘supporter’ cells .

Q: Is the mind (consciousness) highly organised brain activity?

21

Neuronal Behaviour

22

Quantum Theory of Mind

• Non-algorithmic thought → cannot be modelled by a digital (Turing) computer.

• Consciousness as a quantum mechanical phenomenon

(Penrose & Hameroff) –Hypothesis: Neuron microtubules within neurons support quantum superpositions (non-computable behaviour) + macroscopic quantum entanglement across brain.

• Highly controversial – decoherence counter-argument!

• Physical collapse of quantum wavefunction of microtubules essential for consciousness (Orch-OR). 23

Complex Dynamical Behaviour Theory

of Mind

• Intrinsic non-linear dynamics of each individual neuron + network dynamics (attractors, bifurcations of behaviour, small changes in inputs lead to large changes in outputs).

• ‘Simple’ non-linear models found for behaviour of individual spiking neurons → reproduce complex bursKng behaviour.

• Apparently non-algorithmic behaviour (sometimes chaos) from algorithmic (deterministic) components.

• Consciousness as an emergent phenomenon from a neural network complex dynamical system of the physical brain.

24

Are you sure?• An underlying level of reality?

• Quantum state decoherence and gravitons?

• Non-linear quantum theory

• The classical-quantum divide - looking for

decoherence

• To be continued… 25

THANK YOU!!!26

top related