public participation: environmental impact assessment … · (environmental impact assessment)...
Post on 18-Jul-2018
216 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
9/5/2012
1
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)Regulations, Guidelines, Experience
Establishes National Environmental Policy y
Establishes Administrative Procedures for Federal Agencies to assess/consider impacts
Creates Council on Environmental Quality y(CEQ)
2
9/5/2012
2
Declares National Policy (Title 1, Section 101) to:
(1) Use all practicable means and measures for: P d ti h b t d t Productive harmony between man and nature
Requirements of present/future generations
Widest range of beneficial uses
Enhance renewable recycle depletable
Preserve : historic, cultural and natural heritage
(2) Coordinate plans/functions/programs/ resources(2) Coordinate plans/functions/programs/ resources
(3) Each person should both enjoy and be responsible for preservation and enhancement of the environment
3
NEPA (Section 102)(2)(c): Directs federal agencies to prepare publicly availableagencies to prepare publicly available "detailed statement" with every proposal for legislation or major Federal action significantly affecting the human environment Statements must include: Environmental impacts of proposed action Unavoidable adverse impacts of proposal
Alt ti t th d ti Alternatives to the proposed action Relationship between local short-term uses versus maintenance
and enhancements of long-term productivity Irreversible/irretrievable commitments of resources
4
9/5/2012
3
Administrative Procedure Act (APA) Public Notice and Comment Public information requests:10 days to decide/ 20 days for appeals Judicial Review: for legal wrong/adverse impact of Federal action
Other Laws Affecting US EIA
Section 309 of the Clean Air Act of 1970 EPA independent review and comment: written and public EPA Administrator refers to CEQ any legislation, federal action, or
regulation unsatisfactory: public health or environmental quality
Memorandum of Agreement between CEQ and EPA EPA responsible for notice of availability of EIS In Federal Register EPA responsible for notice of availability of EIS In Federal Register EPA receives, tracks EIS’s and manages EIS filing system
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
Proposed Federal actions potentiallyposing significant impact
NEPA, Section 102
impact
EIS threshold
latio
ns:
Crite
riaen
cy R
ulem
akin
g
Environmental Assessment (EA) required
Assess to decide a) EIS b) Finding No Significant Impactc) Withdraw
6
CEQ
Regu
Fede
ral A
gc) Withdraw
Categorical ExclusionsIndividually or Cumulatively no potential for significant impact/Case by case assess for extraordinary circumstances
9/5/2012
4
Environmental Impact Statements (EIS’s)
Small proportion of federal actions require an Environmental Impact Statement
EIS’s
Environmental Assessments (EA’s)(Initial Environmental Impact Assessment)
About 50,000 annually
(Environmental Impact Assessment)About 5-600 annually
EAs
7
Categorical ExclusionsCategorical Exclusions
NEPA affects private parties only when there is a Federal ‘handle” on a proposed private action e.g.p p p g◦ Permits, licenses, grants, loans, use of Federal land or resources
Private Sector Proponents:◦ Submit environmental documentation along with applications◦ May carry out public participation/consultation separate or with Agency◦ May enter into third party agreement with Federal Agency to hire a
contractor to prepare an EIS with Federal Agency technical direction ◦ Do not prepare decision documents, EIS or write permit/other conditions
Each Federal agency is responsible but: ◦ Involves all agencies across government with jurisdiction and expertise◦ Mandates independent review by U.S. EPA◦ Provides oversight and both formal and informal conflict resolution by the
Council on Environmental Quality in Executive Offices of the President
8
9/5/2012
5
U.S. Environmental Impact AssessmentProposed Agency Action
Categorical Exclusion
Environmental Assessment (EA)Environmental Assessment (EA)
Significant impact No significant impact
Environmental Impact Assessment (EIS)
Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI)
Notice of Intent
Scoping Process
Exclusion applies
No exclusion
Implementation of Agency Action
Final EISAgency and Public Review
Draft EIS
Scoping Process
Record of Decision
Developing specific legislative authority and regulations
Issuance of a finding of no significant impact for an EA Issuance of a finding of no significant impact for an EA
_____________________________________________
Notice of Intent to pursue a proposed action and to develop an EIS
Scoping of reasonable alternatives, relevant stakeholders, and issues of concern required for EIS’s
Review of a draft EIS Review of a draft EIS
Wait period – after the final EIS
Review of an agency’s record of decision
Monitoring and evaluation process
10
9/5/2012
6
Make diligent effort to involve the public in preparing/implementing NEPA*preparing/implementing NEPA Provide public notice to agencies and the public
meetings/hearings/availability\documents Hold or sponsor public hearings or meetings if substantial
environmental controversy or request
Solicit information and comments from the public, especially persons or organizations who might be interested or affected
Explain where persons can get information or status reports
11
Explain where persons can get information or status reports
Have a minimum 45 day comment period on draft EIS’s
Ensure public availability of public, agencies, EPA comments
* 40 CFR 1506.6
Public involvement before decisions are madeAgency cannot issue a decision on a proposed actionAgency cannot issue a decision on a proposed action until90 days after notice of filing of a Draft EIS 30 days after notice of filing of a Final EIS
has elapsed since the publication of EPA’s notice of availability in theFederal Register of filing an EIS with EPA
Accurate scientific analysis, expert agency comments, and public scrutinyco e s, a d pub c sc u y
Documents concentrate on truly significant issues rather than amassing needless detail.
12
* 40 CFR 1500.1 (b)
9/5/2012
7
:Action with National Concern: By mail on request
P bli ti i th F d l R i t Publication in the Federal Register Notice by mail to national organizations reasonably expected to be interestedActions with primarily local concerns: Nine suggestions◦ Notice to State and area-wide clearinghouses◦ Notice to Indian Tribes◦ Follow State’s public notice procedures for comparable actions◦ Publish in local newspapers (general circulation rather than legal papers)◦ Notice through local media◦ Posting on and off site where action is to be located◦ Posting on and off site where action is to be located◦ Direct mail to owners and occupants of nearby or affected property◦ Publish in newsletters expected to reach potentially interested persons◦ Notice to potentially interested community organizations including small
business associations
13
* 40 CFR 1506.6 (b)
Federal agencies shall “involve environmental agencies, applicants and the public to the extent practicable” (1501.4 (b))pp p p ( ( ))
EA process is flexible in format and timing, but must include:◦ Publicly available document◦ Assessment of Impacts ◦ Consideration of Alternatives particularly where there are unresolved
conflicts concerning alternative uses of resourcesList of agencies and persons consulted but not formal comment or◦ List of agencies and persons consulted– but not formal comment or scoping
◦ Mitigation if impacts would potentially be significant without mitigation(1508.9)
14
9/5/2012
8
Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) is a decision document supporting a determination that an action will not resultdocument supporting a determination that an action will not result in significant impacts.
The FONSI must include the EA or a summary of it, and commit to mitigation measures needed to reduce impacts below significance thresholds. FONSIs must be:◦ Circulated to affected public; or◦ Made available for review for 30 days prior to making decision y p g
when: Action usually requires an EIS Action is without precedent
15
The EIS development process must include:Notice of intent published in advance of work on an EIS
Environmental Impact Statements (EIS) formal requirements/less discretion
Notice of intent published in advance of work on an EISScoping all potentially affected parties*Commenting by federal agencies with jurisdiction/expertiseDraft EIS to public/stakeholders: 45 days for comment Final EIS to public/stakeholders: 30 days for
commentReferral of EIS to CEQ and President for dispute resolutionp
* Legislative proposals do not require scoping for EIS process
16
9/5/2012
9
Lead agency prepares a Record of Decision (ROD)(ROD)States decisionIdentifies alternatives considered, environmentally
preferablemitigation measures all practicable were adopted or why
notcommits to a monitoring and enforcement program
ROD is a public document (i e be available for ROD is a public document (i.e. be available for public review), but it need not be circulated for review.
17
Lead agencies shall: (1506.3) Include conditions in grants permits or other approvals Include conditions in grants, permits or other approvals Condition funding of actions on mitigation monitoring requirements under specific Agency laws (such as
the National Forest Management Act 36CFR 219)
Upon request: Inform cooperating or commenting agencies on progress make available to the public the results of relevant monitoring.
18
9/5/2012
10
Each Federal agency shall make achieving environmental justice Identifying Factors for Assessing Disproportionate
I t Mi it d L I P l tipart of its mission by identifying and addressing disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental effects of its programs, policies, and activities on minority populations and low income populations
i th U it d St t
Impacts on Minority and Low-Income Populations
Proximity and Exposure Cumulative Impacts Physical Infrastructure
in the United States.
Executive Order 12898,
Federal Actions to Address
Environmental Justice in
Minority Populations and
Low-Income Populations
(1994) Susceptible Populations Unique Exposure Pathways Ability to Participate in Decision-Making (social capital)
*Also, looking into Psycho-Social Stress
1998 US Institute for Environmental Conflict Resolution 2005 CEQ/OMB Memorandum2005 CEQ/OMB Memorandum Conflict prevention & resolution Use of neutrals Leadership – department and agency policy Incorporation of principles Mechanisms & strategies Accountability – performance evaluation
Other resourcesOther resources◦ EPA: CPRC/ Superfund Community Grants◦ DOI: CADR ◦ National Roster and private practitioners◦ State dispute resolution programs◦ Professional associations (ACR, ABA)◦ University-based programs and research
20
9/5/2012
11
New Tools can help the public identify their interests: NEPAssist: Overview
21
September 5, 2012 22
9/5/2012
12
New or continuing activities financed, assisted, conducted or approved by federal agencies, for example:
-- Permits, licenses, approvals-- Grants-- Loans
Legislati e proposals 1508 18 (a)
And whether: Connected Cumulative
Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention 23
Legislative proposals 1508.18 (a) New/revised rules, regulations,
plans, policies or procedures 1508.18 (b)(1)
Similar
Combination of small group meetings, open h d f ilit t d t h ll bli tihouses, and facilitated town hall public meetings:
Nuclear Regulatory Commission reactor license renewal and early site permit program
Procedures for involving the diverse interests that represent the community affected by a proposed projectproject
Department of Interior, ESM03-7, Procedures for Implementing Consensus-Based Management in Agency Planning and Operations, (July 2, 2003):
24
9/5/2012
13
Consult Stakeholders (4.38(b)(3) ) Consultation process 90 days; proponent/stakeholder
agreement can shorten to 30 days via Commission waiver Identify all relevant federal and state agencies, tribes,
NGOs, and interested parties of proposal Document all three stages of the consultation process: At least one joint meeting with stakeholders within 30 to 60 days of requesting a license explain project information, potential environmental
effects To find information gaps/study needs. stakeholders/public consulted on schedule/agenda Site visit usual in conjunction with the joint meeting Inform Commission no less than 15 days before Promptly share transcript/audio recording /written notes Comments within 60 days for recommended studies
FERC dispute resolution role on information/studies Public comment on the draft application including
response to comments and study resultssee: Joint Agency Meeting Notice , Joint Meeting Newspaper Notice
and Consultation Checklist
25
Community Outreach Strategy Goal - to establish and maintain two-way, open communication between the study team and community members, including minority and low-income populationsminority and low income populations.
Actions:◦ 52 Pre-scoping “Listening Tours” ◦ Initial scoping meetings/written comment period;◦ Published reports on website◦ Designation of community liaisons◦ Four Public hearings◦ 17 Station Area Advisory Committees (SAAC’s)◦ Citizens' Advisory Council ◦ Speaker's Bureau Meetings/Neighborhood
/CEvents/Community Meetings ◦ Open House Public Meetings with notes on website◦ Newsletters in English and non-English versions ◦ Study Area Resource Hubs and designated liaisons
for specific communities
September 5, 2012 26
9/5/2012
14
Changing definitions of HealthTransportation
September 5, 2012 27
ON
-T
RU
CO
N
1) Reduce construction-related pollution2) Increase traffic management3) Pro ide for constr ction noise control
CO
ST
TiO 3) Provide for construction noise control
TR
AN
SIT
BIC
YC
LE
W
AL
K
1) Increase/improve transit service to meet/attract demand--more riders, and reduce air pollution
2) Connected walking and bicycling facilities throughout3) Create a common way-finding system
LID
S A
ND
E
S
1) Include six landscaped freeway lids2) Use landscaping materials throughout the SR 520 corridor, along adjacenttrails and roadways and at transit stops3) Improve and preserve the integrity of the Washington Park
September 5, 2012 28
LA
ND
SC
AP
ED
G
RE
EN
SP
AC
E
) p p g y gArboretum, andthe ability of visitors to enjoy it and other green spaces and naturals areas4) Preserve access to the waterfront for water-related activities
DE
SIG
N 1) Reduce noise throughout the corridor2) Add art/design for adjacent communities’ character 3) Utilize innovative storm water management practices
9/5/2012
15
Interdisciplinary and Mitigation Development TeamsInterstate Highway exampleInterstate Highway example
Community Benefits Agreements, separate but enforceable Los Angeles Airport Example Coalition for Economic, Environmental and Educational Justice approximately 22 community, educational, religious, environmental,
and labor organizations. represents the interests of low-income and minority populationsrepresents the interests of low income and minority populations
located near Airport. Agreement provides to communities that would be impacted by the
implementation of the Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) environmental mitigation programs jobs-related benefits
September 5, 2012 29
The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)creates a Federal Government responsibility that affects p yprivate project proponent actions.
Public Participation requirements:◦ Transparency and public access to information ◦ Due diligence in engaging the public/stakeholders◦ All categories of environmental review, all project stages◦ Environmental Justice: attention to vulnerable populations
E i t l C fli t R l ti Environmental Conflict Resolution Best practices evolving, need push, need time Deadlines/Streamlining forcing greater efficiency
September 5, 2012 30
top related