public choice theory and the economics of taxation

Post on 14-Feb-2016

53 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

DESCRIPTION

29. Public Choice Theory and the Economics of Taxation. Chapter Objectives. The Difficulties of Conveying Economic Preferences Through Majority Voting “Government Failure” and Why It Occurs Different Tax Philosophies and Ways to Distribute a Nation’s Tax Burden - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Copyright 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies29-1

Public Choice TheoryGovernment FailureApportioning the Tax BurdenTax IncidenceIncidence of U.S. TaxesLast Word

Key Terms

End Show

29Public Choice Theory and the Economics of Taxation

Copyright 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies29-2

Public Choice TheoryGovernment FailureApportioning the Tax BurdenTax IncidenceIncidence of U.S. TaxesLast Word

Key Terms

End Show

Chapter Objectives• The Difficulties of Conveying

Economic Preferences Through Majority Voting

• “Government Failure” and Why It Occurs

• Different Tax Philosophies and Ways to Distribute a Nation’s Tax Burden

• Principles Related to Tax Shifting, Tax Incidence, and Efficiency Losses From Taxes

Copyright 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies29-3

Public Choice TheoryGovernment FailureApportioning the Tax BurdenTax IncidenceIncidence of U.S. TaxesLast Word

Key Terms

End Show

Public Choice Theory• Government Failures• Revealing Preferences

Through Majority Voting–Inefficient Voting

Outcomes• Inefficient “No” Vote• Inefficient “Yes” Vote

Graphically…

O 29.1

Copyright 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies29-4

Public Choice TheoryGovernment FailureApportioning the Tax BurdenTax IncidenceIncidence of U.S. TaxesLast Word

Key Terms

End Show

Revealing Preferences Through Majority Voting

• Our democratic process relies heavily on majority voting

• Majority voting does not always produce efficient outcomes b/c it fails to incorporate strength of preference of the individual voter

• Inefficient “no” vote – Read p.565 and see Figure 29.1 a

• Inefficient “yes” vote – Read p.565 and see Figure 29.1 b

• Inefficient voting may lead to underallocation or overallocation of resources

Copyright 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies29-5

Public Choice TheoryGovernment FailureApportioning the Tax BurdenTax IncidenceIncidence of U.S. TaxesLast Word

Key Terms

End Show

Public Choice TheoryInefficient Voting Outcomes

InefficientMajority “No” Vote

InefficientMajority “Yes” Vote

$300 $300

Ben

efit;

Tax

Ben

efit;

Tax

0 0

$700

$250 $200$100

$350 $350

Adams

Adams

Benson

BensonConrad

Conrad

“NO” “NO” “YES” “YES”“YES” “NO”

MSB > MSC$1,150 > $900

Inefficient Since“NO” Wins!

MSB < MSC$800 < $900

Inefficient Since“YES” Wins!

Copyright 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies29-6

Public Choice TheoryGovernment FailureApportioning the Tax BurdenTax IncidenceIncidence of U.S. TaxesLast Word

Key Terms

End Show

Public Choice Theory• Interest Groups• Political Logrolling

–Logrolling – Vote Trading• Paradox of Voting

–Preferences–Voting Outcomes

• Median-Voter Model

O 29.2

Copyright 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies29-7

Public Choice TheoryGovernment FailureApportioning the Tax BurdenTax IncidenceIncidence of U.S. TaxesLast Word

Key Terms

End Show

Paradox of Voting• Situation in which society may

not be able to rank its preferences consistently through paired-choice majority voting

• Read Voting Outcomes p.567• Median-voter model – under

majority rule, median voter will in a sense determine election outcome

Copyright 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies29-8

Public Choice TheoryGovernment FailureApportioning the Tax BurdenTax IncidenceIncidence of U.S. TaxesLast Word

Key Terms

End Show

Government Failure• Special-Interest Effect

–Pork-Barrel Politics• Rent-Seeking Behavior• Clear Benefits, Hidden

Costs• Limited and Bundled

Choice• Bureaucracy and

Inefficiency• Imperfect Institutions

Copyright 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies29-9

Public Choice TheoryGovernment FailureApportioning the Tax BurdenTax IncidenceIncidence of U.S. TaxesLast Word

Key Terms

End Show

Government Failure• Government failure – inefficiency

due to characteristics of public sector

• Special-interest effect – small group of well-informed beneficiaries obtain a gov policy that give them large gains at the expense of greater number of persons

• Ex. pork-barrel politics

Copyright 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies29-10

Public Choice TheoryGovernment FailureApportioning the Tax BurdenTax IncidenceIncidence of U.S. TaxesLast Word

Key Terms

End Show

Government Failure• Rent-seeking behavior – appeal

to gov for special benefits at the taxpayers’ or someone else’s expense

• Ex. tax breaks that benefit specific corporations, extensive occupational licensing

Copyright 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies29-11

Public Choice TheoryGovernment FailureApportioning the Tax BurdenTax IncidenceIncidence of U.S. TaxesLast Word

Key Terms

End Show

Apportioning the Tax Burden• Benefits-Received

Principle• Ability-to-Pay Principle• Tax Progressivity

–Progressive–Regressive–Proportional

• Applications

Copyright 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies29-12

Public Choice TheoryGovernment FailureApportioning the Tax BurdenTax IncidenceIncidence of U.S. TaxesLast Word

Key Terms

End Show

Principles of Taxation• 1. benefits-received principle –

those who benefit most from government-supplied g&s should pay in proportion to the amount of benefits they receive

• Ex. tax on gasoline• 2 Major Drawbacks:• 1. Difficulty in measuring benefits

received• 2. Logical application to

antipoverty programs

Copyright 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies29-13

Public Choice TheoryGovernment FailureApportioning the Tax BurdenTax IncidenceIncidence of U.S. TaxesLast Word

Key Terms

End Show

Principles of Taxation• 2. Ability-to-pay principle – those

with larger incomes should pay more in taxes (both relative and absolute terms)

Copyright 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies29-14

Public Choice TheoryGovernment FailureApportioning the Tax BurdenTax IncidenceIncidence of U.S. TaxesLast Word

Key Terms

End Show

Three tax structures• Defined by relationship b/w avg

tax rate and income• 1. progressive – tax rate

increases as income increases• Ex. Federal indiv. Income tax• 2. proportional – tax rate remains

the same regardless of income• Ex. corporate income tax• 3. regressive – average tax rate

declines as income increases• Ex. sales tax

Copyright 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies29-15

Public Choice TheoryGovernment FailureApportioning the Tax BurdenTax IncidenceIncidence of U.S. TaxesLast Word

Key Terms

End Show

Tax Incidence• Elasticity and Tax

Incidence–Division of Burden–Elasticities

• Efficiency Loss of a Tax–Tax Revenues–Efficiency Loss–Role of Elasticities

G 29.1

Copyright 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies29-16

Public Choice TheoryGovernment FailureApportioning the Tax BurdenTax IncidenceIncidence of U.S. TaxesLast Word

Key Terms

End Show

Tax Incidence• Who ends up paying a tax?• Elasticity and tax incidence:• 1. with a specific supply, the

more inelastic the demand for the product, the larger the portion of tax shifted to consumer

• 2. with a specific demand, the more inelastic the supply, the larger the portion of the tax paid by the producer

Copyright 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies29-17

Public Choice TheoryGovernment FailureApportioning the Tax BurdenTax IncidenceIncidence of U.S. TaxesLast Word

Key Terms

End Show

Tax IncidenceIncidence of an Excise Tax

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

5 10 15 20 25 Q

P

Pric

e (P

er B

ottle

)

Quantity(Millions of Bottles Per Month)

S

D

S’

Tax $2

Copyright 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies29-18

Public Choice TheoryGovernment FailureApportioning the Tax BurdenTax IncidenceIncidence of U.S. TaxesLast Word

Key Terms

End Show

Tax Incidence

0

P

QQ

P

0

Tax Incidence andElastic Demand

Tax Incidence andInelastic Demand

Demand Elasticity and the Incidenceof an Excise Tax

De

Dt

Tax TaxSt

S

St

S

Q2

P1

Pe

Pa

P1

Pi

Pb

Q1 Q2Q1

aa

b

b

cc

Copyright 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies29-19

Public Choice TheoryGovernment FailureApportioning the Tax BurdenTax IncidenceIncidence of U.S. TaxesLast Word

Key Terms

End Show

Tax Incidence

0

P

QQ

P

0

Tax Incidence andElastic Supply

Tax Incidence andInelastic Supply

Supply Elasticity and the Incidenceof an Excise Tax

D D

S

SSt

St

P1Pa

Pe

P1

Pb

Pi

Q1Q2 Q1Q2

Tax Tax

aa

bb

c

c

Copyright 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies29-20

Public Choice TheoryGovernment FailureApportioning the Tax BurdenTax IncidenceIncidence of U.S. TaxesLast Word

Key Terms

End Show

Efficiency Loss of a Tax• Aka deadweight loss of tax• Loss is society’s sacrifice to net

benefit , because the tax reduces levels of production and consumption below levels of economic efficiency

• See Figure 29.5

Copyright 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies29-21

Public Choice TheoryGovernment FailureApportioning the Tax BurdenTax IncidenceIncidence of U.S. TaxesLast Word

Key Terms

End Show

Tax IncidenceEfficiency Loss of a Tax

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

5 10 15 20 25 Q

P

Pric

e (P

er B

ottle

)

Quantity(Millions of Bottles Per Month)

S

D

S’

Tax $2

Tax Paid byConsumers

Tax Paid byProducers

EfficiencyLoss (or

DeadweightLoss)

Copyright 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies29-22

Public Choice TheoryGovernment FailureApportioning the Tax BurdenTax IncidenceIncidence of U.S. TaxesLast Word

Key Terms

End Show

Incidence of U.S. Taxes• Personal Income Tax • Corporate Income Tax• Sales and Excise Taxes • Property Taxes• The U.S. Tax Structure

Copyright 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies29-23

Public Choice TheoryGovernment FailureApportioning the Tax BurdenTax IncidenceIncidence of U.S. TaxesLast Word

Key Terms

End Show

Incidence of U.S. TaxesTaxes on Goods and Services as a Percentage of Total Tax Revenues

GLOBAL PERSPECTIVE

United KingdomNetherlands

GermanyItaly

SwedenCanadaFranceJapan

United States

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35

32.730.829.2

26.926.4

26.325.4

20.117.6

Source: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, 2002

Copyright 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies29-24

Public Choice TheoryGovernment FailureApportioning the Tax BurdenTax IncidenceIncidence of U.S. TaxesLast Word

Key Terms

End Show

Government Failure• E.P.A. House Building• Chicago “Wilderness”

Program• Bison Meat, Cauliflower, and

Pumpkin Supports• Catfish as Livestock

Spending• 9,300 Special Projects in 2003• Waste and Fraud in Katrina

Relief Spending

Last

Word “…In the News”

Copyright 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies29-25

Public Choice TheoryGovernment FailureApportioning the Tax BurdenTax IncidenceIncidence of U.S. TaxesLast Word

Key Terms

End Show

Key Terms• public choice theory• logrolling• paradox of voting• median-voter model• government failure• special-interest effect• rent-seeking

• benefits-received principle• ability-to-pay principle• progressive tax• regressive tax• proportional tax• tax incidence• efficiency loss of a tax

Copyright 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies29-26

Public Choice TheoryGovernment FailureApportioning the Tax BurdenTax IncidenceIncidence of U.S. TaxesLast Word

Key Terms

End Show

Next Chapter Preview…

Antitrust Policy andRegulation

top related