presentation by s p dhal, faculty member, spbt college
Post on 05-Jan-2016
37 Views
Preview:
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
Presentation by S P Dhal, Faculty
Member, SPBT College
Risk Management in Banks
Live Interactive Learning Session [16-04-2007]
[Module B]
What is Risk?
• Risk is the probability that the realized return would be different from the anticipated/expected return on investment.
• Risk is a measure of likelihood of a bad financial outcome.
• All other things being equal risk will be avoided.• All other things are however not equal and that a
reduction in risk is accompanied by a reduction in expected return.
What is Risk?
The uncertainties associated with risk elements impact the net cash flow of any business or investment. Under the impact of uncertainties, variations in net cash flow take place. This could be favourable or un-favourable. The un-favaourable impact is ‘RISK’ of the business.
Anatomy of Bank Risk
Non-Financial Risk Financial Risk
Business Risk
Strategic Risk
Delivery (of Financial Services) Risk
Balance Sheet Risk
Operational Risk
Legal Risk Reputational Risk
Balance Sheet Risk
Credit Risk
Concentration Risk
Intrinsic Risk
Market Risk
Interest Rate Risk
Liquidity Risk
Currency Risk
Commodity Risk
Interest Rate Risk
Price Risk Reinvestment Risk
Yield Curve Risk
Basis Risk
Gap Risk
Risk in Traditional Sense Systematic Risks
Affects all Industry/ All securitiesNon-controllableNon-diversifiable
Unsystematic RisksAffects specific Industry/ Specific SecuritiesControllableDiversifiable
Risk in Banking Business
Banking business is broadly grouped under following major heads from Risk Management point of view:
1. The Banking Book
2. The Trading Book
3. Off-Balance-sheet Exposures
The Banking Book
All assets & liabilities in ‘banking book’ have following characteristics:
1. They are normally held until maturity
2. Accrual system of accounting is applied
Since assets & liabilities are held till maturity, their mismatch may land the bank in either excess cash in-flow or shortage of cash on a particular time. This commonly known as ‘Liquidity Risk’.
The Banking BookDue to change in interest rates, assets and liabilities are subjected to interest rate risk on their maturities/re-pricing.
Further, the assets side of the banking book generates credit risk arising from defaults in payment of interest and or installments by the borrowers.
In addition to all these risk, banking book also suffers from ‘Operational Risk’.
The Trading Book
The trading book includes all the assets that are held with intention of trading that are marketable. They are normally held for a short duration and positions are liquidated in the market. Trading Book assets include investment held under ‘Held for Trading’ category.
They are subjected to Market Risk and are marked to market.
Off-Balance-Sheet Exposure
• Off-balance sheet exposure is contingent in nature- Guarantees, LCs, Committed or back up credit lines etc.
• A contingent exposure may become a fund-based exposure in Banking book or Trading book. It is known as Call Risk
• Therefore, Off-balance sheet exposures may have liquidity risk, interest rate risk, market risk, credit or default risk and operational risk
RISKS IN BANKING
• Risk is inherent in Banking• Banking is not avoiding risks but managing
it• Risks in banking can be of Broadly 3 types:
– Credit Risk– Market Risk– Operational Risk
ALM addresses to Market Risks
Risk Management in Banks & Basel Accord –I, 1988
In 1988, Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, published a framework for a minimal capital requirement for credit exposure. The bank books were classified into 5 buckets i.e. grouped under 5 categories according to credit risk weights of zero, ten, twenty, fifty and one hundred percent.Assets required to be classified into one of these risk buckets based on the parameter of counter party.Banks required to hold capital equal to 8% of the risk-weighted value of assets. In India, the minimum capital requirement is 9% as decided by RBI.
1996 Amendment to include Market Risk
In 1996, BCBS published an amendment to provide an explicit capital cushion for ‘Market Risk’ to which banks are exposed.
Market Risk is the risk of adverse deviations of the marked-to-market value of the assets due to market movements as a result of change in interest rates, market price or exchange rate.
Basel II Accord- Need & Goals
Linking of risks with capital in terms of Basel Accord I needed a revision for the following reasons:- Credit assessment under Basel I is not risk sensitive enough. ‘One Suit fit all’ approach was applied to all types of entities with uniform 100% risk weightage.- Risk arising out of operation were ignored though it has potential of affecting the bank’s survival.
Basel Accord II
The Basel II Accord is based on three pillars:
• Minimum Capital Requirement
• Supervisory review process &
• Market discipline
Minimum Capital
Requirement
Three Basic PillarsThree Basic Pillars
Supervisory Review Process
Supervisory Review Process
Market Discipline
Requirements
Market Discipline
Requirements
The New Basel Capital Accord
StandardizedStandardized
Internal RatingsInternal Ratings
Credit Risk ModelsCredit Risk Models
Credit MitigationCredit Mitigation
Market RiskMarket Risk
Credit RiskCredit Risk
Other RisksOther Risks
RisksRisksTrading BookTrading Book
Banking BookBanking Book
OperationalOperational
OtherOther
Minimum Capital RequirementPillar One
1. Minimum Capital Requirements- Credit Risk (Pillar One)
• Standardized approach (External Ratings)
• Internal ratings-based approach• Foundation approach
• Advanced approach
• Credit risk modeling(Sophisticated banks in the future)
Minimum Capital
Requirement
Evolutionary Structure of the Accord
Credit Risk Modeling ?
Standardized Approach
Foundation IRB Approach
Advanced IRB Approach
Increased level of sophistication
Standardized Approach
• Provides Greater Risk Differentiation than 1988• Risk Weights based on external ratings• Five categories [0%, 20%, 50%, 100%, 150%]
• The loans considered past due be risk weighted at
150 percent unless a threshold amount of specific
provision has already been set aside by the bank
against the loan• Special treatment for ‘Retail’ & ‘SME’ sectors
The New Basel Capital Accord
Option 222
Assessment
ClaimAAA to
AA-
A+ to A- BBB+ to
BBB-
BB+ to
BB- (B-)
Below BB-
(B-)
Un-rated
Sovereigns 0% 20% 50% 100% 150% 100%
20% 50% 50% 100% 150%
100%Banks
Option 111 20% 50%
3
100%
3
100%
3
150%
50%33
Corporates 20% 50%(100%)
100% 100% 150% 100%
11 Risk weighting based on risk weighting of sovereign in which the bank is incorporated.22 Risk weighting based on the assessment of the individual bank.
33 Claims on banks of a short original maturity, for example less than six months, would receive a weighting that is one category more favourable than the usual risk weight on the bank’s claims
.
Standardized Approach:New Risk Weights (January 2001)
The New Basel Capital AccordCapital for Credit Risk- Internal Rating Based Approach:
•Three elements:
– Risk Components [PD, LGD, EAD]
– Risk Weight conversion function
– Minimum requirements for the management of policy
and processes
– Emphasis on full compliance
–EL (Expected Loss) = PDxLGDxEADDefinitions;PD = Probability of default
LGD = Loss given default
EAD = Exposure at default
Note: BIS is Proposing 75% for unused commitments
EL = Expected Loss
Standardized Approach verses IRB Approach
0
1.6
8
16
PER CENT
AA
A
AA
A+ A-
BB
B
BB
+
BB
- B
CC
C
RATING
New standardized model Internal rating system & Credit VaR
12
1 2 3 4 4.5 5 5.5 6 76.5
S & P :
The New Basel Capital Accord
Market Risk:
(a) Standardised Method
(i) Maturity Method
(ii) Duration Method
(b) Internal Models Method
What is Operational Risk?
• Earlier stood for non-financial risks
• Current Basel II definition is “the risk of loss resulting from inadequate or failed internal processes, people and systems or from external events”
Basel II definitionCont…
– Includes both internal and external event risk
– Legal risk is also included, but reputational risk not included
– Direct losses are included, but indirect losses (opportunity costs) are not
Examples of OR Loss Events
* Based on Basel Committee’s OR loss event classification
Types of OR* Examples
Internal Fraud• Unauthorized transaction resulting in monetary loss
• Embezzlement of funds
External Fraud• Branch robbery
• Hacking damage (systems security)
Employment Practices & Workplace Safety
• Employee discrimination issues
• Inadequate employee health or safety rules
Clients, Products & Business Practices
• Money laundering
• Lender liability from disclosure violations or aggressive sales
Damage to Physical Assets• Natural disasters, e.g. earthquakes
• Terrorist activities
Business Disruption and System Failures
• Utility outage (e.g. blackout)
Execution, Delivery & Process Management
• Data entry error
• Incomplete or missing legal documents
• Disputes with vendors/outsourcing
The New Basel Capital Accord
Capital Charge for Operational Risk-
As in credit, three alternate approaches are prescribed:
- Basic Indicator Approach
- Standardised Approach
- Advanced Measurement Approach
1). Basic Indicator Approach(Capital Charge for Operational Risk)
To begin with, RBI has advised bank to follow Basic Indicator Approach in India which is 15% of the average Gross Income over three year.
KBIA = [ ∑ (GI*) ] / n,
Where
KBIA = the capital charge under the Basic Indicator Approach.
GI = annual gross income, where positive, over the previous three years
= 15% set by the Committee, relating the industry-wide level of required capital to the industry-wide level of the indicator.
n = number of the previous three years for which gross income is
positive
Gross income = Net profit (+) Provisions & Contingencies (+) operating expenses (Schedule 16) (-) profit on sale of HTM investments (-) income from insurance (-) extraordinary / irregular item of income (+) loss on sale of HTM investments.
2). Standardized Approach (the betas)Capital = b*gross income, by business line
• Standardized / Alternative Standardized– Bank’s activities divided (‘mapped’) into 8 business lines– Capital charge is sum of specified % (‘beta’) of each business
line’s average annual gross income over previous 3 years*– Beta varies by business line (12%-18% range)– General criteria required to qualify for its use
• Active involvement of Board and senior management in OR management framework
• Existence of OR management function, reporting and systems• Systematic tracking of OR data (including losses) by business line• OR processes and systems subject to validation and regular
independent review by internal and external parties
Advantages/ DisadvantagesStrength:
• SimplicityLimitations:
– Blunt charge, not risk-sensitive:• One size fits all
• Risk does not increase linearly with gross income
– Fails to capture effect of bank’s management of operational risk
• No incorporation of qualitative factors
• No incentive for banks to invest in op risk infrastructure
– Capital = firm specific calculation, statistically based methodology
– Intended to overcome the lack of risk sensitivity in the simpler approaches by setting regulatory capital based on the bank’s internal risk measurement models
– These models use the bank’s own metrics to measure operational risk, internal loss data, external loss experience, scenario analysis, and risk mitigation techniques to set capital commensurate with the operational risk posed by the bank’s activities
3) Advanced Measurement Approach (AMA)(Capital Charge for Operational Risk)
ADVANTAGE
COMPARING OPERATIONALRISK WITH MARKET RISK AND CREDIT RISK
Market Risk Credit Risk Operational Risk
Quantifiable exposure
Yes Yes Difficult1
Exposure measure
Position; Risk sensitivity
Money lent; Potential exposure
Difficult – no ready position equivalent available1
Portfolio completeness
Known Known Unknown
Context dependency
Low Medium High
Data frequency High Medium Low
Risk assessment
VAR; Stress testing; Economic risk capital
Rating models; Loss models; Economic risk
capital
No industry consensus; top-down scenarios may be useful
Accuracy Good Reasonable Low
TestingAdequate data for
backtesting
Backtesting difficult to perform over short
term
Results very difficult to test over any time horizon
Usage issues
Instability of underlying price
volatility; Correlation instability in stressed
markets
Many issues: correlations, ratings through time, data
lumpy
Results could be misleading; distraction effect; false reliance;
lack of cause and effect; redundant systems
SummaryMarket risk models
well established and proven tools
Using models considered reasonable – but should be used
with care
Models appear flawed
New Basel Accord II: supervisory review process-
• Defines the role of supervisors with regard to capital adequacy
Pillar II
New Basel Accord II: Market Discipline
• Disclosure requirements that allow market participants to assess key information about a bank’s risk profile and level of capitalisation.
Pillar-III
Value at Risk
VaR is defined as the predicted worst-case loss at a specific confidence level over a certain period of time assuming normal trading conditions.
That means, we can incur loss a maximum of Rs. X (the VaR) over the next one week (time period) and, may expect with 99% confidence level (i,.e. it would be so 99 times out of 100).
Value at Risk
There are three main approaches to calculating VaR:
1. The Correlation Method, also known as Variance/Covariance Matrix Method
2. Historical Simulation Method
3. Monte Carlo Simulation
Comparison of various VaR Modules
Methodology Description Applications
Variance/ Covariance
(Parametric)
Estimates VaR with equation that specifies parameters such as Volatility, Correlation, Delta and Gama
Accurate for traditional assets and linear derivatives, but less accurate for non-linear Derivatives
Monte Carlo Simulation Estimates VaR by simulating random scenarios and revaluing positions in the portfolio
Appropriate for all types of instruments, linear and non-linear
Historical Simulation Estimates VaR by reliving history; takes actual historical rates and revalues positions for each change in the market
Advantages of VaR
• It captures an important aspect of risk in a single number
• It is easy to understand
• It asks the simple question: “How bad can things get?”
Back Testing
• Is a process where model based VaR is compared with the actual performance of the portfolio. This is carried out for evaluating a new model or to assess the accuracy of the existing model
Stress Testing
Stress Testing essentially seeks to determine possible changes in the market value of a portfolio that could arise due to non-normal movement in one or more market parameters.
Stress Testing covers many different techniques. Some of important ones are:
1. Simple Sensitivity Test
2. Scenario Analysis
3. Maximum Loss
4. Extreme Value Theory
Risk Monitoring & Control
• Risk Monitoring and Control calls for implementation of risk and business policies simultaneously. This is achieved through the following:
1. Policy guidelines limiting roles and authority2. Limits structure and approval process3. System and procedures to unbundle products and
transactions to capture all risks4. Guidelines on portfolio size and mix5. Defined policy for market to market6. Limit monitoring and reporting7. Performance Measurement and Resource
allocation
Few Practice Questions
(a) The daily return on the company portfolio follows a normal distribution so that a one-week VaR could be computed.
(b) The one week VaR at the 99% confidence level is $5M.
(c) With probability 95%, the company will not experience a loss greater than $95M in one week.
(d) With probability 5%, the company will loose $1M or more in one week.
Q. A Bank reports a one-week VaR of $1M at the 95% confidence level. Which of the following statements is most likely to be true?
Answer: (d)
Q. Reserve Bank of India has advised Banks to build up an Investment Fluctuation Reserve (IFR) of a minimum 5 per cent of their investments in the categories “Held for Trading” (HFT) and “Available for Sale” (AFS). The specification is to take care of following Risk.
(a). Interest Rate Risk
(b). Operational Risk
(c). Credit Risk
(d). None of above Answer: (a)
Q. “Netting” is a method of aggregating two or more obligations to achieving a reduced net obligation. The benefits accrues from “Netting” is:
(a). Reduced Credit Risk
(b). Liquidity Risk
(c). Systemic Risk
(d) All of the above
Answer: (d)
Q. How is the risk of so-called catastrophic losses dealt with?
(a). Through RAROC models. (b). Through VaR, preferably delta-
gamma approach.(c). By proper Disaster Recovery Plan
& Business Continuity Plan in place.
(d). By mitigation, with reserves in capital.
Answer: (c)
Q. Money market funds are generally considered to have ______ interest rate risk,and______ default risk.
(a). low; low
(b). low; high
(c). high; low
(d). high; high
Answer: (a)
Q. The June 1999 Basle Committee on Banking Supervision issued proposals for reform of its 1988 Capital Accord (the Basle II Proposals). These proposals contained MAINLY:
I. Settlement risk management
II. Capital requirements III. Supervisory review IV. The handling of hedge funds V. Contingency plans VI. Market discipline
(a). I, III and VI (b). II, IV and V (c). I, IV and V (d). II, III and VI
Answer: (d)
Q. If the default probability for an “A”-rated company over a three year period is 0.30%, then the most likely probability of default for the same company over a six year period is:
(a). 0.30%
(b). Between 0.30% and 0.60%
(c). 0.60%
(d). Greater than 0.60%
Answer: (d)
Q. Which of the following procedures is essential in validating the VaR estimates.
(a) Back Testing
(b) Scenario Analysis
(c) Stress Testing
(d) Once approved by regulators no further validation is required.
Answer: (a)
Q. Loans are securitized to:
(a) Reduce credit concentrations.
(b) Reduce regulatory capital.
(c) Provide access to loan products for investors.
(d) All of the above.
Answer: (d)
Q. If the volatility per annum is 25% and the number of trading days per annum is 252, find the volatility per day.
a) 1.58%b) 15.8%c) 158%d) 0.10
Ans: (a).
Q. When the costs/yields of liabilities/assets are linked to a floating rate and there is no simultaneous movement in interest rates, it leads to:
a) Real Interest Rate Riskb) Reinvestment Riskc) Volatility Risk
d) Basis Risk
Ans. (d)
Q. Quite a few models were developed in the last few years to measure credit risk exposure. Which of the models below is based on an actuarial approach?
a) CreditMetricsb) CreditRisk+ c) KMVd) Credit Portfolio View
Ans. (b)
Q. What is the Internal Models Approach?
(a). A method of calculating regulatory capital using a firm’s own internal market risk model and data.
(b). Using standardized models from the regulatory to calculate capital.
(c). Making forecasts on credit ratings using inside information.
(d). Using the Regulator’s own propriety risk model to calculate capital requirements.
Ans. (a)
THANK YOU
top related