powerpoint presentation - maricopa · web viewscore between 0.2 and 0.4 = a moderate difference •...

Post on 14-Apr-2018

217 Views

Category:

Documents

2 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

TRANSCRIPT

November 16, 2016

Josh Rosenberg | Senior Assessment ConsultantDr. David Mason | OD Consultant

Employee Engagement ResultsMCCCD

Presented by:

Executive Debrief

® Leadership Intelligence

wise.com-decision// +1.801.515.6500// USA West 450 South, Springville, UT 84663 815

Next Steps6.

Key Findings5.

Comment and Accountability Analyses4.

AnalysisEngagement 3.

Overall Scores2.

The Engagement Lens1.

The Engagement Experience

CC

MCCCD-Employee Engagement

2

Satisfaction

Engagement

The Engagement Experience

CC

MCCCD-Employee Engagement

3

Satisfaction

ConnectionImpactGrowthAutonomyMeaning

CIGAM

The Engagement Experience

CC

MCCCD-Employee Engagement

4

Execute business impact and need to be resolvedNegative perceptions that have a direct •Clear findings that are beyond debate•

Explain Findings that contradict reality •communicationFindings that result from a lack of •

Explore themFindings that raise issues rather than resolve •Findings where there is considerable debate •

Turning Feedback into Results

CC

MCCCD-Employee Engagement

5

below the benchmark of 75% points 38Participation is

represent the populationThe survey participation rate was low but enough to

12,029Anticipated Responses

%37Participation Rate4,482

Actual Responses

p. 14Participation

CC

MCCCD-Employee Engagement

6

Not Applicablet Know / ’Don

6

AgreeStrongly AgreeNeutralDisagree

DisagreeStrongly

54321

Score Calculation Format

Favorable scores are calculated by combining the 4s and 5s

CC

MCCCD-Employee Engagement

7

Overall Score

CC

MCCCD-Employee Engagement

8

Dimension Summary

*Results may not add up to 100% due to rounding.

CC

MCCCD-Employee Engagement

9

Highest Scores

CC

MCCCD-Employee Engagement

10

Lowest Scores

CC

MCCCD-Employee Engagement

11

differencesubstantial a =exceeds 0.4 score that -dA •

score between 0.2 and 0.4 = a moderate difference-dA •

score between 0 and 0.2 = a minor difference from the norm-dA •

determines if the significance is meaningful.calculation d test measures statistical significance and a Cohen's -A t

Statistical Testing

CC

MCCCD-Employee Engagement

12

Benchmarks

CC

MCCCD-Employee Engagement

13

Benchmarks

CC

MCCCD-Employee Engagement

14

Engagement Analysis

wise.com-decision// +1.801.515.6500// USA West 450 South, Springville, UT 84663 815

p. 33Engagement Anchor Questions

CC

MCCCD-Employee Engagement

16

You quit, stay, and corrupt.Look for ways to find blame.Speak poorly about the company and leaders.Make sarcastic jokes about work.Bored and frustrated at work.

You are putting in the time.Pay is the primary reason why you stay.Do just enough to get by and not get in trouble.Spend significant time taking care of personal needs.Generally feel underutilized.

You are committed to your job.Rarely stretched by assignments.Respond well to leadership.Stick to what you know and take few risks.

the “strong and steady.”–Meet expectations

You love your job!Work can be stressful but is also rewarding and fun.Take personal satisfaction in the quality of your work. Feel stretched beyond your comfort zone.Constantly learning and taking calculated risks.

(n=202)Fully Disengaged

(n=602)Opportunity Group

(n=2,028)Key Contributor

(n=1,641)Fully Engaged%100

%90

%80

%70

%60

50%

%40

30%

20%

%10

0%

%37

45%

13%

%5

Engagement Index

CC

MCCCD-Employee Engagement

17

2015

Benchmark

DecisionWise

Engagement Index Benchmark p. 35

Fully DisengagedOpportunity GroupKey ContributorFully Engaged

MCCCD

%100

%90

%80

%70

%60

%50

%40

30%

%20

10%

0%

%37

45%

%13

%5 %416%

50%

%30

CC

MCCCD-Employee Engagement

18

p. 3Engagement Driver Analysis

CC

MCCCD-Employee Engagement

19

p. 3Engagement Driver Analysis

CC

MCCCD-Employee Engagement

20

Comment Analysis

wise.com-decision// +1.801.515.6500// USA West 450 South, Springville, UT 84663 815

Comment Strengths

CC

MCCCD-Employee Engagement

22

Comment Opportunities

CC

MCCCD-Employee Engagement

23

Accountability Analysis

wise.com-decision// +1.801.515.6500// USA West 450 South, Springville, UT 84663 815

Accountability

CC

MCCCD-Employee Engagement

25

Key Themes

wise.com-decision// +1.801.515.6500// USA West 450 South, Springville, UT 84663 815

are making an impactin their work and feel they Employees find meaning

Key Findings

CC

MCCCD-Employee Engagement

27

Meaning and Impact–Key Findings

CC

MCCCD-Employee Engagement

28

supervisorsworkers and -to their co

Employees are connected

Key Findings

CC

MCCCD-Employee Engagement

29

Relationship with Coworkers–Key Findings

CC

MCCCD-Employee Engagement

30

onboardingtraining they received while

when asked about the Many employees score low

Key Findings

CC

MCCCD-Employee Engagement

31

Onboard Training–Key Findings

CC

MCCCD-Employee Engagement

32

MCCCD–Item 52

My College/Unit–Item 37

Onboard Training by Tenure–Key Findings

CC

MCCCD-Employee Engagement

33

relating to stressscores on survey items Supervisors have low

Key Findings

CC

MCCCD-Employee Engagement

34

(n=3842)

(n=640)

(n=3842)

(n=640)

(n=3842)

(n=640)

Supervisor Stress–Key Findings

CC

MCCCD-Employee Engagement

35

would like from MCCCDeffective as employees

Communication is not as

Key Findings

CC

MCCCD-Employee Engagement

36

Communication-Key Findings

CC

MCCCD-Employee Engagement

37

their collegenot particularly by MCCCD,

valued by the organization; Many employees do not feel

Key Findings

CC

MCCCD-Employee Engagement

38

Feeling Valued–Key Findings

CC

MCCCD-Employee Engagement

39

Turning Feedback into Results

CC

MCCCD-Employee Engagement

40

• Improving the new employee Onboarding Experience

• Providing better performance management tools and resources for supervisors to successfully coach and develop their team members.

• Communicating in a clear and integrated fashion.

The survey identified three areas of focus. Over the course of the next (fiscal/calendar) year the Chancellor’s Executive Council (CEC) and I are committed to addressing the following developmental opportunities:

Next Steps

CC

MCCCD-Employee Engagement

41

Overall Scores by College

CC

MCCCD-Employee Engagement

42

Colleges-Engagement Index p. 35

CC

MCCCD-Employee Engagement

43

Accountability by College

CC

MCCCD-Employee Engagement

44

top related