powerpoint presentation€¦ · ppt file · web view · 2012-03-26document presentation format:...
Post on 17-Apr-2018
219 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
Resource efficiency benchmarking of the Russia Ferrous Foundry Industry:
Key findings of the studyImplemented under IFC Russia Cleaner Production Program
GOAL: to identify the ferrous foundry sector’ resource efficiency potential and develop practical tools for foundries to implement it
2
Benchmarking study time line
3
Stakeholder consultations at every important stage:
Methodology Questionnaire for data collection Self diagnostic guide Matrix of casting types
Advisory board included over 20 representatives from industry, R&D, officials and policy makers.
Consultation process Written comments on all key documents Meetings of Advisory board Workshops in smaller teams
4
What made our study successful : Stakeholder consultations process
7 Key performance indicators (KPIs)
LABOUR
KPI 7
OVERALL PRODUCTION EFFICIENCY
KPI 2
PROCESS YEILD
KPI 1
WATER USE
KPI 6
SAND USE
KPI 5
ENRGY USE
KPI 4
CAPACITY UTILIZATION
KPI 3
Depends on technology and
processes
Depends on type of final product and technology
Depend on management practices and
equipment
What is being benchmarked?
5
Raw material
Melting shopMeltingHolding
Treatment
Molding shopMold formingCore makingCore setting
Casting shopPouringCooling
Shake outSeparation
Finishing shopShot blasting
Grinding Deburring
Thermal treatmentInspection/testing
PackagingLabeling
StorageShipping
Sand recyclingTransport,
сooling
Metal recyclingSeparation,
transport
Metal yardStorage, charging
Sand plantStorage,
preparation
1 2 4 7 3
1 2 7 3
1 2 7
1 2 7 3 7
2 3
2 73
2 7 3buy
Sell
Risersand
runnersScrap
1
Selected KPIsProcess YieldOverall production efficiencyCapacity utilizationEnergyFresh SandWaterLabor
12
4
7
3
56
5
6
5
66 4
1 42
7 KPIs methodology tailored to foundry process
Selected KPIs and methodology tailored to foundry processes
6
7
32 category’ matrix developed to cover diversity of foundry’ production
Grey Iron Product Categories
automatic mouldingGABH = automotive engine
blocks and cylinder heads
GAAO = automotive otherGAAG = agricultureGAMI = mining
mechanized mouldingGMBH = medium size engine
blocks and heads (energy generation)
GMAG = agricultureGMMI = miningGMGE = general engineering
manual (hand) mouldingGHBH = large size engine blocks
and heads (energy generation)
GHMI = miningGHGE = general engineering
Ductile Iron Product Categories
Steel Product Categories
automatic mouldingDAAU = automotive otherDAGE = general engineering
mechanized mouldingDMAU = automotiveDMGE = general engineering
manual (hand) mouldingDHEN = energy generation
componentsDHCO = compressor
componentsDHGE = general engineering
automatic mouldingSARC = railway components (c)SAMM = mining components
(m)SAAC = commercial vehicles (c)SAGC = general engineering
(c)
mechanized mouldingSMRC = railway components
(c) SMMM = mining components
(m)SMPC = pumps & valves (c)SMPS = pumps & valves (s)SMGC = general engineering
(c) SMAC = commercial vehicles
(c)
manual (hand) mouldingSHMM = mining components
(m) SHPC = pumps & valves (c)SHEA = energy components (a)SHGC = general engineering
(c)
c: carbon steel, s: stainless steel, m: manganese; a: high alloy steel
215 foundries(first long list; 25% of all legally registered ferrous
foundries in Russia)
55 sets of independent data for foundries
Study based on real data from enterprises
8
Coverage :•Period : 3 years (2007-2009)•Total # of data sets: 150•Categories covered: 27 out of 32 (85%) • Industry: 478 kt (14% of market)
9
KEY FINDINGS OF THE STUDY
Russian foundry European foundry предприятие
Russia foundries significantly lag behind European
Russian ferrous foundry us per tone of good casting:•Energy: 3 times more•Sand: 3,6 times more•Water: 161 times more•Labor : 3,6 times more man-hours
10
4.5 mln t CO2e
Costs:
EU Russia Russia at EU efficiency level
-36%
Inefficiencies eliminate Russian foundries’ competitive advantage in low prices
Prices for major resources in Russia are less than in the EU:
• Energy: 54% less
• Labor: 92% less
• Overheads: 71% less
11
4 times
• Average defect rate in Russia is 4 times higher than in EU• Effect export: Russia exports less than 1% of casting
• Low quality – threat for internal markets as customers require certain quality (eg. automotive producers)
High levels of defect rate
12
EU Russia
- 26%
Cost structure index for ferrous foundry (materials, labor, energy, equipment maintenance, overheads, water and sand)
How much can Russia ferrous foundry industry gain via resource efficiency?
$ 3.3 bln USD
$2.13 bln USD
$ 3 bln USD -
29%
13
- 43% Low cost and management
practices Capital investment
Over 50% of the potential can be implemented via low-cost measures and management
practices
$3.3 bln USD
Costs
14
Capital investment
Low cost and
management
practices
KPIs and resource efficiency potential:
15
Materials (metal)
Energy
Labor
Equipment related
Overheads
4,2%
43,3%
9,4%4,4%9,7%
$ 3.3 bln USD
12,8%
7,1%
21,4%
13,4%
45,2%
-3.1%-2.7%
-12%
-9.2%
-1.9%
Benchmarking of KPIs is a tool to priorities interventions to achieve maximum impact
Russia average level
Level of best practices
Cost structure
16
17
Next steps:
• Toolkit: Self diagnostic guide, Compendium of KPIs, Best practice guide, Benchmarking study report
• Pilot program with 5-7 companies with foundries
• Resource efficiency finance directly and via FIs
Information available in public domain
http://www.ifc.org/ifcext/eca.nsf/Content/
Russia_Foundry_Russian
18
http://www.ifc.org/rcpp
IFC contacts
IFC Russia Cleaner Production (IFC RCPP)• Yana Gorbatenko, Program managerYGorbatenko@ifc.org
Study team IFC RCPP:• Kristina Turilova, Task leader KTurilova@ifc.org• Boris Nekrasov, Technical expert BNekrasov@ifc.org• Maria Sigutina, PR and stakeholdersMSigutina@ifc.org
19
top related