powered exoskeleton
Post on 14-Oct-2014
112 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
The powered exoskeleton is essentially a wearable robot that amplifies its
wearer’s strength, endurance and agility. There is an effective transfer of power
between the human and the robot. Humans and exoskeletons are in close physical
interaction.
A possible classification of wearable robots takes into account the function
they perform in cooperation with the human actor. Thus, the following are instances
of wearable robots:
Empowering robotic exoskeletons. These were originally called extenders
(Kazerooni, 1990) and were defined as a class of robots that extends the
strength of the human beyond its natural ability while maintaining human
control of the robot. A specific and singular aspect of extenders is that the
exoskeleton structure maps on to the human actor’s anatomy.
Orthotic and prosthetic robots - According to this classification, orthotic
wearable robots, e.g. exoskeletons, are those that operate mechanically
parallel to the human body. Its purpose is to restore lost or weak functions,
whereas prosthetic wearable robots operate mechanically in series with the
human body and their chief function is to substitute for lost body limbs, e.g.
following an amputation.
1
CHAPTER 2
HISTORY
In the early 1960s, the US Defense Department expressed interest in the
development of a man-amplifier, a “powered suit of armor” which would augment
soldiers’ lifting and carrying capabilities. At the same time, at Cornell Aeronautical
Laboratories work started to develop the concept of man–amplifiers – manipulators to
enhance the strength of a human operator. In later work, Cornell determined that an
exoskeleton, an external structure in the shape of the human body which has far fewer
degrees of freedom than a human, could accomplish most desired tasks.
General Electric Co. further developed the concept of human–amplifiers
through the Hardiman project from 1966 to 1971. The Hardiman concept was more of
a robotic master–slave configuration in which two overlapping exoskeletons were
implemented. The inner one was set to follow human motion while the outer one
implemented a hydraulically powered version of the motion performed by the inner
exoskeleton. All these studies found that duplicating all human motions and using
master–slave systems were not practical. Additionally, difficulties in human sensing
and system complexity kept it from walking.
Several exoskeletons were developed at the University of Belgrade in the
1960s and 1970s to aid paraplegics. Although these early devices were limited to
predefined motions and had limited success, balancing algorithms developed for them
are still used in many bipedal robots. “HAL” by Cyberdyne is an orthosis, connected
to thighs and shanks that move a patient’s legs as a function of the EMG signals
measured from the wearer.
The concept of extenders versus master/slave robots as systems exhibiting
genuine information and power transmission between the two actors was coined in
1990 (Kazerooni, 1990).Efforts in the defense and military arena have continued up to
the present, chiefly promoted by the US Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency
(DARPA).
2
CHAPTER 3
PRINCIPLE
The powered exoskeleton is based on the principle of internal force or external
force systems. Which of these force interaction concepts is chosen depends chiefly on
the application. On the one hand, empowering exoskeletons must be based on the
concept of external force systems; empowering exoskeletons are used to multiply the
force that a human wearer can withstand, and therefore the force that the environment
exerts on the exoskeleton must be grounded: i.e. in external force systems the
exoskeleton’s mechanical structure acts as a load-carrying device and only a small
part of the force is exerted on the wearer. The power is transmitted to an external
base, be it fixed or portable with the operator. The only power transmission is
between the human limbs and the robot as a means of implementing control inputs
and/or force feedback.
Fig 3.1. Schematic representation of internal force(left) and external force(right)
exoskeleton
3
On the other hand, orthotic exoskeletons, i.e. exoskeletons for functional
compensation of human limbs, work on the internal force principle. In this instance of
a wearable robot, the force and power are transmitted by means of the exoskeleton
between segments of the human limb. Orthotic exoskeletons are applicable whenever
there is weakness or loss of human limb function. In such a scenario, the exoskeleton
complements or replaces the function of the human musculoskeletal system. In
internal force exoskeletons, the force is non-grounded; force is applied only between
the exoskeleton and the limb.
In all, the design consists in using biomechanical data (sEMG) or the contact
force between the extender and human from the limbs to determine the configuration
of the actuators and actions that are applied at joint level.
CHAPTER 4
4
EXOSKELETON DESIGN ARCHITECTURE
Fundamental to designing a lower extremity exoskeleton is selecting the
overall structural architecture of the limbs. Many different layouts of joints and limbs
can combine to form a functioning body part e.g. a leg, but any architecture generally
falls into one of a few categories:
Fig 4.1. Anthropomorphic exoskeleton Fig 4.2. Non-anthropomorphic
exoskeleton
4.1. Anthropomorphic Architecture
5
Anthropomorphic architectures attempt to exactly match the human limb. By
kinematically matching the human degrees of freedom and limb lengths, the
exoskeleton’s leg position exactly follows the human leg’s position. This greatly
simplifies many design issues. For example, one does not have to be concerned with
human/exoskeleton collisions. However, one major difficulty is that the joints in
human legs cannot be duplicated using the common state of technology in designing
joints. For instance, the human knee does not exhibit a pure rotation and duplicating
all its kinematics will result in a complicated (and perhaps non-robust) mechanical
system. Another major point of concern in this architecture is that the exoskeleton
limb lengths must be equal to the human limb lengths. This means that for different
operators to wear the exoskeleton, almost all the exoskeleton limbs must be highly
adjustable. In general, the anthropomorphic architecture is erroneously regarded to be
the preferred choice because it allows the exoskeleton to attach to the operator
wherever desired.
4.2. Non-anthropomorphic Architecture
While not as common in exoskeleton designs, many non-anthropomorphic
devices are highly successful, such as bicycles. Non-anthropomorphic architectures
open up a wide range of possibilities for the limb design as long as the exoskeleton
never interferes or limits the operator. Often it is difficult to develop architecture
significantly different from a human leg that can still move the foot through all the
necessary maneuvers (e.g. turning tight corners and deep squats). Safety issues
become more prominent with non-anthropomorphic designs since the exoskeleton
must be prevented from forcing the operator into a configuration they cannot reach.
Another problem with this architecture is that the exoskeleton legs may collide with
the human legs or external objects more often because the exoskeleton joints are not
located in the same place as the human joints.
4.3. Pseudo-anthropomorphic Architecture
6
For maximum safety and minimum collisions with the environment,
architecture is chosen that is almost anthropomorphic. This means, for example the
leg is kinematically similar to a human’s, but does not include all of the degrees of
freedom of human legs. Additionally, the degrees of freedom are all purely rotary
joints. Since the human and exoskeleton leg kinematics are not exactly the same
(merely similar), the human and exoskeleton are only rigidly connected at the
extremities (feet and torso). Any other rigid connections would lead to large forces
imposed on the operator due to the kinematic differences. However, compliant
connections, allowing relative motion between the human and exoskeleton, are
tolerable. Another benefit of not exactly matching the human kinematics is that it is
easier to size for various operators.
CHAPTER 5
7
EXOSKELETON COMPONENTS
Any biomechatronic system must have the following types of components:
5.1. Biosensors
Biosensors detect the user's "intentions." Depending upon the impairment and
type of device, this information can come from the user's nervous and/or muscle
system. The biosensor relates this information to a controller located either externally
or inside the device itself. Biosensors also feedback from the limb and actuator (such
as the limb position and applied force) and relate this information to the controller or
the user's nervous/muscle system. Biosensors detect electrical activity such
as galvanic detectors (which detect an electric current produced by chemical means
on the skin).
Fig 5.1. Biosensor
5.2. Mechanical sensors
Mechanical sensors measure information about the device (such as limb
position, applied force and load) and relate to the biosensor and/or the controller.
There are mechanical devices such as force meters and accelerometers.
8
Fig 5.2. Cutaway view of LVDT
5.3. Controller
The controller interfaces the user's nerve or muscle system and the device. It
relays and/or interprets intention commands from the user to the actuators of the
device. It also relays and/or interprets feedback information from the mechanical and
biosensors to the user. The controller also monitors and controls the movements of the
bio mechatronic device.
Fig 5.3. A network architecture to monitor/control a lower limb exoskeleton
9
5.4. Actuator
The actuator is an artificial muscle that produces force or movement. In
selecting actuators for a particular application, a number of requirements may arise.
These include power or force density, efficiency, size and weight, and cost. In
general, actuators in wearable robot applications are used under dynamic operating
conditions. Dynamic operation usually produces changing conditions in the amount of
power flow. The actuator can be a motor with cable-drive system, pneumatic or a
hydraulic system that aids or replaces the user's native muscle depending upon the
device. In wearable robotics, traditional actuator technologies, e.g. pneumatic,
hydraulic and electromagnetic actuators, are commonly used. Hydraulic and
pneumatic actuators are known for their high force density and high force or torque
characteristics, and have been used in a number of applications
.
Fig 5.4. Actuator designed for thigh
10
5.5. Portable storage
They could be powered by an internal combustion engine, batteries or,
potentially, fuel cells. Different types of batteries are commercially available as
portable energy solutions. The main issue with battery technologies is the ability to
meet power and energy requirements while minimizing the weight of the energy
storage device. This requirement will be a major factor in the selection of a given
actuation technology and in the practical application of the WR for interaction with a
human being. Battery systems range from reliable technologies, such as lead–acid,
that have been proven and developed over many years, to various newer designs that
are currently under development. Commercial solutions include lithium–ion, sodium–
sulfur and sodium–nickel chloride.
Fig 5.5. A figure showing portable storage
CHAPTER 6
11
WORKING
In these devices, the operator force on the device is sensed and amplified
electronically by use of a computer to drive the device actuator. In other words, these
devices extend the workers physical power by adding mechanical power to the
maneuvering task. The correct amount of power to add is calculated instantaneously
in the device computer. The result is that the intelligent assist device lifts a pre-
programmed larger percentage of the total force of the load while the operator lifts the
remaining much smaller percentage. This smaller percentage is sensed physically by
the operator, so the operator has a feel of the load weight and inertia.
Fig 6.1. An Upper-Limb exoskeleton
The working phases of a bio mechatronic exoskeleton are:
12
1. Data acquisition – The measurement of angular position or linear
displacements of a given joint or segment using various force and pressure
sensing technologies like LVDT, accelerometer, biosensors etc.
Movement and position of limbs are controlled by electrical signals
traveling back and forth between the muscles and the peripheral and
central nervous system. Electromyography (EMG) is the registration
and interpretation of these muscle action potentials.
Surface EMG (sEMG) is produced when ions flow in/out of muscle
cells. Nerve sends signal to initiate muscle contraction. This signal is
acquired using a high sensitive Ag/AgCl electrode lead in wet
condition attached to the skin.
More is the muscle contraction level more is the amplitude of the
sEMG signal. This signal is transduced into electronic circuit.
Fig 6.2. A figure showing data acquisition
2. Classification – Estimating the muscle force based on the acquired signal.
Signal is amplified to take full advantage of input after filtering out the
noise prior to A/D conversion.
Muscle force is then estimated from above amplified data.
The input to the robot can also be derived from the contact forces
between the robot and the human.
3. Actuation – Moving the robotic arm
13
The estimated force is sent via an interface circuit to the robotic arm.
In case of contact force, the contact force is measured, appropriately
modified, and used as an input to the robotic arm control, in addition to
being used for actual maneuvering. So that the human arm feels a
scaled down version of the actual forces on the robot without a
separate set of actuators.
The actuator arm moves to position corresponding to estimated force.
Fig 6.3. A figure showing actuation
CHAPTER 7
14
FEATURES
Some of the features and advantages of exoskeleton are as follows:
Strength augmentation
Endurance augmentation
The system provides its pilot(i.e. wearer) the ability to carry significant
payloads with minimal effort
Can operate in any type of terrain
Human provides an intelligent control system for the exoskeleton
Control algorithm ensures that the exoskeleton moves in concert with
the pilot with minimal interaction force between the two
exoskeleton’s kinematic chain maps on to the human limb anatomy
CHAPTER 8
15
CHALLENGES
Followings are some of the challenges for the development of wearable
exoskeleton technologies that DARPA has outlined:
Structural materials - The exoskeleton will have to be made out of composite
materials that are strong, lightweight and flexible.
Power source - The exoskeleton must have enough power to run for at least 24
hours before refueling.
Control - Controls for the machine must be seamless. Users must be able to
function normally while wearing the device.
Actuation - The machine must be able to move smoothly so it's not too
awkward for the wearer. Actuators must be quiet and efficient.
Biomechanics - Exoskeletons must be able to shift from side to side and front
to back, just as a person would move in battle. Developers will have to design
the frame with human-like joints.
Energy consumption - Energy consumption is a critical issue for wearable
robots. It must be optimized. For example, developments of robot capable of
walking down a gentle slope without any control or actuation.
Degrees of freedom – The Degree of freedom must be optimized so as to
reduce kinematic redundancy that occurs when more degrees of freedom
(DoFs) are available than are required to perform a given task.
CHAPTER 9
16
APPLICATION
In defense establishment where Soldiers could carry heavy loads across
rugged terrain without fatigue. Similarly, military medics could carry injured
victims off the battlefield.
Fire and rescue workers could carry heavy gear or supplies great distances
where vehicles could not travel.
In industries for material handling purposes.
For construction worker for their safety.
In space applications
They can provide improved motor function that better mimic normal
biological function to impaired individuals. They can also be used to train
individuals with impaired motor function
17
CHAPTER 10
FUTURE SCOPES
“Future is Machine”
Superhuman strength has always been confined to science fiction, but
advances in human-performance augmentation systems could give a person the ability
to lift hundreds of pounds using the effort they would usually use to lift a fraction of
that weight. With this added strength, soldiers will be able to mount weapons directly
to the uniform system.
The Future Force Warrior concept envisions the radical use of technologies
such as nanotechnology, powered exoskeletons etc. to provide the infantry with
significantly higher force multiplier than the opposing force. The U.S. military hopes
to develop a fully realized end product sometime in 2032, incorporating research
from U.C. Berkeley’s BLEEX exoskeleton project and the Massachusetts Institute of
Technology's Institute for Soldier Nanotechnologies into a final design.
It is clear that technology will not remain confined in the Hollywood
blockbusters. We will see that impaired one will be able to walk properly. Workers in
industries will work more with less fatigue and our soldiers will be more resilient and
powerful than what is now.
18
CHAPTER 11
CONCLUSION
Humans aren't the swiftest creatures on Earth, and most of us are limited in the
amount of weight that we can pick up and carry. These weaknesses can be fatal on the
battlefield, and that's why the U.S. Defense is investing $50 million to develop
an exoskeleton suit for ground troops. This wearable robotic system could give
soldiers the ability to run faster, carry heavier weapons and leap over large obstacles.
Imagine a battalion of super soldiers that can lift hundreds of pounds as easily as
lifting 10 pounds and can run twice their normal speed.
Exoskeleton research and development has been ongoing for the past few
years. Efforts have been hindered by a number of challenges, such as developing a
system design that does not interfere with the way a wearer would normally walk and
can run on a small battery-powered pack rather than fuel. M.I.T.'s research is no
exception. During test runs, researchers found that although the loads on their backs
were lighter, walking required more exertion, causing the wearer to use 10 percent
more oxygen than if he or she was not wearing the exoskeleton.
Currently, researches for the development of Exoskeletons are:
UC Berkeley/Lockheed Martin HULC legs, the primary competitor to
Sarcos/Raytheon. Allows the user to carry up to 200 lbs on a backpack
attached to the exoskeleton independent of the user.
Cyberdyne's HAL 5 arms/legs. Allows the wearer to lift 5 times as much as
they normally could.
Honda Exoskeleton Legs. Weighs 14.3 lbs and features a seat for the wearer.
M.I.T. Media Lab's Biomechatronics Group legs. Weighs 11.7 kilograms (26
lbs).
Sarcos/Raytheon XOS Exoskeleton arms/legs. For use in the military and to
"replace the wheelchair", weighs 150 lbs and allows the wearer to lift 200 lbs
with little or no effort.
19
In India, although the study and research on mechatronics have been here from
some time, still overall progress in the biomechatronic field is way back when
compared to the research work going on other organizations outside the country.
Scientists and engineers should consider putting their effort in such field so that in
future our country may stand at least comparable to the developed one.
“A tool is but the extension of a man's hand, and a machine is
but a complex tool. He that invents a machine augments the
power of man and the well-being of mankind.” - Henry Ward
Beecher
20
REFERENCES
A. Zoss, Kazerooni, H, A. Chu, “On the Biomechanical Design of the
Berkeley Lower Extremity Exoskeleton (BLEEX)”, IEEE/ASME Transactions
on Mechatronics, Volume 11, Number 2, pp. 128-138, April 2006
H. Kazerooni, J. Guo, "Human Extenders," ASME J. of Dynamic
Systems, Measurements, and Control, vol. 115, no. 2(B), June 1993.
Jacob, Moshe, Arcan, “A Myosignal-Based Powered Exoskeletons Systems”
IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man And Cybernetics, Volume 31, Number
2,pp. 3132-3139, May 2001
Joel, Jacob, “Upper-Limb Powered exoskeleton Design” IEEE Transactions
on Mechatronics, Volume 12, number 4, pp. 408-417, August 2007
21
21
top related