population dynamics and foraging ecology of northern sea otters (enhydra lutris kenyoni) in...

Post on 04-Aug-2015

54 Views

Category:

Science

1 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

TRANSCRIPT

Population Dynamics and Foraging Ecology of Northern

Sea Otters (Enhydra lutris kenyoni) in Washington State

Jessica Hale1, Kristin Laidre2, Ron Jameson3, Steve Jeffries4

1University of Washington, SAFS2University of Washington, SAFS & Polar Science Center

2USGS3WDFW

Clara L. Minard

WDFW, 2004

Objectives

1. Understand population growth and range expansion of northern sea otters in Washington State since reintroduction;

2. Quantify changes in the diet of sea otters over the 46-year period of population growth since reintroduction.

Methods

• Develop a spatially explicit demographic population model for northern sea otters in Washington State

• Compare diet across a gradient of occupation time using space-for-time approach

• Evaluate diet changes overtime by comparing foraging data collected in 1993-1999 to current diet at same sites

Most recent index of population size: 1573 total

1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 20150

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

Independents

Pups

Year

Inde

x of

Pop

ulati

on S

ize

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 400

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

ObservedPredicted

Year

Inde

pend

ent C

ount

1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015

( )( 1) ( ) 0.19 ( ) 1

1149.59

N tN t N t N t

WDFW, 2004

NORTH

SOUTH

1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 20150

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

% North

% South

Year

Perc

ent o

f Tot

al P

opul

ation

Inde

xPopulation Distribution between

North and South

NORTH

SOUTH

1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 20150

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

North Segment

Observed

Predicted

Year

Inde

pend

ent C

ount

( )( 1) ( ) 0.30 ( ) 1

336.69

N tN t N t N t

NORTH

1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 20150

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

South Segment

Observed

Predicted

Year

Inde

pend

ent C

ount

( )( 1) ( ) 0.23 ( ) 1

1150.64

N tN t N t N t

SOUTH

Prey frequency was different among years (χ2=10012, d.f. = 60, p <0.001).

1993-1999 Foraging Analyses by Year

© Caroline Hempstead

Prey frequency was different among seasons (χ2=7139, d.f. = 30, p <0.001).

1993-1999 Foraging Analyses by Season

Prey frequency was different between male and female sea otters (χ2=148, d.f. = 10, p <0.001).

1993-1999 Foraging Analyses by Sex

Fisheries Species

1993-1999 Foraging Analyses – Fisheries Species

1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 19990

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Fisheries SpeciesNon-fisheries Species

Year

Perc

ent o

f Die

t

Preliminary Foraging Observations

Planned Analyses

• Bayesian State-Space Model

• Re-calculate carrying capacity using recent survey indices

• Create a Spatially Explicit population model

• Space-for-time diet comparison

• Historical diet comparison at same sites

Tinker et al. 2008

Acknowledgments• Pilot Jeff Well from Rite Bros. Aviation• Mick Cope, Anita McMillan, and Shelley Ament from WDFW• Deanna Lynch and Sue Thomas from USFWS• Shawn Larson, Pat McMahon, and Caroline Hempstead from the

Seattle Aquarium• Lisa Triggs, Mandy Betz, and Terre Zorman from Point Defiance Zoo

and Aquarium• Richard McGovern, Donna Hauser, and Erica Escajeda• Funding from NOAA Dr. Nancy Foster Scholarship Program

Thanks!Twitter: @HaleJessie Email: jrh33@uw.eduBlog: halejessie.wordpress.com

top related