performance testing of a road tolling system · testing of web services • webservice mocking...

Post on 25-May-2020

6 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

TRANSCRIPT

Performance Testing of a Road Tolling System

Oliver BaendlSiegfried Goeschl

1Donnerstag, 27. September 12

Gauteng Open Road TollingSouth Africa

2Donnerstag, 27. September 12

42 Tolling Points3Donnerstag, 27. September 12

1.500.000 registered road-user4Donnerstag, 27. September 12

11 Satellite Centers5Donnerstag, 27. September 12

41 E-Toll Shops

6Donnerstag, 27. September 12

20 Mobile Payment Units7Donnerstag, 27. September 12

Central Operation Center8Donnerstag, 27. September 12

750 Concurrent CRM Client Users

9Donnerstag, 27. September 12

162 vehicle passges per second10Donnerstag, 27. September 12

400 concurrent web users11Donnerstag, 27. September 12

Two Data Centers

12Donnerstag, 27. September 12

Master Control Program

13Donnerstag, 27. September 12

Project Overview

• Vehicles are passing through a tolling point

• The vehicle is identified either using the license plate number (via OCR) or a tag

• Vehicle passage are transmitted to Open Road Tolling Back Office (ORTBO)

• 90% video passages with three images

• 10% tag passages

14Donnerstag, 27. September 12

Project Overview

• Vehicle passages are collected and assigned to road-user accounts in the Transaction Clearing House (TCH)

• TCH responsible for billing the customer

• Passages of unregistered or black-listed cars are processed by the Violation Processing Center (VPC)

15Donnerstag, 27. September 12

Project Overview

• Overall system contains multiple Oracle RACs and MSSQL clusters

• Interfaces between the subsystems mostly web services

• Backup data center replicates the “Central Operation Center” over dark fiber

16Donnerstag, 27. September 12

Schedule Phase One

• Performance testing of CRM Server simulating 771 concurrent & active CRM client sessions

• Performance testing of public-facing web portal simulating 400 concurrent & active web user sessions

• On success the CRM subsystem goes live and has real user accounts

17Donnerstag, 27. September 12

Schedule Phase Two

• Simulating up to 162 vehicle passage per second

• Validating the end-to-end processing under load (passage processing, customer billing and violation processing)

• On success the overall system goes live

18Donnerstag, 27. September 12

Performance Test Scope

• End to end performance acceptance test

• Mandatory and client-witnessed test

• Strict acceptance criteria regarding

‣ throughput

‣ number and severity of errors

‣ validation of test runs

19Donnerstag, 27. September 12

Performance Test Types

Baseline Test One hour average load

Stress Test One hour peak load

Endurance Test 24 hours maximum load

20Donnerstag, 27. September 12

Performance Test Hardware

• Six dedicated load injectors

‣ Windows 2008 Server

‣ 3 physical and 3 virtual boxes

‣ Dual quad-cores with 8 GB RAM

• No direct access outside the data center

‣ Citrix over RDP over RDP

21Donnerstag, 27. September 12

Performance Test Tools• All performance test tools have issues

‣ Make sure that they work for you

• We prefer JVM-based test tools

‣ Easy to migrate between different OS

‣ We are Java developers

• We prefer command-line invocation

‣ RDP over slow network is really slow

22Donnerstag, 27. September 12

Performance Test Tools

• We use a non-distributed installation

‣ Complex network and routing

‣ Firewall not under our control

• Check the license and price tags

‣ Virtual users can be expensive

‣ Connectivity to license server?

23Donnerstag, 27. September 12

The Test Tools We Used

Subsystem Interface Planned Delivered

CRM Server WebService

Public Web Portal HTML

Vehicle PassageProcessing WebService

24Donnerstag, 27. September 12

Apache JMeter

• Open Source and free

• Implemented a new reporting backend to scope with huge result files

• Rock solid - only minor issues

• Extensible using scripting and Java libraries

• Rough GUI compared to commercial tools

• Unsuitable for complex ASP.NET web sites

25Donnerstag, 27. September 12

WAPT Pro

• Excellent value for money

• Good support

• ASP.NET module saved my day

• Extensible through Javascript

• One major issue with generation of test values under high load (requires restart)

26Donnerstag, 27. September 12

soapUI Pro

• Excellent for prototyping and functional testing of web services

• WebService mocking saved my day

• Extensible using Groovy and Java libraries

• Various issues during load testing

• soapUI was replaced with JMeter for performance tests

27Donnerstag, 27. September 12

• No software installation

• Take two (or more)

• Automation is your friend

• Performance test for everyone

• Performance tests are a valuable asset

Some More Thoughts

28Donnerstag, 27. September 12

No Software Installation

• Portable Apps on USB Stick

‣ Run tests directly from USB Stick

‣ Clone USB Stick to hard disk

• Have all your tools on the USB stick

‣ Java, JMeter, Editor, Git, ...

29Donnerstag, 27. September 12

Take Two (or more)

• A minimum of two share-nothing load injectors are required to prove that the production servers is causing the performance bottleneck (and not your test tool)

• We used a maximum of five share-nothing load injectors simultaneously

30Donnerstag, 27. September 12

• Performance test were run mostly at night and over the weekend

• Test execution managed by Hudson

• Test failures triggers email notification

• Test protocols are copied to FTP server

Automation Is Your Friend

31Donnerstag, 27. September 12

Performance Tests for Everyone

• All test scenarios are configured as Hudson jobs

‣ Baseline, stress & endurance test

‣ Some other internal tests

• Everyone can start and monitor a performance test scenario over the web browser

• Even developers can run performance tests

32Donnerstag, 27. September 12

• Performance tests can be used in creative and un-planned ways

‣ Smoke test for new deployment

‣ Testing database failover

‣ Testing data center replication & failover

‣ Testing different database setups

Performance Tests as Asset

33Donnerstag, 27. September 12

The few things you should take home

34Donnerstag, 27. September 12

Lessons Learned

• Tests tools are buggy

• Client-witnessed test are hard

• Performance tests are a valuable asset

• Creation and maintenance of complex performance test suite is a project on its own

35Donnerstag, 27. September 12

Questions & Answers

36Donnerstag, 27. September 12

top related