patricia charlebois imo
Post on 14-Jan-2016
65 Views
Preview:
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
Preparedness, Response and Cooperation for Oil and
Chemical Incidents
OPRC & HNS - Recent Developments and New
Challenges
Patricia Charlebois Patricia Charlebois IMOIMO
Overview
• International legal framework• Obligations under the OPRC
Convention & HNS Protocol • The role of IMO• The OPRC-HNS Technical Group• Policy implications and challenges
in developing mechanisms for HNS
International Legal Framework
There are a number of conventions aimed at protection of the marine environment from pollution from
ships
• Main Instruments are:– Prevention: MARPOL 73/78– Preparedness & Response:
OPRC 1990 and its HNS Protocol 2000
Background
• The OPRC Convention was initially established in 1990 following the Exxon Valdez disaster in March 1989
• The Convention entered into force five years later in May 1995.
• The HNS Protocol followed in 2000, in recognition of the increasing threat of pollution incidents involving chemicals
• The HNS Protocol has yet to enter into force
The OPRC Convention & HNS Protocol
• The OPRC Convention, as the parent document, provides the template for the HNS Protocol
• As such…– The two are mirror pieces of
international legislation; – structured and worded very
similarly;– covering oil spill response and
HNS response, respectively.
OPRC Convention and HNS Protocol
Both provide…• a framework for the development of
national and regional capacity to prepare for and respond to oil/HNS pollution incidents, and…
A platform to:• facilitate international co-operation and
mutual assistance in preparing for and responding to major oil/HNS pollution incidents
Obligations of parties- National level -
1. A requirement for pollution emergency plans for:– Ships; offshore oil operations; ports and oil/HNS handling
facilities
2. Reporting: – Requirement reporting any observed event involving the
discharge of oil/HNS to the nearest coastal State or State with jurisdiction
3. A national system for responding to Oil/HNS pollution incidents which includes:– a national contingency plan– designated national authorities – an identified national operation focal point (or focal points)
4. Preparedness and response capacity– Individually or through bilateral/multilateral
co-operation: Pre-positioned equipment; programme of exercises and training of personnel; plans and communication capabilities; a mechanism for coordinating the response
Obligations of Parties- International level -
Requirement for…• Informing neighbouring States
of spills which could affect them
• Providing assistance if requested by another party
• Requesting Parties agree to facilitate the receipt of such assistance in-country
• Parties agree, to the extent of their capability, to provide international assistance to other State parties, and;
• Involve oil, chemical & shipping industries in preparedness & response activities
International
Multi-national or Regional
Local
COUNTRY PLAN
BILATERAL & MULTILATERAL
PLANS
Area
National
INDUSTRYAPPROACH
INTERNATIONALFRAMEWORK
INTER-REGIONALARRANGEMENTS
TIER 1Small spill within capability of individual facility or harbour
authority
TIER 2 Coordination of more than 1 source
of equipment/personnel
TIER 3Mobilization of all available national
resources and possibly regional and int’l
systems--depending on size of spill
Global Response Framework for Oil Spills
The Role of IMO
1. Information Services2. Education & Training3. Technical services4. Technical assistance
The OPRC-HNS Technical Group
• A subsidiary body of the IMO’s Marine Environment Protection Committee (MEPC)
• The OPRC-HNS Technical Group that meets in conjunction with MEPC to:
– Share experiences among a network of partners – Member States, Regional Agreements and Industry
– develop tools, resources, manuals, guidance documents and training courses to help assist countries in building capacity
• Plays an important role in helping countries in understanding and implementing the OPRC Convention and its Protocol and for improving preparedness and response to oil and HNS incidents at the national and international level
Recent developments
• Manual on Chemical Pollution – Section 1 – Problem Assessment and Response
Arrangements – Section 2 – Search and Recovery of Packaged
Goods Lost at Sea
• Introductory courses on preparedness and response to HNS incidents
• Guidance document on planning and response to chemical releases in the marine environment –joint document with industry
• IMO web page providing information and assistance for HNS incidents
The HNS Protocol-ChallengesEntry into force: Twelve months after ratification by not less
than fifteen States, which are States Party to the OPRC Convention.
Number of Contracting
Parties
% of world’s tonnage
OPRC 1990 85(EOF 13-May-
95)
64.31
HNS Protocol
2000
14(not yet EOF)
15.84
Current status:
Need only 1 more ratification for entry into force of the HNS Protocol
Definition• What is the definition of an ‘HNS’?
For the purposes of the Protocol…
“Hazardous and noxious substances means any substances other than oil which, if introduced into the marine environment, is
likely to create hazards to human health, to harm living resources
and marine life, to damage amenities or to interfere with other
legitimate uses of the sea”
HNS Protocol 2000, article 2 (2)
Challenges……Oil: • preparedness & response
well understood• although different types,
some uniformity in properties and behaviour
• approach and equipment options are the same and relatively standard
• relative danger and hazard to human health is low.
HNS:• response difficult or
impossible. Depending on substance
• wide variety of substances • (8 million +)• varying type and degree of
hazard• completely different
behaviour from substance to substance
• potential for significant danger (explosive, flammable) and hazard to human health (corrosive, toxic)`
Which means...
• Different risk and threat scenario, approach and knowledge-requirement
• Therefore, a completely different set of skills, expertise and equipment needed to respond to HNS incidents
Constraints to ratification and implementation of HNS Protocol
-Maritime & Port Authorities
• Little expertise and knowledge of HNS within these organizations or even within the State
• Little or no equipment for HNS response (protective equipment, pumps, detection devices, etc…)
• Normally, this type of knowledge and the necessary equipment resides with Emergency Services in developed countries i.e. Fire Brigade
International
Multi-national or Regional
Local
COUNTRY PLAN
BILATERAL & MULTILATERAL
PLANS
Area
National
INDUSTRYAPPROACH
INTERNATIONALFRAMEWORK
INTER-REGIONALARRANGEMENTS
TIER 1Small spill within capability of individual facility or harbour
authority
TIER 2 Coordination of more than 1 source
of equipment/personnel
TIER 3Mobilization of all available national
resources and possibly regional and int’l
systems--depending on size of spill
Global Response Framework for Oil Spills
Challenges to implementation
Building systems for response to HNS can be time and resource-intensive taking into account:– Training needs– Equipment needs and maintenance issues– Development and testing of plans for a new
type of incident– Building relationships with a new set of
partners and stakeholder groups– Translating into policy and regulations – i.e
lack of a list of identified substance in HNS Protocol
May be especially hard to justify in light of:– Frequency of such incidents– Timeframe for response-if even possible
Questions to be answered in developing systems for HNS
• Notification and reporting– Can existing systems be
modified to accommodate HNS requirements?
• National Plan – Options−Update existing oil spill plans to
accommodate HNS−Separate plan
Questions to be answered in developing systems for HNS
Developing response capacity– This is the most difficult for countries to address
in terms of ratifying and implementing the Protocol.
Questions/concerns• Limited expertise available in current
structures• How and where to access necessary training?
How to define training needs?• How do we do it? How far do we go?• What hazards will we/won’t we respond to• What can we do ourselves? What can be
contracted out?• How we can be sure that contractor’s will
meet the requirement?
Constraints• Expensive and resource-intensive
to develop such capacity• Facilitation of
relationships/partnerships with whole new constituency: chemical industry, independent chemical spill response organizations.
• Very few, if any, well-established working models yet in place.
Summary1. Oil spill response is well-understood and there
are relatively uniform and standardized approaches (and equipment for response) for preparedness and response to oil spills
2. HNS is much more difficult due to the wide array of chemicals with widely differing hazards, properties, and behaviours.
3. Expertise on HNS may not be readily available within in maritime administrations (or even nationally) and, if it does exist, the breadth of expertise is usually limited.
4. Many complex practical and policy questions to be considered when developing systems for HNS
5. Developing such capacity can be both time- and resource-intensive (training, equipment, instrumentation…).
Questions?
top related