part iv: consumer surplus producer surplus

Post on 22-Jan-2016

67 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

DESCRIPTION

ECONOMICS. What does it mean to me?. Part IV: Consumer Surplus Producer Surplus. READ Krugman Section 9, Modules 49, 50, 51 Mankiw Ch 7, 8. 9. VOCABULARY. Willingness to Pay : the maximum price at which he/she would pay for a good. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Part IV:Part IV:•Consumer SurplusConsumer Surplus•Producer SurplusProducer Surplus

ECONOMICSECONOMICSWhat does it mean to me?

READ Krugman Section 9, Modules 49, 50, 51Mankiw Ch 7, 8. 9

VOCABULARY

Willingness to PayWillingness to Pay: the maximum price at which he/she would pay for a good.

Individual Consumer SurplusIndividual Consumer Surplus: the net gain in the purchase of a good. It is the difference between the actual price and a person’s willingness to pay.

Total Consumer Surplus:Total Consumer Surplus: the sum of all the consumer surpluses of all the buyers of a good.

INDIVIDUAL CONSUMER SURPLUS

60

40

20

10

0

Price =$28

Buyer Willingness to pay Price paid Individual Consumer Surplus

David $62 $28 $34

Maggie 55 28 27

Henry 38 28 10

Jamie 18 ---- 0

Anna 11 ---- 0

Maggie’s CS is $55 - 28 = $27

David’s CS is $62 - 28 = $34

Henry’s CS is $38 - 28 = $10

Jamie

Anna

Total Consumer Surplus equals

34 + 27 + 10 = $71$71

60

40

20

10

0

Price =$28

Now, lets suppose a sale drops the price to $14. How has Consumer Surplus changed?

Maggie’s CS is $55 - 14 = $41

Now David’s CS is $62 - 14 = $48

Henry’s CS is $38 - 14 = $24

Now, Jamie has CS, $18 - 14 = $4

Anna

…..Total Consumer Surplus now equals

48 + 41 + 24+ 4 = $117$117

Price = $14

INDIVIDUAL PRODUCER SURPLUS

45

35

25

15

0

Just as buyers of a good would have been willing to pay more for their purchase than the price they actually pay, sellers of a good would have been wiling to sell it for less than the price they actually receive

Chelsea’s

Jerusha’s

Brandon’s

Chris

Hannah

PotentialSeller’s

Sellers Cost

Chris $5

Brandon 15

Chelsea 25

Jerusha 35

Hannah 45

45

35

25

15

0

At a price of $30, Chris, Brandon and Chelsea sell their books.

Chelsea

Jerusha

Brandon

Chris

Hannah

PotentialSeller’s

Sellers Cost

Chris $5

Brandon 15

Chelsea 25

Jerusha 35

Hannah 45

Price = $30

45

35

25

15

0

At a price of $30.

Chelsea’s PS, $25 -30 = $5

Jerusha

Brandon’s PS, $15 - 30 = $15

Chris’s PS, $5 - 30 = $25

Hannah

Total Producer Surplus is

25 + 15 + 5 = $45

Price = $30

CONSUMER SURPLUSCONSUMER SURPLUS

andand

PRODUCER SURPLUSPRODUCER SURPLUS

(when there are many (when there are many potential buyers/sellers)potential buyers/sellers)

Whenever a transaction occurs in the marketplace,

both consumers and producers benefit.

But how much do

they benefit?

Suppose I am willing to pay $4 for 10 widgets.

However, the price is $1.50.

6

5

4

3

2

1

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

P

Q

This results in CONSUMER

SURPLUS, which is the

difference between D

and P

D

P

$2.50

$4.00

- 1.50

$2.50

x 10

$25.00

Price

So, Consumer SurplusConsumer Surplus is the TOTAL BENEFIT consumers receive from

having a market in the good.

6

5

4

3

2

1

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

P

Q

D

P

$2.50

$4.00

- 1.50

$2.50

x 10

$25.00

Price

Rise 2.50Run 10

= .25=

Now, let’s graph this problem using an economist’s demand curve.

6

5

4

3

2

1

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

P

Q

The equation for this line would be:

P = 4 - .25Q

If P=0, then Q=__

If Q=0, then P=__P = 4 - .25 (0)

P = 4 - 0P = 4

0 = 4 - .25Q+ .25Q.25Q = 4 .25 .25

Q = 16

The area between the demand ($4.00) and the price ($1.50) is the CONSUMER SURPLUS.

6

5

4

3

2

1

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

P

Q

Mathematically, P < 4 - .25Q, P > 1.50, Q > 0

Area of a triangle = 1/2bh

Consumer Surplus = 1/2 (10 x 2.50)

= $12.50

So….how much do producers benefit

from this transaction?

6

5

4

3

2

1

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

P

Q

Suppose that a firm is willing to sell the good for $.50 but the price is $1.50 for

10 widgets.

PriceSupply (willing

to sell cost)

PRODUCER SURPLUS is the

difference between supply

curve and the price.

$1.00

Rise 1.50Run 10

= .15=

Let’s graph the supply curve on the old graph.

6

5

4

3

2

1

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

P

Q

P = .15Q

If the price is set at 1.50, then 1.50 = .15Q

.15 .15

10 = Q

S

DPrice

Remember the area of a triangle = 1/2bh, so…..

6

5

4

3

2

1

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

P

Q

1/2 (10 x 1.50) = $7.50 =

PRODUCER SURPLUS

S

DPrice

In this case, both consumers and producers gain:

6

5

4

3

2

1

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

P

Q

CS + PS = 12.50 + 7.50 = $20.00

TOTAL BENEFIT TO SOCIETY

S

DPrice

Now, let’s suppose a tax of $.80 is added to the price of gasoline. This adds to the cost of producing the widgets.

6

5

4

3

2

1

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

P

Q

If 0 widgets, then P = 0 + .80 = .80

S

DPrice

If 10 widgets, then P = 1.50 + .80 = 2.30

S1

This changes our point of equilibrium.

6

5

4

3

2

1

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

P

Q

S

D

Price

S1

What happens to consumer surplus?

What happens to producer surplus?What happens to producer surplus?

What does the pink rectangle represent?What does the pink rectangle represent?

TAX REVENUE

The green triangle represents DEADWEIGHT loss, or the amount of sales

you give up with the higher price.

What is the new Quantity?

6

5

4

3

2

1

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

P

Q

S

DPrice

S1

Demand P = 4 - .25Q

Supply P = .15Q

Supply w/tax P = .15Q + .80

4-.25Q+.25Q = .15Q+.25Q+.80

4 - .80 = .40Q +.80 - .80

3.20 = .40Q

4-.25Q =

P = .15(8)

P = 2.00

(8, 2)

.15Q +.80

.40 .40

8 = Q

6

5

4

3

2

1

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

P

Q

S

DPrice

S1

(8, 2)

Consumers pay: $2 per unit, including the tax…..

Producers receive after they pay the tax: $2 - .80 = $1.20

What is the height for the new Consumer Surplus triangle?

6

5

4

3

2

1

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

P

Q

S

DPrice

S1

4 - 2.00 = 2.00* 8 * 1/2 = $8.00 new CS

(compared to $12.50 old CS)

What is the height for the new Producer Surplus triangle?

6

5

4

3

2

1

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

P

Q

S

DPrice

S1

1.20 = h 8 = b

1.820 * 8 * 1/2 = $4.80$4.80 new PSnew PS

(compared to $7.50 old PS)

So…..using the equation 1/2bh (area of a triangle)

6

5

4

3

2

1

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

P

Q

S

DPrice

S1

1/2 * 8 * 1.70 = $8.00 = New CS

1/2 * 8 * .80 = $4.80 = New PS

.80 * 8 = $6.40 = Tax Amount

8.00 + 4.80 + 6.40 = $19.20 Total Benefit

(compared to $20.00 old TB)

Compare the New Total Benefit of $19.20 to the

Old Total Benefit of $20.00.

Do excise taxes benefit society?

Economists do not support taxes which do

not benefit society, such as excise taxes.

Good taxes include: property taxes, income taxes, and estate taxes.

So….who pays the $.80 ?

Consumers pay: $ .50

Producers pay: $ .30

In this case, consumers pay most (BUT NOT ALL) of the tax. Tax incidence depends on

the elasticity of demand and the elasticity of supply. In short, whomever is less flexible in adjusting to changes in price will pay more of

the tax.

Consumers avoid paying the whole of the Consumers avoid paying the whole of the tax by buying less of the product at a lower tax by buying less of the product at a lower

quantity.quantity.

GAINS FROM TRADE:

6

5

4

3

2

1

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

P

Q

S

DPrice

S1

Consumer Surplus = 1/2 * 8 * (4 - 2) = $8.00

Producer Surplus = 1/2 * 8 * (1.20 - 0) = $4.80

Tax Revenue = $. 80 * 8 = $6.40

GAINS FROM TRADE = 8 + 4.80 + 6.40 = $19.20

Deadweight Loss = 20.00 - 19.20 = $ .80

Project by:Project by:

Virginia H. MeachumVirginia H. Meachum

Coral Springs High SchoolCoral Springs High School

Sources:Sources:

Principles, Problems, and PoliciesPrinciples, Problems, and Policies, by Campbell McConnell & , by Campbell McConnell & Stanley BrueStanley Brue

Principles of EconomicsPrinciples of Economics, by N. Gregory Mankiw, by N. Gregory Mankiw

Economics For AP, by Paul Krugman, Robin Wells, David Anderson, Margaret Ray

Notes by Florida Council on Economic Education and FAU Notes by Florida Council on Economic Education and FAU Center for Economic Education (Prof Bill Boshardt)Center for Economic Education (Prof Bill Boshardt)

Notes by Foundation for Teaching EconomicsNotes by Foundation for Teaching Economics

top related