optokinetic effect on the subjective visual vertical and body tilt perception

Optokinetic effect on the subjective visual vertical and

body tilt perception

M. De Vrijer, W.P. Medendorp, J.A.M. Van Gisbergen

2

FnfghjFnfghj

Tilt angle [deg]

Resp

onse

err

or

[deg]

Spatial orientationSubjective body tilt (SBT)Accurate in whole tilt range

Subjective visual vertical (SVV)Undercompensation

at tilt angles > 60°

Van Beuzekom, Medendorp, Van Gisbergen, Vision Res., 2001

SBT

SVV

Dissociation: SBT ≠ SVV

3

FnfghjFnfghj

• Affects body tilt percept (SBT)Young et al. (1975)

• Affects subjective visual vertical (SVV)

Dichgans et al. (1972, 1974)

• Both effects increase at larger tilts

Example of roll-optokinetic stimulus (OKS)

Optokinetic (roll) stimulation (OKS)

This study

Combined measurements of these effects

Is there dissociation between optokinetic effects on SBT and SVV?

4

FnfghjFnfghj

Experiments

• Subjects (n=8) were roll-tilted in darkness to various tilt angles (-135 to 135°)

• Upon arrival, an optokinetic drum was turned on (Ø 76°, rotation velocity: -35, 0 or +35 °/s)

SBT task SVV task

5

FnfghjFnfghj

CCW-stimulusCW-stimulus Stationary

Optokinetic stimulation

6

FnfghjFnfghj

Results

• OKS causes shift in SBT

CW CCW

• OKS affects SBT differently than SVV

CW

CW CCW

CCW

7

FnfghjFnfghj

Effects differ for tilt-increasing and tilt-reducing OKSTilt-increasing OKS

Tilt-reducing OKS

ΔSVV

ΔSVV

ΔSBT

ΔSBT

CW CCW

8

FnfghjFnfghj

• No dissociation for tilt-reducing OKS• Dissociation for tilt-increasing OKS

Effects differ for tilt-increasing and tilt-reducing OKSTilt-increasing OKS

Tilt-reducing OKS

9

FnfghjFnfghj

Summary

10

FnfghjFnfghj

Conclusions

• In absence of optokinetic stimulation, subjects have veridical SBT, whereas SVV is biased at tilts > 60°

• Presence of optokinetic stimulus affects both SBT and SVV:• Tilt-reducing optokinetic stimulus affects SBT and

SVV equally• Tilt-increasing optokinetic stimulus affects SVV more

severely than SBT

• The dissociation between SBT and SVV in the tilt-increasing condition is further evidence for the notion that these percepts are based on different computational principles

11

FnfghjFnfghj

Questions?

12

FnfghjFnfghj

Tilt dependence of optokinetic effect

13

FnfghjFnfghj

Ocular torsion

• Subjects performed another task:

- Align visual line with body axis (subjective line body, SLB)

14

FnfghjFnfghj

Future directions

See:De Vrijer, Medendorp & Van Gisbergen, JNP 2008