optional presentation title 1 rutgers, the state university of new jersey evolving research data...
Post on 24-Dec-2015
215 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
Optional Presentation Title
1Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Evolving Research Data Services
Laura Palumbo June 16, 2015
Rutgers University Libraries
@LauraBPalumbo laura.palumbo@rutgers.eduChemistry & Physics Librarian/Science Data Specialist
Rutgers University Libraries, New Brunswick, NJ
Rutgers University Community Repository
2010: Launch of RUcore2011: Able to accept data
RUresearch created2012: Pilot data projects
accepted2013: Questions re copyright
& legal issues
History of RUcore
https://www.flickr.com/photos/jurvetson/
Task Force for Research Data Implementation
● Data Librarians (2)
● Health Science Librarians (2)
● Research Data Manager
● Digital Library Architect
● Metadata Librarian
● Digital Humanities Librarian
CHARGE: Environmental scan for administrative structures and evaluation processes for technical, legal, and confidential issues.
Consult with research offices; staffing, storage, and funding requirements.
Environmental Scan
https://www.flickr.com/photos/michaelcasey/
● 35 Repositories● 34 Review Criteria from ARL SPEC Kit
334, Research Data Management Services
● 5 categories: ○ Research Data Management
Services ○ Data Archiving Services ○ RDM Service Staffing ○ Partnerships ○ Research Data Policy
Highlights
● Many institutions provided data management consulting, regardless of level of data acceptance.
● Most repositories were operated by libraries; some in collaboration with OIT and/or OVPR.
● Number of staff varied from 2-18; many had part-time responsibilities for data management.
● Most placed responsibility for evaluation of data with the PI.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/katerha/
● Most allowed self-deposit of data or self-deposit and mediated deposit
● Data deposit agreements were common, similar
● Privacy was addressed by statements, stripping of confidential information, encryption
● Information about storage capacity was limited. Restrictions to file size typical,10 - 500 GB free of charge
● Funding models were not found, although a few mention fees for additional storage, and extra staff time.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/42931449@N07/
Policies
● Data Policies at an institutional level are not a given
● Most policies, where available, share a similar
format:○ the university owns the data
○ the principal investigator is the steward of that data and is responsible for complying with any restrictions or legal requirements
○ protocols exist in the event the PI leaves the institution
Image by Leo Reynolds, Flickr
A few good examples
Johns Hopkins http://jhuresearch.jhu.edu/Data_Management_Policy.pdf
New York University http://www.nyu.edu/content/dam/nyu/research/documents/OSP/PolicyonResearchData030110.pdf
Ohio State http://orc.osu.edu/files/2011/01/ResearchDataPolicy.pdf
University of Wisconsin-Madison http://researchdata.wisc.edu/research-data-policies/
Image by Mariusz Kluzniak, https://www.flickr.com/photos/39997856@N03/
Policy vs policy
Libraries can make policies which should support an institutional Policy on research data, but first need to determine:
What is the Library’s role in research data?
What are the risks involved in accepting and sharing research data? How much control will you have?
Is your institution- Library Administration, Research Office, General Counsel- comfortable with the perceived level of risk?
Deposit Agreements
Deposit agreements typically stated:
● the depositor is legally allowed to deposit the data
● data does not contain confidential or sensitive information
● the depositor holds the institution harmless
● the repository may take actions to describe, preserve, and maintain the data
Proposed Guidelines for Data Acceptance
● Will accept both science and humanities data
● Will accept funded and unfunded research data, but funded may be given preference
● The “responsible researcher” must be Rutgers faculty or staff, and must initiate the deposit process
● Data associated with grad students electronic D & T will be accepted
● Short term embargoes will be allowed
● The depositor will sign a deposit agreement
Proposed Guidelines for Initial Implementation
● Mediated deposit only
● Initial projects will be 100 GB or less without fees
● Data must be in digital format
● No human or animal subjects
● No commercial interests
● No data which would require system modificationsImage by Alan Levine https://www.flickr.com/photos/cogdog/
Future development ?
● Full implementation would allow self-deposit, with online forms for deposit agreement, checklist, and application form for metadata
● Metadata entry would ideally be automated
● Data would be subject to a brief review for technical and possible copyright or legal issues
● Special projects would be mediated- very large, special formats, system modifications, other?
Considerations
● Funding- how will your service become sustainable?
● Metadata- staff-time intensive or automated? How much is enough?
● Data service responsibilities- will this be a part-time function for many, full-time for a few, or both?
● Will your service be easy and efficient, so that researchers want to use it?
● What value does your library add to the research process?
top related