open science: new collaborative tools

Open Science in practice: new collaborative tools

Elena GigliaOpen Access office – University of Turin

elena.giglia@unito.it Photos are mine, https://www.flickr.com/photos/eg65/albums

Zen scholarly communication?

SKILLS AND SERVICES NEEDED FOR THE GREAT CONVERSATION SHOULD SERVE ITS OBJECTIVES, NOT THE REVERSE.

WHAT DOES SCHOLARLY COMMUNICATION NEED TO WORK? crystals of knowledge

a set of peers

Stern, Niels, Guédon, Jean-Claude; Jensten, Thomas Wiben (2015). Crystals of Knowledge Production. An Intercontinental Conversation about Open Science and the Humanities. “Nordic Perspectives on Open Science”, [S.l.], v. 1, p. 1–24, oct. 2015

https://101innovations.wordpress.com/

https://101innovations.wordpress.com/

A blurred environment…

Kramer, Bianca (2016), Defining the scholarly Commons. Reimagining research communications. Workshop notes and visualizations, Feb. 2016

600

Going deeper…

A shift towards pre-prints

http://biorxiv.org/

http://asapbio.org/

http://www.nature.com/news/biologists-urged-to-hug-a-preprint-1.19384

http://science.sciencemag.org/content/352/6288/899.full

https://www.statnews.com/2016/05/27/preprint-biology-bioxriv/

New trends in publishing

https://thewinnower.com/

http://f1000research.com/articles/5-632/v1

A change of perspective

https://www.pubpub.org/

https://www.scienceopen.com/

A change of content

Loosening the grip

https://www.openlibhums.org/

http://www.lingoa.eu/

http://www.knowledgeunlatched.org/

Bridging the gaphttp://www.rapidscience.org/reward-metrics/

Building together

https://www.authorea.com/

https://hypothes.is/

https://www.overleaf.com/

http://f1000.com/work/

Not only texts

https://github.com/

https://figshare.com/

https://zenodo.org/ http://www.slideshare.net/

Not only authors

https://publons.com/

https://www.peerageofscience.org/

Redesigning

https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01302597

http://www.openscholar.org.uk/institutional-repositories-start-to-offer-peer-review-services/

Peer review?

http://retractionwatch.com/

FC. Fang, A. Casadevall, Retracted Science and the Retraction Index, Infection and Immunity, 2011; 79(10): 3855–3859

Competition or collaboration?

Brembs, Digital Scholarship and Open Science need a digital infrastructure , Nov. 2015

http://blog.scienceopen.com/2016/04/how-can-academia-kick-its-addiction-to-the-impact-factor/

https://royalsociety.org/events/2015/04/future-of-scholarly-scientific-communication-part-1/

Flying high

https://royalsociety.org/events/2015/04/future-of-scholarly-scientific-communication-part-1

Opening up evaluation

http://blog.scienceopen.com/2016/02/the-open-citation-index/ http://sparceurope.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/Evaluate-SEBriefingPaper-1215.pdf

http://www.nature.com/news/bibliometrics-the-leiden-manifesto-for-research-metrics-1.17351

http://www.ascb.org/dora/

E.Giglia, Un altro mondo è possibile: dall’Open Access alla Open Science, Bibliotime 1 2016

That’s all!