onto-planning: innovation for regional development planning within eu convergence framework
Post on 01-Nov-2014
560 Views
Preview:
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
Onto-‐planning: innova.on for regional development planning within EU convergence
framework. Francesco Scorza, Giuseppe Las Casas, Angelo Carlucci
Università della Basilicata – Laoratorio di Ingegneria dei Sistemi Urbani e Territoriali (LISUT) University of Basilicata – Laboratory of Urban and Regional Systems Engineering (LISUT),
Viale dell’Ateneo Lucano 10, 85100, Potenza -‐ Italy Francesco.scorza@unibas.it
LISUT
Laboratorio di Ingegneria dei Sistemi Urbani e Territoriali
Laboratory of Urban and Regional Systems Engineering
University of Basilicata
Faculty of Engineering
Department of Architecture, Planning and Transport Infrastructure
INPUT 2010 – 13, 15 Settembre 2010 - Potenza Ing. Francesco Scorza
Index:
• Istances of local development planning • Onto-‐Planning: a renewed methodological and operaUve approach
• ReDO • ReDO & ROPs • Conclusions
LISUT
Laboratorio di Ingegneria dei Sistemi Urbani e Territoriali
Laboratory of Urban and Regional Systems Engineering
University of Basilicata
Faculty of Engineering
Department of Architecture, Planning and Transport Infrastructure
Istances:
Plan
SDI, …
NegoUaUon
ParUcipaUon
ImplementaUon
Management
EvaluaUon
Programmer, Decision maker
Context
Beneficiaries
LISUT
Laboratorio di Ingegneria dei Sistemi Urbani e Territoriali
Laboratory of Urban and Regional Systems Engineering
University of Basilicata
Faculty of Engineering
Department of Architecture, Planning and Transport Infrastructure
Istances:
Rationality of the process Equity, effectiveness and sustainability
Accountability Pertinence and relevance of the plan in front of the context
Communication - Participation Interoperability
Evaluation
LISUT
Laboratorio di Ingegneria dei Sistemi Urbani e Territoriali
Laboratory of Urban and Regional Systems Engineering
University of Basilicata
Faculty of Engineering
Department of Architecture, Planning and Transport Infrastructure
POR Basilicata 2000/2006 Axis IV – Sistemi locali di sviluppo
Axis Overal Objectives
“promozione di interventi di messa in rete delle attività commerciali” - B5.2.1 “processi di internazionalizzazione rivolti a mercati esteri identificati come strategici a livello regionale (es., ‘Progetti Paese, Mercato, Filiera, Distretto) anche a seguito del confronto con il partenariato socio-economico.” - B5.3.2
“realizzazione di partnership internazionali di tipo economico produttivo e commerciale che vedano il coinvolgimento di operatori appartenenti a comunità di lucani all’estero” - B5.3.3
Specific objectives with sectorial specifications
……
……
“Favorire l’internazionalizzazione delle imprese della Basilicata e la promozione dell’integrazione e della cooperazione economica, culturale e istituzionale, transfrontaliera, transnazionale e interregionale.” B5
B5.3 …… Results
AcUons
StarUng point of the research
LISUT
Laboratorio di Ingegneria dei Sistemi Urbani e Territoriali
Laboratory of Urban and Regional Systems Engineering
University of Basilicata
Faculty of Engineering
Department of Architecture, Planning and Transport Infrastructure
Grafo 1: Program structure Asse IV ROP Basilicata 00/06
Specific Objectives
Overall Objective
Results
Actions
ROP Basilicata 2000/2006 analysis
LISUT
Laboratorio di Ingegneria dei Sistemi Urbani e Territoriali
Laboratory of Urban and Regional Systems Engineering
University of Basilicata
Faculty of Engineering
Department of Architecture, Planning and Transport Infrastructure
Grafo 2: Program structure Misure IV.4 / IV.19 ROP Basilicata 00/06
Specific Objectives
Overall Objective
Results
Actions
LISUT
Laboratorio di Ingegneria dei Sistemi Urbani e Territoriali
Laboratory of Urban and Regional Systems Engineering
University of Basilicata
Faculty of Engineering
Department of Architecture, Planning and Transport Infrastructure
ROP Basilicata 2000/2006 analysis
Grafo 3: Program structure Bando MulUmisura IV.4 / IV.19 ROP Basilicata 00/06
Specific Objectives
Overall Objective
Results
Actions
LISUT
Laboratorio di Ingegneria dei Sistemi Urbani e Territoriali
Laboratory of Urban and Regional Systems Engineering
University of Basilicata
Faculty of Engineering
Department of Architecture, Planning and Transport Infrastructure
ROP Basilicata 2000/2006 analysis
Knowledge management
vs planning process
LISUT
Laboratorio di Ingegneria dei Sistemi Urbani e Territoriali
Laboratory of Urban and Regional Systems Engineering
University of Basilicata
Faculty of Engineering
Department of Architecture, Planning and Transport Infrastructure
Building knowledge process: conceptualizaUon
LISUT
Laboratorio di Ingegneria dei Sistemi Urbani e Territoriali
Laboratory of Urban and Regional Systems Engineering
University of Basilicata
Faculty of Engineering
Department of Architecture, Planning and Transport Infrastructure
Ontological approach
Ontology: “a model allowing to develop an abstract and symplified representation of reality
In our view the ontology is a tool for developing and manage a reasoned representation of reality according with explicit tasks
LISUT
Laboratorio di Ingegneria dei Sistemi Urbani e Territoriali
Laboratory of Urban and Regional Systems Engineering
University of Basilicata
Faculty of Engineering
Department of Architecture, Planning and Transport Infrastructure
Main components of ontology
LISUT
Laboratorio di Ingegneria dei Sistemi Urbani e Territoriali
Laboratory of Urban and Regional Systems Engineering
University of Basilicata
Faculty of Engineering
Department of Architecture, Planning and Transport Infrastructure
• CONCEPTS • ASSIOMI (definitions) • ATTRIBUTES • RELATIONS
• Taxonomic • Not-taxonomic
• RESTRICTIONS
ReDO
LISUT
Laboratorio di Ingegneria dei Sistemi Urbani e Territoriali
Laboratory of Urban and Regional Systems Engineering
University of Basilicata
Faculty of Engineering
Department of Architecture, Planning and Transport Infrastructure
LISUT
Laboratorio di Ingegneria dei Sistemi Urbani e Territoriali
Laboratory of Urban and Regional Systems Engineering
University of Basilicata
Faculty of Engineering
Department of Architecture, Planning and Transport Infrastructure
Phases Description Output 1 Domain definition Identification of ontology “scope”. According to main questions described
above, we defined the domain including the relevant aspects of EU OPs management and evaluation: components, actors, policies, tools, etc.
Domain
2 Concept identification
According to ontology structure, a team of experts (technicians and scientists) identified the relevant concepts for ReDO purposes after an analysis of 2007/2013 POs (PO ERDF Basilicata, PO ERDF Puglia, PO ERDF Campania - Italy).
Concept list (about 110 concepts)
3 Thesaurus For each concept, the research team identified the pertinent definition using accredited sources. The result is a glossary (thesaurus) and it represents the first operative output of the process.
Thesaurus (about 110 concepts and definitions)
4 Extraction of ontology classes from thesaurus
Within the whole thesaurus, the research team defined the ontology classes through a pear to pear negotiation.
Classes (61 ReDO classes)
5 Taxonomy development
The 61 classes have been organized in a taxonomy: a hierarchical structure based on the taxonomic relation “IS_A”
Taxonomy
6 Application of attributes and restrictions to each class
Attributes and restrictions allow to realize an operative characterization of a class. The definition itself is an attribute of a class. Attributes correspond to data/information required for the individuals of the class. Restrictions are rules for class population.
Attributes Restrictions
7 Definition of relations among classes
Relations among classes allowed to represent procedures and functions connected to the management and the evaluation of OPs
Relations
8 Ontology population After the construction of the ontological structure a very important step is the population of the ontology. It is the phase of operative representation of the domain in ReDO knowledge management tool.
Instances
ReDO
LISUT
Laboratorio di Ingegneria dei Sistemi Urbani e Territoriali
Laboratory of Urban and Regional Systems Engineering
University of Basilicata
Faculty of Engineering
Department of Architecture, Planning and Transport Infrastructure
ReDO & ROPs
LISUT
Laboratorio di Ingegneria dei Sistemi Urbani e Territoriali
Laboratory of Urban and Regional Systems Engineering
University of Basilicata
Faculty of Engineering
Department of Architecture, Planning and Transport Infrastructure
ReDO & ROPs
LISUT
Laboratorio di Ingegneria dei Sistemi Urbani e Territoriali
Laboratory of Urban and Regional Systems Engineering
University of Basilicata
Faculty of Engineering
Department of Architecture, Planning and Transport Infrastructure
10 Francesco Scorza, Giuseppe Las Casas, Angelo Carlucci
Fig.6 Program Content Structure
Using the previous classes we represent the five ROPs. In the following figure is proposed an output of the representation. Each trees represents one program.
At the end of the study we obtained an ontology with more than six hundred items: a very complex network (see fig. 8). At this step the useful ontological tools provided by protégé helped to interrogate the network producing comparative results. In the figure 9 it is presented an example of query through protegé query tool.
Fig.7 Regional Operative Programs
ReDO & ROPs
LISUT
Laboratorio di Ingegneria dei Sistemi Urbani e Territoriali
Laboratory of Urban and Regional Systems Engineering
University of Basilicata
Faculty of Engineering
Department of Architecture, Planning and Transport Infrastructure
Onto-planning: innovation for regional development planning within EU convergence framework 11
Fig.8 ReDO Complex Network
Fig.9 ReDO Query
ReDO & ROPs
LISUT
Laboratorio di Ingegneria dei Sistemi Urbani e Territoriali
Laboratory of Urban and Regional Systems Engineering
University of Basilicata
Faculty of Engineering
Department of Architecture, Planning and Transport Infrastructure
Onto-planning: innovation for regional development planning within EU convergence framework 11
Fig.8 ReDO Complex Network
Fig.9 ReDO Query
Conclusions • A tested procedure for ontology design, methodological
remarks regarding the role of users (or stakeholders) interacUon in the process of building-‐up the ontology
• PerspecUves: integraUon in SDI • The ontological representaUon of the program gives
important contribuUon: – to control – to evaluate the program structure logic.
LISUT
Laboratorio di Ingegneria dei Sistemi Urbani e Territoriali
Laboratory of Urban and Regional Systems Engineering
University of Basilicata
Faculty of Engineering
Department of Architecture, Planning and Transport Infrastructure
Thanks
Ing. Francesco Scorza
PhD Student at University of Basilicata -‐ Faculty of Engineering Department of Architecture, Planning and Transport Infrastructure (DAPIT) Laboratory of Urban and Regional Systems Engineering (LISUT) Viale dell’Ateneo Lucano, 10 85100 Potenza – Italy
www.lisut.org francesco.scorza@unibas.it Skype: francescoscorza Tel: 0039.347.7001363
top related