nic robotics progress report two - sgn progress report two ... ade from s hnical cons ject is to d...
Post on 07-Jun-2018
218 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
2
Contents
1 Document Control .................................................................................................................................. 3
2 Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................ 4
2.1 Risks to Project Delivery .............................................................................................................................. 5 2.2 Learning Summary ....................................................................................................................................... 7
3 Project Managers Report ........................................................................................................................ 8
3.1 Previous Six Months – 19.06.2014 to 19.12.2014 ....................................................................................... 9 3.2 Targets for the next six months – 19.12.2014 – 19.06.2015 ..................................................................... 14
4 Consistency with Full Submission ......................................................................................................... 18
5 Risk Management ................................................................................................................................ 18
6 Successful Delivery Reward Criteria ...................................................................................................... 19
7 Learning Outcomes .............................................................................................................................. 19
7.1 Dissemination ............................................................................................................................................ 20
8 Business Case Update ........................................................................................................................... 23
9 Progress against Plan ............................................................................................................................ 23
10 Progress against Budget ..................................................................................................................... 24
11 Bank Account ..................................................................................................................................... 25
12 Intellectual Property Rights ................................................................................................................ 27
13 Other .................................................................................................................................................. 27
13.1 Company Rebranding .............................................................................................................................. 27
14 Accuracy Assurance Statement ........................................................................................................... 28
Appendix A – ULC Progress Report…………………………………………………………………………………………………………29
Appendix B – RPS Progress Report…………………………………………………………………………………………………………44
Appendix C – Risk Register – v2.2 – 10.12.2014…………………..…………………………………………………………….……62
Appendix D – ULC Progress Report…………………………………………………………………………………………………………68
4
2 Ththsupa
Thfol
Thattto
Siprde
Thiddeapsplailea
Ath
Project
Execue purpose oe 19th June mmary of thrtner, and R
e aim of the lowing func
Element 1 repair and i
Element 2 for tier 2 a
Element 3
Element 4
e project aitempt to recustomers.
nce the last oject plan aliverables is
Successful
Creation of
Creation of
The projectblog facilit
Promotion
Manufactu
e past six mentifying kesign of the propriate vecifications d out in the ading compa
nother key ae robotic pla
Progress Rep
tive Sumf this docum2014 and thee progress mPS as the tec
Robotics protions:
– Developmenspection de
– Developmend tier 3 pipe
– Robotic vis
– Automated
ms to realise duce traffic co
project progrnd budget, sushown below
delivery of SD
detailed des
both the init
website has
of the projec
re of a test ri
onths have s suppliers anoperating sysendors who aand the targeproject plannies have be
rea has beentform and th
port Two
mmary ent is to re key deliveramade from Schnical cons
oject is to d
ent of a robevices for ti
ent of an intee
ual and non
d live asset r
the benefitongestion,
ress report uccessfully dw, a breakd
DRC9.3 – Sou
sign and fab
tial concept
s been publi
ct at the 20
ig and pipe
seen the prond the requistem. One oare capable oet price. Thi. Multiple veen brought
n the develohe repair m
ort on the pables over tGN, with subultant.
evelop a rob
tic ‘platformer 2 and tier
ernal mecha
‐visual inspe
eplacement
s of these mverall excav
was publisheelivering eacown of each
urce Vendo
rication spec
ual designs,
shed and con
4 Low Carbo
samples sou
ject progressrements of tf the most cof supplying s has been aendors were in to the pro
pment from codule develo
rogress the he next six bsequent re
otic system
m’ and launc3 pipe
nical joint in
ction
for distribut
ethods on cation foot p
d the projecch milestoncan be foun
r for Sensors
cification for
and subseq
ntains all pr
on Network
rced from th
s from the inhe system, tritical aspecthe types ochieved sucidentified foject.
conceptual dped under E
project has mmonths of theports from U
to be used i
h system to
stallation m
ion services
ertain gas oprint, inspecti
t has progree and targetsd throughou
(E3)
the robotic
uent 3D desig
oject detail,
and Innovati
e live netwo
nitial researchrough to tts of the prof sensors reqcessfully andollowing a wo
designs thro1 & E2, show
made since te project. TheLC Robotics
n a live gas m
enable deplo
odule and
and mains f
erations (tieon time and
ssed as plans listed in PPRt this repor
tool head (E
gn of the lau
a document
on Conferen
ork for contro
h and concehe exciting stject to date wuired in line within the porldwide sea
ugh to the fiwn in Figure
19th
the last subme report conas the princ
main to perf
oyment of m
Weco seal re
or tier 1 mai
er 2‐3 gas m general inc
ned in line R1. A list of .
1 & E2)
unch tube
library, ani
nce (LCNI Co
olled testing
ptual designtage of defiwas to idenwith agreeprojected tiarch, and a n
nal fabricati1 below.
h December 2
mission on tains a iple project
orm the
odular
pair method
ns
ains) in an onvenience
with the the key
mations and
nference)
phases, ning the tify d mescales umber of
on design of
2014
f
7
2.In anprdide
NdeInbu(hev
Project
2 Learninline with PPd external. oject results ssemination monstratin
otable dissetail on all asternal sharinsiness throuttp://www.lent.
Progress Rep
ng SummaR1, the projeThe goal of thand methodmodes, ensug the way kn
mination actipects of the g with key cogh bimonthlcniconferenc
port Two
ary ect learning he project dds. The plan uring transpnowledge is
vities since project, a blontacts inclly steering grce.org/) and
outcomes wsseminationdetails the farency and edisseminate
PPR1 includeog facility auding the staroup meetinpresentatio
ill be dividen plan is to eormat and tieffective cod between t
e the creationd links to coakeholder tegs. Attendan of the proj
d into two cansure accesmescales of
mmunication hese two gr
n and publicontact the pram and key dnce at the LCect in the Cu
tegories of dsibility to, anthe internal with all stak
oups can be s
ation of the roject team department CNI Conferenustomer Imp
19th
disseminatid dissemina and externkeholders. A see on page
website, cowith any quheads thronce acts session
h December 2
on: internal tion of the al plan 20.
ntaining eries. ughout the
at the
2014
17
IdScA utimmRi
To arthfoanas
Project
entify how tore (MRPS) key outcomlised to proanagement pains across sk Model.
ensure the ranged a woe types of dr Tier 2 & 3 y immediatset life.
Progress Rep
he data provpackage e of the projevide a true reprocess similGB will need t
Figure 19
project teamrkshop with ata currentlymains. The me action is req
port Two
vided by the
ect is to deteflection of ar to the Mto be create
9 – Graphical
m have a firkey asset in, and where
model will nequired to rem
e sensor payl
ermine how tasset conditiRPS (Mains Rd. Figure 19
summary of
m understantegrity enginthe data caped to give a mediate pip
load can be
the data beion. A methRisk Prioritisshows the
f the main
ding of how neers from Sptured by thclear indicae barrel, an
integrated i
ng produceod of integraation Score) ey factors th
MRPS risk mo
the existing rGN and its exe sensor pation of the led the frequen
n to the Mai
d by the sensting the dataused for Tierhat currently
del for Tier 1
risk model wxternal consckage can infvel risk assoncy of future
19th
ins Prioritis
sor module a in to an asr 1 (2” to 8” contribute
1 pipes
works, SGN hultants to difluence a siociated with e surveys to
h December 2
ation Risk
can be set metallic) to the MRPS
ave scuss how
milar model the asset, if prolong the
2014
S
18
4 At w
5 At nube Se Oreby vepr Ca Ocoansea thE3 O As plchlo La FoEliteUprcado
1h
Project
Consisthis stage oebsite1.
Risk this stage omber of chalow:
lection of v
ne of the higmotely in thULC in to thndors has rocess and th
pabilities of
ne of the mommunicatiod the sensoparate the ospecialised te design of operations.
peration of t
mentioned atforms has ange has bewest rating.
unch tube d
r early versiements 1, 2 m due to theLC from the ovided confilculated. Thecumentatio
ttps://www.o
Progress Rep
tency wf the project
Managemf the project nges have b
endors for se
hest risks to e challenginge available tesulted in sate chosen tec
the tether fo
st challenginn, consumabr module in operation of tether for eaceach tether hBoth remain
he Robot in a
above, the dresulted in cen documen
evelopment
ons of the ris& 3. For reviee criticality oLarge CISBOTdence that te next key ren has been p
fgem.gov.uk/o
port Two
with Fulthere are n
ment there are neen made si
nsors – Orig
the project g environmetechnology atisfactory michnology ca
or E1, E2 &
ng aspects ofble supply aone tether. the repair mch function has been divin low risk it
a live gas ma
decision to shanges to tted in the ri
– Original Sc
sk register tew v1.9 it wof the launcT operation, he final desieview of the produced in
ofgem‐public
l Submio variances
o risks abovnce the last
inal Score 10
at its comment of a live gnd supplierstigation of thn be found i
E3 – Original
f the tether nd functionahe complexodule and sewhich share ded in to tms.
ain – Origina
eparate the ohe complexitsk register, b
core – Risk n
he launch tuas agreed thh tube on thand the delign will operalaunch tube January 2015
ations/84774/
ssion to the Full S
e the green, PPR submis
0 – Current
encement wgas main, to s, and the suhe risk and an the Projec
Score 5 – C
design is col strength toity of the teensor modulkey charactwo separate i
l Score 8 –
operation oy of the desbut no chan
ot listed as
be specificaat this item e system opevery of the ate effectivwill be con5.
/gasnicsubmi
ubmission do
low risk catesion, a sum
Score 5
as the abilitythe agreed tbsequent se reduction int Managers R
urrent Score
mbining all o cover the fther design we to two seeristics to be tems on the
Current Score
f the repair aign and the oge has been m
a standalone
ion was coveneeded to beration. The 3D design foely. As a resuducted when
ssionfromsco
ocument pub
egory on the mary of the m
y to identify aarget price. Tlection of prn its score. DReport sectio
s 5
f the requireunctionality owas a key facparate transdeveloped. register, item
e 8
nd sensor moperation of made to the
item – Cur
ered by the de listed on thexperience gr the launch lt; a low ris the detailed
tiagasnetwork
19th
blished on th
project risk main change
a technologThe researcrimary and sDetail of the on.
ed power, of the repairctor when dport platforTo cover them 22 for E2,
module betweach procerisk score
ent Score 4
design capahe register agained by botube by UL level has bd manufactu
ks‐robotics.p
h December 2
he Ofgem
register. A s are listed
y to be used h conducted econdary selection
r module eciding to ms, allowing e change, and 23 for
een two ss. This which is at its
bilities for s a separateoth SGN and C has een ring
df
2014
19
6 ThOfse
Tprre
S
9.
9.
9.
9.
9.
9.
9.
9.
Th
ht
7 Thmopnawith
At thjeanplfo
Fiin
Project
Succee SDRC 9.1 gem on 27th ction of this
he next SDRoject progreport or any
DRC
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
e full SDRC
tps://www.
Learnie main outpethods to asportunities tional and inll be dissemie project.
present a lae IPR conditiopardise the d SGN. This anned after tund in secti
gure 21 sumternally and
Progress Rep
ssful Dereport was suJuly 2014. Areport.
C due, reportss report. Atof the remain
Due
28/03/2014
14/12/2015
27/08/2014
03/08/2015
17/04/2017
04/12/2015
04/12/2015
13/10/2017
breakdown c
ofgem.gov.uk
ng Outcuts of this prsess and remgenerated bynternational nated so tha
rge proportions concerncommercialhas been facthe expectedon 12 of this
marises the kexternally.
port Two
livery uccessfully sA summary o
t 9.4 will be s this time thning SDRC’s.
Descriptio
Developm
Developm
Source ve
Configura
Tapping a
Launch rob
Launch rob
Launch rob
can be viewe
k/ofgem‐pu
comes roject are thmediate the ey this projecstandard boat the techno
on of the ding the desi aspects of tctored in to td approval dreport.
key learning
eward ubmitted of the conten
submitted inere are no o
n
ent of conc
ent of conc
ndor for sen
ion of testin
nd fitting too
bot (Elemen
bot (Elemen
bot (Elemen
Figure 2
d using this
blications/8
e technical existing gas dt are succesdies, acadeology can be
sign work angn. Dissemihe system, the Stakeholate of the pa
outcomes t
Criterian 25th April 2t of SDRC9.
n August 201outstanding
eptual desig
eptual desig
sor (Elemen
g with robo
ol validation
t 1&2)
t 3)
t 4)
0 – Table of
link below:
5427/projec
and engineedistribution sfully dissemia, local au incorporat
nd specificatnation of thiand impact der engageatents. An u
o date, and
014 and SDR3 can be foun
5 (see Figurerisks which c
ns (Element 1
n (Element 4
t 3)
tic platform
(Element 4)
SDRCs
tdirectionfor
ring knowlenetwork. The
minated for Gthorities aned by all GB G
ion can’t be s informationon the financment plan, pdate on the
how they hav
RC 9.3 was sund in the Pro
e 20) and covould impact
1&2)
)
(Element 3)
roboticsincl.
dge gained werefore it is eB GDN’s, thed other key stGDNs upon s
shared with n prior to pacial return to ith the majo IPR conditio
ve been dis
19th
uccessfully soject Manag
vered in the on the deliv
Statu
.projectplanv
whilst researessential the wider gas takeholderssuccessful c
external patent approvo the GB gas ority of key eons of the pr
eminated bo
h December 2
ubmitted to ers Report
next very of this
s
Submitted
On target
Submitted
On target
On target
On target
On target
On target
v2.pdf
ching new at learning community, . Learning ompletion of
rties due to al could consumer vents roject can be
oth
2014
e
20
Ke
D
Re
D
Se
Pr
In
N
St
Pu
Pr
In
Ex
LCto
Pu
Pu
Pr
7.Thhuto thpr
Project
y Learning O
evelopment o
search into
evelopment o
paration of
actical testi
ternal Disse
aming comp
eering grou
blication of
ovision of ro
novation pie
ternal Disse
NI Conferengas industry
blication of
blication of
ovision of ro
1 Dissee project tegely succesa wide rangee general reesenting the
Progress Rep
Outcomes
of launch tub
sensor suppl
of a tether g
the sensor an
ng of a transp
mination
etition – eng
p meetings –
robotics web
botics email
ce in compa
mination
ce – promoty personnel
reports on O
robotics web
botics email
Figure 21 –
mination am attendedsful and allowe of stakehosponse to the Robotics co
port Two
be conceptu
liers and ap
uide and inc
nd repair m
port platfor
aging with a
to obtain su
bsite – so m
address – to
ny team bri
ing the prog
Ofgem and S
bsite – allow
address – to
– Key learni
d the LCNI cwed the Roblders. The pe project wncept at th
al design
plication of
orporation i
odules into
m to transpo
ll members o
pport from a
embers can a
o provide a d
ef to inform t
ress of the p
GN websites
ing anyone t
o provide a d
ng outcomes
nference alotics team troject team rs one of ent conference
equipment a
nto the laun
distinct oper
rt a ‘payloa
of the busin
all areas of t
access infor
direct line of
the wider b
project and
– highlighti
to access pr
direct line of
s and the wa
ong with theo showcase received pothusiasm and.
nd technolo
ch tube desi
ations with t
d’ inside a liv
ess to submi
he business
mation
communica
usiness
making the p
ng the progr
oject detail a
communica
ys they hav
rest of the Ia project ovsitive and cod interest. Fi
gy in a live ga
gn
heir own tet
e gas main
t a name for
tion to the p
roject team
ess to date
nd view prog
tion to the p
e been dissem
nnovation terview and anstructive fgure 22 show
19th
as main
ther
r the robot
project team
available fo
gress
project team
minated
eam. This evan info‐film teedback frows the Proje
h December 2
r inquiries
ent was o reach out m GDNs and ct Manager
2014
22
NThww
PrcatwJulLethbeot
SpD
Thexbewith
Project
ational Joint e 2014 NJUere awarded orks with ro
ior to the strried out tho excavatioy 2014 utiliarning from e systems wincorporather network
eaking at thepartment f
is view was pected to into find new ll be througat is needed
Progress Rep
Utility GrouG street workthe prestigio
botics techno
art of the NICe first live fiens in Woolwising the Largethe trial andhich are beined whenevers to assist wi
e NJUG Awaor Transport,
echoed by Bcrease by 43ways of minh innovation to do this.”
port Two
p (NJUG) Aks awards cous Outstanology (Figur
C Robotics pld trial of thich, London. e CISBOT syd the commeng developer possible in ith use of th
rds, Robert G described
ob Gallienn3 per cent, sonimising disrand collabo
Figure 23 –
wards eremony wading Contribe 24).
Figure 2
roject, SGN we system. ThThe successtem on Castrcialisation d under the the design ofe system.
Goodwill Mobotics as a
e, NJUG CEO o the challenuption to roaration, and I
the Robotic
s held at the bution to Str
24 – NJUG A
worked withe aim was ts of the trial t Iron main sof a robotic NIC project hf the syste
P, the Parlia‘game‐chan
who said: “ge facing utad users. Th believe SG
s website
House of Coeet Works aw
wards
ULC on the o remediate led to a 9.1kizes from 18platform whhas been ext
m. All of the k
mentary Undger’.
Between 201ilities, local e only way thN’s CISBOT sy
ommons in Nward for prev
NIA Large CI370m of 24”m commerci” to 30” acrich shares optremely benenowledge ha
er‐Secretary
10 and 2040authorities anhe industry wystem will d
19th
November anvious and on
SBOT projec” Cast Iron pial package oss SGN’s nperational sieficial and leas been shar
y of State at
, traffic on ond their conwill meet thieliver the st
h December 2
nd SGN n‐going
ct and ipe from starting in etwork. milarities to arning will red with the
the
ur roads is tractors will s challenge ep‐change
2014
23
ReFodeGiNpr
Thhide
A
8 At rech
9 At Re
ThhiRo
BoPP
Project
view and Sr the 2014 velop a robven the succGT asked ouojects.
e SGN NIC rghlighting thtermine ass
copy of the l
Businpresent theport, or the anges will b
Progrepresent the ports from
e RPS reportghlights any botics has a
oth of these R Summary
Progress Rep
upport of NaNetwork Innootics solutioness of SGN wr company to
obotics teamere will the pet integrity a
etter sent to
ess Casere are no chatarget pricese required.
ess againproject is prboth RPS and
t condenses concerns or lso provided
reports can bReport).
port Two
tional Grid Tovation Comn to perform with roboticso review thei
m reviewed thpotential foand our willin
o NGT can b
e Updatanges to thes set. The Ro
nst Plarogressing ind ULC Roboti
and summaareas of int a condense
be found in
Transmissiopetition Natthe survey a
s previously, r proposal
he proposal r some sharngness to sh
e found in th
e business cabotics team
n line with thcs confirm t
rizes the PPRerest in the pd report as
Appendix B (
n 2014 NIC ional Grid Trand maintenand in winnnd ensure t
document aed learning, are this info
e appendice
se that was believes tha
e project sche successf
R from their project they the principal
RPS PPR Sum
Bid ransmission ance of higing funding here is no du
nd issued wparticularly irmation wh
s of this repo
submitted int over the ne
hedule agreul progressio
point of viewfeel needs tproject par
mmary Repo
(NGT) submih pressure trfor this projeuplication wit
ritten suppon relation to en appropria
ort (Appendi
n the full suext six mont
ed as part of n of the pro
w as our techo be monitortner.
rt) and App
19th
itted a propansmission ect for the 2th funding f
rt for the N the sensorsate.
ix D).
mission proh reporting
the project ject to date.
hnical consured closely.
endix A (ULC
h December 2
osal to pipelines. 013 NIC bid, or the two
GT’s project, used to
‐forma period; no
direction.
ltants and ULC
Robotics
2014
27
1In onnoke
As plUwi
SGcothre
1
1ThThco
Thwiw
Project
2 Intellaccordance intellectual t have any IPy parts of th
reported in atform (EleSPTO on the ll be assigne
N are commnsumer. Wite IPR is not gistered, SG
3 Othe
3.1 Compe business hese rebrandmparing the
e robotics pth the new ebsite was d
Progress Rep
ectual Pwith the Gasproperty rigPR to report e system is c
the previousment 1), repa30th of Aprild to SGN.
mitted to protth this in minat risk. This hN will proact
r
any Rebraas begun theing guideline logos shown
roject team brand to provelayed to allo
port Two
Properts Network Inghts (IPR) beion. Additiocompleted.
s period, a pir module (El 2014. In ac
tecting the Ind we are cohas been builtively dissem
anding e rollout of es formed thn in Figure 2
Figure 29
is working vide a clear, ow it to be l
y Rightnovation Cng pursued fnal filings ar
rovisional palement 2) anccordance w
PR of the prntrolling thet in to the Stinate detail
he new brae basis for th9
– The SGN a
ith the businconsistent maunched wit
s ompetition Gfor the proje anticipate
atent applicand sensor mith the NIC
oject which e level of dettakeholder where appr
nd which wilhe project l
nd Robotics
ness to ensumessage for h the rebra
overnance Dect. In this red in early 20
ation for the odule (ElemeProject Agre
will potentiaail released Engagement opriate.
l be ongoingogo develop
new brandin
re that all cour stakeholnded SGN we
Document, Ueporting per15 when th
selected coent 3) has bement, the
lly be of greain to the pubplan, and as
over the nment. This ca
ng logos
ommunicatioders. The puebsite in Nov
19th
ULC Robotics riod, ULC Robe final desig
ncept of the een filed witon‐provision
at benefit tblic domain s soon as pa
xt couple of an be seen b
on material iublication of vember 201
h December 2
will report botics does n of several
transport h the nal patent
o the GB gas to ensure tents are
years. y
s in‐keeping the project 4.
2014
9 Dec 2014
Conten
Revision
Referenc
Executive
Summary
Eleme
Launch
Eleme
Consisten
Risk Man
Progress
Key Learn
Eleme
Eleme
| Project Progre
nts
History ........
ced Documen
e Summary ...
y of Progress
nt 1&2 .........
h System ......
nt 3 ..............
ncy with Full
nagement .....
Against Plan
ning Outcome
nt 1&2 .........
nt 3 ..............
CONFIDENTess Report Conten
.....................
ts .................
.....................
by Element ..
.....................
.....................
.....................
Submission ..
.....................
& Budget .....
es .................
.....................
.....................
TIAL INFORMnt for SGN
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
......................
MATION – NO
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
OT FOR PUBLI
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
IC RELEASE
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
.....................
1
................ 2
................ 2
................ 3
................ 4
................ 4
................ 4
................ 4
................ 5
................ 5
................ 5
................ 6
................ 6
.............. 10
9 Dec 2014
ExecuThe objetechnolorepair lemanagemproject, Uhas beento date stakehold
ULC Roboreport (JuSince theon schedfollowingaccomplimodule being masensor tfinalized.completeretrievingthe launc The projereport, amanagerelectricalbeing uti
| Project Progre
tive Sumective of the ogies which caeaking mechment processULC Roboticsn matured froare a direct ders, namely
otics has beeune 2014), ale start of the dule, which nog the submissished in this r(Element 2) anufactured. esting has ta. The manued the initial g the roboticch system wil
ect is fully stan additional
r. All team ml engineer shilized as well
CONFIDENTess Report Conten
mmary NIC Robotic
an operate inanical joints ses by provids is excited toom concept t
result of an SGN, the pro
n under contl milestones wproject and
ow includes tsion of this rereporting perhave been c The researc
aken place, ufacturing of design of the
c system froml also start in
affed with deengineer was
members are hould be join on an as ne
TIAL INFORMnt for SGN
cs project is side live gas d
and failed ding enhance
o report that to prototype
excellent leoject sponsor
ract since Febwere achieveas of the datwo SDRC mileeport. Includriod. The detompleted anch for the sevendors werthe sensor
e launch system the live gas
early 2015.
edicated engis added to thfull-time and
ning the teameeded basis.
MATION – NO
to develop ndistribution mWeco seals,
ed inspectiona new, innovmanufacturinvel of collaband RPS, the
bruary 2014. ed on schedulte of this repoestones. The
ding the SDRCtailed design
nd the prototensor modulere selected arobot will be
em which is re mains during
ineering pershe team, whicd dedicated tm soon. Add
A detailed s
OT FOR PUBLI
new, cutting mains. This ne, but will an capabilities
vative and comng. The succ
boration and project tech
Since the sule, including Sort, all fourte
ere are two mC, several sign
of the transptype system e (Element 3and the sensegin as scheesponsible fog normal dai
sonnel. Sincech now consiso the NIC Ro
ditional resouummary of t
IC RELEASE
edge robotiew technologlso support s. In the firmmercially viess and achieattention tonical service
ubmission of tSDRC 9.3 (Soueen milestone
more milestonnificant technport platformfor 24” diam) was complsor robot deduled in ear
or safely and ely operations
e the submissst of a total o
obotics projecurces such asthe project’s
c repair and gy will not on
the pipe frrst nine moniable robotic evements of
o detail from provider.
the last projeurce Vendor fes have beenes for 2014 t
nical achievemm (Element 1)meter mains
eted, severaesign is currerly 2015. ULefficiently laus. The manuf
sion of the laof six engineect. An additi sensor consprogress and
3
inspection ly remotely
racture risk nths of this
technology the project all project
ect progress for Sensor).
n submitted hat are due ments were ) and repair is currently l rounds of ently being LC has also unching and facturing of
ast progress ers and one onal senior
sultants are d upcoming
9 Dec 2014
objectiveof the de
SummElement The deveproblems2014 wadesigneduse of thdiameterplaced foreceived.on sched
Launch SThe deveAfter comconcepturetrievingfacilitate Septembexplore aThe initiathe projethe detadocumen Summary
• I• I• M• D• C• 3• U
Element The deveThe concis currensystem, tmonths o
| Project Progre
es are given inesigns have be
mary of P1&2
elopment of s or areas of s matured, re
d to enter 24”he modular fer gas mains. or all critical l. All fabricat
dule by 13 Feb
System elopment of tmpleting theual design forg the robotic operations w
ber 8th 2014. and improve al design for tect specificatails of the lntation that is
y of Element Initial ElectricInitial 3D DesMechanical SDevelopmentCreation of D3D Design of User Interface
3 elopment of tceptual designntly being finathe robotic syof research, i
CONFIDENTess Report Conten
n this report.een detailed
rogress b
the transpoconcern. Th
eviewed and ” diameter g
eatures of theManufacturilong lead comion of manufbruary 2015.
the launch sy launch syste
r an efficient system. Pot
was also com Following ththe concepts
the launch sysions and wasaunch systes due on the
1&2 Milestoc Schematic Dsign of Transppecification Dt of Conceptu
Detailed FabricMechanical Ce and Contro
the sensor mon of the sensoalized. Throuystem can bento sensor te
TIAL INFORMnt for SGN
. What we’vein all project
by Eleme
ort platform he conceptua
finalized. Thas mains hase system, theng of the repmponents. Mfactured parts
stem is curreem specificatand robust la
tential concepmpleted. The
he acceptancs until an initstem was bees matured thm design in16th of Januar
ones This PeriDesign and Paport Platform,Document Deual Designs (Lcation & MfgComponents l System Des
odule is curreor robot (Elemugh scaling oe configured technology are
MATION – NO
e learned, oumilestone rep
nt
and repair mal design of thhe manufactus been comple robotic systepair robot is cMany custom s will be com
ently on schedtion documeaunching systpts for the suconceptual d
ce of the contial design foen completedrough design
n preparationry 2015.
od (includes arts Selection,, 18 July 2014evelopment (Launch Tube),. Documenta(Launch Tubeign and Progr
ently on schement 1&3) prof key parts ato accommod
eas for Eleme
OT FOR PUBLI
r developmeports.
module is cuhe repair roburing documeeted. Throuem can be cocurrently in and off the s
mpleted, and a
dule with no nt in August tem that will
upporting madesign was prnceptual desigor the systemd in accordann, analysis ann for comple
Launch Syste, 27 June 201
4 Launch Tube) 29 August 20tion (Robotic
e), 21 Novemramming, 26
dule with no resented in Apand effectivedate 12 to 48
ent 3, a down
IC RELEASE
nt approach
urrently on sbot (Element entation for gh scaling of
onfigured to aprogress. Purshelf componall off the she
major proble2014, ULC R
provide a mchinery and e
resented to Sgn work, ULC
m was complece with the red testing. Ueting the ne
em): 4
), 1 August 20014 c Platform), 10ber 2014 December 14
major problepril 2014 was use of the m
8” diameter g-selection pro
and the intric
chedule with1&2) presenta robotic sys
f key parts anaccommodatrchase ordersnents have alelf parts will b
ems or areas Robotics comeans of dispaequipment n
SGN & RPS in C immediateleted in Novemequirements LC is currentecessary man
014
0 October 20
4 (on-schedul
ems or areas s matured, revmodular featgas mains. Afocess was car
4
cate details
h no major ted in April
stem that is nd effective e 12 to 48”
s have been ready been be received
of concern. mpleted the atching and ecessary to London on
ly began to mber 2014. set forth in ly finalizing nufacturing
14
e)
of concern. viewed and ures of the fter several rried out to
rpsgroup.com/ireland
Document Control Sheet
This report takes into account the particular instructions and requirements of the Client. It is provided for sole use of the Client and its professional advisors. Information disclosed should be treated as being strictly private and confidential. Any use which a third party makes of this document, or any reliance on or decisions to be made based on it, is the responsibility of such third parties. No responsibility is accepted by RPS for the use of this Document, in whole or in part, for any other purpose.
Client: SGN
Project Title: Network Innovation Competition (NIC) Robotic Solutions
Document Title: Project Progress Report Update 2
Document No: MDR1025Rp013
Text Pages: 15 Appendices: 0
Rev. Status Date Author(s) Reviewed By Approved By
F02 Final 11
th December,
2014
Ian MacHugh
David Phelan
Mark Phelan
David Phelan
Ciarán Butler
PJ Rudden
Ofgem Project Progress Report Update 2
NIC Robotic Solutions Project Progress Report Update 2
MDR1025Rp013 i
TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................. 1
1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................ 3
2 PROGRESS SUMMARY ...................................................................................................... 4
2.1 ELEMENT 1 .................................................................................................................................... 6
2.2 ELEMENT 2 .................................................................................................................................... 7
2.3 ELEMENT 3 .................................................................................................................................... 7
2.4 ELEMENT 4 .................................................................................................................................... 8
3 KEY LEARNING OUTCOMES ............................................................................................... 9
4 CONSISTENCY WITH FULL SUBMISSION PRO-FORMA ....................................................... 11
5 RISK MANAGEMENT ....................................................................................................... 13
6 KEY TARGETS AND OBJECTIVES FOR THE NEXT 6 MONTHS ............................................... 14
7 CERTIFICATION ............................................................................................................... 15
LIST OF TABLES
Table 2-1: Table of Reports by RPS ........................................................................................................ 4 Table 2-2: Face to Face Project Team Meetings .................................................................................... 6 Table 3-1: Robot Configurations, Entry-hole Requirements & Estimated Launch Tube size ............... 10
NIC Robotic Solutions Project Progress Report Update 2
MDR1025Rp013 2
Finalising the design of the sensor module followed by parts fabrication, assembly and integration with the robotic platform.
Carry out the internal testing of the launch system testing including retrieval & travel testing and seal repair tool testing.
Identify and select suitable live gas mains for use as field trial sites.
NIC Robotic Solutions Project Progress Report Update 2
MDR1025Rp013 3
1 INTRODUCTION
This project progress report provides an update of work completed since the last progress report submitted to Ofgem. The key areas to which RPS is providing an update on are as follows:
Progress of each element against plan and budget;
Key learning outcomes,
Consistency with full submission,
Risk management,
Key objectives for the next six months. RPS input towards robotics innovation development RPS was appointed by SGN in February 2014 to provide a range of services including on the project such as:
Technical review and gap analysis of conceptual designs and manufacturing design against SGN, UK and European Standards and legislation.
Due diligence and project appraisal
Strategic development planning
Provision of technical assessments and advisory services
Provision of support and assistance for the provision of field trial testing.
Assist on technical input for Mains Risk Prioritisation System (MRPS)
Risk management
Multidisciplinary engineering design
NIC Robotic Solutions Project Progress Report Update 2
MDR1025Rp013 8
Extensive consideration has been given to all specifications associated with the sensor module, with parameters requiring additional research and testing being identified.
Existing sensor technologies are being researched in detail and that there is communication with component manufacturers.
SGN has sourced pipe samples and shipped them to United States for testing by ULC. Analysis of the tests carried out will inform the project team of what can/cannot be done including the level of detail (i.e. extent of survey required versus ‘value proposition’) that can be used to inform the MRPS.
Overall, it appears that ULC is progressing well with Element 3. They are managing the sourcing of possible sensor vendors and are currently on schedule. There are a number of key areas the development of the Element 3 must achieve in order to progress:
1. ULC must successfully be able to design a sensor module using the selected sensor technologies that can be commercially reproducible. There are currently a number of unknowns regarding the sensor module mechanical specification that need to be confirmed.
2. Operation of the sensor module will be relevant to SGN’s operational objective with respect to pipe risk management. The overarching goal is to devise a practical sensor module that can identify primary pipe defects that will provide the most informative and meaningful set of measurements to assess mains integrity while meeting the cost target outlined in the Full Submission Pro-forma.
A key risk regarding the sensor module development is to make sure that there is no delay in the project programme as there are a number of reporting milestones to be achieved and the sensor package is due for procurement and testing in March 2015. This is an important Go/No-Go Milestone.
2.4 ELEMENT 4
Element 4 involves automated live asset replacement for smaller distribution pipes. Work is due to begin on this Element in July 2015.
NIC Robotic Solutions Project Progress Report Update 2
MDR1025Rp013 14
6 KEY TARGETS AND OBJECTIVES FOR THE NEXT 6 MONTHS
The key targets for the next six months involve:
1. Fabrication of parts for the robotic platform and joint repair module.
2. Assemble the robotic platform and joint repair module and carry out preliminary functional testing.
3. Develop and assemble the launch system prototype, including completing the final design and parts fabrication stages.
4. Finalise the design of the sensor module.
5. Parts fabrication and assembly of the sensor module and integration with the robotic platform.
6. Carry out the internal testing of the launch system, robotic platform launch including retrieval & travel testing and seal repair tool testing.
7. Identify and select suitable live gas mains for use as field trial sites. This will involve obtaining the necessary permits to conduct the field trials and the meeting the required health & safety criteria.
8. A MPRS workshop will be held to determine how sensor data can be incorporated into the risk model.
9. Structural assessments to be performed to determine the risks associated with installing the launch tube on the gas mains.
10. While no SDRC milestones are scheduled over the next 6 months, there are a number of SDRC milestones in the following 6 month period and consideration will be given to these during the next 6 months to ensure that these are adequately prepared for.
NIC Robotic Solutions Project Progress Report Update 2
MDR1025Rp013 15
7 CERTIFICATION
It has been decided to seek CE marking for both the robotic systems and launch tube developed under this project. This decision was made on the basis that obtaining this marking is a form of quality assurance whereby independent testing confirms that the systems comply with the various applicable European Standards. It will greatly aid the integration of these robotic systems onto the market should this project be successful. The applicable Directives include:
Pressure Equipment Directive (Directive 97/23/EC),
Machinery Directive (Directive 2006/42/EC),
Electromagnetic Compatibility Directive (Directive 2004/108/EC),
Low Voltage Directive (Directive 2006/95/EC),
ATEX Directive (Directive 94/9/EC).
Investigation is currently underway into the Directives to check if the conformity tests are required to be carried out by an independent Notified Body or whether they can be done by the manufacturer. This varies for different Directives. Depending on these requirements, the UK Conformity Assessment Bodies (notified bodies, recognised third party organisations and user inspectorates) will be assessed for each applicable Directive to assess who can best provide the relevant conformity assessment tests.
62
A
Project
ppendi
Progress Rep
x C ‐ Ris
port Two
sk Register – v2.2 ‐ 11.12.2014
19thh December 22014
Scoring Key
16-25 10-15 1-9
Likelih
ood
Impact
Score
Likelih
ood
Impact
Score
1
Insufficient Resources
Insufficient resources assigned to the NIC Project Manager and/or
ULC's Director of Research and Development. SGN unable to
resource personnel for on‐site management and management of
SCO procedures.
Time /
Financial3 3 9
A ‐ Regular resource review at monthly innovation group meeting.
B ‐ Implement and maintain a project programme to monitor deliverables
against the timescales and ensure that any shortage of resources impacting
delivery of the overall project are clearly identified. Review programme at
monthly progress meetings.
C ‐ ULC Robotics to contract additional staff to the project.
D ‐ SGN to identify dedicated resources to undertake site management and
management of SCO procedures.
E ‐ RPS has assigned committed resources to carry out technical advisory of
the NIC Robotics Project.
A‐ SW
B ‐ SW
C ‐ AM
D ‐ AM
E ‐ DP
Ongoing N/A 1 3 3
2
Local Authorities Communication for E1,2&3
SGN unable to obtain notices from Local Authorities to allow work on
the highway.
Time /
Financial2 4 8
A ‐ SGN to liaise with Local Authorities as early as possible to expedite the
process.
B ‐ Input from the SGN Regulation and Corporate Communications Officer
where necessary to support engagement with customers.
A ‐ SW
B ‐ SW & SG10/04/2015 54 1 4 4
3
Local Authorities Communication for E4
SGN unable to obtain notices from Local Authorities to allow work on
the highway
Time /
Financial2 4 8
A ‐ SGN to liaise with Local Authorities as early as possible to expedite the
process.
B ‐ Input from the SGN Regulation and Corporate Communications Officer
where necessary to support engagement with customers.
A ‐ SW
B ‐ SW & SG17/02/2017 228 1 4 4
4
Stakeholder Opposition for Elements 1,2&3
Has the potential to influence the public's perception of the project.
This could lead to a negative response if not handled appropriately;
conversely can result in a very positive response.
Reputation 1 4 4
A ‐ Implement and maintain a stakeholder management plan.
B ‐ Input from the SGN Regulation and Corporate Communications Officer to
ensure high level engagement with customers as early as possible. This will
allow our stakeholders to understand exactly what we are aiming to achieve
and what the benefits are.
A ‐ SW & SG
B ‐ SW & AM &
SG
Ongoing N/A 1 4 4
5
Stakeholder Opposition for Element 4
Has the potential to influence the public's perception of the project.
This could lead to a negative response if not handled appropriately;
conversely can result in a very positive response.
Reputation 1 4 4
A ‐ Implement and maintain a stakeholder management plan.
B ‐ Input from the SGN Regulation and Corporate Communications Officer to
ensure high level engagement with customers as early as possible. This will
allow our stakeholders to understand exactly what we are aiming to achieve
and what the benefits are.
A ‐ SW & SG
B ‐ SW & AM &
SG
Ongoing N/A 1 4 4
6
Technical Issues with Robotic Platform for Elements 1,2&3
Any technical issues when developing the robotic platform could
delay the Project and lead to increased costs. Further issues may
arise if the project timeline begins to slip.
Time /
Financial4 4 16
A ‐ ULC Robotics to divert staff from other aspects of the business to support
the project.
B ‐ Go / No Go Stage Gate at early stages of the project.
A ‐ ULC
B ‐ SW & RPS 10/04/2015 54 1 4 4
By When
Residual Risk
Project Plan Ref
Business Risk
Ref No
Risk
Inherent Risk
Controls & Mitigation Owner
Responsibility Key:AM ‐ Angus McIntosh (SGN)SW ‐ Sam Wilson (SGN)SG ‐ Susan Gray (SGN)DP ‐ Dave Phelan (RPS)MP ‐Mike Passaretti (ULC)
7
Technical Issues with Robotic Platform for Element 4
Any technical issues when developing the robotic platform could
delay the Project and lead to increased costs. Further issues may
arise if the project timeline begins to slip
Time /
Financial4 4 16
A ‐ ULC Robotics to divert staff from other aspects of the business to support
the project.
B ‐ Go / No Go Stage Gate at early stages of the project.
A ‐ ULC
B ‐ SW & RPS 09/01/2017 253 1 4 4
8
Repair Module (Element 2)
Issues that may occur when developing the Repair Module has the
potential to delay the project.
Time /
Financial4 4 16
A ‐ ULC Robotics to divert staff from other aspects of the business to support
the project.
B ‐ Go / No Go Stage Gate at early stages of the project.
A‐ ULC
B ‐ SW & RPS 10/04/2015 48 1 4 4
9
Sensor Module (Element 3)
Issues that may occur when developing the Sensor Module has the
potential to delay the project.
Selection of optimum Sensor.
Sensor Accuracy, Processing Time, Interface & Usefulness.
Sensor Module proposed puts pipe safety at risk
Time /
Financial4 4 16
A ‐ ULC Robotics to investigate optimum solution to satisfy the needs of the
project.
B ‐ Go / No Go Stage Gate at early stages of the project.
A‐ ULC
B ‐ SW & RPS 23/10/2015 160 2 4 8
10
Repairing Leaking Joints
There is a risk that a solution for remotely repairing leaking Weco
seals and mechanical joints will not be determined.
Financial 1 5 5
A ‐ Develop sealing methods and conceptual designs early in the project
schedule to ensure that a method is determined.
B ‐ Shop testing will be performed to ensure that the methodology provides
an adequate seal.
C ‐ Go / No Go Stage Gates added into the project plan in case a solution has
not been determined.
A ‐ ULC
B ‐ ULC
C ‐ SW & RPS03/07/2015 79 1 5 5
11
Sensor Manufacturer Not Found
There is a risk that a sensor manufacturer will not be found which
meets the requirements i.e. functioning and transmitting data
accurately over a long distance, providing accurate measurement of
pipe wall loss, measurements in varying pipe diameters etc.
Time /
Financial2 5 10
A ‐ Generate a report outlining options for sensors and the pros/cons of each
will be performed early in the project.
B ‐ A collaborative decision relative to the sensor selected for the project will
be performed.
C ‐ Go / No Go Stage Gates added into the project plan in case a manufacturer
is not found.
A ‐ SW
B ‐ SW & ULC
C ‐ SW & RPS
06/03/2015 142 1 5 5
12
Sensor Manufacturer
Delays from the sensor manufacturer could affect the overall
schedule.
Time /
Financial3 4 12
A ‐ ULC Robotics to divert staff from other aspects of the business to support
the project. B ‐ Review project plan
if required for sourcing sensor vendor
A ‐ SW
B ‐ SW 06/03/2015 142 2 4 8
13
Technical Issues with Service Replacement
Any unforeseen technical issues with service replacement could
hamper the effectiveness of the robotic system and delay the
Project. For example; identifying custom flexible PE tubing to insert
in the service line, identifying custom fittings for service replacement
and ensuring a reliable and gas tight seal on the newly connected
service.
Time /
Financial4 4 16
A ‐ ULC Robotics to divert staff from other aspects of the business to support
the project.
B ‐ Test robot in mock up main.
C ‐ Go / No Go Stage Gates at early stages of the project.
A ‐ SW
B ‐ SW
C ‐ SW & RPS14/04/2017 247 1 4 4
14
Field Trial Challenges
The mains selected for the field trial are not suitable for the robotic
operation.
Time /
Financial 3 3 9
A ‐ Network Analysis undertaken.
B ‐ Familiarity with site location and mains.
C ‐ Pre inspection of main using camera.
A ‐ SGN
B ‐ SGN & ULC
C ‐ SW & RPS
23/06/2017 267 1 3 3
15Launch Robot for Elements 1,2&3
SGN / ULC Robotics are unable to launch the robot into the main.
Time /
Financial1 5 5
A ‐ Ensure entry tee compatible with launch tube and manufacturer
requirements.
B ‐ Design parameters well defined.
C ‐ Go / No Go Stage Gate at early stages of the project.
A‐ ULC
B ‐ ULC
C ‐ SW & RPS
18/01/2016 80 1 5 5
16Launch Robot for Element 4
SGN / ULC Robotics are unable to launch the robot into the main.
Time /
Financial1 5 5
A ‐ Ensure entry tee compatible with launch tube and manufacturer
requirements. B
‐ Design parameters well defined.
C ‐ Go / No Go Stage Gate at early stages of the project.
A‐ ULC
B ‐ ULC
C ‐ SW & RPS
27/11/2017 253 1 5 5
17
Robot Manoeuvrability E1,2&3
There is a risk that a motor drive system capable of transporting the
robotic system for each element cannot be developed.
Financial 2 4 8
A ‐ ULC have significant experience developing and deploying complex
electromechanical systems in live natural gas mains and other inaccessible
locations.
B ‐ Ability to apply past engineering knowledge along with computer
modelling and simulation to guide the conceptual design of the robotic
platform drive system.
C ‐ Go / No Go Stage Gates added into the project plan in case a solution has
not been determined.
A‐ ULC
B ‐ ULC
C ‐ SW & RPS
06/02/2015 74 1 4 4
18
Robot Manoeuvrability E4
There is a risk that a motor drive system capable of transporting the
robotic system for each element cannot be developed.
Financial 2 4 8
A ‐ ULC have significant experience developing and deploying complex
electromechanical systems in live natural gas mains and other inaccessible
locations.
B ‐ Ability to apply past engineering knowledge along with computer
modelling and simulation to guide the conceptual design of the robotic
platform drive system.
C ‐ Go / No Go Stage Gates added into the project plan in case a solution has
not been determined.
A‐ ULC
B ‐ ULC
C ‐ SW & RPS
09/09/2016 241 1 4 4
19
Structural Assessment
Risk associated with the Launch Tube and the structural integrity of
the pipe condition to take loads.
Time /
Financial1 4 4
A ‐ RPS to carry out assessment with review from Structural Engineers.
Structural Assessment takes into account maximum loads in ideal scenarios
and then provides assumptions that affect maximum loads (for example wall
thickness & unsupported pipe lengths).
B ‐ ULC to agree and be satisfied with assumptions.
A‐ RPS
B ‐ ULC 09/01/2015 N/A 1 4 4
20
Robotic Functionality For E1,2&3
There is a risk that the technology developed cannot be operated at
the target length of 150 meters or manoeuvre around debris,
obstacle and bends.
Financial 2 4 8
A ‐ Utilise 3D modelling and simulation techniques throughout the design to
determine the estimated travel distance and ability to manoeuvre within the
pipe (launch, retrieve, avoid or travel over/through debris and obstacles,
etc.).
B ‐ Once the manoeuvrability and the overall travel distance for each pipe size
has been determined a decision can be made to pursue one concept, modify
the design to meet the specifications of the project or modify the project
criteria to meet the design limitations.
C ‐ Go / No Go Stage Gates added into the project plan in case a solution has
not been determined.
A‐ SW / ULC
B ‐ SW & ULC
C ‐ SW & RPS
25/09/2015 74 1 4 4
21
Robotic Functionality for E4
There is a risk that the technology developed cannot be operated at
the target length of 150 meters or manoeuvre around debris,
obstacle and bends.
Financial 2 4 8
A ‐ Utilise 3D modelling and simulation techniques throughout the design to
determine the estimated travel distance and ability to manoeuvre within the
pipe (launch, retrieve, avoid or travel over/through debris and obstacles,
etc.).
B ‐ Once the manoeuvrability and the overall travel distance for each pipe size
has been determined a decision can be made to pursue one concept, modify
the design to meet the specifications of the project or modify the project
criteria to meet the design limitations.
C ‐ Go / No Go Stage Gates added into the project plan in case a solution has
not been determined.
A‐ SW / ULC
B ‐ SW & ULC
C ‐ SW & RPS
17/02/2017 245 1 4 4
22
Capabilities of the Tether for Elements 1 & 2
There is a risk that a tether capable of carrying power and data
connections meeting the distance and bend radius requirements
cannot be developed. For example; transmitting data over a long
distance, providing sufficient bend radius, manufacture lightweight
and robust tether to the desired length.
As a result of the design process, it has been determined that the
best course of action is to develop two tethers (one for the sensor
module and one for the repair module).
Financial 2 5 10
A ‐ Deliver a list of conceptual design requirements to cable manufacturers
for quotations early in the project to mitigate against technical and schedule
risk.
B ‐ Experience working with several industrial cable manufacturers to develop
custom, highly specialised tethers for powering and controlling robotic
systems.
C ‐ Conceptual Design Go / No Go Stage Gate added into the project plan at
an early stage in case a solution cannot be determined.
D ‐ ULC are aware of the issue of gas leakage at the gland arrangement of the
large CISBOT launch tube.. This will be factored into conceptual design
E ‐ Developing two tethers will avoid complications with dual functionality
and will be proven through the controlled testing phase of the project
A ‐ SW
B ‐ SW
C ‐ SW & RPS
D ‐ ULC
E ‐ ULC
22/05/2015 71 1 5 5
23
Capabilities of the Tether for Elements 1 & 3
There is a risk that a tether capable of carrying power and data
connections meeting the distance and bend radius requirements
cannot be developed. For example; transmitting data over a long
distance, providing sufficient bend radius, manufacture lightweight
and robust tether to the desired length.
As a result of the design process, it has been determined that the
best course of action is to develop two tethers (one for the sensor
module and one for the repair module).
Financial 2 5 10
A ‐ Deliver a list of conceptual design requirements to cable manufacturers
for quotations early in the project to mitigate against technical and schedule
risk.
B ‐ Experience working with several industrial cable manufacturers to develop
custom, highly specialised tethers for powering and controlling robotic
systems.
C ‐ Conceptual Design Go / No Go Stage Gate added into the project plan at
an early stage in case a solution cannot be determined.
D ‐ ULC are aware of the issue of gas leakage at the gland arrangement of the
large CISBOT launch tube. This will be factored into conceptual design
E ‐ Developing two tethers will avoid complications with dual functionality
and will be proven through the controlled testing phase of the project
A ‐ SW
B ‐ SW
C ‐ SW & RPS
D ‐ ULC
E ‐ ULC
22/05/2015 71 1 5 5
24
Capabilities of the Tether for Element 4
There is a risk that a tether capable of carrying power and data
connections meeting the distance and bend radius requirements
cannot be developed. For example; transmitting data over a long
distance, providing sufficient bend radius, manufacture lightweight
and robust tether to the desired length.
Financial 2 5 10
A ‐ Deliver a list of conceptual design requirements to cable manufacturers
for quotations early in the project to mitigate against technical and schedule
risk.
B ‐ Experience working with several industrial cable manufacturers to develop
custom, highly specialised tethers for powering and controlling robotic
systems.
C ‐ Conceptual Design Go / No Go Stage Gate added into the project plan at
an early stage in case a solution cannot be determined.
D ‐ ULC are aware of the issue of gas leakage at the gland. This will be
factored into conceptual design
A ‐ SW
B ‐ SW
C ‐ SW & RPS
D ‐ ULC
17/02/2017 243 1 5 5
25
Tapping and Fitting Tools
There is a risk that a tapping and fitting tools capable of being carried
and operated by the service replacement robot cannot be
developed.
Financial 2 5 10
A ‐ Tools for service replacement will be identified early in the development
stage of the robotic system.
B ‐ Experience developing a prototype service replacement robot which
performed tapping and fitting of a new service connection on inserted PE
pipe. C ‐ The
entire system will be shop tested at ULC to ensure it performs prior to being
deployed in the field.
D ‐ Tapping and Fitting Tool Validation Go / No Go Stage Gate added into the
project plan in case a solution cannot be determined.
A‐ ULC
B ‐ ULC
C ‐ SW & ULC
D ‐ SW & RPS
12/05/2017 250 1 5 5
26
Cost Escalation
Costs may escalate due to unforeseen circumstances and / or
unknown delays in Programme, procurement, shipping, field trials
etc.
Financial 2 5 10
A ‐ Build sufficient float into Project plan
B ‐ Project has built in Go/No Go Stage Gates to ensure an opportunity to halt
Project at anytime.
A‐ SW / ULC
B ‐ SW & RPSOngoing N/A 1 5 5
27
SME Cash flow
There is a risk that ULC may not have the required cash flow to
complete each task defined on the project plan.
Financial 2 5 10
A ‐ Up front mobilisation payment.
B ‐ Project has built in payment milestones to ensure steady cash flow.
C ‐ Go/No Go Stage Gates added into the project plan at critical points.
A ‐ SW
B ‐ SW & ULC
C ‐ SW Ongoing N/A 1 5 5
28
Timetable Slippage
Timetable may slip due to unforeseen circumstances and / or
unknown delays in procurement, custom and shipping to the UK.
Time /
Financial2 4 8
A ‐ Build sufficient float into Project plan
B ‐ Regular steering group reviews to monitor progress against the
programme
C ‐ If required there is an opportunity to halt programme at Go/No Go Stage
Gates
A ‐ SW & AM
B ‐ SW & AM
C ‐ AM
Ongoing N/A 2 4 8
29
Operation of Robot in a Live Gas Main For Elements 1,2&3
Safety risk ‐ pollution risk from gas leakage and potential for
anaerobic sealant to contaminate moving parts of the robot as well
as debris from inside the main to be spread when removing the
robot. Due to operation in the carriageway, potential risk of impact
from vehicles in the event of a road traffic accident.
Time /
Financial2 4 8
A ‐ Spillage kits available at trial sites
B ‐ Monitor level of debris being removed from main visually using robot
camera
C ‐ ULC to consider the impact of anaerobic contamination on
moving/functional parts of the robot and the associated cleaning that is
required.
D ‐ The operation of E2 & E3 will be performed using two seperate
transportation platforms, reducing design complexity and the possibility of
anerobic contamination to one system.
A ‐ SW & RPS
B ‐ ULC
C ‐ ULC
D ‐ ULC / SGN
25/09/2015 72 2 4 8
30
Operation of Robot in a Live Gas Main For Element 4
Safety risk ‐ pollution risk from gas leakage and potential for debris
from inside the main to be spread when removing the robot
Time /
Financial2 4 8
A ‐ Spillage kits available at trial sites
B ‐ Monitor level of debris being removed from main visually using robot
camera
A ‐ SW & RPS
B ‐ ULC09/01/2017 253 1 4 4
31
Structural Integrity of Pipe Wall
The impact of the pressure applied by the robotic wheels when
operating inside the main could have a detrimental affect on the
integrity of the pipe wall.
Reputation /
Time /
Financial
1 4 4
A ‐ A Structural Assessment will be carried out to mitigate this risk
B ‐ Launch tube operational weight design parameters set for ULC
C ‐ Coupon sample taken from main at initial survey to confirm main material
prior to the launch tube being fitted
A ‐ RPS
B ‐ SW & RPS
C ‐ SW & ULC
10/04/2015 52 1 4 4
32
Launch tube development for Elements 1, 2 & 3. A launch tube
design needs to be developed to facilitate a gas free operation and
ease of use on site. Considerations need to be given to its
manoeuvrability, functionality and the excavation footprint.
Time /
financial1 4 4
A ‐ ULC and SGN to utilise experience gained from Large CISBOT trial and
incorporate improvements into the new design
B ‐ SGN and RPS to assess designs against UK legislation
C ‐ Maximum operating weight of launch tube to be identified as a result of
structural integrity pipe wall report conducted by RPS (30)
A ‐ ULC & SGN
B ‐ SGN & RPS
C ‐ SGN & RPS
16/01/2015 59 1 4 4
33
Communication of Project Team Due to
geographical split of team across UK, Ireland and the USA, there is a
risk that effective communication channels may not be maintained
efficiently.
Time /
Financial1 4 4
A ‐ Face‐to‐face meetings for key stage gate deliverables
B ‐ Use of virtual meeting centre and secure file share
A ‐ SW
B ‐ SWOngoing N/A 1 4 4
34Impact of UK legislation/HSE acknowledgement of remediation
technique.
Time /
Financial3 4 12
A ‐ SGN to set up regular progress meetings with HSE
B ‐ RPS and SGN to check legislative requirements for system operation and
outputs
A ‐ SW & AM
B ‐ RPSOngoing N/A 2 4 8
National National Warwic Gallows WarwicCV34 616 Dece Dear Sir/ Re: Net Thank yo Having shand the technolorobotics approac ourselve It appearNTS and capable challengconducti We do nfollowin
1) 2) 3)
We belieconditiopressuresome leacoming m
Grid TransmiGrid House Technology PHill
DA mber 2014
Madam,
work Innovatio
u for the opp
uccessfully impotential finangy. As you arproject, and ha taken by Nat
s worked with
s that this projall distributio
of inspecting ces. If successfung proactive a
ot think that thg reasons:
Designed for
Designed for
Targeting ins
ve that there mn measuremen involved, therning from the
months and wi
ission
Park
on Competitio
ortunity to c
mplemented rncial, operatire aware, we ave undertakional Grid Tr
h Synthotech o
ject will need on networks bocomplex pipewful however, iand efficient a
his project co
r Unpiggabl
r significantl
spection of
may be an opnt methods. Ae sensors we ae sensor reviewill share the r
on
omment on yo
obotics into loonal and envirhave been recn this in partnansmission in on a robotics a
to develop rooth in the Uwork, operati will potenti lsset managem
nflicts with th
e pipeline co
y higher pre
asset conditio
portunity to shthough the pi
are developingw we have clevant outcom
our NIC proje
ow pressure gronmental beently awardenership with
n their partnersand other inn
obotic technol. The develo
ng at up to 10lly allow the
ment.
e above ment
nfiguration
ssures (100b
on only not
hare some leapeline operat
g as part of ompleted. We
mes.
ct 2014.
as distributionefits associate (2013) NIC f
ULC Roboticsship with Synovation & tech
ogy which is, pment of a ro0barG will fanetwork to op
ioned NIC a
barg)
remediation
rning betweeing environmr NIC project will be subm
SGN St. La Statio Horley Surre RH6 9
pipework, weed with this tyfunding for ou, so can see sithotech and Pr
hnology projec
at present, ubotic inline ince a number oerate at full c
arded to our
or replacem
both projectent will be vermay be appli
itting our SDR
wrence Housn Approach y y 9HJ
e have seen aype of in-pipeur own innovimilarities in remtech. We cts under NI
navailable acrnspection deviof unique and apacity whilst
network for th
ment
s in relations ry different dicable, or therRC 3 report i
e
t first
ative the have
A.
oss the ce complex t
he
to asset ue to the e may be
n the
We woulthe same Similar tconduct demonst Yours Si Angus InnovatiSGN
d also be happfor ours.
o the NTS, ounspection to v
rable data.
ncerely
McIntosh on & New Tec
py to support
ur transmissiovalidate asset
chnology Ma
technical peer
n network is health is criti
nager
r review at th
nearing the encal to maximi
e end of the p
d of its desigsing asset life
roject, and w
n life and as s and extendin
ould invite yo
uch the requirng this asset li
u to do
rement to fe by
top related