nato otan us military representative to nato information exchange in coalition operations “from...

Post on 06-Jan-2018

215 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

DESCRIPTION

NATO SOVIET THREAT US DA NL GE UK BE US GE IT GR TU US TU

TRANSCRIPT

NATONATO

OTANOTAN

US MILITARY REPRESENTATIVEUS MILITARY REPRESENTATIVETO NATOTO NATO

Information ExchangeInformation ExchangeIn Coalition OperationsIn Coalition Operations

““From Guarding to Sharing”From Guarding to Sharing”

1 June 20061 June 2006

LtGen Ed Hanlon, USMCLtGen Ed Hanlon, USMC

EUROPE 1945 - 1990

Threat

NATO 1949 - 1989

SOVIET THREAT

US

DA

NL

GE

UK

BE

US

GE

ITGR TUUS US

TU

Cold War Comms•Static•Robust•Redundant•Oriented on territorial defense•More military than civilian•Heavy reliance on message traffic (TARE, AUTODIN, etc)•Some data comms•Survivable against extreme challenges (EMP, EW)

ARTICLE VARTICLE V

ARTICLE VARTICLE V

•AN ATTACK AGAINST ONE NATO ALLY AN ATTACK AGAINST ONE NATO ALLY IS AN ATTACK AGAINST ALL.IS AN ATTACK AGAINST ALL.

11 Sep 01 12 Sep 01

Kosovo Operation

Current ACE Current ACE OperationsOperations

INTERNATIONAL SECURITY

ASSISTANCE FORCE

2006: A Year of Transition Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF)

andThe International Security Assistance Force (ISAF)

• ISAF Stages 3 and 4• Increased role of NATO / ISAF

in Afghanistan• Increased need for

communications and coordination between OEF and ISAF

Technical Result

• Need for Greater Integration of ISAF and OEF Communications

• Need for increased information exchange

2 Aspects

• Technical Aspect• Policy Aspect

Policy is harder than technics

Information Releasability

• US to OEF Coalition• OEF Coalition to ISAF• NATO to ISAF• ISAF to OEF Coalition

Examples

• Situational Awareness & Locations

• Intelligence• Special Operations

Post Cold War NATO Comms

• Still redundant and robust• Covering greater distances• Deployable• More civilian, less military• Reach back capacity• More data, less voice• Video

Challenge: Will We Remain Ready? Will We Stay Ahead?• What will the world look like in 5, or

10, or 15 years?• How can communications and

technology help meet these challenges?

• How can AFCEA influence the technological developments demanded by future developments?

NATO Future CommsSome Ideas

• Light• Mobile• Quick to install• Hand held• More nodes—plug and play• Voice, data, VTC—all in one small and light

package

US MILITARY US MILITARY REPRESENTATIVEREPRESENTATIVE

TO NATOTO NATO

Information ExchangeInformation ExchangeIn Coalition OperationsIn Coalition Operations

““From Guarding to Sharing”From Guarding to Sharing”

1 June 20061 June 2006

LtGen Ed Hanlon, USMCLtGen Ed Hanlon, USMC

top related