muon preparation for the phase 2 tp
Post on 07-Jan-2016
23 Views
Preview:
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
11-D
e-2
01
3 C
MS
We
ek
“Mu
on
pla
ns
for
the
Ph
ase
2 T
P”
J.
Ha
use
r, U
CL
A
For discussion:
What was shown at the upgrade plenary Weds.
Discuss the outline of the muon TP section Additional thoughts
Muon preparation for the Phase 2 TP1
11-D
e-2
01
3 C
MS
We
ek
“Mu
on
pla
ns
for
the
Ph
ase
2 T
P”
J.
Ha
use
r, U
CL
A
Three main aspects (details in backup slides): Aging studies, replacement
GIF++ tests for CSC and RPC chamber aging, DT components Freon replacement for RPC gas after LS3 DT minicrate replacement
Forward muon trigger and redundancy GE1/1 and GE2/1 based on improved L1 trigger, redundancy in the
most intense region RE3/1 and R4/1: timing for background rejection and PU mitigation
Forward muon tagging extension (ME0) Large eta coverage (~2.1-4.0) for big acceptance, S/N boosts in
modes with muon Hermeticity for modes excluding muons
Recap of muon Phase 2 plans2
11-D
e-2
01
3 C
MS
We
ek
“Mu
on
pla
ns
for
the
Ph
ase
2 T
P”
J.
Ha
use
r, U
CL
A
Proposed at ECFA workshop, Oct. 2013
High Rapidity Muon (HRM) layout
3
11-D
e-2
01
3 C
MS
We
ek
“Mu
on
pla
ns
for
the
Ph
ase
2 T
P”
J.
Ha
use
r, U
CL
A
Mindful of the very compressed timescale … 1 mo (mid-Jan.): Detector
conceptual designs frozen for physics perf.
3 mo (late-March): First draft of sections, plans to complete
5-6 mo (early July): Full draft to internal readers
Organization for the muon part of TP
…muon IB approved yesterday a simple organizational structure just for preparing the muon part of the TP
A single coordinator (JH) for both main aspects: Consolidation of the existing detector High eta detector extensions
Contact persons to coalesce the various aspects of the muon TP Names to be announced in ~1 week
4
CONSOLIDATION roadmap
• Chamber longevity • Radiation tolerance• FE longevity / rate
capability; back-end electronics
• Workplan of tests to be performed; milestones
• Trigger primitive generation
• Expected performance - Pile-Up ; simulations; degradation scenarios
• Cost of interventions
Muon Upgrades TP Coordination
-- Consolidation of existing detector
-- High etadetector extensions
DT
RPC
CSC
5
HIGH ETA EXTENSIONS
• What needs? • What constraints? • Integration in CMS? Si-
Tracking? Calorimetry?• What options? Costs?
Priorities?• Workplan;
organization; schedule
Muon Upgrades TP Coordination
-- Consolidation of existing detector
-- High etadetector extensions Simulation, Physics, trigger
New Detectors and R&D
Electronics R&D
Integration into CMS; infrastructure
Costing
6
Muon Upgrades TP Coordination
-- Consolidation of existing
detector-- High etadetector extensions
DT
RPC
CSC
Simulation, Physics, trigger
New Detectors and R&D
Electronics R&D
Integration into CMS; infrastructure
Costing
Muon Upgrades TP organization
Contact persons supervise the writing of muon TP parts, report to muon TP Coordination
7
11-D
e-2
01
3 C
MS
We
ek
“Mu
on
pla
ns
for
the
Ph
ase
2 T
P”
J.
Ha
use
r, U
CL
A
Modeled somewhat after the organization of the 1994 overall TP for the CMS detector
Integrate this with the organization chart
Pages: Aim for nearly 60 pages on a 1st draft Subsequently fit it into 30 pages as requested Put much information into CMS notes that can be
referenced – needs discussion
TP muon section planning8
11-D
e-2
01
3 C
MS
We
ek
“Mu
on
pla
ns
for
the
Ph
ase
2 T
P”
J.
Ha
use
r, U
CL
A
1. Introduction: main motivation and goals for upgrade, outline of the section ~2 pp
2. Phase 1 detector longevity ~10 pp:2.1 DT (electronics), including R&D needed2.2 CSC (chamber aging), including R&D needed2.3 RPC (gas), including R&D needed
3. High eta detector extensions – overall design ~3 pp3.1 Detailed motivation for new detectors (simulations, trigger)3.2 Design considerations3.3 Detector overview3.4 Infrastructure requirements
4. The GEM detectors within existing coverage (GE1/1, GE2/1) ~4 pp4.1 System overview4.2 GEM detectors4.3 On-chamber electronics4.4 Electronics layout4.5 R&D needed
TP muon section outline (part I)9
11-D
e-2
01
3 C
MS
We
ek
“Mu
on
pla
ns
for
the
Ph
ase
2 T
P”
J.
Ha
use
r, U
CL
A
5. The advanced RPC detectors within existing coverage (RE3/1, RE4/1) ~4 pp5.1 System overview5.2 Advanced RPC detectors5.3 On-chamber electronics5.4 Electronics layout5.5 R&D needed
6. The eta extension ME0 ~3 pp6.1 System overview6.2 High granularity detectors6.3 On-chamber electronics (if different from GE1/1 etc.)6.4 Electronics layout6.5 R&D needed
7. Performance estimates ~2 pp8. Project planning (or does this belong in a later section of the TP
overall?) ~2 pp8.1 Organization8.2 Timescale for R&D and production8.3 Plans towards TDR
9. Cost estimate ~2 pp
TP muon section outline (part II) 10
11-D
e-2
01
3 C
MS
We
ek
“Mu
on
pla
ns
for
the
Ph
ase
2 T
P”
J.
Ha
use
r, U
CL
A
Physics coordination to “drive” the physics discussion for muons
Significant interplay with trigger upgrade section
Significant interplay with endcap calorimeter (geometry, infrastructure)
Need to coordinate with GE1/1 TDR as well as active GEM meetings (as well as muon sim, DT, CSC, RPC meetings)
Coordination11
11-D
e-2
01
3 C
MS
We
ek
“Mu
on
pla
ns
for
the
Ph
ase
2 T
P”
J.
Ha
use
r, U
CL
A
Fill the contact person positions (~1 week) For efficiency, mostly 1 name/box…
some deserving individuals will be left out
Expect to use Monday 5 p.m. General Muon Meeting for A) high eta extension discussions B) existing detector consolidation
discussions Given the schedule, defining
the detector parameters and right simulations is highest priority ME0 is most interesting: space in Z
(thickness), rapidity coverage 2.1-4.0 or ??, number of layers, granularity, polyethylene, steel shielding?
Next steps12
Friday 9:00 in Salle A:a special “phase 2 ad hoc muon” meeting (apologies to Physics plenary):https://indico.cern.ch/conferenceDisplay.py?confId=288056
11-D
e-2
01
3 C
MS
We
ek
“Mu
on
pla
ns
for
the
Ph
ase
2 T
P”
J.
Ha
use
r, U
CL
A
Would like to create “muon phase 2” email list, hypernews forum
Need to optimize meeting-ology Try to avoid existing DT, RPC, CSC, GEM meetings Combine some meetings? Request meeting room space?
Decisions on scope and important branch points: Will be discussed in muon IB, seek unanimity… but upgrade management has decision power (Tiz)
Additionally13
11-D
e-2
01
3 C
MS
We
ek
“Mu
on
pla
ns
for
the
Ph
ase
2 T
P”
J.
Ha
use
r, U
CL
A
Backup slides14
15Longevity of Phase 1 Muon systems
o Measured rates are linearly increasing with luminosity and with a strong η dependence as expected from simulation
o No aging effects have been observed so far - Test have been performed up to 0.3 C/cm - only forward CSC station will exceed
this limit after 3000 fb-1 - new tests including readout will be performed at the GIF++ facility to confirm aging properties of all systems
The muon systems are expected to sustain 3000 fb-1
Integrated charge collected in CSCs after 3000 fb-1
o Construction tests of the radiation damage to FPGAs in the DT read-out indicate that they need to be replaced for Phase 2 operation - The new electronics design will
not limit the L1-trigger rate
0.3 C/cm limit tested
23
-Oct
-20
13
Up
gra
des
We
ek
“To
wa
rds
the
mu
on
pa
rt o
f th
e P
hase
2 T
P”
J.
Ha
use
r, U
CL
A
There is a host of reasons for minicrate replacement: ASICs and boards will be very old Radiation tolerance is questionable – needs
investigation Bandwidth is limited to 300-500 kHz Interventions are very delicate Power consumption is high Performance with high background rates can be much
enhanced No “sound bites”, but the totality is a pretty
strong case (Cristina)
DT Minicrate replacement16
First level of DT read-out and trigger
23
-Oct
-20
13
Up
gra
des
We
ek
“To
wa
rds
the
mu
on
pa
rt o
f th
e P
hase
2 T
P”
J.
Ha
use
r, U
CL
A
Example: L1 rate limitation 300-500 kHz
Estimated occupancy region
17
23
-Oct
-20
13
Up
gra
des
We
ek
“To
wa
rds
the
mu
on
pa
rt o
f th
e P
hase
2 T
P”
J.
Ha
use
r, U
CL
A
18
GE1/1: trigger motivation The leading motivation is to improve muon
triggering in this region Rate reduction from bending angle and increased efficiency from
added redundancy
23
-Oct
-20
13
Up
gra
des
We
ek
“To
wa
rds
the
mu
on
pa
rt o
f th
e P
hase
2 T
P”
J.
Ha
use
r, U
CL
A
19Bending angle and multiple scattering
Practically no sensitivity away from zero in YE3 and YE4 ME0 (YE-1) has the best separation from zero
Some gain still expected from bending angle in GE2/1
RE3/1,4/1 no use from bending angle==> use them only for redundancy
==> next slides focus on bending angle information
New simulation results (Krutelyov)
23
-Oct
-20
13
Up
gra
des
We
ek
“To
wa
rds
the
mu
on
pa
rt o
f th
e P
hase
2 T
P”
J.
Ha
use
r, U
CL
A
20ME0-ME1/1 bending for eta 2.14-2.4
“Close” chambers have worse separation, still pretty good
Bending angle works really well in ME0 (not as good as GE1/1 though)
close
far
Tools used: fast simulation with CSC sim hits
— propagate CSC sim to GEM layer
— emulate detector channel resolution
— compute bending angle
New simulation results (Krutelyov)
23
-Oct
-20
13
Up
gra
des
We
ek
“To
wa
rds
the
mu
on
pa
rt o
f th
e P
hase
2 T
P”
J.
Ha
use
r, U
CL
A
21
GE2/1-ME2/1 bending
GE2/1 can give 40% decrease in trigger rate for 2.14-2.4
close
far
Tools used: fast simulation with CSC sim hits
— propagate CSC sim to GEM layer
— emulate detector channel resolution
— compute bending angle
New simulation results (Krutelyov)
23
-Oct
-20
13
Up
gra
des
We
ek
“To
wa
rds
the
mu
on
pa
rt o
f th
e P
hase
2 T
P”
J.
Ha
use
r, U
CL
A
22Trigger rate reduction: summary
~4.5
New simulation results (Krutelyov)
23
24
top related