monday, april 9pehs.psd202.org/documents/cneal/1523553020.pdfversion 2: adnan didnt seriously...
Post on 26-Aug-2020
0 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
Monday,
April 9
4 BTW slots open after school
today; see Mr. Peterson
Agenda
– Say something
–Exploring those left behind
DO: Closely read/analyze a passage to determine
meaning.
Evaluate author’s purpose to determine meaning.
HW: pg 117-138 ICB
Say Something!
– Squad up! In your squads, take turns reading your passage, and listen to each of your group member’s ideas on why this passage is significant.
– Focus on purpose (why did Capote write this section this way) and theme (what message is he conveying?)
– Once everyone is done, read your answer.
– Remember: this is an opportunity to add to your annotations!
Those left behindIn squads, evaluate why Capote is choosing to
describe those effected by the aftermath of the
murders, and how he does so (purpose)
– HOW does Capote include these details? (consider appeals) & WHY does he include these details?
– Dick and Perry bounce checks
– Al Dewey on the case
– Theory of the Hartman Café gossips
– Families leaving Holcomb
Example – the helpful calls (Capote 100-101)
HOW does Capote include these details? (consider
appeals) & WHY does he include these details?
– “It was three in the morning, and the telephone rang again. Not that the hour mattered. Al Dewey was wide awake anyway, and so were Marie and their sons…”(100)
– Capote is emphasizing that this is happening again (so this is an ongoing thing), that the hour doesn’t matter because A) no one can sleep (revealing everyone’s sleeplessness due to worry/anxiety) and B) that these calls come in at literally all hours, so this is not an outlier.
Example – the helpful calls (Capote 100-101)
HOW does Capote include these details?
(consider appeals) & WHY does he include
these details?
– “But most of those who telephoned were responsible citizens wanting to be helpful (‘I wonder if you’ve interviewed Nancy's friend, Sue Kidwell...’). Either that or the callers were people officially concerned – law officers and sheriffs from other parts of the state (‘This may be something, may not, but a bartender here says he overheard two fellows…’). And while none of these conversations had as yet done more than make extra work for the investigators, it was always possible that the next one might be, as Dewey put it, ‘the break that brings down the curtain’” (101).
– Capote is emphasizing characterization: people are genuinely concerned and want to be helpful, but Capote also emphasizes that this makes extra work for the investigators. Capote is detailing that the investigators are not making progress despite the fact they are working very hard. This is emphasizing the high number of dead ends they must pursue, as well as foreshadow Dewey’s optimism that one of these ‘busy work’ leads might break the case.
Wait, how do you know it’s
foreshadowing?
“And while none of these conversations had as yet done more than make extra work for the investigators, it was always possible that the next one might be, as Dewey put it, ‘the break that brings down the curtain’” (101).
– You know the case is ultimately solved, therefore you need to be aware of all the potential hypotheses to solve it
– Capote would not spend so much time on these details unless they were important (purpose)
– His technique (using repetition and juxtaposition) is emphasizing/highlighting what already has happened, points the reader to consider what will happen – this is foreshadowing
Those left behindIn squads, evaluate why Capote is choosing to
describe those effected by the aftermath of the
murders, and how he does so (purpose)
– HOW does Capote include these details? (consider appeals) & WHY does he include these details?
– Dick and Perry bounce checks
– Al Dewey on the case
– Theory of the Hartman Café gossips
– Families leaving Holcomb
Dick and Perry leave it all behind
(Capote 107-113)
– Capote uses the trip down to Mexico as an opportunity
to include Dick and Perry talking about themselves.
– Why does Perry dwell on what must be wrong with
them, while Dick is adamant that “I’m a normal”? Why
does Capote include this detail? (purpose)
– Why is giving the “persons unknown” time to talk about
themselves necessary? How does it juxtapose with
their previous actions?
Agenda for the week
– Tuesday No School: enjoy the day off!
– Wednesday: discuss through page 138 & listen to part of “Leakin Park”
– Thursday: closely read Barb’s letter & listen to part of “Inconsistencies”
– Friday: Quiz 2 on Part 2 of ICB and Episodes 2-4 of Serial (Includes an ICB annotation check)
Warning: there may be a pop quiz this week!
Wednesday,
April 11
Yes, hopefully your
teachers,
administrators, and
staff can cook like
this,
←though we make no
promises…seriously.
Agenda
– Strip Quiz! On pages 117-138 and “The Break Up”
– Quiz pass back
– Episode 3 of Serial: “Leakin Park”
DO: Demonstrate understanding and recall of anchor text.
Evaluate quiz performance and study strategies.
Evaluate evidence in Serial to determine guilt/innocence.
HW: Through page 155 of ICB for Friday & Finish “Leakin Park”
Strip quiz – closed book &
transcript
–You will have 5 minutes to write a
detailed answer to your specific
question. Do your best, and be
thorough!
Quiz 1 Pass BackICB Part 1 & Serial “The Alibi”
Update your quiz chart
Update your strengths/weaknesses chart according to your answers. What are your primary strengths/ weaknesses?
– Are you up to date in the reading?
– Do you remember what you read?
– Do you go beyond the surface (close read)?
– Do you review your notes before a quiz?
– Is there a certain question type you are good at? Struggle with?
Quiz 1 Key
21.B
22.A
6. A
7. A
8. C
9. B
10.D
1. C
2. C
3. D
4. B
5. C
11. B
12.B
13.B
14.D
15.B
16. C
17.C
18.B
19.A
20.C
Common area problems
– The following questions were the most
commonly missed questions.
– As we discuss them, focus on A) why you got
it wrong, and B) what you can do to improve
on these types of questions
11. Capote describes Dick having Sunday night dinner with his
family. Dick responds to questions about his “supposed overnight
trip” and “seems quite his ordinary self” (73). Consider the diction in
the passage carefully. What impact does Capote’s diction in the
passage have?
A. proves Dick had no plans.
B. establishes suspicions about Dick.
C. creates tension and propels the plot.
D. establishes logos as anyone would be comfortable with
family.
– Make sure you focus on the connotations; what do
“supposed” and “seems” indicate?
12. Friends and family clearly grieve for the Clutters. Mrs. Clare tells
Mother Truitt to “remember: If one bird carried every grain of sand, grain by
grain, across the ocean, by the time he got them all on the other side, that
would only be the beginning of eternity” (69). What tone word best suits this
passage?
A. Jubilant B. Mournful C. Personification D. Patronizing
– Remember the context; Mrs. Clare is sad the Clutters have
died, and she believes that sadness will be around for a
long time (only the beginning of eternity)
– It is clear classes as a whole still do not know their tone
words; there will be a tone quiz in your future. Start
studying now.
16. How did Capote initially find out
about the Clutter murders?
A. Harper Lee told him one morning over coffee.
B. A New Yorker magazine editor alerted him about the
crime.
C. He read a short news account while hundreds of miles away.
D. He was raised in Kansas and kept in touch with the
community.
– Make sure you review intro PowerPoint notes
– I also gave you the New York Times story he read
18. Koenig describes Adnan as having “giant brown eyes
like a dairy cow” and asks” Could someone who looks
like that really strangle his girlfriend?” (Ep 1). Which of
Aristotle’s Appeals best suits Koenig’s rhetoric (claim)
here?– A. Logos B. Pathos C. Ethos D. Moral character
– Moral character is not a rhetorical appeal
(though it can be a subset of ethos); if you got
this wrong, you need to review the rhetorical
appeal PowerPoint on my Teacher Web Page
(which you already should have reviewed)
19. Attorney Christina Gutierrez knew about
Asia seeing Adnan in the library. Why does
Koenig include this detail?
A. prove the conviction lacks ethos/credibility
B. strengthen the logos appeal for Adnan
C. demonstrate the attorney “was out to get” Adnan
D. reveal Asia’s moral character
– This issue is that without presenting this alibi, there is the chance
Adnan could be innocent (A)
– While they theorize that Christina did this in order to make more
money on the appeal, that does not mean the same thing as being
“out to get” him
Moving forward
– Do the reading!
– Check your discussion/reading guides
– Go deeper; ask yourself questions while you
read
– Just knowing what’s happening in the book is
not enough; you need to analyze as well
Episode 3: “Leakin Park”
Homework
–Finish “Leakin Park” and update
your evidence tracker
–Keep reading ICB! You have those
discussion questions for a reason!
Thursday,
April 12
Agenda
– Close read Barbara’s letter
– Episode 4 of Serial: “Inconsistencies”
DO: Closely read to analyze SOAPSTone to determine
meaning.
Evaluate evidence in Serial to determine guilt/innocence.
HW: Through page 155 of ICB for Friday & Finish “Inconsistencies”
Barbara’s letter (Capote 138-143)
– Perry’s surviving sister, Barbara, writes him a letter while he is in prison.
– Closely read her letter (annotating for SOAPSTone) to analyze purpose (both hers and Capote’s).
– Evaluate if this changes your opinion of Perry
Side note
– ‘Cut the mustard’ means the person
does not live up to the task
–Consider that nowadays we might say
“Up to snuff” or “make the cut”
Barbara’s purpose
–What do you think she hopes
Perry will do after reading this
letter?
–How do you know? Cite specific
evidence
Capote’s purpose
– Why would Capote include this letter in full? What is his purpose?
– Don’t say “he’s building ethos” – dig deeper. Why does the letter need to be included in full, rather than just summarized? Why include it now?
Episode 4: “Inconsistencies”
Serial: Episode 4
“Inconsistencies”
Jay’s Credibility
Inconsistency #1
Version 1: Jay is the “criminal element of Woodlawn.”
Version 2: Jay is “perceived” to be a criminal, but he’s really not.
Is Jay forgetting, fibbing, lying, or something else? Probably fibbing/lying, since he seems scared of being blackmailed by whatever Adnan has on him.
Why would he change this part of his story? Probably to protect himself. He wants to show how he could be blackmailed by a murderer (and thus explain why he hasn’t come forward until now), but doesn’t want to confess to felonies in front of two detectives.
Inconsistency #2
Version 1: They went to Westview Mall to go shopping.
Version 2: They went to Security Square Mall to go shopping.
Is Jay forgetting, fibbing, lying, or something else? Up to the
student. Could be anywhere from forgetful to intentionally
lying.
Why would he change this part of his story?
Inconsistency #3
Version 1: Jay and Adnan both smoke in Adnan’s car in the
evening.
Version 2: Only Jay smokes.
Is Jay forgetting, fibbing, lying, or something else? Sounds
pretty innocuous. Probably just forgetting.
Why would he change this part of his story? Doesn’t seem to
matter much.
Inconsistency #4
Inconsistency #4
Version 1: Adnan talked about killing Hae in the week prior to the murder.
Version 2: Adnan didn’t seriously mention killing Hae until the day of the murder.
Is Jay forgetting, fibbing, lying, or something else? Seems like it has to more than
“forgetful.” Somewhere between fibbing and lying.
Why would he change this part of his story? To accuse Adnan while protecting himself.
He makes it appear that Adnan premeditated the murder, but when it looks like Jay
might get lamed for not calling the police or warning Hae, he makes it appear that he
didn’t take it seriously until it was too late.
Inconsistency #5
Version 1: Jay didn’t help bury the body.
Version 2: Jay helped bury the body.
Is Jay forgetting, fibbing, lying, or something else? This isn’t
something you forget. It’s a lie of some sort.
Why would he change this part of his story? To offer
testimony while not implicating himself?
Inconsistency #6
Version 1: The police call Adnan while Jay and Adnan are at a
restaurant.
Version 2: The police call Adnan while Jay and Adnan are at a friend’s
apartment.
Is Jay forgetting, fibbing, lying, or something else? This doesn’t seem
like something you would forget. It’s a lie of some sort.
Why would he change this part of his story? Sarah mentions that the
friend’s father is a homicide detective, so Jay might be protecting her (or
trying to keep her father at a distance).
Inconsistency #7
Version 1: Jay and Adnan take a side trip to Patapsco State
Park.
Version 2: He doesn’t mention this at all.
Is Jay forgetting, fibbing, lying, or something else? It’s hard to
tell. Sarah barely mentions this example.
Why would he change this part of his story? It’s hard to tell.
Sarah barely mentions this example.
Inconsistency #8
Version 1: Adnan shows Jay the body at “a strip” on Edmondson Avenue.
Version 2: Adnan shows Jay the body in a Best Buy parking lot.
Is Jay forgetting, fibbing, lying, or something else? This is “the mother of
all inconsistencies.” It seems like it’s a significant lie.
Why would he change this part of his story? Jay says because he thought
Best Buy might have cameras in their parking lot. (But if he’s telling the
truth, wouldn’t he want there to be cameras to validate his story?) Sarah
calls the lie “nonsensical.”
Episode 4 Wrap-Up
– Remember these inconsistencies throughout the rest of Serial in order
to determine the main question of whether or not Adan is justly
imprisoned.
– Soon you will hear more of Adan’s inconsistencies and keep those in
mind as well.
– Lastly, while we may not find out the truth to some of these
discrepancies or who is actually responsible for Hae’s death, our job is
to analyze the arguments and claims, including credibility.
– Then we as a class at least will determine if there is cause for
reasonable doubt.
Friday,
April 13
Agenda
– Quiz 2 + Annotation check
– Outcome D Benchmark 1 Intro – Annotated
Bibliography
DO: Demonstrate understanding and recall of ICB and Serial.
Annotate to track important passages and to improve understanding.
Understand expectations for ODB1.
HW: Read & annotate ICB 159-179
Quiz 2 + annotation check
– Write your answers on Mastery Manager & your
quiz
– I will check in your annotations
Outcome D Benchmark 1
Annotated Bibliography
Due: Tuesday, April 24 @ 7:05 AM
Annotated Bibliography
According to Merriam-Webster’s Online Dictionary (2011)
Annotate: “to make or furnish critical or explanatory notes or comment”
Bibliography: “the history, identification, or description of writings or
publications”
Why do we combine these words?
Purpose of an annotated bibliography:
To learn about a particular topic
To demonstrate the value of a particular source
To inform fellow or future researchers about a topic or a source
Annotated Bibliography -
Task
– Choose a topic
– Formulate a claim
– Research it
– Summarize it (annotated bibliography)
– This will all prepare you to complete
Benchmark 2, a formal recorded
presentation (more on that later)
Outcome D Topics
– Post-convictions exonerations
– Disbarment (for lawyers)
– DNA testing for trials
– Media’s role in cases
– Defense lawyers who are appointed to represent the defendant
– Benefits of granting immunity for witnesses
– Corruption of lawyers, judges, or jury members.
– Chicago Cover up paying the judges (late 80s and 90s)
– Sentencing (mandatory minimums, 3-strike rule, judge vs. jury, etc.)
– Public defenders vs. private defense attorneys
– The Innocence Project and its purpose
– Jury selection/ “Voir dire” (name of a form of
jury selection process)
– Police taped/recorded interrogations
– Are most trials fair?
– Immigration Courts
– Appointment of attorneys
– Role of race, gender, religion, etc. play roles in
convictions
Annotated Bibliography
Format depends on assignment, but the typical format is a list of MLA-
formatted works referenced entries followed by annotations.
Alphabetized by author’s last names
No headings
Brief reflection/analysis (2 paragraphs)
Times New Roman, 12 point black font – SINGLE
SPACED (with 1 space between each “part” – see
example)
Annotated Bibliography
There are some unique characteristics of annotations:
–No direct quotations
Give audience YOUR interpretation of the source material
–Can be written in present or past tense
“Scientists Bob Blahblah and Sarah Cookie found…”
“Chicagoland is a documentary style TV show that includes witness
testimony and statistics to argue..”
–No first or second person pronouns (“I”, “my”, “me”,
“you”, etc.)
Be objective and removed in description of source
AnnotationsFor each source entry, there is an MLA-formatted
citation followed by annotations (2 paragraphs).
The annotations include 3 parts:
o Part 1 = Summary
o (5-7 sentences) – paragraph 1
o Part 2 = Critique/Evaluation
(2-4 sentences) – paragraph 2
o Part 3 = Application
(2-4 sentences) – paragraph 2
Note! Each source must be
professional
– This means no blogs! If there is no author listed, it’s
not a professional source.
– You should search:
– Newspapers
– The New York Times, The Atlantic, The Washington Post, The Guardian, The
Christian Science Monitor, NPR, BBC
– Organizations (ending in .org)
– Federal websites (ending in .gov)
– You will loose points if it is not a professional source
____ / 2: Source 1 – accurate MLA citation
____ / 8: Source 1 – thorough, well-developed annotation (summary,
critique/evaluation, application – specifically how will you use this source in your
presentation)
____ / 2: Source 2 – accurate MLA citation
____ / 8: Source 2 – thorough, well-developed annotation (summary,
critique/evaluation, application)
____ / 4: Format – Times New Roman 12 point black font throughout, Proper heading
and header, topic-related title centered, single spaced with a single space between
each part, hanging indent for citations, tabbed indent for annotation paragraphs,
typed, sources in alphabetical order
____ / 4: Conventions – free of errors (capitalization, spelling, punctuation, subject
verb agreement, no 1st/2nd person pronouns, no quotes, no redundancy,
precise/formal language, etc.)
____ / 2: Research – credible sources
Rubric
ANNOTATION PART 1: Summary
Consider:
A.What is the specific topic of the source?
Main ideas?
B.What methods did the author use?
Evidence? Appeals? Interview? Research
statistics? Direct address?
C.What was the purpose of the
study/article/research?
D.Research conclusions?
Parmesan, Camill, and Hector Galbraith. “Executive Summary.” Observed Impacts of
Global Climate Change in the U.S. Pew Center on Global Climate Change, Nov.
2004. Web. 17. Jan. 2007.
This report includes recent scientific findings that document the impact changes in the
climate have had on the distribution of plants and animals in the United States and on how
they interact with their communities. For example, Camill and Galbraith explain how a
shift has taken place in the blooming period for plants and the breeding period for animals
caused by global warming. Because of changes in their geographic range, species may
interact differently, possibly resulting in population declines. The scientists stress that such
shifts can harm the world’s biodiversity. Plants and animals that are rare now face
extinction. The annual cycle of carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere has also changed,
largely due to the lengthening of the growing season, affecting basic ecosystem.
Example – Summary
Steps to Complete Summary
– What is the main idea (what is this
article about)?
– Who is involved? (author, researcher,
subject, etc.)
– What are the findings?
– Make sure to include any essential statistics
ANNOTATION PART 2: Critique/Evaluation
Consider:
A. Strengths and weaknesses of the source?
language choices, organization, level of detail, objectivity, evidence, appeals, speaker, audience,
purpose, credibility/trustworthiness, etc.
B. What, if any, information is missing? Are there flaws in the argument? Is there
bias?
C. Is the source scholarly or general such as a blog, twitter account, or something
informal? Explain.
– Focus on strengths of the source
o What would help you persuade your audience?
– Do not feel the need to be nice
o Your audience should know if there are any deficiencies or areas for improvement
Example Critique/Evaluation
Written in 2007, this formal report was slightly more helpful than other
sources because its information is based on observations made
specifically in the United States. The source appears reliable as it is
based on scientific evidence as opposed to general assertions that may
not be backed up by research. This essay will be helpful because it
focuses on how plants and animals are currently affected, such as their
shifting communities and how they are clashing. This could be used to
explain human changes by providing evidence of what is happening to
other species and appealing to an audience’s sense of logic.
Steps to Complete Evaluation
– What are the strengths of this
source?
– What are its weaknesses or
shortcomings?
– How will it be helpful to you?
– Consider ethos/pathos/logos
ANNOTATION PART 3: Application
Consider:
– How can you apply this information to your argument?
– Where will it fit into your argument?
– How would you justify using the source for your persuasion?
How is this source different than others in the same
field or on the same topic?
How does this source inform your future research or
persuade your audience?
Example Application
This source will not be as helpful in explaining the
climate’s effects on human biological function in
particular, but it will provide some framework. For
example, explaining how the plants that help convert
carbon dioxide into oxygen are being harmed and
relating that to how humans will suffer the
consequences can evoke fear
and engagement from an audience.
Steps to Complete Application
– What specific aspect will you use
for your presentation?
– Will it need additional support? If
so, what is still needed?
Example Annotated Bib Entry (MLA citation + part 1 + part 2 + part 3)
Parmesan, Camill, and Hector Galbraith. “Executive Summary.” Observed Impacts of Global Climate
Change in the U.S. Pew Center on Global Climate Change, Nov. 2004. Web. 17. Jan. 2007.
This report includes recent scientific findings that document the impact changes in the climate have had on the
distribution of plants and animals in the United States and on how they interact with their communities. For
example, Camill and Galbraith explain how a shift has taken place in the blooming period for plants and the
breeding period for animals caused by global warming. Because of changes in their geographic range, species may
interact differently, possibly resulting in population declines. The scientists stress that such shifts can harm the
world’s biodiversity. Plants and animals that are rare now face extinction. The annual cycle of carbon dioxide
levels in the atmosphere has also changed, largely due to the lengthening of the growing season, affecting basic
ecosystem.
Written in 2007, this formal report was slightly more helpful than other sources because its information is based
on observations made specifically in the United States. The source appears reliable as it is based on scientific
evidence as opposed to general assertions that may not be backed up by research. This essay will be helpful
because it focuses on how plants and animals are currently affected, such as their shifting communities and how
they are clashing. This could be used to explain human changes by providing evidence of what is happening to
other species and appealing to an audience’s sense of logic. This source will not be as helpful in explaining the
climate’s effects on human biological function in particular, but it will provide some framework. For example,
explaining how the plants that help convert carbon dioxide into oxygen are being harmed and relating that to how
humans will suffer the consequences can evoke fear and engagement from an audience.
Due date!
–Due Tuesday, April 24 by
7:05 AM to Turnitin.com
–You will lose 10% for every
day it is late
–You will have Wednesday as
a lab day – come prepared!
Outcome D Topics
– Post-convictions exonerations
– Disbarment (for lawyers)
– DNA testing for trials
– Media’s role in cases
– Defense lawyers who are appointed to represent the defendant
– Benefits of granting immunity for witnesses
– Corruption of lawyers, judges, or jury members.
– Chicago Cover up paying the judges (late 80s and 90s)
– Sentencing (mandatory minimums, 3-strike rule, judge vs. jury, etc.)
– Public defenders vs. private defense attorneys
– The Innocence Project and its purpose
– Jury selection/ “Voir dire” (name of a form of
jury selection process)
– Police taped/recorded interrogations
– Are most trials fair?
– Immigration Courts
– Appointment of attorneys
– Role of race, gender, religion, etc. play roles in
convictions
top related