moderated(by(liora(lazarus( the right to...

The Right to Education Sandra Fredman © Oxford Human Rights Hub

Moderated by Liora Lazarus

The Right to Education Prof Sandra Fredman © Oxford Human Rights Hub

•  To Participate :

–  Tweet @OxHRHRight2Education

–  Message our Facebook page: Oxford Human Rights Hub Blog

–  Email oxfordhumanrightshub@law.ox.ac.uk

@OxHRH #Right2Education Oxfordhumanrightshub@law.ox.ac.uk Facebook: Oxford Human Rights Hub blog

Key points

•  Human right or policy goal?

•  Shape and content. •  Freedom right. •  Social right. •  Equality right.

•  International human rights law.

•  Jurisdictions where right has been explored.

•  Role of courts and litigation.

Focus of today’s webinar

A closer look

•  1 in 10 children of primary school age still out of school.

•  Global out-of-school rate stuck at 9% since 2007.

•  More than 4 in 10 out-of-school children will never enter a classroom.

Poll one

Education has been identified as a development goal. Do you think there is added value in a human right to education?

•  1A. Yes. •  1B. No. •  1C. Don’t know.

From Development Goals to Human Right

Development Goals

•  Political commitments.

Human Rights Legally binding.

•  Transfer of aid; charity.

•  Focus on developing countries.

•  Quantitative and aggregate outcomes.

Individuals as rights-bearers.

All countries.

58m rights to education unfulfilled.

India: from Directive Principles…

•  Article 45: The State ‘shall endeavour to provide’ free and compulsory education for all children under 14 within 10 years.

•  Article 41: The State shall, ‘within the limits of its economic capacity and development,’ make effective provision for securing the right …education.

To Fundamental Rights

•  Not ‘mere pious declarations’.

•  The directive principles must be read into the fundamental rights.

•  ‘The right to life and the dignity of an individual cannot be assured unless it is accompanied by the right to education.’ (Mohini Jain 1992.)

Indian Constitutional Amendment

•  21A. ‘The State shall provide free and compulsory education to all children of the age of six to fourteen years.’ (2002)

•  Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act 2009.

Role of Human Rights

•  Freedom right: restraining State intrusion – education as propaganda.

•  Social right: provision of buildings, furniture, teachers, quality of education.

•  Equality right: segregation, gender, poverty.

•  At the very least: accountability, transparency, participation.

Shape of the Right

•  Straddles traditional boundaries

•  Civil and political: Duty not to interfere

•  Socio-economic: Duty to protect and provide

•  Multiplier right: The right to freedom of speech and other rights…cannot be appreciated and fully enjoyed unless a citizen is educated (Mohini Jain)

Freedom Right: Education as propaganda

Freedom right: Duty to respect

•  ICCPR: State should not interfere in parent’s choice of religion of instruction.

•  ICESCR: Respect for the liberty of parents… to ensure the religious and moral education of their children in conformity with their convictions.’

•  ECHR: State shall respect the right of parents to ensure education is in conformity with their political and religious convictions.’

From respect to provide

Should State provide faith schools?

Poll two

Should right to education require State to fund faith schools?

2A. Right to education requires State to fund faith schools.

2B. State must permit faith schools but no requirement of State funding.

2C. State should prohibit all faith schools.

Language disputes

•  Belgian Linguistics case: French speaking parents living in Flemish area wanted their children educated in French.

•  ECHR: ‘No person shall be denied the right to education’: Negative formulation.

•  Therefore no duty to establish or subsidise education of any particular type. •  Duty to permit but not to fund.

Social Right: Duty to provide

ICESCR: Ratified by 162 States:

(a) Primary education: compulsory and available free to all.

(b) Secondary education: progressive introduction of free education (Art 13).

Duty to provide: Challenges

•  A human right to buildings, furniture, teachers?

•  A human right to quality education?

•  ‘Compulsory and available free to all.’

•  Role of courts in resource decisions.

Buildings and Furniture

•  Respondents are in breach of right to basic education by failing to provide adequate furniture.

•  Respondents are ordered to ensure that all schools identified as having furniture shortages shall receive adequate furniture to enable each child to have his or her own reading and writing space (Modzozo, SA High Court 2014).

Adjudicating minimum standards

•  Basic literacy, calculating, and verbal skills necessary to enable children to eventually function productively as civic participants capable of voting and serving on a jury.

•  ‘Minimally adequate’ physical facilities, teaching by adequately trained teachers (New York: (Campaign for Fiscal Equity )

Role of courts

•  Legitimacy and competence especially around budgetary policy.

•  ‘The State, in enacting a budget … must appropriate the constitutionally required funding for the New York City schools’. (Campaign for Fiscal Equity )

Poll three

Should free compulsory education be free for all?

3A. Free for all.

3B. Free only for disadvantaged (means tested).

3C. All learners pay fees.

Free compulsory education

•  New York State Constitution: ‘The legislature shall provide for the maintenance and support of a system of free common schools, wherein all the children of this state may be educated.’

•  SA Constitution: ‘Everyone has the right to a basic education, including adult basic education.’

Litigating the right to free education: Colombia

•  Until 2010, Colombia was the only Latin American country permitting local governments to charge for primary education in public schools.

•  On 31 May 2010, the Colombian Constitutional Court held that all public primary schools must cease

charging students tuition fees.

The Colombian outcome

•  In Dec 2011, the Colombian national Government issued National Decree 4807/2011 establishing that education shall be free in public institutions at the primary and secondary levels.

•  Article 2: Free education includes not charging for complementary services (indirect costs such as books and uniforms?).

Equality and Segregation

Brown v Board of Education: ‘To separate them from others of similar age and qualifications solely because of their race generates a feeling of inferiority as to their status in the community that may affect their hearts and minds in a way unlikely ever to be undone.’ (US SCt 1954)

Equality and Segregation

Segregation amounts to indirect discrimination against Roma children (DH v Czech Republic, ECHR (2007).

Equality and Poverty: A clash of rights?

•  India: 25% of places at unaided private schools must be put aside for disadvantaged learners. Fees at public level paid by State.

•  Challenge: Breaches right to to establish and administer educational institution (Art19)?

•  Court: Upheld law for non-minority schools (Society for Un-aided Private Schools of Rajasthan vs. Union of India 2012).

A reasonable limitation

•  A child denied right to access education is not only deprived of right to live with dignity -

•  Also deprived of right to freedom of speech and expression.

•  Aim: To remove all barriers which a child belonging to the weaker section and disadvantaged group has to face while seeking admission.

•  Reasonable restriction on freedom of occupation. @OxHRH #Right2Education Oxfordhumanrightshub@law.ox.ac.uk Facebook: Oxford Human Rights Hub blog

Conclusion

•  Human right or policy goal?

•  Shape and content.

•  Freedom Right.

•  Social Right.

•  Equality Right.

•  Role of Courts and Litigation. @OxHRH #Right2Education Oxfordhumanrightshub@law.ox.ac.uk Facebook: Oxford Human Rights Hub blog

Presented by Professor Sandra Fredman

Moderated by Associate Professor Liora Lazarus

Acknowledgements

•  The Bertha Foundation •  Gullan & Gullan •  The Knowledge Exchange •  Jennifer MacKay – Jump Training and Development •  Francesca Hayhoe, Senior Marketing Executive at the ICAEW •  Steve Pierce, Oxford IT Services •  OxHRHub team:

o Meghan Campbell o Laura Hilly o Liora Lazarus o Shreya Atrey o Heather McRobbie

•  How to Participate in the Q & A Session:

–  Tweet in questions @OxHRH #Right2Education

–  Message a question to our Facebook page: Oxford Human Rights Hub Blog

–  Email a question to oxfordhumanrightshub@law.ox.ac.uk

moderated(by(liora(lazarus( the right to...

Documents

the lazarus endeavor

project lazarus description final -...

lazarus of bethany

project lazarus/ccnc

curriculumvitae -...

ibx for lazarus user...

hl7 nlm ehr project alschuler.spinosa commercenet webify...

tutorial lazarus

selectiveopenness:anevaluationonopen-door...

application form for professor and associateprofessor

android in lazarus

curriculumvitae–bodongchen · 2019...

joanna weaver lazarus awakening awakening lazarus awakening...

wedi innovation summit liora alschuler, lantana consulting...

raising lazarus

the lazarus constellation - lexfo · 2020. 10. 8. · the...

the lazarus effect

hl7s clinical document architecture liora alschuler himss...

lazarus primacy

hl7 nlm ehr contract phase i alschuler.spinosa commercenet...