modelling cavity filter temperature drift in cst mws• 16 staff with knowledge of rf and materials...

Modelling cavity filter

temperature drift in CST MWS

Dr Novak Petrovic

September 2009 Abridged

Presentation Outline

• Company background

• Role of CST MWS

– Conventional solutions

– HTS solutions

– Ceramic solutions

• Practical Problems and Current Work

– Definition

– CST MWS solution

• Q&A, further discussion

September 2009 Abridged

Company Background

• Founded in 2002

• “Microwave and Materials Designs”

• New materials for microwave applications in the wireless cellular market

• 16 staff with knowledge of RF and materials technologies

• Venture capital backed

• Pursuing OEM & operator relationships

September 2009 Abridged

Solutions overview

• Cellular wireless infrastructure

• Spectrum re-farming (U900)

• Interference mitigation (Custom)

• Co-siting & co-location (Sharing)

• Low noise solutions (Cryogenic)

• LTE – filtering & range extension

September 2009 Abridged

HTS solutions

September 2009 Abridged

Conventional solutions

September 2009 Abridged

Materials solutions

Novel ceramic materials made in house

Abridged

Application of CST MWS

Abridged

Design and Characterisation

Coupling matrix

optimisation

Design

Tuning

Characterisation

Matlab / Java

Abridged

Problem 1

Filter response change due to temperature change?

Thermal expansion

of metals

Change of dimensions

Change of resonant

frequency

Change of filter

response

Abridged

Change in performance

Abridged

Change in performance

Keep the drift to

less than 1 GSM ch

Operational temperature

specification: -40 to +85 deg C

Abridged

Current approach

1tan2 CZfResonance condition:

fringingplatescrew CCCC

diameterresonator_

metercavity_dialn60coaxZ

Abridged

Approximating capacitance

fringingplatescrew CCCC

1tan2 CZf

Partly empirical

Abridged

Temperature expansion

Thermal expansion coefficient:Linear:

αL << 1

small ΔT

Area:

αA ≈ 2αL

isotropic

materials

Vol:

αV ≈ 3αL

isotropic

materials

T

L

L

0

1

TV

V

V

0

TA

A

A

0

TL

L

L

0

Abridged

Automation of current approach

Abridged

Automation of current approach

Only works for

“static” analytic cases,

known impedance

September 2009 Abridged

CST MWS solution

Formulate parameters

as a function

of temperature

September 2009 Abridged

CST MWS solution

Abridged

Practical caseSpreadsheet calculation: -0.762 MHz drift, -20.2 ppm/˚C

CST MWS: -0.9 MHz drift, -23.8 ppm/˚C

C ppm/deg 106

1

12drift

Tf

fff

Abridged

Measured results

Total temperature drift of -0.9 MHz was measured

(+40 ˚C temperature change, rate of -0.023 ˚C/MHz)

CST MWS works

Abridged

Extension to arbitrary shapes

αA ≈ 2αL

isotropic

materials

TA

A

A

0

Abridged

Scaling check

Reference objects to cavity

(or fixing screw location)

Area of scaled objects

does check out.

Abridged

Other possibilities

Parametrise all features

Abridged

Accuracy

Criterion: Establish logical convergence (experiments),

by examining change in error, and referenced to mesh.

35 LPW: 141,120 meshcells, f1 = 946.4 MHz f2 = 945.5 MHz

Also confirmed convergence on basic coaxial case.

25 LPW: 54,400 meshcells, f1 = 941.7 MHz f2 = 940.8 MHz

15 LPW: 17,248 meshcells, f1 = 934.5 MHz f2 = 933.6 MHz

45 LPW: 269,500 meshcells, f1 = 946.9 MHz f2 = 946.0 MHz

September 2009 Abridged

Problem 2

• Current work: Design ceramic filter

– Calculate temperature drift and compensate

• Previous methodology applied

• However, a lot more CST MWS simulations

September 2009 Abridged

General design notes

More precise simulations.

Ceramics changes in addition to metal.

September 2009 Abridged

Manufacturer info

τf

Adjustable

September 2009 Abridged

Standard cavity: temperature

D = 0.5’’

H = 0.2’’

L = 1.05’’

C = 1.5’’

f0 ≈ 4 GHz

T

f

ff

0

0

1

September 2009 Abridged

Composite coefficient

T

1

T

L

LC

1

T

D

DT

H

HL

11

T

f

ff

0

0

1

Dielectric constant

Cavity

Resonator (dimensions)

ppm/deg C

September 2009 Abridged

Extract τε

f0 at amb = 3959.39 MHz

f0 at amb + 60˚ C = function of τε (change of ε with T)

Parametrise:

-dielectric const. change

-resonator dim. change

-cavity dim. change

-safe to ignore holder

Change τε to get quoted τf

T

1

τf = 0

September 2009 Abridged

Conversion

Change τε, calc f0 at

amb & temp, calc τf

T εnomr,newr, 1

C deg 60T

September 2009 Abridged

Extract τε: check

C ppm/deg 3.15ε

1,05.0 ,1 ,2

1 CBA

CLεf4

3 CBA

CLf

ε3

4

CB

A

31

r

2

rr

0

4

553.8

LD

f

September 2009 Abridged

Drift of the design

Representative cavity vs entire filter

Metallic resonator methodology

f0 @ amb = 913.15 MHz

f0 @ amb + 60 ˚C = 913.67 MHz

Sweep τε until design stabilises

C ppm/deg 5.9design

C ppm/deg 0 want We design

MWS

September 2009 Abridged

Sweep desired τε

Work out required τε so dopants can be selected

Change until f0 @ +0 ˚C and f0 @ +60 ˚C are the same

C ppm/deg 7.3

September 2009 Abridged

Convert back to τf in std cavity

C ppm/deg 7.3Want

C ppm/deg 8 into Translates f

C ppm/deg 6 toup Rounded f

C ppm/deg 5.1 Therefore design ORDER !

MWS

f0 @ amb = 913.15 MHz

f0 @ amb + 60 ˚C = 913.23 MHz

C ppm/deg 7.14 Have

September 2009 Abridged

Standard cavity: frequency

September 2009 Abridged

Summary

• Work out tau_epsilon from specs

• Work out expected design drift

• Work out required tau_epsilon

• Translate to tau_f in standard cavity

• Translate to standard cavity frequency

• Order

• Keep working...

September 2009 Abridged

AccuracyCase f0

at amb

MHz

f0

at amb

+60 deg C

τf

ppm/deg C

Δf

MHz

40 LPW

606,528

3953.604 3953.658 0.23 0.054

30 LPW

262,236

3956.217 3956.277 0.25 0.06

20 LPW

75,816

3962.602 3962.675 0.31 0.073

15 LPW

30,400

3972.118 3972.207 0.37 0.089

Used τε = -15.3 ppm/deg C

September 2009 Abridged

Keep working...

Entire filter,

all parametrised...

Spurious coupling

(coupling sign)

Temperature drift

Verification

September 2009 Abridged

Tune and measureTuned with the aid of Mesaplexx Filter Design Tool

September 2009 Abridged

Tuning

Extract coupling matrix

by comparing to model

Note difference to desired,

change (screws) manually,

5 – 50 times (?)

September 2009 Abridged

Accuracy

SPW = 6, MIN = 6

Tetrahedrons: 156,411

Adaptation: 1 @ 897.7 MHz

Accuracy = 1e-6

delta S = 0.01 (both)

SPW = 4, MIN = 4

Tetrahedrons: 41,872

Adaptation: None

Accuracy = 1e-4

delta S = 0.01 ~ 7 min

~ 31 min

September 2009 Abridged

Drift illustration-1.5 ppm/deg C

896.92 MHz

vs

897 MHz

September 2009 Abridged

Relevance

• Turn-around time (12 weeks)

• Qualification of custom-made ceramics

– Q, εr, τε (the difficult trio)

– nonlinear coefficients, complex ε

– cryogenic temperatures (non-linear)

• Tight specification (GSM channels)

• New tuners, dual-mode filters, frequency

scaling ...

September 2009 Abridged

Unexpected twistsDielectric supports contribute as well!

September 2009 Abridged

Parameter extraction

Extraction of material properties by numerical simulation.

September 2009 Abridged

Future work

• Power handling in comblines

– Line integral to calculate voltage

• Thermal runaway in ceramic filters

– Power handling

• Printed filters

• Lumped element extraction

• More macros

Abridged

2008 - EDN Innovation AwardsWinner – Best application of RF design

Winner – Best overall project

Thank you!

Contact:

Novak Petrovic

novak.petrovic@mesaplexx.com

npetrovic@gmail.com