modeling the ebola outbreak in west africa, november 18th 2014 update
Post on 13-Aug-2015
28 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
DRAFT – Not for a.ribu2on or distribu2on
Modeling the Ebola Outbreak in West Africa, 2014
November 18th Update
Bryan Lewis PhD, MPH (blewis@vbi.vt.edu) presen2ng on behalf of the Ebola Response Team of
Network Dynamics and Simula2on Science Lab from the Virginia Bioinforma2cs Ins2tute at Virginia Tech
Technical Report #14-‐122
DRAFT – Not for a.ribu2on or distribu2on
NDSSL Ebola Response Team Staff: Abhijin Adiga, Kathy Alexander, Chris Barre., Richard Beckman, Keith Bisset, Jiangzhuo Chen, Youngyoun Chungbaek, Stephen Eubank, Sandeep Gupta, Maleq Khan, Chris Kuhlman, Eric Lofgren, Bryan Lewis, Achla Marathe, Madhav Marathe, Henning Mortveit, Eric Nordberg, Paula Stretz, Samarth Swarup, Meredith Wilson,Mandy Wilson, and Dawen Xie, with support from Ginger Stewart, Maureen Lawrence-‐Kuether, Kayla Tyler, Kathy Laskowski, Bill Marmagas Students: S.M. Arifuzzaman, Aditya Agashe, Vivek Akupatni, Caitlin Rivers, Pyrros Telionis, Jessie Gunter, Elisabeth Musser, James Schli., Youssef Jemia, Margaret Carolan, Bryan Kaperick, Warner Rose, Kara Harrison
2
DRAFT – Not for a.ribu2on or distribu2on
Currently Used Data
● Data from WHO, MoH Liberia, and MoH Sierra Leone, available at h.ps://github.com/cmrivers/ebola
● MoH and WHO have reasonable agreement ● Sierra Leone case counts censored up
to 4/30/14. ● Time series was filled in with missing
dates, and case counts were interpolated.
3
Cases Deaths Guinea 1919 1166 Liberia 6909 2836 Sierra Leone 5586 1510 Total 14,436 5520
DRAFT – Not for a.ribu2on or distribu2on
Liberia – Case Loca2ons
4
DRAFT – Not for a.ribu2on or distribu2on
Liberia – County Case Incidence
5
DRAFT – Not for a.ribu2on or distribu2on
Liberia Forecast – Original Model
6
8/9/08 to
9/14
9/15 to
9/21
9/22 to
9/28
9/29 to
10/05
10/06 to
10/12
10/13 to
10/19
10/20 to
10/26
10/27 to
11/02
11/03 to
11/09
Reported 639 560 416 261 298 446 1604* 227 298
Forecast (classic model)
697 927 1232 1636 2172 2883 3825 5070 6741
Reproduc2ve Number Community 1.3 Hospital 0.4 Funeral 0.5 Overall 2.2
52% of Infected are hospitalized
* Repor2ng change
DRAFT – Not for a.ribu2on or distribu2on
Learning from Lofa -‐ Summary
7
Model fit to Lofa case with a change in behaviors resul2ng in reduced transmission sta2ng mid-‐Aug (blue), compared with observed data (green)
Fit reduc2on seen in Lofa
Model fit to Liberia case with a change in behaviors resul2ng in reduced transmission sta2ng Sept 21st (green), compared with observed data (blue)
Apply to Liberia
DRAFT – Not for a.ribu2on or distribu2on
Liberia Forecast – Prelim New Model
8
9/16 to
9/21
9/22 to
9/28
9/29 to
10/05
10/06 to
10/12
10/13 to
10/19
10/20 to
10/26
10/27 to
11/02
11/03 to
11/09
11/10 to
11/16
11/17 to
11/23
Reported 560 416 261 298 446 1604* 227 298 -‐-‐ -‐-‐
Reported back log adjusted
396 251 245 490
New model 757 603 541 580 598 608 617 625 633 638
Reproduc2ve Number Community 0.5 Hospital 0.2 Funeral 0.2 Overall 1.0
DRAFT – Not for a.ribu2on or distribu2on
Prevalence of Cases – New model
9
Date People in H+I 9/7/14 523 9/14/14 695 9/20/14 887 9/27/14 1051 10/4/14 1119 10/11/14 1152 10/18/14 1174 10/25/14 1192 11/1/14 1208 11/8/14 1224 11/15/14 1239 11/22/14 1255 11/29/14 1271 12/6/14 1288 12/13/14 1304 12/20/14 1320 12/27/14 1337
DRAFT – Not for a.ribu2on or distribu2on
Sierra Leone – County Data
10
DRAFT – Not for a.ribu2on or distribu2on
Sierra Leone – Contact A.ack Rate
11
DRAFT – Not for a.ribu2on or distribu2on
Sierra Leone Forecasts
12
9/6 to
9/14
9/14 to
9/21
9/22 to
9/28
9/29 to
10/05
10/06 to
10/12
10/13 to
10/19
10/20 to
10/26
10/27 to
11/02
11/03 to
11/09
11/10 to
11/16
11/17 to
11/23
Reported 246 285 377 467 468 454 494 486 580 -‐-‐ -‐-‐
Forecast 256 312 380 464 566 690 841 1025 1250 1523 1856
35% of cases are hospitalized
ReproducPve Number Community 1.20 Hospital 0.29 Funeral 0.15 Overall 1.63
DRAFT – Not for a.ribu2on or distribu2on
Prevalence in SL
13
10/6/14 456.6 10/13/14 556.7 10/20/14 678.8 10/27/14 827.5 11/3/14 1008.8 11/10/14 1229.8 11/17/14 1498.9 11/24/14 1826.8 12/1/14 2226.1 12/8/14 2712.2 12/15/14 3303.7 12/22/14 4023.3 12/29/14 4898.1
DRAFT – Not for a.ribu2on or distribu2on
Agent-‐based Model Progress
• Synthe2c Informa2on Viewer for Ebola affected Countries – Assist in troubleshoo2ng simula2on results – Aid in calibra2on issues
• Calibra2on – Rainy Season altera2on • Considera2on of Mali and Senegal
14
DRAFT – Not for a.ribu2on or distribu2on
Synthe2c Informa2on Viewer
15
Interface for exploring details of the popula2on and their ac2vi2es
DRAFT – Not for a.ribu2on or distribu2on
Synthe2c Informa2on Viewer
16
Zoom down to the household level to see rela2ve densi2es and selected details
DRAFT – Not for a.ribu2on or distribu2on
Synthe2c Informa2on Viewer
17
Zoom down to the individual and look at their ac2vity pa.ern
DRAFT – Not for a.ribu2on or distribu2on
Calibra2on – Previous Steps
• Disease Model representa2on • Flowminder data used for travel • Ini2alize simula2on in Lofa • Road map with travel status used for prelim es2mate of travel altera2on
18
Bomi Bong Gbarpolu Grand Bassa Grand Cape Mount Grand Gedeh Grand Kru Lofa Margibi Maryland Montserrado Nimba River Cess River Gee Sinoe Green 1 Bomi 0.55 0.5 1 0.5 0.425 0.425 0.1 1 0.425 1 0.55 0.1 0.425 0.3 Red 0.5
Bong 0.55 0.3 0.55 0.3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0.1 1 0.366666667 Black 0.1 Gbarpolu 0.5 0.3 0.5 0.5 0.425 0.425 0.1 0.5 0.425 0.5 0.3 0.1 0.425 0.3
Grand Bassa 1 0.55 0.5 0.5 0.3 0.3 0.4 1 0.3 1 0.55 0.1 0.3 0.3 Based on traveling from county capital to county capital
Grand Cape Mount 0.5 0.3 0.5 0.5 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.3 0.5 0.233333333 0.1 0.3 0.3 Based on 17SEPT2014 data Grand Gedeh 0.425 1 0.425 0.3 0.3 1 1 0.55 1 0.55 1 0.1 1 0.5
Grand Kru 0.425 1 0.425 0.3 0.3 1 1 0.533333333 1 0.533333333 1 0.1 1 0.5
Lofa 0.1 1 0.1 0.4 0.3 1 1 0.55 1 0.55 1 0.1 1 0.214285714
Margibi 1 1 0.5 1 0.5 0.55 0.533333333 0.55 0.533333333 1 1 0.1 0.533333333 0.3
Maryland 0.425 1 0.425 0.3 0.3 1 1 1 0.533333333 0.533333333 1 0.1 1 0.5
Montserrado 1 1 0.5 1 0.5 0.55 0.533333333 0.55 1 0.533333333 0.55 0.1 0.533333333 0.3
Nimba 0.55 1 0.3 0.55 0.233333333 1 1 1 1 1 0.55 0.1 1 0.233333333 River Cess 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1
River Gee 0.425 1 0.425 0.3 0.3 1 1 1 0.533333333 1 0.533333333 1 0.1 0.5
Sinoe 0.3 0.366666667 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.5 0.2142857
14 0.3 0.5 0.3 0.233333333 0.1 0.5
DRAFT – Not for a.ribu2on or distribu2on
Calibra2on – Spa2al Spread Simula2on
19
DRAFT – Not for a.ribu2on or distribu2on
Calibra2on – Spa2al Spread MoH
20
DRAFT – Not for a.ribu2on or distribu2on
Simula2on Comparison – spread from Lofa
21
Cases per 100k popula2on
Mean simula2on Normal Travel Ministry of Health Data
DRAFT – Not for a.ribu2on or distribu2on
Simula2on Comparison – Rainy Season Travel
22
Cases per 100k popula2on
Mean simula2on Rainy Travel Ministry of Health Data
DRAFT – Not for a.ribu2on or distribu2on
Simula2on Comparison – spread from Lofa
23
Total Cases
Single Simula2on result – Normal Travel Ministry of Health Data
DRAFT – Not for a.ribu2on or distribu2on
Simula2on Comparison – spread from Lofa
24
Total Cases
Single Simula2on result – Rainy Travel Ministry of Health Data
DRAFT – Not for a.ribu2on or distribu2on
Calibra2on Next Steps
• Determine “right” 2me of rainy travel – Pursue more real-‐2me and comprehensive data
• Combine all condi2ons and a.empt calibra2on – Lofa-‐based introduc2on – Lofa and other county temporal changes in txm – Regional travel – affected by rainy season
25
DRAFT – Not for a.ribu2on or distribu2on
Agent-‐based Next Steps
• Planned Experiments: – Impact of hospitals with geo-‐spa2al disease
• Study design / implementa2on under construc2on – Vaccina2on campaign effec2veness
• Framework under development – Es2ma2on of surveillance coverage requirements
• Simulate zoono2c and human introduc2on scenarios, look at “gold standard” transmission trees with varying level of completeness to represent different levels of surveillance
• Address ques2on of needed resources for eventual final stages of “stamp out”
26
DRAFT – Not for a.ribu2on or distribu2on
APPENDIX Suppor2ng material describing model structure, and addi2onal results
27
DRAFT – Not for a.ribu2on or distribu2on
Legrand et al. Model Descrip2on
Exposednot infectious
InfectiousSymptomatic
RemovedRecovered and immune
or dead and buried
Susceptible
HospitalizedInfectious
FuneralInfectious
Legrand, J, R F Grais, P Y Boelle, A J Valleron, and A Flahault. “Understanding the Dynamics of Ebola Epidemics” Epidemiology and Infec1on 135 (4). 2007. Cambridge University Press: 610–21. doi:10.1017/S0950268806007217.
28
DRAFT – Not for a.ribu2on or distribu2on
Compartmental Model
• Extension of model proposed by Legrand et al. Legrand, J, R F Grais, P Y Boelle, A J Valleron, and A Flahault. “Understanding the Dynamics of Ebola Epidemics” Epidemiology and Infec1on 135 (4). 2007. Cambridge University Press: 610–21. doi:10.1017/S0950268806007217.
29
DRAFT – Not for a.ribu2on or distribu2on
Legrand et al. Approach
• Behavioral changes to reduce transmissibili2es at specified days
• Stochas2c implementa2on fit to two historical outbreaks – Kikwit, DRC, 1995 – Gulu, Uganda, 2000
• Finds two different “types” of outbreaks – Community vs. Funeral driven outbreaks
30
DRAFT – Not for a.ribu2on or distribu2on
Parameters of two historical outbreaks
31
DRAFT – Not for a.ribu2on or distribu2on
NDSSL Extensions to Legrand Model
• Mul2ple stages of behavioral change possible during this prolonged outbreak
• Op2miza2on of fit through automated method
• Experiment: – Explore “degree” of fit using the two different outbreak types for each country in current outbreak
32
DRAFT – Not for a.ribu2on or distribu2on
Op2mized Fit Process • Parameters to explored selected – Diag_rate, beta_I, beta_H, beta_F, gamma_I, gamma_D, gamma_F, gamma_H
– Ini2al values based on two historical outbreak • Op2miza2on rou2ne
– Runs model with various permuta2ons of parameters
– Output compared to observed case count
– Algorithm chooses combina2ons that minimize the difference between observed case counts and model outputs, selects “best” one
33
DRAFT – Not for a.ribu2on or distribu2on
Fi.ed Model Caveats
• Assump2ons: – Behavioral changes effect each transmission route similarly
– Mixing occurs differently for each of the three compartments but uniformly within
• These models are likely “overfi.ed” – Many combos of parameters will fit the same curve – Guided by knowledge of the outbreak and addi2onal data sources to keep parameters plausible
– Structure of the model is supported
34
DRAFT – Not for a.ribu2on or distribu2on
Model parameters
35
Sierra&Leonealpha 0.1beta_F 0.111104beta_H 0.079541beta_I 0.128054dx 0.196928gamma_I 0.05gamma_d 0.096332gamma_f 0.222274gamma_h 0.242567delta_1 0.75delta_2 0.75
Liberiaalpha 0.083beta_F 0.489256beta_H 0.062036beta_I 0.1595dx 0.2gamma_I 0.066667gamma_d 0.075121gamma_f 0.496443gamma_h 0.308899delta_1 0.5delta_2 0.5
All Countries Combined
DRAFT – Not for a.ribu2on or distribu2on
Learning from Lofa
36
Model fit to Lofa case series up Aug 18th (green) then from Aug 19 – Oct 21 (blue), compared with real data (red)
DRAFT – Not for a.ribu2on or distribu2on
Learning from Lofa
37
Model fit to Lofa case with a change in behaviors resul2ng in reduced transmission sta2ng mid-‐Aug (blue), compared with observed data (green)
DRAFT – Not for a.ribu2on or distribu2on
Learning from Lofa
38
Model fit to Liberian case data up to Sept 20th (current model in blue), reduc2on in transmissions observed in Lofa applied from Sept 21st on (green), and observed cases (red)
DRAFT – Not for a.ribu2on or distribu2on
Learning from Lofa
39
Model fit to Liberia case with a change in behaviors resul2ng in reduced transmission sta2ng Sept 21st (green), compared with observed data (blue)
top related