model-based covert timing channels: automated modeling and evasion steven gianvecchio 1, haining...

Model-Based Covert Timing Channels:Automated Modeling and Evasion

Steven Gianvecchio1, Haining Wang1, Duminda Wijesekera2, and Sushil Jajodia2

1College of William and Mary2George Mason University

2RAID 2008 Model-Based Covert Timing Channels: Automated Modeling and Evasion

Outline

Background Covert Timing Channels Model-Based Framework Experimental Evaluation

Capacity Detection Resistance

Conclusion

3RAID 2008 Model-Based Covert Timing Channels: Automated Modeling and Evasion

Outline

Background Covert Timing Channels Model-Based Framework Experimental Evaluation

Capacity Detection Resistance

Conclusion

4RAID 2008 Model-Based Covert Timing Channels: Automated Modeling and Evasion

Background

Covert Channels manipulate shared resources to transfer

information hide communication (or extra communication) exfiltrate sensitive data (e.g., keys,

passwords)

5RAID 2008 Model-Based Covert Timing Channels: Automated Modeling and Evasion

Background

Types of Covert Channels shared resource is the type covert storage channels

(e.g., packet header fields) covert timing channels

(e.g., packet arrival times)

6RAID 2008 Model-Based Covert Timing Channels: Automated Modeling and Evasion

Outline

Background Covert Timing Channels Model-Based Framework Experimental Evaluation

Capacity Detection Resistance

Conclusion

7RAID 2008 Model-Based Covert Timing Channels: Automated Modeling and Evasion

Main Goals high capacity strong detection resistance

Capacity –

bits/time unit, not bits/symbol

Covert Timing Channels

)(

);(max

XE

YXIC Xt

8RAID 2008 Model-Based Covert Timing Channels: Automated Modeling and Evasion

Covert Timing Channels

OPtimal Capacity (OPC) send information as fast as possible E(X) is small (1,000s of packets/second)

Fixed-average Packet Rate (FPR) send information as fast as possible with a

fixed-average packet rate E(X) is fixed (a few packets/second)

9RAID 2008 Model-Based Covert Timing Channels: Automated Modeling and Evasion

Outline

Background Covert Timing Channels Model-Based Framework Experimental Evaluation

Capacity Detection Resistance

Conclusion

10RAID 2008 Model-Based Covert Timing Channels: Automated Modeling and Evasion

Model-Based Framework

LEGITTRAFFIC

ANALYZERCOVERT

IPDs

FILTERLEGITIPDs

MODELENCODER TRANSMITTER

COVERTTRAFFIC

TERMS:IPD – INTER-PACKET DELAY

POISSON, WEIBULL, ...

EXPONENTIAL, GAMMA,

PARETO, LOGNORMAL,

MODELS:

MESSAGE

RANDOM NUMBER

INPUT:

The Framework filters and analyzes legitimate traffic encodes and transmits covert traffic

11RAID 2008 Model-Based Covert Timing Channels: Automated Modeling and Evasion

Components

LEGITTRAFFIC

ANALYZERCOVERT

IPDs

FILTERLEGITIPDs

MODELENCODER TRANSMITTER

COVERTTRAFFIC

TERMS:IPD – INTER-PACKET DELAY

POISSON, WEIBULL, ...

EXPONENTIAL, GAMMA,

PARETO, LOGNORMAL,

MODELS:

MESSAGE

RANDOM NUMBER

INPUT:

Filter filters input for the specified type of traffic

(e.g., outgoing HTTP) outputs legitimate IPDs

12RAID 2008 Model-Based Covert Timing Channels: Automated Modeling and Evasion

Components

LEGITTRAFFIC

ANALYZERCOVERT

IPDs

FILTERLEGITIPDs

MODELENCODER TRANSMITTER

COVERTTRAFFIC

TERMS:IPD – INTER-PACKET DELAY

POISSON, WEIBULL, ...

EXPONENTIAL, GAMMA,

PARETO, LOGNORMAL,

MODELS:

MESSAGE

RANDOM NUMBER

INPUT:

Analyzer fits the legitimate IPDs to several models

using MLE (blocks of 100 IPDs) selects the model with the lowest RMSE

13RAID 2008 Model-Based Covert Timing Channels: Automated Modeling and Evasion

Components

LEGITTRAFFIC

ANALYZERCOVERT

IPDs

FILTERLEGITIPDs

MODELENCODER TRANSMITTER

COVERTTRAFFIC

TERMS:IPD – INTER-PACKET DELAY

POISSON, WEIBULL, ...

EXPONENTIAL, GAMMA,

PARETO, LOGNORMAL,

MODELS:

MESSAGE

RANDOM NUMBER

INPUT:

Encoder uses the IDF of the model generates covert IPDs that mimic the

legitimate traffic

14RAID 2008 Model-Based Covert Timing Channels: Automated Modeling and Evasion

Encoding / Decoding

1. Continuize

2. Encode

3. Decode

4. Discretize

scontinuize rrS

ssF

1mod||

)(

ss1

modelencode drFF )(

srrSrF ssdiscretize )1mod)((||)(

ssmodeldecode rdFF )(

15RAID 2008 Model-Based Covert Timing Channels: Automated Modeling and Evasion

Components

LEGITTRAFFIC

ANALYZERCOVERT

IPDs

FILTERLEGITIPDs

MODELENCODER TRANSMITTER

COVERTTRAFFIC

TERMS:IPD – INTER-PACKET DELAY

POISSON, WEIBULL, ...

EXPONENTIAL, GAMMA,

PARETO, LOGNORMAL,

MODELS:

MESSAGE

RANDOM NUMBER

INPUT:

Transmitter sends out packets with covert IPDs

Receiver and Decoder receive packets and decode message

16RAID 2008 Model-Based Covert Timing Channels: Automated Modeling and Evasion

Model-Based Framework

Implementation Details components run in user space filter, encoder, transmitter written in C; plus

inline assembly for RDTSC analyzer written in MATLAB

17RAID 2008 Model-Based Covert Timing Channels: Automated Modeling and Evasion

Outline

Background Covert Timing Channels Model-Based Framework Experimental Evaluation

Capacity Detection Resistance

Conclusion

18RAID 2008 Model-Based Covert Timing Channels: Automated Modeling and Evasion

Experimental Evaluation

Test Scenarios LAN, WAN East-to-East, WAN East-to-West

LAN WAN-EE WAN-EW

distance 0.3 mi 525 mi 2660 mi

RTT 1.7ms 59.6ms 87.2ms

IPDV 2.5e-05 2.41e-03 2.1e-04

hops 3 18 13

IPDV – inter-packet delay variation

19RAID 2008 Model-Based Covert Timing Channels: Automated Modeling and Evasion

Test Setup

MB-HTTP Weibull – avg. λ = 0.0371, avg. k = 0.3010 E(X) is 0.3385 (~3 packets/second)

OPC E(X) is 7.31e-3 to 7.87e-5

(1,515 to 12,777 packets/second) FPR

Exponential – λ = 2.954 E(X) is 0.3385 (~3 packets/second)

20RAID 2008 Model-Based Covert Timing Channels: Automated Modeling and Evasion

Theoretical Capacity

channel

LAN WAN-EE WAN-EW

CPP CPS CPP CPS CPP CPS

MB-HTTP 9.39 27.76 4.12 12.19 6.84 20.21

OPC 0.50 6,395 0.50 68.80 0.50 758.54

FPR 12.63 37.32 6.15 18.17 9.59 28.35

CPP – capacity/packet, CPS = capacity/second

LAN, WAN East-East, WAN East-West OPC has highest capacity

21RAID 2008 Model-Based Covert Timing Channels: Automated Modeling and Evasion

Theoretical Capacity

channel

LAN WAN-EE WAN-EW

CPP CPS CPP CPS CPP CPS

MB-HTTP 9.39 27.76 4.12 12.19 6.84 20.21

OPC 0.50 6,395 0.50 68.80 0.50 758.54

FPR 12.63 37.32 6.15 18.17 9.59 28.35

CPP – capacity/packet, CPS = capacity/second

LAN, WAN East-East, WAN East-West MB-HTTP and FPR are close

22RAID 2008 Model-Based Covert Timing Channels: Automated Modeling and Evasion

Empirical Capacity

WAN E-E empirical capacity

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

bit

em

pir

ica

l ca

pa

cit

y

FPR MB-HTTP

WAN E-E bit error rates

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

bit

err

or

rate

FPR MB-HTTP

WAN East-East MB-HTTP versus FPR capacity and bit error degrade quickly

23RAID 2008 Model-Based Covert Timing Channels: Automated Modeling and Evasion

Empirical Capacity

WAN E-W empirical capacity

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

bit

em

pir

ica

l ca

pa

cit

y

FPR MB-HTTP

WAN E-W bit error rates

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

bit

err

or

rate

FPR MB-HTTP

WAN East-West MB-HTTP versus FPR capacity and bit error degrade slowly

24RAID 2008 Model-Based Covert Timing Channels: Automated Modeling and Evasion

Empirical Capacity

channel

LAN WAN-EE WAN-EW

CPP CPS CPP CPS CPP CPS

MB-HTTP 6.74 19.93 2.15 6.35 5.18 15.31

OPC 0.85 10,899 0.66 91.28 0.98 1,512

FPR 10.95 32.35 4.63 13.67 9.37 27.69

CPP – capacity/packet, CPS = capacity/second

LAN, WAN East-East, WAN East-West OPC again has the highest capacity

25RAID 2008 Model-Based Covert Timing Channels: Automated Modeling and Evasion

Empirical Capacity

channel

LAN WAN-EE WAN-EW

CPP CPS CPP CPS CPP CPS

MB-HTTP 6.74 19.93 2.15 6.35 5.18 15.31

OPC 0.85 10,899 0.66 91.28 0.98 1,512

FPR 10.95 32.35 4.63 13.67 9.37 27.69

CPP – capacity/packet, CPS = capacity/second

LAN, WAN East-East, WAN East-West MB-HTTP and FPR are still close

26RAID 2008 Model-Based Covert Timing Channels: Automated Modeling and Evasion

Tests of Shape: Kolmogorov-Smirnov test –

where s1 and s2 are distribution functions

Tests of Regularity: The regularity test (Cabuk 2004) –

26

Detection Resistance

|)()(|max 21 xsxsKSTEST

jijiSTDEVregularity

i

ji ,,,||

27RAID 2008 Model-Based Covert Timing Channels: Automated Modeling and Evasion

KSTEST

LEGIT-HTTP MB-HTTP FPR OPC

sample size mean stddev m. s.d. m. s.d m. s.d

100x2,000 .193 .110 .196 .093 .92 .0 .99 .0

100x10,000 .141 .103 .157 .087 .92 .0 .99 .0

100x50,000 .096 .096 .122 .073 .92 .0 .99 .0

100x250,000 .069 .066 .096 .036 .92 .0 .99 .0

KSTEST scores high mean and low s.d. for FPR and OPC

28RAID 2008 Model-Based Covert Timing Channels: Automated Modeling and Evasion

KSTEST

LEGIT-HTTP MB-HTTP FPR OPC

sample size mean stddev m. s.d. m. s.d m. s.d

100x2,000 .193 .110 .196 .093 .92 .0 .99 .0

100x10,000 .141 .103 .157 .087 .92 .0 .99 .0

100x50,000 .096 .096 .122 .073 .92 .0 .99 .0

100x250,000 .069 .066 .096 .036 .92 .0 .99 .0

KSTEST scores similar mean and s.d. for LEGIT and MB-HTTP

29RAID 2008 Model-Based Covert Timing Channels: Automated Modeling and Evasion

KSTEST

scores for 100x 2,000 packets

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

0.3

0.35

0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45 0.5

test score

pro

po

rtio

n

LEGIT-HTTP MB-HTTP

scores for 100x 10,000 packets

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

0.3

0.35

0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45 0.5

test score

pro

po

rtio

n

LEGIT-HTTP MB-HTTP

KSTEST distribution similar distributions for LEGIT-HTTP and MB-

HTTP scores

30RAID 2008 Model-Based Covert Timing Channels: Automated Modeling and Evasion

KSTEST

scores for 100x 50,000 packets

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

0.3

0.35

0.4

0.45

0.5

0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45 0.5

test score

pro

po

rtio

n

LEGIT-HTTP MB-HTTP

scores for 100x 250,000 packets

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45 0.5

test score

pro

po

rtio

n

LEGIT-HTTP MB-HTTP

KSTEST distribution LEGIT-HTTP and MB-HTTP overlap even

with 250,000 packets

31RAID 2008 Model-Based Covert Timing Channels: Automated Modeling and Evasion

KSTEST

LEGIT-HTTP MB-HTTP FPR OPC

sample size FP TP TP TP

100x2,000 .01 .01 1.00 1.00

100x10,000 .01 .01 1.00 1.00

100x50,000 .01 .01 1.00 1.00

100x250,000 .01 .02 1.00 1.00

KSTEST detection rates FPR and OPC are detected easily

32RAID 2008 Model-Based Covert Timing Channels: Automated Modeling and Evasion

KSTEST

LEGIT-HTTP MB-HTTP FPR OPC

sample size FP TP TP TP

100x2,000 .01 .01 1.00 1.00

100x10,000 .01 .01 1.00 1.00

100x50,000 .01 .01 1.00 1.00

100x250,000 .01 .02 1.00 1.00

KSTEST detection rates FP equals TP for LEGIT and MB-HTTP

33RAID 2008 Model-Based Covert Timing Channels: Automated Modeling and Evasion

regularity

LEGIT-HTTP MB-HTTP FPR OPC

sample size mean mean mean mean

100x2,000 w=100

43.80 38.21 0.34 0.00

100x2,000 w=250

23.74 22.87 0.26 0.00

regularity scores similar mean for LEGIT and MB-HTTP

34RAID 2008 Model-Based Covert Timing Channels: Automated Modeling and Evasion

regularity

LEGIT-HTTP MB-HTTP FPR OPC

sample size FP TP TP TP

100x2,000 w=100

.01 .00 1.00 1.00

100x2,000 w=250

.01 .00 1.00 1.00

regularity detection rates MB-HTTP is not detected at all

35RAID 2008 Model-Based Covert Timing Channels: Automated Modeling and Evasion

regularity

LEGIT-HTTP MB-HTTP FPR OPC

sample size FP TP TP TP

100x2,000 w=100

.01 .00 1.00 1.00

100x2,000 w=250

.01 .00 1.00 1.00

regularity detection rates again FPR and OPC are detected easily

36RAID 2008 Model-Based Covert Timing Channels: Automated Modeling and Evasion

Outline

Background Covert Timing Channels Model-Based Framework Experimental Evaluation

Capacity Detection Resistance

Conclusion

37RAID 2008 Model-Based Covert Timing Channels: Automated Modeling and Evasion

Conclusion

Model-Based Covert Timing Channels can be built automatically effective even in coast-to-coast scenario capacity is very close to FPR much stronger detection resistance than FPR

and OPC

38RAID 2008 Model-Based Covert Timing Channels: Automated Modeling and Evasion

Conclusion (cont.)

Future Work investigate detection methods for model-

based covert timing channels explore other more advanced covert timing

channel designs (e.g., non-parametric models)

39RAID 2008 Model-Based Covert Timing Channels: Automated Modeling and Evasion

Questions?

Thank You!