measuring gravitational waves with geo600
Post on 21-Jan-2016
18 Views
Preview:
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
Martin Hewitson and the GEO team
Measuring gravitational waves with GEO600
GEO meeting Sept 2004 2
Introduction
DRMI gives 2 output signals, each containing GW information – P(t) and Q(t)
There is a transfer function from h(t) to P(t) and from h(t) to Q(t)
Tp(f) = P(f) / h(f) and Tq(f) = Q(f)/h(f) Each comprise an optical part and an electronic part Each vary (slowly?) in time
We want to calibrate P(t) and Q(t) to h(t) on-line
Need to estimate Tp(f) and Tq(f) hp(t) and hq(t) Combine hp(t) and hq(t) to get optimal h(t)
GEO meeting Sept 2004 3
In the steady state….
GEO meeting Sept 2004 4
Transfer functions h(t)P,Q
GEO meeting Sept 2004 5
Optical transfer function - equations
For each quadrature, P and Q, Overall gain Pole frequency Pole Q Zero frequency
GEO meeting Sept 2004 6
Measured optical response - P
GEO meeting Sept 2004 7
Calibration overview
calibration
GEO meeting Sept 2004 8
Calibration software tasks
GEO meeting Sept 2004 9
On-line measurement of Tp(f)
GEO meeting Sept 2004 10
Optimisation routine
Fit models of the transfer functions to the measured ones
8 parameter fit Gp, Ppf, Ppq, Pzf, Gq, Qpf, Qpq, Qzf
Electronic parameters are fixed Algorithm uses various minimisation
methods to find the best parameter set that describes the data
It also returns a measure of success – 2
GEO meeting Sept 2004 11
Undoing the effect of the optical response
The parameters from sys id can be used to generate inverse optical response
Poles to zeros, zeros to poles, invert gains
IIR filters are designed for these inverted responses
Overall gains are treated separately
Filters are applied to up-sampled error-point to give better filter response
Inverse P
GEO meeting Sept 2004 12
Generating loop-gain correction signals
A full set of IIR filters has be constructed to match the response of the feedback electronics in the detection band
One set for fast feedback, one set for slow feedback
Error-point signal is filtered through these electronics filters and then through actuator filters
This produces two ‘displacement’ signals that correct for the loop gain of the MI servo
GEO meeting Sept 2004 13
Fast path (UG 100 Hz) electronics model
GEO meeting Sept 2004 14
Slow path (UG 8 Hz) electronics model
GEO meeting Sept 2004 15
Calibration pipeline – hp(t)
GEO meeting Sept 2004 16
Parameter estimation results - P
GEO meeting Sept 2004 17
Parameter estimation results - Q
GEO meeting Sept 2004 18
2 behaviour
The measure of success from the optimisation routine tells us something about data quality
2 depends on SNR of calibration lines in P
GEO meeting Sept 2004 19
Quality channel
One 16-bit sample per second
Encodes information from
Lock status Maintenance status 2 threshold crossings
So far, 2 thresholds have been chosen arbitrarily
This will be extended soon – see data quality indicators talk 32 bit
sample per sec
GEO meeting Sept 2004 20
Measured2 behaviour
GEO meeting Sept 2004 21
Measured2 behaviour
GEO meeting Sept 2004 22
Measured2 behaviour
noise estimation (2)
GEO meeting Sept 2004 23
hp(f) and hq(f) – validation I
GEO meeting Sept 2004 24
ESD calibration - Validation II
Labbook pages 1587, 1596, 1602
GEO meeting Sept 2004 25
Combining hp(t) and hq(t)
With ‘correct’ hp(t) and hq(t) we can try to combine them to get some optimal h(t)
Both signals represent (apparent) strain Each contain some differential arm-length
change information (real strain) So, far only tried a couple of simple
examples Simple mean High/low pass filter combination
GEO meeting Sept 2004 26
Simple mean combination
h(t) = [hp(t) + hq(t)] / 2
GEO meeting Sept 2004 27
Simple mean combination – phase check
GEO meeting Sept 2004 28
Filtered combination – highpass+lowpass
h(t) = lowpass{hp(t)} + highpass{hq(t)}
GEO meeting Sept 2004 29
Filtered combination – results
h(t) = lowpass{hp(t)} + highpass{hq(t)}
GEO meeting Sept 2004 30
Filtered combination – phase check
GEO meeting Sept 2004 31
Current and future work
Q quadrature parameters are now successfully estimated and signal is calibrated to hq(t)
Updating of the optical filters needs more extensive studies to look for artefacts
More studies of 2 values for P+Q simulations More studies of 2 values for P+Q ‘real’ data How to combine h(t)_P and h(t)_Q ?
Some simple ideas already exist Other possibilities should be explored The combined h(t) needs studied for artefacts
Include more automation MI loop gains read from LabVIEW Add more data quality checks – extend quality channel bits
Try using recorded feedback signals for loop-gain correction
GEO meeting Sept 2004 32
Pros and cons
Pros Calibration is updated once per second Accuracy to ~10% from 50Hz to 6kHz Runs on-line with 2 min latency – time-domain Produces calibrated time-series – hp(t), hq(t)
Cons Fast (>1Hz) optical gain fluctuations ignored Outwith valid frequency range, accuracy is
poorer Bottom line is ESD calibration – good to about 5%
Need independent check of ESD Photon pressure calibrator
GEO meeting Sept 2004 33
Intermission
(Pause)
GEO meeting Sept 2004 34
Introducing GEO Summary Pages
Track fixed measurements over lock stretches
Same set of measurements is performed on each data segment
Lock stretches can be overnight runs, weekend runs, science runs
A report is produced (web page) for each data segment
Quick-look way of comparing detector status over days
Also gives information about data quality Q: Should this data segment be analysed?
GEO meeting Sept 2004 35
GEO Summary Pages – calibration quality
GEO Summary pages focus primarily on calibration quality and sensitivity measures so far
Min/Max spectra BLRMS sensitivity Data quality channel – locked?, Maintenance? Recovered parameters 2 values Lock lists and duty cycle
Will be extended to include GEO++ monitor outputs (see Ajith’s talk)
GEO meeting Sept 2004 36
Where to look
Index of reports appears at
http://www.geo600.uni-hannover.de/georeports/index.html
The list of reports is split into months Each entry is a summary of the full report Links take you to the full report
Let’s have a look…
top related