measures of student achievement appoquinimink school district november 2007
Post on 17-Dec-2015
214 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
Measures of Student Achievement
Appoquinimink School DistrictNovember 2007
Elementary Highlights
ASD Reading scores are among the best in the state.
Writing scores at grades 3 and 5 increase significantly
Science performance remains constant and at the top in the state
Grade 3 Reading:Comparison of Change
82
93
84
94
84
93
81
90
70
75
80
85
90
95
2004 2005 2006 2007
StateASD
Percent of students who meet/exceed state content standards
Grade 3 Reading:Performance on Nationally Scored Questions
7979
78
7071
7273
747576
7778
79
2004 2005 2006
ASD
Percentile ranking on nationally standardized questions (SAT 9/10)
Grade 3 Mathematics:Comparison of Change
78
81.3
79
85
78
89
77
85
7072747678808284868890
2004 2005 2006 2007
StateASD
Percent of students who meet/exceed state content standards
Grade 3 Mathematics:Performance on Nationally Scored Questions
82
78
81
78
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
2004 2005 2006 2007
ASD
Percentile ranking on nationally standardized questions (SAT 9/10)
Grade 3 Writing:Comparison of Change
52
65
69
83
61
72
67
82
010
203040
506070
8090
2004 2005 2006 2007
StateASD
Percent of students who meet/exceed state content standards
3rd Grade Disaggregated
90
40
82
44
82
45
0
20
40
60
80
100
Rdg Math Wrtg
Percent Meeting or Exceeding Standards
Reg EdSpec Ed
3rd Grade Disaggregated
92
80
89
7282
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Rdg Math Writing
Percent Meeting or Exceeding the Standard
WhiteAfr.American
Grade 5 Reading:Comparison of Change
75
92
77
96
77
93
8591
0
20
40
60
80
100
2004 2005 2006 2007
StateASD
Percent of students who meet/exceed state content standards
Grade 5 Reading:Performance on Nationally Scored Questions
79
83
82 82
73
75
77
79
81
83
2004 2005 2006 2007
ASD
Percentile ranking on nationally standardized questions (SAT 9/10)
Grade 5 Mathematics:Comparison of Change
75
81
77
83
77
85
76
82
70
72
74
76
78
80
82
84
86
2004 2005 2006 2007
StateASD
Percent of students who meet/exceed state content standards
Grade 5 Mathematics:Performance on Nationally Scored Questions
76
74
7878
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
2004 2005 2006 2007
ASD
Percentile ranking on nationally standardized questions (SAT 9/10)
Grade 5 Writing:Comparison of Change
60
66
56
72
51
6462
74
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
2004 2005 2006 2007
StateASD
Percent of students who meet/exceed state content standards
5th Grade Disaggregated
91
53
82
44
74
31
0
20
40
60
80
100
Rdg Math Wrtg
Percent Meeting or Exceeding Standards
Reg EdSpec Ed
5th Grade Disaggregated
92
8387
6575
67
0
20
40
60
80
100
Rdg Math Wrtg
Percent Meeting or Exceeding Standards
WhiteAfr. Amer.
4th Grade Science
91
96
92
96
92
96
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
2004 2005 2006 2007
StateASD
4th grade social studies
69
83
65
78
70
84
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
2004 2005 2006 2007
StateASD
Elementary Next Steps Accelerated Reader will continue to be a district-wide
program to support reading fluency and comprehension.
Extended time programs continue to be targeted to student specific needs.
Fastt Math is in its second year of implementation in all elementary schools.
Full day kindergarten is in place for the second year. Common math program is in place in elementary
schools. Research based reading intervention programs are
being used with students reading below grade level Implementation and monitoring of Global Studies
initiatives The district is taking steps to be fully prepared for
implementation of Response to Intervention next year.
Middle School Highlights
Middle School performance continues to exceed state standards in Reading, Writing and Math.
We continue to narrow the gap between white and African American students in reading and writing.
6th and 8th grade science scores, while remaining steady, continue to exceed state standards.
Grade 8 Reading:Comparison of Change
71
8579
9184
9382
92
0
20
40
60
80
100
2004 2005 2006 2007
StateASD
Percent of students who meet/exceed state content standards
Grade 8 Reading:Performance on Nationally Scored Questions
73
7777
75
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
2004 2005 2006 2007
ASD
Percentile ranking on nationally standardized questions (SAT 9/10)
Grade 8 Mathematics:Comparison of Change
50
63
53
65 62
78
61
72
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
2004 2005 2006 2007
StateASD
Percent of students who meet/exceed state content standards
Grade 8 Mathematics:Performance on Nationally Scored Questions
66
72
74
72
62
64
66
68
70
72
74
2004 2005 2006 2007
ASD
Percentile ranking on nationally standardized questions (SAT 9/10)
Grade 8 Writing:Comparison of Change
81
92
76
8678
89
78
88
0
20
40
60
80
100
2004 2005 2006 2007
StateASD
Percent of students who meet/exceed state content standards
8th Grade Disaggregated
92
63
77
28
88
57
0
20
40
60
80
100
Rdg Math Wrtg
Percent Meeting or Exceeding Standards
Reg. EdSpec. Ed
8th Grade Disaggregated
95
83 80
53
9081
0
20
40
60
80
100
Rdg Math Wrtg
Percent Meeting or Exceeding Standards
WhiteAfr. Amer.
6th grade science
7687
80
91
78
89
00102030405060708090
100
2004 2005 2006 2007
StateASD
6th grade social studies
57
70
60
73
61
74
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
2004 2005 2006 2007
StateASD
8th grade science
50
68
53
71
54
73
58
74
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
2004 2005 2006 2007
State ASD
8th grade social studies
47
69
54
75
51
65
50
65
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
2004 2005 2006 2007
StateASD
Middle School Next Steps Building administrators have developed
intervention programs which take place during the school day and after hours to address the needs of students not meeting the standards.
Red Flag assessments for math continue to be utilized to inform instruction. Data from these assessments will be reviewed to determine individual student needs.
Attention continues to be focused on ensuring that special education students have access to the regular education curriculum.
ISTs are fully operational in both buildings.
High School Highlights Red Flag assessments continue to be
administered to inform instruction. Accelerated Reader continues to be in
place for all 9th and 10th grade students. Attendance in the extended time
program has increased. Student performance in writing, reading
and math exceeds state standards.
Grade 10 Writing:Comparison of Change
81 82 79 8176 76
6671
010
203040
506070
8090
2004 2005 2006 2007
StateASD
Percent of students who meet/exceed state content standards
Grade 10 Reading:Comparison of Change
70 7070
75
71 71
73
81
6466
687072
747678
8082
2004 2005 2006 2007
StateASD
Percent of students who meet/exceed state content standards
Grade 10 Reading:Performance on Nationally Scored Questions
50
7772
78
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
2004 2005 2006 2007
ASD
Percentile ranking on nationally standardized questions (SAT 9/10)
Grade 10 Mathematics:Comparison of Change
5354
5256
5957
70
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
2004 2005 2006 2007
StateASD
Percent of students who meet/exceed state content standards
Grade 10 Mathematics:Performance on Nationally Scored Questions
69
72
79
64
66
68
70
72
74
76
78
80
2004 2005 2006 2007
ASD
Percentile ranking on nationally standardized questions (SAT 9/10)
10th Grade Disaggregated
81
34
70
21
71
160
20
40
60
80
100
Rdg Math Wrtg
Percent Meeting or Exceeding Standards
Reg. EdSpec. Ed
10th Grade Disaggregated
85
6975
56
76
56
0
20
40
60
80
100
Rdg Math Wrtg
Percent Meeting or Exceeding Standards
WhiteAfr. Amer.
11th grade science
54 56 5963 61
67 6566
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
2004 2005 2006 2007
StateASD
11th grade social studies
46
53
53
54
51
63
53
58
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
2004 2005 2006 2007
StateASD
Advanced Placement
50
57
60
44
46
48
50
52
54
56
58
60
2005 2006 2007
3+
SAT Scores - Reading
486 487482
480478
455
475
495
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
MHS
SAT Scores - Math
481
494491
488
484
465
480
495
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
MHS
SAT Scores - Writing
466471
445
460
475
490
2006 2007
MHS
SAT State Comparison
478
480
484 483
471468
460
465
470
475
480
485
Reading Math Writing
MHSState
High School Next Steps Staff will continue to implement brain-based learning
strategies Continued emphasis will be placed on “CRISS”. Training
for staff has been planned for this school year. Intervention programs have been put in place for both
reading and mathematics. These should aid us as we attempt to close achievement gaps.
Instructional Support Teams are being implemented at Middletown High School.
There is 6-12 vertical articulation among teachers in core content areas.
Administratively we have formed an Instructional Council which meets regularly to discuss student achievement at the secondary level.
Curriculum Review
State Recommended Curriculum
State Standards GLEs/CLEsInstructional
Programs/Models
Next Steps Cross Walk
Standards GLEs/CLEs Instructional Programs/Models
Model Units/Lessons
Our Commitment Data-driven decision making at each school. A prescriptive plan for raising DSTP scores and other
indicators of achievement in all content areas. Scientifically researched based interventions through
the RTI process, for each child, regular and special education.
Continued emphasis on professional development. Classroom evaluation to ensure effective, aligned
instruction. Involvement of parents/community in the
instructional dialogue Coordinated and aligned strategic plan that includes
teacher goals, administrator goals, IDEA and Consolidated grant.
Thank You
top related