market update micro irrigation - icfa.org.in · 3.09 4.94 7.73-1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 2005 2010 2015 e...
Post on 23-Jul-2020
0 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
Micro IrrigationMarket Update
Micro Irrigation Penetration Rate
90.0%
78.0%
65.0%
55.0%
52.0%
10.0%
5.5%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Israel
Russia
Spain
U.S.
Brazil
China
India
Penetration Rate (%)
3.09
4.94
7.73
-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
2005 2010 2015
Mil
lio
n H
ecta
re
All India Area Covered Under Micro
Irrigation; 2005-2015
All India Area Covered Under Micro
Irrigation by Segments; 2015
(Million Hectare)
3.37,
43.62%
4.36,
56.38%
Drip Irrigation
Sprinkler Irrigation
Top 10 States with Micro Irrigation Area Covered; 2015 (Million Hectare)
1.68 , 21.80%
1.27 , 16.45%
1.16 , 15.05%
0.85 ,
10.96%
0.83 , 10.73%
0.57 , 7.42%
0.35 , 4.56%
0.32 , 4.15%
0.26 , 3.32%
0.10 , 1.32%
0.33 , 4.25%Rajasthan
Maharashtra
Andhra Pradesh
Karnataka
Gujarat
Haryana
Madhya Pradesh
Tamil Nadu
Chhattisgarh
Bihar
Others
Year Wise Micro Irrigation Area Covered of Major States; 2009-2015
243.17 212.54
12.60
144.54
261.10 195.66
44.16 37.60 13.60
200.72 192.62
12.33 161.33 181.13
146.62 54.09 32.41
64.66
1,021.48
575.08 515.31
397.65 391.26
310.23
202.78 130.95
23.25
-
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
00
0'
Hec
tare
2009-11 2011-13 2013-15
Major States Area Covered Under Micro Irrigation by Segments; 2015
170
896 835
430 411
23166 290
16 5
1,514375
328
417 418
550 18630 241
97
-
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
1,600
1,800
00
0'
Hec
tare
Drip Irrigation Sprinkler Irrigation
Major States Micro Irrigation Systems Penetration Rate; 2015
16.3%10.8%
10.4%9.3%
8.5%8.1%
7.3%6.4%
5.5%2.3%2.3%2.2%
1.9%1.5%1.4%1.4%1.4%
1.0%1.0%
0.3%0.2%0.2%0.2%0.1%
0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% 14% 16% 18%
Haryana
Andhra Pradesh
Karnataka
Maharashtra
Chhattisgarh
Odisha
Bihar
Kerela
Nagaland
West Bengal
Uttar Pradesh
Himachal Pradesh
Manipur
Penetration Rate (%)
Energy Consumption; 2015 Fertilizer Consumption; 2015
49.3%
42.0%
40.0%
40.0%
37.8%
35.1%
33.4%
29.9%
26.8%
22.4%
22.2%
18.1%
15.1%
30.5%
0% 20% 40% 60%
Haryana
Rajasthan
Bihar
Gujarat
Chhatisgarh
Sikkim
Maharashtra
Uttarakhand
Karnataka
Odisha
Andhra Pradesh
Uttar Pradesh
Tamil Nadu
Total
Energy Consumption Savings (%)
43.8%
42.7%
40.9%
40.4%
37.5%
28.8%
28.2%
27.1%
23.0%
22.8%
20.9%
18.0%
7.6%
28.5%
0% 20% 40% 60%
Rajasthan
Gujarat
Sikkim
Chhattisgarh
Haryana
Andhra Pradesh
Karnataka
Tamil Nadu
Maharashtra
Uttar Pradesh
Odisha
Uttarakhand
Bihar
Total
Ferilizer Consumption Savings (%)
Fruit Crops Productivity; 2015 Vegetable Crops Productivity; 2015
73.4%
70.4%
66.7%
49.2%
38.2%
35.0%
34.2%
32.5%
28.2%
19.4%
17.3%
15.4%
6.8%
42.4%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80%
Gujarat
Rajasthan
Chhattisgarh
Maharashtra
Haryana
Odisha
Uttar Pradesh
Uttarakhand
Karnataka
Andhra Pradesh
Tamil Nadu
Bihar
Sikkim
Total
Productivity Increase (%)
98.8%
68.7%
66.7%
49.8%
39.4%
34.1%
31.0%
30.8%
28.9%
28.7%
28.2%
26.4%
22.1%
52.7%
0% 50% 100% 150%
Chhattisgarh
Gujarat
Sikkim
Uttarakhand
Rajasthan
Andhra Pradesh
Bihar
Uttar Pradesh
Karnataka
Maharashtra
Odisha
Tamil Nadu
Haryana
Total
Productivity Increase (%)
Increase in Farmer’s Income; 2015 Introduction of New Crop; 2015
68.0%
67.3%
59.0%
52.5%
49.4%
45.8%
38.5%
37.3%
33.3%
32.8%
32.6%
27.7%
20.1%
42.0%
0% 50% 100%
Gujarat
Chhattisgarh
Haryana
Rajasthan
Uttar Pradesh
Maharashtra
Odisha
Sikkim
Tamil Nadu
Bihar
Andhra Pradesh
Karnataka
Uttarakhand
Total
Farmer's Income Increase (%)
98.4%
62.6%
53.6%
52.0%
46.0%
41.4%
26.7%
18.8%
11.6%
11.6%
2.2%
1.6%
0.5%
30.4%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 120%
Haryana
Uttar Pradesh
Chhattisgarh
Sikkim
Odisha
Andhra Pradesh
Karnataka
Maharashtra
Gujarat
Tamil Nadu
Uttarakhand
Bihar
Rajasthan
Total
% of Farmers Introduced New Crops
Irrigation Savings; 2015
49.3%
49.0%
45.4%
36.5%
31.0%
28.6%
27.9%
27.6%
26.5%
24.7%
24.7%
23.3%
20.8%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%
Gujarat
Haryana
Rajasthan
Chhattisgarh
Maharashtra
Bihar
Sikkim
Uttar Pradesh
Odisha
Karnataka
Tamil Nadu
Uttarakhand
Andhra Pradesh
Irrigation Cost Savings (%)
Year-Wise Total Fund Allocation and Utilization; 2012-17
State-Wise Fund Allocation and Utilization; 2015-17
14.9 15.6
11.2 10.8
17.0
80.5%75.1%
85.9%
93.1%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
-
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
Uti
liza
tion
(%
)
₹B
illi
on
Allocation (₹ Billion) Utilization (%)
S. No States
2015-16 2016-17
Allocation
(₹ Crore)
Utilization
(%)
Allocation
(₹ Crore)
1 Maharashtra 176.75 50% 330
2 Gujarat 146.75 139% 250
3Andhra
Pradesh131.75 135% 260
4 Karnataka 111.75 100% 169
5 Rajasthan 104.75 50% 120
6 Telangana 92.75 103% 165
7Madhya
Pradesh82.75 162% 140
8 Tamil Nadu 72.75 100% 110
9 Haryana 34.5 49% 40
10 Bihar 20 50% 0
11 Others 100.93 119
Total 1075.43 1703
State-Wise Potential for Micro Irrigation in India
Crop-Wise Potential for Micro Irrigation in India
Crops Million Hectare
Cereals27.6
Cotton8.8
Pulses7.6
Vegetables6.0
Oil Seeds4.9
Sugarcane4.3
Fruits3.9
Coconut, Plantation Crops and
Oil Palms 3.0
Spices and Condiments2.4
Flowers, medicinal and
aromatic plants 1.0
10.79 , 26%
6.39 , 15%
5.66 , 13%
3.38 , 8%
3.28 , 8%
2.71 , 6%
2.39 , 6%
1.85 , 4%
1.44 , 3%1.23 , 3%
1.12 , 3% 2.00 , 5%Uttar Pradesh
Madhya Pradesh
Rajasthan
Punjab
Gujarat
Maharashtra
Haryana
Bihar
Karnataka
West Bengal
Andhra Pradesh
Others
There is no dedicated scheme on MI. It’s just a component of
PMKSY.
Lack of dedicated team and IT-backed operations
Delay in release of guidelines/government orders, uncertainty
and sporadic changes in scheme guidelines
Delay in Subsidy disbursement
Absence of easy financing mechanisms for farmers
High cost of maintenance and repairing of MI instrument
Government should initiate an awareness campaign to sensitize farming
community about MI
It should be made mandatory for firms providing infrastructure for micro
irrigation to train the beneficiary about usage and handling of system with
proper manual.
To safeguard the investment made by farmer on MI system, provision for
ensured maintenance service of MI system by the firm for at least 3 years should
be made to provide hassle free service to farmers.
SAUs and other institutes should initiate diploma courses for imparting skill of
operating and maintaining micro irrigation systems to rural youth, this will
provide employment to youth as well as create local service providers.
Schemes like Credit Linked, Back-Ended Subsidy and Credit Guarantee Fund
Trust for Micro and Small Enterprises should be promoted and extended with
the help of state and central agenesis along with the industries, cooperatives,
NGOs.
top related