mark parsons (nsidc) and peter fox (rpi) egu 2012, gi 1.3 april 23, 2012, vienna, austria exploring...

Post on 03-Jan-2016

216 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

TRANSCRIPT

Mark Parsons (NSIDC) and Peter Fox (RPI)

EGU 2012, GI 1.3

April 23, 2012, Vienna, Austria

Exploring Metaphors for making Data Available

ICSU SCCID recommendation

http://eloquentscience.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/open_access.jpg

http://www.helmholtz.de/fileadmin/user_upload/forschung/Open_Access/Open_Access_Cloud_WEB.jpg

http://www.icsu.org/publications/reports-and-reviews/strategic-coordinating-committee-on-information-and-data-report

ICSU SCCID recommendation

OECD guidelines = data access and sharing policies

http://bernews.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/oecd-logo.jpg

ICSU SCCID recommendation

•Engage actively – publishers of all kinds together

– library community

– scientific researchers

•To – Document and promote community

best practice in the handling of supplemental material, publication of data and appropriate data citation.

http://www.einstruction.com/files/default/files/publishers.jpg

http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2010/03/reed-elsevier-logo240cs030110.jpg

http://www.leebullen.com/Finished%20Pics/Scientists.jpg

Goal?

• Data as a first class object

• Metaphors indicate a particular stakeholder perspective

Technical advances

From: C. Borgman, 2008, NSF Cyberlearning Report

7

Data Information Knowledge

Producers Consumers

Context

PresentationOrganization

IntegrationConversation

CreationGathering

Experience• Ecosystem

• Stimulate

Innovation

Research

Exploration

Data perspective

8

Producers Consumers

Quality Control

Fitness for Purpose Fitness for Use

Quality Assessment

Trustee Trustor

Is this separation good or not?

9

Producers Consumers

Quality Control

Fitness for Purpose Fitness for Use

Quality Assessment

Trustee Trustor

Multiple approaches - generic

• Organizations

• Data Centres

• Publishers

• Release (e.g. like software)

• Linked data

• … (am not going to cover them all)

An un-named US govt. agency

Pros/Cons - Data Centres (‘big iron’)

• Volume• Streamlined• Automation• Auditable• Reprocessing capability• Central authority• Funded

• Over-reliance on automation• Weak documentation• Use is assumed• Roles ill-defined, reputation?• Does not handle heterogeneity• Preservation ?• Overly focused on generation• …

Pros/Cons - Publishers

• Simple• Tested• Disseminated• Shifted burden• Imprimatur• De-facto preservation• Citable• Based on science norms

• Locked• Static/• Not machine

accessible• Cost?• Not scalable• Cannot verify use

Pros/Cons - Release (software)

• Many stages (alpha, beta, release candidate, release)

• Versioned• Documented and change

notified• Intends to couple user

feedback to developers• Packaged• Licensing well thought out • …

• Provenance implicit• Preservation poorly dealt with• Quality may be difficult to

determine• Attribution not part of the mind-

set• Derivative or embedded use

not always well defined• …

Pros/Cons - Linked data

• Scales• Built on web• Simple model design• Tested• Disseminated• Machine processable• No central authority• Heterogeneous• Use not assumed• Flexible evolution• Supports encapsulation

• Poor versioning• Poor auditing• No imprimatur• No preservation/ stewardship• Not human friendly• Heterogeneous vocab.• Changes data model• Unknown evolution• …

Setting of the roles and relations

• Yes it is about contracts… of all sorts…– But that’s a longer story.

Attributes in search of metaphors

• A new paradigm of Archive, Release, and Mediate that disaggregates the functions?

• Rapid, carefully versioned and described releases (like software)?

• Open software/web: Simple, Weak (least power), Scalable, Open?

• Active mediation between producers and consumers (like specialist shop keepers – a new role)?

Call to discussion

• Multiple metaphors, many considerations

• An ecosystem approach allows multiple solutions in a socio-technical system

• Significant opportunities for under-served data generators to get their data ‘out there’ perhaps publication (still a metaphor!)

• Consequences – it will be annoying for a while..

• Role(s) for professional societies, e.g. statements on data• Thanks for your attention - pfox@cs.rpi.edu , http://tw.rpi.edu

• Watch for our Data Science Journal essay on this topic

top related