march 16-17, 2011 new york city, ny evaluation results michelle bissonnette
Post on 23-Mar-2016
28 Views
Preview:
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
MARCH 16-17, 2011NEW YORK CITY, NY
EVALUATION RESULTS
Michelle BissonnetteU.S. Department of Education
Table of ContentsWho Responded ?ResultsOverall Summit EvaluationEvaluation of SessionsEvaluation of Logistics and SupportEvaluation Comments
WhoResponded?
Who Responded?
Participants: Attendees engaged in dialogue at the center tableAttendees: Invited guests in audience observing dialogue and participating in Q&A
Response Rate: Percent of each group who completed an evaluation
19%
43%
Chart: See accessible version in notes
4
Overall Summit
Evaluation
Item 3A. The summit as a whole was useful – I am glad I attended. (5 = Strongly Agree, 1= Strongly
Disagree)
Chart: See accessible version in notes
Average ScoreParticipants: 4.74Attendees: 4.48All: 4.61
6
Item 3B. The issues discussed were relevant to my work. (5 = Strongly Agree, 1= Strongly
Disagree)
Chart: See accessible version in notes
Average ScoreParticipants: 4.58Attendees: 4.44All: 4.51
7
Item 3C. I learned about policies and practices that will help me when I return home.
(5 = Strongly Agree, 1= Strongly Disagree)
Chart: See accessible version in notes
Average ScoreParticipants: 4.31
Attendees: 4.08All: 4.19
8
Item 3D. I made valuable professional connections.(5 = Strongly Agree, 1= Strongly Disagree)
Chart: See accessible version in notes
Average ScoreParticipants: 4.03Attendees: 3.98All: 4.00
9
Item 3E. The OECD background paper was informative and will serve as useful tool as I
continue this work.(5 = Strongly Agree, 1= Strongly Disagree)
Chart: See accessible version in notes
Average ScoreParticipants: 4.31Attendees: 4.33All: 4.32
10
Item 3F. The meeting logistics and pre-meeting communications were effective.
(5 = Strongly Agree, 1= Strongly Disagree)
Chart: See accessible version in notes
Average ScoreParticipants: 4.12Attendees: 4.03All: 4.07
11
Evaluation of
Sessions
Item 4A. Quality, relevance and usefulness of Framing the Issues session
(5 = Excellent, 1= Poor)
Chart: See accessible version in notes
Average ScoreParticipants: 4.58Attendees: 4.36All: 4.47
13
Item 4B. Quality, relevance and usefulness of Teacher Recruitment and Preparation session
(5 = Excellent, 1= Poor)
Chart: See accessible version in notes
Average ScoreParticipants: 4.43Attendees: 4.11All: 4.27
14
Item 4B. Quality, relevance and usefulness of Teacher Development, Support and Retention
session (5 = Excellent , 1= Poor)
Chart: See accessible version in notes
Average ScoreParticipants: 4.41Attendees: 4.13All: 4.27
15
Item 4B. Quality, relevance and usefulness of Teacher Evaluation and Compensation session
(5 = Excellent, 1= Poor)
Chart: See accessible version in notes
Average ScoreParticipants: 4.41Attendees: 4.07All: 4.24
16
Item 4B. Quality, Relevance and Usefulness of Teacher Engagement in Reform session(5 = Excellent, 1=
Poor)Chart: See accessible version in notes
Average ScoreParticipants: 4.12Attendees: 4.19All: 4.15
17
Item 4C. Please indicate your level of satisfaction with the format of the sessions. (5 = Excellent, 1= Poor)
Item 4C. Session Format Part I – Participant Discussion
Chart: See accessible version in notes
Average ScoreParticipants: 4.59Attendees: 4.32All: 4.45
Item 4C. Session Format Part II – Attendee Q&A
Chart: See accessible version in notes
Average ScoreParticipant: 4.15Attendee: 3.97All: 4.06
18
Item 4D. Quality, relevance and usefulness of What Have We Learned? session (5 = Excellent, 1= Poor)
Chart: See accessible version in notes
Average ScoreParticipants: 4.22Attendees: 4.42All: 4.32
19
Evaluation of
Logistics & Support
Item 5A. Travel and hotel information was clear and timely.
(5 = Strongly Agree, 1= Strongly Disagree)
Chart: See accessible version in notes
Average ScoreParticipants: 4.45Attendees: 4.05All: 4.25
21
Item 5B. American Museum of Natural History was an effective setting for day one.
(5 = Strongly Agree, 1= Strongly Disagree)
Chart: See accessible version in notes
Average ScoreParticipants: 4.25Attendees: 3.98All: 4.11 22
Item 5B. The Hilton NY was an effective setting for day two.
(5 = Strongly Agree, 1= Strongly Disagree)
Chart: See accessible version in notes
Average ScoreParticipants: 4.60
Attendees: 4.44All: 4.52 23
Item 5B. My questions and concerns were addressed in a timely and complete manner.
(5 = Strongly Agree, 1= Strongly Disagree)
Chart: See accessible version in notes
Average ScoreParticipants: 4.50Attendees: 4.21All: 4.35 24
Evaluation Comments
Comments on Format:
• Tony Mackay – brilliant moderator
• Rich + very good
• Great to have unions and ministers together
• Keep questions/comments from observers/audience focused on session topic.
• Submit questions from audience in advance.
• Include more time for Q&A or vary format of sessions throughout day.
26
Comments on Format:
• More time for discussion and networking
• Sessions began to feel a bit redundant
• Greater variety of session format: breakouts, mixed seating during meals
• Include more teachers at the table.
• Extend the summit so there is more time to process and engage.
• Video screens and interpreters a must
• School leaders/principal representatives – what is our role in the summit?
27
Participants/Attendees found helpful or insightful:
• Framing document/session
• Rapporteurs’ summaries
• Learning from international experiences esp. Hong Kong, Singapore and Finland
• Hearing how unions and management work in collaboration
• High achieving countries’ clearly defined systemic change
• Hearing about:– the common challenges of all education systems– similar problems from which we can learn and translate
solutions for our own unique contexts28
General Feedback:
• THANK YOU! BRAVO! EXCELLENT! STUNNING!
• Please continue this summit in future.
• Suggested readings/research for attendees
• Materials/logistical information available earlier
• A teacher exchange could add a lot to understanding between the countries.
• This was an outstanding and historic event that began a very important conversation with the objective to improve teaching and learning.
29
THANK YOU!
top related