lut - kuntatekniikka - kuntatekniikka.fi
Post on 22-Mar-2022
5 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
1
2
LUT
Our strengths:
− Focused strategy
− Deep co-operation with firms
in Finland and abroad
− Internal integration between
schools at LUT → holistic
view in research
• Strategy
• Business and profitability
• Technology
Transport
15,9%
E-mobility Existing infra
Synthetic e-fuelsSynthesis/
Bioprocess
Electrolysis
CO2
capture
Paper & pulp
Industry 6,5%
Cement
industry 3%
Oil
refinery
H2
Ammonia, other
chemical products
Chemical
industry
Feed/food
protein
Agriculture
11,8%
CO2
Air
Water
N2
Power and heat
industry 30,4% + 3,2%
Electricity
production
Grid &
operation
E2
E2
Manufacturing
industry
Finance Government
Storage
H2 infra Iron &Steel
Industry
(7,2%)N2
capture
Buildings5,5% (17,5%)
2,6%
Energy Transition
Electrification and Hydrogen Economy
Transport
15,9%
E-mobility Existing infra
Synthetic e-fuelsSynthesis/
Bioprocess
Electrolysis
CO2
capture
Paper & pulp
Industry 6,5%
Cement
industry 3%
Oil
refinery
H2
Ammonia, other
chemical products
Chemical
industry
Feed/food
protein
Agriculture
11,8%
CO2
Air
Water
N2
Power and heat
industry 30,4% + 3,2%
Electricity
production
Grid &
operation
E2
E2
Manufacturing
industry
Finance Government
Storage
H2 infra Iron &Steel
Industry
(7,2%)N2
capture
Buildings5,5% (17,5%)
2,6%
Examples of PX2 research at LUT
• Neo Carbon Energy
• Spinoffs: Solar Food, Soletair Power
• Global LUT energy transition model
• P2X Nebraska (NPPD, Wärtsilä, LUT)
• P2X Göteborg (St1)
• P2XEnable & X-Ahead
• Path to 100% Renewable seminars (Wärtsilä)
• P2X to institutional investors (SEB, Danske Bank, OP, Carnagie)
• P2X Joutseno – Industrial pilot (St1, Kemira, Wärtsilä, Finnsementti, Finnair, Shell Global Solutions International, Neste, Jotex Engineering, Terästorni, Refinec, Premekon)
• ADCD Vaasa (Under work)
• Hiilineutraali Suomi –report (Carbon Neutral Finland, Wärtsilä, St1)
• Sector Coupling Finland (Wärtsilä)
• Arctic Energy Forerunners Coalition (St1, Wärtsilä, SSAB, etc)
5
Fuels from industrial
emissionsProject P2X Joutseno –
Feasibility study and development of e-fuels pilot plant in
industrial scale
6Petteri Laaksonen,
Feasibility study
Project P2X Joutseno• Industrial scale pilot plant in Joutseno,
Lappeenranta• Investment size
• 50-80 MEUR (Methanol – Gasoline (MTG))
• 180 MEUR (MTG, double capacity, electrolyser)
• Raw materials• Hydrogen (H2) 5 000 tn from Kemira Chemicals
• Carbon dioxide (CO2) 36 667 tn from Finnsementti
• End products• Methanol 26 000 tn (appr. 1 000 lorry loads)
• Can be further processed to
• Gasoline (12 000 tn)
• Kerosene (aviation)
• Diesel (to be studied)
• Partners• St1, Kemira, Wärtsilä, Finnsementti, Finnair, Shell Global Solutions
International, Neste, Jotex Engineering, Terästorni, Refinec, Premekon
• City of Lappeenranta
• IPR’s• Owned by LUT (ERDF funded project)
7Petteri Laaksonen
CO2
H2
Methanol
Gasoline
Kerosene
Diesel
StorageSynthesis
Transport
(airplanes, ships,
cars, lorries)Excess
Process H2
CO2
capture
Finnsementti
Project P2X Joutseno
Electricity from Grid
CO2
Neutral
Fuels
Kemira
St1, Wärtsilä,
Shell, Neste
H2O
Additional
water
electrolysis
O2
3.
© LUT University
2.
1.
4.
1. Water electrolysis
2. Purification of the process hydrogen from Kemira
3. CO2 capture and purification at Finnsementti
4. Methanol synthesis to end products
Petteri Laaksonen,
Finnair
Equipment
manufacturing
Alternatives investments and costs
9
Budgetary offers
LUT analysis using
literature and models,
• Investment costs
• Electricity, steam and heat use
• Auxiliary inputs (catalysts, chemicals)
• Operational expenses
• Construction
• Electrical
• Civil
Diagram: Veikko Kortela’s model, Wärtsilä
adapted by Hannu Karjunen, LUT
Profitability modelling
10
Cost calculation
Budgetary offers
(Wärtsilä, LUT, St1)
Cost calculation –
Aspen+ modelling
(LUT, St1)
Integration and
verification of cost
calculations
Profitability –
Discounted cashflow
(LUT, Wärtsilä, St1)
Market survey
(LUT)
CAPEX
OPEX
Market demand
development
Technology study
Profitability − Total investment ~80 M€ (MtG) or ~180 M€ (MtG with electrolysis)
− Discounted Cash Flow (20 years, budgetary offers and Aspen modelling)
− Alternatives
• Methanol to Gasoline (Technology available from many suppliers)
• Methanol to Gasoline, Kerosene, Diesel (Technology TRL8 requires commercialization)
− Sensitivity analysis under work
Market study
Regulation
Life cycle assessment on methanol, continued to Gasoline
Status
11
Technology & modelling
12
Commercially
available?
Commercial offer
analyzed?
Modelled in
ASPEN
Modelled using
other toolsIncompleted tasks
CO2 Capture x x x Heat integration
CO2 Compression x x xDetailled design
Heat integration
CO2 Transport x x x Outsourcing?
H2 & CO2
Purificationx
Selection of source
and technology
H2 & CO2 Storages x xDynamic study with
updated cost values
MeOH Synthesis x x x Heat integration
MTG Synthesis x x x Heat integration
MTO-MOGD x
Petteri Laaksonen, Research Director
LUT School of Energy Systems
petteri.Laaksonen@lut.fi
+358 40 508 8498
top related