low-power photovoltaic cells batteries used as … · 3 low-power photovoltaic cells batteries used...
Post on 16-Mar-2020
2 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
LOW-POWER PHOTOVOLTAIC CELLS BATTERIES
USED AS GAMMA RADIATION DOSE ESTIMATORS
V. FUGARU1, R.O. DUMITRESCU2,3, C.D. NEGUT1
1Horia Hulubei National Institute for Nuclear Physics and Engineering,
30 Reactorului, P.O.Box MG-6, RO-077125 Bucharest-Magurele, Romania 2Doctoral School of Physics – University of Bucharest,
P.O.B. MG-11, Romania 3CBRN Defence and Ecology Scientific Research Centre, 041309 Bucharest, Romania
Corresponding author: olimpiu81@yahoo.com
Received October 30, 2017
Abstract. In this paper, the possibility of using commercial low-power photovoltaic
cells batteries as sensors for the estimation of the gamma radiation dose in a certain point in
space and for certain energy in particle accelerators related experiments, when the occurred
nuclear reactions are involving the presence of higher or lower gamma radiation fields, was
studied. Initially, three low-power photovoltaic cells batteries were exposed to three
different well-known gamma radiation doses (33.45 kGy, 35.61 kGy and 37.9 kGy) and
one was kept as blank (0 kGy), and then, an analysis of some of their functional parameters
(short circuit current, open circuit voltage, external quantum efficiency) was performed.
The functional parameters were studied with respect to the illuminance conditions and to
the absorbed dose values in order to determine which of them can be used in gamma
radiation dosimetry. Five different artificial lighting conditions were used, and, in each
case, the values of sensitivity of the sensors (expressed in nA/Gy) and their external
quantum efficiencies were determined. As it was shown in this study, low-power
photovoltaic cells batteries can indeed be used as gamma radiation dose estimators, and
even more, can be used in complex gamma radiation fields distribution studies.
Key words: Low-power photovoltaic cells battery, illuminance, gamma radiation,
solid state dosimetry.
1. INTRODUCTION
Nuclear radiations are emissions of waves or particles, carrying energy.
These energies induce some changes to the structure of exposed materials
(in particular on electrical and optical properties) [1–10]. Using this “cause-effect”
relation, the estimation of an unknown gamma radiation dose induced to an
exposed material can be done.
Romanian Journal of Physics 63, 903 (2018)
Article no. 903 V. Fugaru, R.O. Dumitrescu, C.D. Negut 2
In this paper, the possibility of using commercial low-power photovoltaic
battery cells as sensors for the estimation of the gamma radiation dose in a certain
point in space and for certain energy in particle accelerators related experiments,
when the occurred nuclear reactions are involving the presence of higher or lower
gamma radiation fields, was studied.
A photovoltaic cells battery is a group of photovoltaic cells which provide
electrical power based on the conversion of light into electricity using
semiconducting materials that exhibit the photovoltaic effect. It is defined as a
device whose electrical characteristics, such as current, voltage, or resistance, vary
when exposed to light, and it is based on the following aspects: absorption of light
generating either electron-hole pairs or excitons, the separation of charge carriers
of opposite types and the separate extraction of those carriers to an external circuit
[11–17]. A photovoltaic cell consists of two or more layers of semiconductor
materials deposited on a surface made of a wide range of materials (FR4 type
0.5 mm glass textolite sheets in the case of the ones used in this paper). The
deposited semiconductor layers have usually thicknesses between 10-9
m and
2 × 10-7
m and contain in their base matrix certain chemical elements in order to
form type “p” and type “n” junctions. A photovoltaic cell is basically a p-n
junction. On their entire exterior surface, the photovoltaic cells are coated with
epoxy resins in order to provide a satisfying mechanical resistance to them but not
significantly affecting the entrance of the light in their volume. Usually,
photovoltaic cells are built having relatively small surfaces, providing small
quantities of electric current. By combining them in various serial or parallel
connections (photovoltaic cells batteries), their current/voltage can be increased in
order to be high enough for practical usability.
2. MATERIALS AND METHODS
The functional parameters (short circuit current, open circuit voltage,
external quantum efficiency) of four photovoltaic cells batteries exposed to gamma
radiation were studied with respect to the illuminance conditions and to the
absorbed dose values in order to determine which of them can be used in gamma
radiation dosimetry.
Three amorphous Si based low-power photovoltaic cells batteries were
exposed to a Co-60 gamma-ray source inside the “hot cells” found in
Radioisotopes and Radiation Metrology Department (DRMR) from Horia Hulubei
National Institute for Nuclear Physics and Engineering (IFIN-HH), ROMANIA, in
order to obtain three different well-known gamma radiation doses (33.45 kGy,
35.61 kGy and 37.9 kGy) and one was kept as blank (0 kGy). The Co-60 gamma
rays source provided a constant dose rate of 395 Gy/h at 10 cm distance from it, in
the place where the exposures were performed. The dose debit was measured using
3 Low-power photovoltaic cells batteries used as gamma radiation dose estimators Article no. 903
a 30006 type “Farmer” ionization chamber, a waterproof standard chamber for
absolute dosimetry (0.65 % combined standard uncertainty for a coverage factor
k = 2). The mean value of energies of the gamma rays emitted by a Co-60 source is
1.25 MeV, way higher than the bandgap energy of amorphous Si (a-Si), of
1.12 eV.
Each photovoltaic cells batteries was made of 12 photovoltaic cells
(connected in serial), placed on 2 rows of six cells, as it can be seen in Fig. 1. The
photovoltaic cells used in this paper were based on amorphous Si, which provide
increased sensitivity in low light conditions. The cells batteries had the following
characteristics: sensitive area – 12 cells × (6 × 10) × 10-6
m2, sensibility –
350 nA /lx, Vout/klx – 5v (idle voltage), Isc – 350 µA (short circuit current), r = 12
(number of p-n junctions/elementary cells in a battery).
Fig. 1 – Photovoltaic cells battery.
In order to locate each cell in a battery, a matrix approach was proposed,
meaning each battery was represented as a matrix with l lines and c columns
(l = 1…n, c = 1…m). A certain dose value corresponding to a certain cell can be
defined as Dl,c, if individual cell measurements are performed. These types of
individual cell measurements are important if gamma ray field uniformity studies
are performed [18].
In order to measure each of the functional parameters of the irradiated
photovoltaic cells batteries, an experimental device was built, as it can be seen in
Fig. 2.
Article no. 903 V. Fugaru, R.O. Dumitrescu, C.D. Negut 4
Fig. 2 – Experimental set-up.
Practically, the experimental set-up was a dark box ((60 × 60 × 110) mm3)
containing the exposed photovoltaic cells batteries, a stabilized source of light and
a high quality electrometer. The source of light used was a multispectral
incandescent E10 type light bulb (6.3V, 2.0W). The illuminance inside the
experimental device was varied by modifying the voltage provided to the light
source. The voltages used were 2.1 V, 2.9 V, 3.7 V, 4.4 V and 5.2 V corresponding
to the following illuminance values: 33 lx ± 0.7 %, 79.8 lx ± 0.7 %, 196.8 lx ±
0.6 %, 422.3 lx ± 0.6 % and 813 lx ± 0.7 %. The illuminance measurements were
performed using a MOBILE-CASSY LD 524009 type lux-meter. For each of the
four photovoltaic batteries the currents in dark, Id, were measured: Id1 = 0.81 ×
10-9
A, Id2 = 1.4 × 10-9
A, Id3 = 1.48 × 10-9
A and Id4 = 0.1862 × 10-9
A.
When no light source is present, the electric current inside the short circuit is
the sum of the currents provided by the major and minor carriers. Locally, the
current is depending to the electric potential difference for each p-n junction, which
depends to the temperature.
When a light source is involved, on the exterior circuit of the photovoltaic
cells battery a photocurrent occurs [19–22], as follows (Equation 1):
fI
TBk
Vre
esII
]1
)0
(
[ (1)
where: I – electric current on the exterior circuit,
Is – saturation current of unirradiated p-n junctions,
If – photocurrent (photo-electric current),
V0 – electric potential difference for a p-n junction (open circuit),
5 Low-power photovoltaic cells batteries used as gamma radiation dose estimators Article no. 903
e – electron change,
r – number of p-n junctions/elementary cells in a battery,
kB – Boltzmann constant,
T – temperature.
Short circuit current is increasing in a linear manner with the increase of the
intensity of the light. The intensity of the light source (incandescent light bulb,
multispectral emission) was modified by modifying the voltage to it. The obtained
photocurrent is practically proportional to illuminance.
By assigning the zero value to the electrical current thru the exterior circuit,
the expression of the electric potential difference (open circuit) for an r number of
p-n junctions (r × V0) is the following, Equation (2):
1ln
0sI
fI
e
kTVr . (2)
Equation (2) also shows the dependence between the electric potential
difference – open circuit voltage (V0) and the temperature. The influence of the
temperature was diminished as much as possible in the experiment performed in
this paper by using the photovoltaic cells batteries in current generator regime. This
way, the serial circuit of the p-n junctions is closed on a negligible resistance
related to the internal one, for which 00Vr . The short circuit current becomes
fI
shortI and it is not depending to the temperature anymore (ambient
temperature during experiment was 22 oC).
The dependence of the short circuit current value to the photovoltaic cell
parameters, dose, time and illuminance is given by the Equation (3), [23]:
)(
,
jLgelS
iR
jishortI
, (3)
where:
jishortI
,
– measured short-circuit current expressed in A,
t
iD
iR – dose rate (Di), expressed in Gy/s,
ApS – cross-section area expressed in m2,
l – minority-carrier diffusion length expressed in m,
ρ – density of the material (2330 kg/m3 for Si),
e – electronic charge (1.6 × 10-19
A s),
Article no. 903 V. Fugaru, R.O. Dumitrescu, C.D. Negut 6
ε – average energy required to produce one electron-hole pair (5.76 ×
10- 19
J).
The Equation (3) becomes Equation (4):
)(81047.6
,jLglS
iD
jishortI
(4)
where:
g(Lj) – photo-generation rate,
Lj – illuminance expressed in lx.
The illuminance is expressed as follows, Equation (5):
LS
PCj
jL
, (5)
where:
Фj – luminance per lamp expressed in lm;
C – utilization coefficient;
P – light loss factor;
SL – area per lamp expressed in m2.
Equation (4) shows the linear dependence between short circuit current and
the absorbed dose, but also the influence of the illuminance.
For a photovoltaic cell, in normal functioning conditions, a very important
factor of its efficiency is the filling factor (FF). This factor is a measure of the
quality of a cell, and it is defined by determining its current-voltage characteristic.
The filling factor is dependent to the internal resistance of the photovoltaic cells
battery (FF is higher when the internal resistance is lower). Unlike the short-circuit
current, the open circuit voltage (V0) is not depending to the internal resistance of
the photovoltaic cells battery.
By exposing a photovoltaic cells battery to increasing gamma radiation dose,
its internal resistance is increasing, leading to a decreasing short circuit current.
This phenomenon is the base of the possibility of using photovoltaic cells battery
as instruments for gamma radiation doses estimations.
The evaluation of the absorbed dose is a very important task to be fulfilled,
especially in the cases of high dose values (> 100 Gy). In this direction, many
materials and devices were studied in order to determine their behaviour when
exposed to ionizing radiation [24]. As an example, the glass based dosimeters
showed their functionality on a wide range of absorbed dose values. Their usability
was proven in literature [25–28] by using various types of photo-spectrometric
measurements (optical densitometry). These types of dosimeters already showed
their potential in different fields as: applied physics experiments, nuclear medicine,
industry etc. [29–33].
7 Low-power photovoltaic cells batteries used as gamma radiation dose estimators Article no. 903
In the case of photovoltaic cells batteries, their usability was shown for
higher energy gamma radiation (hundreds of keV) and for higher dose values.
Due to the fact that in this paper the short circuit current measurement was
performed (unaffected by temperature variations), its dependence to absorbed dose
is linear, as Equation (6) shows:
shortImn
fI
shortIfD )( , (6)
where: Ishort – short circuit photocurrent of photovoltaic cells battery ( 0shortI ),
n, m – fitting parameters.
In order to determine the variance associated to the estimated dose, the
Uncertainties Propagation Law is applied to Equation (6). In this case, the general
analytical relation is a function depending on three variables, D = D(If, n, m),
leading to Equation (7):
2
2
22
22
2
fI
fI
D
mm
D
nn
D
D
. (7)
The concrete form of Equation (7) is given by Equation (8), which contains
only known quantities:
222
222 m
fIf
ImnD
. (8)
By solving Equation (8), the uncertainty associated to a determined dose value can
be estimated using Equation (9):
2DD
. (9)
3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
The accumulation of radiation induced defects in the structure of irradiated
photovoltaic cells batteries is the cause of the reduction of their function
parameters. The graphical representation of functional parameters as a function of
absorbed dose value (i = 1, 2, 3, 4) and illuminance, Lj (j = 1, 2, 3, 4, 5), allows us
to determine the relation between them and to decide if any of them can be used as
dosimetric parameter.
In Fig. 3, the short circuit current as a function of illuminance, for each of
the four studied photovoltaic batteries, is presented.
Article no. 903 V. Fugaru, R.O. Dumitrescu, C.D. Negut 8
Fig. 3 – Short circuit current as a function of illuminance, for each absorbed dose value.
As it can be seen from Fig. 3, the fitting relations have the following form,
Equation (10):
LbaI iishorti . (10)
It can also be seen that the short circuit absolute values are increasing with
the increase of the illuminance and are lower for higher absorbed dose values. As it
can be seen in Fig. 3, the square of the sample correlation coefficient (R2) takes
values over 94 % in all cases, showing the goodness of fits.
The variation of the open circuit voltage as a function of illuminance, for
each of the four studied photovoltaic batteries is shown in Fig. 4. It can be seen that
the open circuit voltage value is decreasing with the increase of the absorbed dose.
An increase of the open circuit voltage value with the increase of illuminance can
be also seen. For values of illuminance over 200 lx, a saturation effect is starting to
be observed.
9 Low-power photovoltaic cells batteries used as gamma radiation dose estimators Article no. 903
Fig. 4 – Open circuit voltage as a function of illuminance, for each absorbed dose value.
The sensibility of photovoltaic cells batteries reported to absorbed dose and
illuminance are shown in Table 1.
Table 1
Sensibility of photovoltaic cells batteries reported to absorbed dose and illuminance
Sensibility [Gy/nA] 0.52 0.32 0.21 0.12 0.11
Illuminance [lx] 33.0 79.8 196.8 422.3 813.0
From Table 1 in can be observed that with the increase of the illuminance a
lower dose value is needed to obtain a nA of short circuit current, meaning an
increased sensibility [34]. A saturation trend can also be observed, starting from
around a 422.3 lx illuminance value. Table 1 also shows that the five illuminance
values chosen in this paper are optimal.
The variation of the external quantum efficiency with illuminance, for each
absorbed dose value, η (%), is presented in Fig. 5. The external quantum efficiency
represents the fraction of the incident light that is converted in electrical energy,
and it is given by Equation (11):
Article no. 903 V. Fugaru, R.O. Dumitrescu, C.D. Negut 10
100
,
0,
,
jiP
ijV
jishortI
ji
(11)
where Pi represents the power of the optical radiation reaching the surface of the
photovoltaic sensor.
Fig. 5 – External quantum efficiency as a function of illuminance, for each absorbed dose value.
From Fig. 5 it can be seen that with the increased of the absorbed dose value,
a decrease of the efficiency of the battery is occurring. For the studied photovoltaic
cells batteries, the external quantum efficiency was placed between 0.2 % and
1.8 %, on the entire range of artificial illuminating conditions. The external
quantum efficiency in artificial illuminating conditions is inferior to the one
provided by Sun, (5–7) %.
From the three functional parameters studied, the one chosen to be used as
dosimetric parameter was the short circuit current, due to the fact that it is not
affected by other external parameters as the temperature. In Fig. 6, the variation of
the short circuit current with the absorbed dose value, on the entire doses range is
presented.
11 Low-power photovoltaic cells batteries used as gamma radiation dose estimators Article no. 903
Fig. 6 – Short circuit current as a function of absorbed dose, for each illuminance conditions.
As it can be seen in Fig. 6, the short circuit current absolute value is
decreasing with the increase of the absorbed dose value and increasing with the
increase of illuminance. For a certain illuminance value, the analytical relation
between the short circuit current and absorbed dose is a relation of the type of
Equation (6).
Short circuit current as a function of absorbed dose, for each illuminance
conditions on the (0–35.61) kGy interval is presented in Fig. 7. This interval was
chosen for its higher linearity.
By using the fitting relations from Fig. 7, the analytical relations between the
absorbed dose and short circuit current, for each illuminance conditions, were
determined (calibration curves). The results are presented in Table 2.
Table 2
Analytical relations between absorbed dose and short circuit current on (0–35.61) kGy interval
Calibration curve
for each illuminance value
Ishort
for (0–35.61) kGy interval
[A] × 10-5
Illuminance
[lx]
R2
[%]
D1 [kGy] = 333.3 + 1.6 × 107 × Ishort (–2.06) ÷ (–1.75) 33.0 64.8
D2 [kGy] = 341.7 + 4.2 × 106 × Ishort (–8.1) ÷ (–7.0) 78.9 75.2
D3 [kGy] = 366.7 + 3.3 ×106 × Ishort (–11.1) ÷ (–9.7) 196.8 73.1
D4 [kGy] = 383.0 + 2.1 × 106 × Ishort (–18.0) ÷ (–16.0) 422.3 88.0
D5 [kGy] = 280.0 + 106 × Ishort (–27.8) ÷ (–24.0) 813.0 99.6
Article no. 903 V. Fugaru, R.O. Dumitrescu, C.D. Negut 12
Fig. 7 – Short circuit current as a function of absorbed dose (0–35.61) kGy,
for each illuminance conditions.
By measuring the short circuit value and using the relations from Table 2
according to the chosen illuminance conditions, an unknown absorbed dose value
can be determined. These relations are valid only on the studied (0–35.61) kGy
interval due to the fact that the calibration “short circuit current – absorbed dose”
was performed only on this interval. Having more dose values spread on a larger
interval, new calibration curves can be obtained. As it can be seen from R2 values,
the calibration curve corresponding to the 813.0 lx illuminance fits best the
experimental points due to the fact this value is closest to the one recommended by
the producer of this type of photovoltaic cells batteries (working regime).
4. CONCLUSIONS
In this paper, the functional parameters (short circuit current, open circuit
voltage, external quantum efficiency) of low-power photovoltaic cells batteries after
their exposure to gamma radiation were studied. It was shown that all of these
parameters are affected by the energy deposited in their volume. Do to this fact, it
was shown that low-power photovoltaic cells batteries can be used as sensor in
13 Low-power photovoltaic cells batteries used as gamma radiation dose estimators Article no. 903
gamma radiation dosimetry. It was also determined which of these parameters is
the best parameter to be use in dosimetry. The best parameter to be use in
dosimetry was found to be the short circuit current.
By studying the short circuit current variation with the absorbed dose value,
calibration curves were obtained. Using these calibration curves, any unknown
dose value can be determined. The calibration curves are valid only on the studied
(0–35.61) kGy interval due to the fact that the calibration “short circuit current –
absorbed dose” was performed only on this interval. Having more dose values
spread on a larger interval, new calibration curves can be obtained.
The uncertainty associated to the proposed gamma radiation dosimetry
method was also estimated. The main qualities of this dosimetry method are that it
is fast, easy to be applied in various situations and economically efficient.
REFERENCES
1. M.-R. Ioan, Investigation of RGB spectral components in the images captured through gamma
rays affected optical focusing lens, Rom. J. Phys. 61 (7-8), 1198-1206 (2016).
2. M.-R. Ioan, Study of the optical absorption coefficient variation in soda-lime and borosilicate
glasses due to their exposure to gamma-rays, Rom. J. Phys. 62 (3-4), 206 (2017).
3. D. Nikolic and A. Vasic-Milovanovic, The impact of successive gamma and neutron irradiation
on characteristics of PIN photodiodes and phototransistors, W A. Monteiro (Editor), Radiation
Effects in Materials, InTech, 2016, doi: 10.5772/62756.
4. M.-R. Ioan, Study of the optical materials degradation caused by gamma radiation and the
recovery process by controlled heat treatment, Rom. J. Phys. 61 (5-6), 892-902 (2016).
5. M.-R. Ioan, Analyzing of the radiation induced damage to optical glasses by using online heating
laser measurements, Rom. J. Phys. 61 (3-4), 614-625 (2016).
6. A.V. Kir’yanov, Effects of electron irradiation upon absorptive and fluorescent properties of
some doped optical fibers, W A. Monteiro (Editor), Radiation Effects in Materials, InTech, 2016,
doi: 10.5772/63939.
7. M.R. Ioan, I. Gruia, G.V. Ioan, L. Rusen and P. Ioan, Laser beam used to measure and highlight
the transparency changes in gamma irradiated borosilicate glass, J. Optoelectron. Adv. M. 16
(1-2), 162-169 (2014).
8. M.-R. Ioan, I. Gruia, G-V. Ioan, L. Rusen, C.D. Negut and P. Ioan, The influence of gamma rays
and protons affected optical media on a real Gaussian laser beam parameters, Rom. Rep. Phys.
67 (2), 508-522 (2015).
9. M.R. Ioan and I. Gruia, Change of optical parameters of the BK-7 glass substrate under gamma
irradiation, Rom. J. Phys. 60 (9-10), 1515-1524 (2015).
10. S. V. Firstov, V. F. Khopin, S. V. Alyshev, E. G. Firstova, K. E. Riumkin, M. A. Melkumov, A.
M. Khegai, P. F. Kashaykin, A. N. Guryanov and E. M. Dianov, Effect of gamma-irradiation on
the optical properties of bismuth-doped germanosilicate fibers, Optical Materials Express 6 (10),
3303-3308 (2016).
11. J. M. Pearce, N. Podraza, R. W. Collins, M. M. Al-Jassim, K. M. Jones, J. Deng and C.R.
Wronski, Optimization of open circuit voltage in amorphous silicon solar cells with mixed-phase
(amorphous+nanocrystalline) p-type contacts of low nanocrystalline content, J. Appl. Phys. 101
(11) 114301 (2007), doi:10.1063/1.2714507.
12. Solar Cell, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_cell.
Article no. 903 V. Fugaru, R.O. Dumitrescu, C.D. Negut 14
13. N. Kavasoglu, A. S. Kavasoglu, O. Birgi and S. Oktik, Intensity modulated short circuit current
spectroscopy for solar cells, Sol. Energy. Mater. Sol. 95, 727-730 (2011).
14. C. Ciobotaru and G. Musa, Monochromatization effect kinetic model for Penning gas mixtures
emission mechanisms, Turk. J. Phys. 36 (1), 77-85 (2012), doi: 10.3906/fiz-1010-4.
15. L. C. Ciobotaru, Monochromatisation effect - AC/DC discharges comparative behaviour,
Rom. Rep. Phys. 62 (1), 134-141 (2010).
16. L. Ciobotaru, P. Chiru, C. C. Neacsu, G. Musa, PDP type barrier discharge ultraviolet radiation
source, J. Optoelectron. Adv. M. 6 (1), 321-324 (2004).
17. J. Perlin, From space to Earth: the story of solar electricity, Earthscan 50, 1999.
18. M. -R. Ioan, A novel method involving Matlab coding to determine the distribution of a collimated
ionizing radiation beam, J. Instrum. 11, P08005 (2016), doi: 10.1088/1748-0221/11/08/P08005.
19. H.M. Diab, A. Ibrahim, and R. ElMallawany, Silicon Solar Cells as a Gamma Ray Dosimeter,
Measurement 46 (9), 3635–3639 (2013).
20. D. Renker and E. Lorenz, Advances in solid state photon detectors, J. Instrum. 4, P04004 (2009).
21. I. Gaye, R. Sam, A. D. Sere, I. F. Barro, M. A. Ould EI Moujtaba, R. Mane and G. Sissoko, Effect
of irradiation on the transient response of a silicon solar cell, I.J.E.T.T.C.S. 1 (3) 210-214
(2012).
22. K. Scharf and J. K. Sparrow, Steady-state response of silicon radiation detectors of the diffused p-
n junction type to X-ray. I photovoltaic mode of operation, Journal of Research of the National
Bureau of Standards -A Physics and Chemistry 68A (6) (1964).
23. K. Scharf, Photovoltaic effect produced in silicon solar cells by X-and gamma rays, Journal of
Research of the National Bureau of Standards-A. Physics and Chemistry 64A (4), 297-307
(1960).
24. A.C. Muller, F. X. Rizzo and L. Galanter, Solar cell integrating dosimeter, BNL 902 (T-368) –
Isotopes-Industrial Technology – TID-4500, 37th Ed, 1964.
25. John F. Fowler, Solid State Dosimetry, Phys. Med. Biol. 8 (1), 1-32 (1963).
26. Sh. Makhkamov, R.A. Muminov, M. Karimov, N. A. Tursunov and A. R. Sattiev, Influence of the
conductivity type of silicon on the process of radiation degradation of solar cells, Appl. Sol.
Energ. 49 (2), 62-66 (2013).
27. M.-R. Ioan, Amorphous and crystalline optical materials used as instruments for high gamma
radiation doses estimations, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. B 377, 43-49 (2016), doi:
10.1016/j.nimb.2016.04.009.
28. P.E. Asard and G. Baarsen, Commercial photodiodes as gamma and Roentgen ray dosimeters,
Acta. Radiol. Ther. Phy. 7, 47-57 (1968).
29. M.R. Ioan, LIDT test coupled with gamma radiation degraded optics, Opt. Commun. 369, 94-99
(2016), doi: 10.1016/j.optcom.2016.02.031.
30. M.R. Ioan, Matlab fractal techniques used to study the structural degradation caused by alpha
radiation to laser mirrors, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 877, 131-137 (2018), doi:
10.1016/j.nima.2017.09.037.
31. I.R. Edmonds, U. Rajappa, C. Hirst and P. Rowntree, Photovoltaic cells for low energy x-ray
dosimetry, Phys. Med. Biol. 35 (4), 571-578 (1990).
32. M.R. Ioan, I. Gruia, P. Ioan, M. Bacalaum, G–V. Ioan and C. Gavrila, 3 MeV protons to simulate
the effects caused by neutrons in optical materials with low metal impurities, J. Optoelectron.
Adv. M. 15 (5-6), 523-529 (2013).
33. H. Diab, A. Ibrahim and R. Elmallawany, Dosimetric study of monocrystalline silicon solar cell,
Rom. J. Biopys. 22 (2), 125-133 (2012).
34. L. Done and M-R. Ioan, Minimum Detectable Activity in gamma spectrometry and its use in low
level activity measurements, Appl. Radiat. Isotopes 114, 28-32 (2016), doi:
10.1016/j.apradiso.2016.05.004.
top related