logistika suvekool...logistika suvekool 23.-24. august 2018. road safety in the european union:...

LOGISTIKA SUVEKOOL23.-24. august 2018

ROAD SAFETY IN THE EUROPEAN UNION: CHALLENGES AND

OPPORTUNITIES

Dovile AdminaiteProject Manager

24 August 2018 Logistics summer school

Tallinn

CONTENT

1. ETSC and our activities

2. Road safety situation in the EU

3. Current EU road safety activities

4. EU’s road to 2030

ETSC

• A science based approach to road safety• Secretariat in Brussels• 60 member organisations from across Europe• More than 200 experts contributing to ETSC’s

work• The European Commission, Member

Organisations, Member States and corporate sponsors are funding our work

NETWORK

Monitoring EU transport safety policy

Road Safety Performance Index (PIN)

Ranking EU countries‘ performances

SAFE & SOBER DRUG DRIVING

The European Union

• 28 member states

• 508.2 mln people

• 4,422,773 sq. KmHalf of geographical Europe

• 24 languages

• 11 currencies

The EU actors

EU Legislation

Road safety competences of the EU

Vehicle safety: Exclusive competence

Infrastructure safety and driver behaviour: shared competence based on the principle of subsidiarity (Article 5.3 of the Treaty on the European Union).

Under the principle of subsidiarity, in areas which do not fall within its exclusive competence, the Union shall act only if and in so far as the objectives of the proposed action cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States, either at central level or at regional and local level, but can rather, by reason of the scale or effects of the proposed action, be better achieved at Union level.

CONTENT

1. ETSC and our activities

2. Road safety situation in the EU

3. Current EU road safety activities

4. EU’s road to 2030

Monitoring EU transport safety policy

Road Safety Performance Index (PIN)

Ranking EU countries‘ performances

SAFE & SOBER

Monitoring EU transport safety policy

Road Safety Performance Index (PIN)

Ranking EU countries‘ performances

SAFE & SOBER

TARGETS AND PERFORMANCE

• The EU set a target of cuttingroad deaths by 50% between 2001 and 2010

• The 50% reduction target renewed for 2010 - 2020

• Countries have similar national targets

TARGET 2001-2010

-60%

-50%

-40%

-30%

-20%

-10%

0%

EU28 average -43%

TARGET 2001-2010

-60%

-50%

-40%

-30%

-20%

-10%

0%

LV EE LT ES LU FR SI SE IE RS DE UK GB PT SK BE AT IT NL DK HU CH CZ CY FI IL HR EL PL NO BG MT RO

EU28 average -43%

1. Latvia -60%2. Estonia -60%3. Lithuania -58%

TARGET 2001-2010

-60%

-50%

-40%

-30%

-20%

-10%

0%

LV EE LT ES LU FR SI SE IE RS DE UK GB PT SK BE AT IT NL DK HU CH CZ CY FI IL HR EL PL NO BG MT RO

EU28 average -43%

1. Latvia -60%2. Estonia -60%3. Lithuania -58%

ESTONIA – PIN ROAD SAFETY AWARD WINNER 2010

127 deaths – General Aviation

Eurostat (2016)

2 deaths – Commercial Air Traffic

964 deaths - Railway

Eurostat (2016)

How many people were killed on EU

roads in 2017?

“Two passenger planes crash, killing everyone on board…”

This is how many people die on EU roads every week

25,250people died in road traffic in the EU in 2017

2014-2017bad years for road safety

A WIDENING GAP BETWEEN THE ACTUAL AND DESIRED PROGRESS

-50%

-40%

-30%

-20%

-10%

0%

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

-50%

-20%

RELATIVE CHANGE (%) IN ROAD DEATHS 2010-2017

-50%

-40%

-30%

-20%

-10%

0%

EU28 average: -20%

Desired EU28 progress towards 2020 target: -38%

1. Norway -49%2. Greece -41%3. Estonia -39%4. Latvia -37%5. Lithuania -36%

20. Finland -18%

+26%

RELATIVE CHANGE (%) IN ROAD DEATHS 2010-2017

-50%

-40%

-30%

-20%

-10%

0%

EU28 average: -20%

Desired EU28 progress towards 2020 target: -38%

1. Norway -49%2. Greece -41%3. Estonia -39%4. Latvia -37%5. Lithuania -36%

20. Finland -18%

+26%

DEATHS PER MILLION INHABITANTS IN 2017

DEATHS PER MILLION INHABITANTS IN 2017

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

EU28 (2010): 63

EU28 (2017): 50

Road deaths per mln. inhabitants 20102010

Road deaths per mln. inhabitants 20172010

DEATHS PER MILLION INHABITANTS IN 2017

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

EU28 (2010): 63

EU28 (2017): 50

Road deaths per mln. inhabitants 20102010

Road deaths per mln. inhabitants 20172010

135,000seriously injured in road traffic in the EU in 2014 according to

MAIS3+ definition

THREE MAIN KILLERS ON THE ROADS

SpeedingMore than 1,300 road deaths could be prevented each year if average speeds dropped by ‘only’ 1km/h on all roads across the EU.

Drink drivingAt least 5,600 deaths could have been prevented if all drivers involved in accidents and reported to be driving over the limit had been sober.

Non use of seat beltsAround 8,600 car occupants survived serious crashes in 2012 because they wore a seat belt.

CONTENT

1. ETSC and our activities

2. Road safety situation in the EU

3. Current EU road safety activities

4. EU’s road to 2030

3rd EU MOBILITY PACKAGE

• Revision of the General safety regulation (GSR)

• Revision of the Infrastructure safety management directive

• Roadmap for the 5th EU Road Safety strategy 2020-2030

• Communication on connecting mobility and vehicle automation

GENERAL SAFETY REGULATION -LIFE SAVING POTENTIAL

25,000 deaths on the road could be prevented

by the introduction of new vehicle safety

measures over the period 2022-2037

ETSC PRIORITIES FOR VEHICLE SAFETY

• Overridable assisting ISA on all new vehicles default ON

• Standard interface to allow (if needed) fitment of Alcohol interlocks

• Autonomous Emergency Braking (AEB)

• Improved direct vision to allow truck drivers to see pedestrians and cyclists

• Event Data Recorders (EDR)

INTELLIGENT SPEED ASSITANCE (ISA)

MAIN TYPES OF ISA

+

Advisory

Assisting

+

Non-Overridable

+

WHY ISA?

ISA ALREADY AVAILABLE

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SoZLrZTnUGs&t=154s

AUTOMATED EMERGENCY BRAKING

• AEB detecting a vehicle in front

• AEB systems with pedestrian and cyclist protection

• AEB can reduce rear-end collisions by 20% to 57%

• Regular AEB systems are compulsory for all new lorries and buses in the EU

ALCOHOL INTERLOCKS

• Increasingly used across Europe• Reoffending rates in Finland reduced

from 30% to 6% with use of interlocks

• Already compulsory on school buses in France and Finland

• Should be mandatory for professional vehicles and all cars should have a standard interface to enable use when needed

ALCOHOL INTERLOCK REHABILITATION PROGRAMS

Increasingly used across Europe for professional drivers and in rehabilitation programs for drink driving offenders

DIRECT VISION FOR TRUCKS

CONTENT

1. ETSC and our activities

2. Road safety situation in the EU

3. Current EU road safety activities

4. EU’s road to 2030

VALLETTA DECLARATION ON ROAD SAFETY

VALLETTA DECLARATION ON ROAD SAFETY

2020-2030:✓ Third EU target to halve the

number of road deaths

✓ First EU target to halve the number of serious road traffic injuries

SOME OF THE EU ROAD SAFETY CHALLENGES IN THE UPCOMING

DECADE

✓ Targets, timetable and leadership

✓ Vulnerable road user safety

✓ Vehicle safety and automation

✓ Enforcement

✓ Infrastructure Safety

✓ Reduction of serious road traffic injuries

SAFE SYSTEM APPROACH

✓ Death and serious injury in road collisions are not an inevitable

✓ Better vehicle construction, improved road infrastructure, and lower speeds can all contribute to reducing the impact of collisions

✓ Safe System is shared in a coordinated manner

MANAGEMENT BY OBJECTIVES –KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS

✓Indicators should be set in line with Safe System Approach

✓ Indicators measure influence of safety interventions

✓ Since 2006 ETSC has been working on measuring EU Member State road safety performance and KPIs

SWEDEN: ROAD SAFETY MANAGEMENT BY OBJECTIVES

AUTNOMOUS VEHICLES: REUGULATION

✓ Tested and approved to common standards✓ Urgent need for a new, harmonised regulatory framework

AUTOMATED VEHICLES: POTENTIAL SAFETY BENEFITS

✓ Reaching Vision Zero in 2050?

✓ Less chance for human error?

✓ High risk group support?

AUTOMATED VEHICLES: CHALLENGES

✓ New collision types?✓ Interaction: automated vs. non-automated✓ Interaction: vulnerable road users; road infrastructure✓ Driver engagement and re-engagement

1. What happens if the system lets us down?

2. Who shall make the (un)ethical choices?

3. How to build andmaintain trust?

www.etsc.eu/PIN @etsc_eudovile.adminaite@etsc.eu

THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION