lloyd knox uc davis

Post on 01-Feb-2016

52 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

DESCRIPTION

South Pole Telescope millimeter-wave observations of thermal emission by dust from 100 million high-z galaxies. Lloyd Knox UC Davis. CIB Anisotropies. Photo credit: Keith Vanderlinde SPT 2nd season winter-over. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

South Pole Telescope millimeter-wave observations of thermal emission by dust from 100 million high-z galaxies

Lloyd KnoxUC Davis

Photo credit: Keith VanderlindeSPT 2nd season winter-over

CIB Anisotrop

ies

Scientific Motivation I

Image: WMAP (slightly hacked by J. Vieira)

Anisotropies in the CIB are sensitive to the entire history of star

formation in the Universe

Where There’s Star Formation, There’s Dust

QuickTime™ and a decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

Standard lore: Dust forms in cold envelopes of evolved stars and in ejecta of supernovae

• Dust also facilitates the cooling necessary for star formation

QuickTime™ and a decompressor

are needed to see this picture.Optical Properties of Dust

Absorbs light at wavelengths

smaller than the grain size

QuickTime™ and a decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

Radiates thermally at

longer wavelengths

Full-sky 94 GHz intensity map

Jessberger et al. (2001)

5

Half of background light from stars is reprocessed by dust

Dole et al. 2006

CIB Brightness = 24 nW/m2/sr

6

Simple Model of Dust Emission

34 K grey body spectrum

734 K grey body spectrum

Rest frequency from z = 1 to z = 5

8

Dimming

redshifting

Object of same luminosity gets brighter when moved from z=1 to z=5

SPT BandsHall et al.

(2010)

Sub-mm magic

RS comment

n(z) for SMGs

10

Dye et al 2009

850 um selected

250, 350, 500 um selected

z-independent brightness, but bulk of them are very faint

• To study in great numbers we need to study them in the confusion limit.

• Intensity = s S2 dN/dS d(lnS)

• Data points are from SPT (Vieira et al. 2010)

Figures by Nicholas

Hall

Number density = s S dN/dS (dlnS)

DSFG = ?

z-independent brightness, but bulk of them are very faint

• To study in great numbers we need to study them in the confusion limit.

• Intensity = s S2 dN/dS d(lnS)

• Data points are from SPT (Vieira et al. 2010)

Figures by Nicholas

Hall

Number density = sSdN/dS (dlnS)

DSFG = Dusty star-forming galaxy

Angular power spectra sensitive to relation between dark matter and star formation history

• To study in great numbers we need to study them in the confusion limit.

• Can measure angular power spectrum of diffuse background, with shape and amplitude dependent on relation of star formation history to dark matter density history.

• The latter we can calculate well from first principles.

Figures by Nicholas

Hall

14

Outline• Measurement in the confusion limit with

SPT*.

• Modeling the signals inferred from SPT, BLAST and Spitzer data.

• Future observational prospects.

• Future modeling challenges.

*Many slides in this part from J. Vieira

The SPT

The South Pole Telescope (SPT)An experiment optimized for fine-scale

anisotropy measurements of the CMB• Dedicated 10-m telescope at the South Pole

• Background-limited 960-element mm camera

Science Goals:• Mass-limited SZ survey of galaxy clusters– study growth of structure, dark energy

equation of state

• Fine-scale CMB temperature anisotropies

– SZ power spectrum to measure σ8

• mm sources

– dusty star forming galaxies

– AGN

– Other rare objects

• NEXT: Polarization

Funded by NSF

Sub-millimeter Wavelength Telescope:• 10 meter telescope ⇒ 1’ FWHM beam at 1.4 mm• Clean and simple optical design to minimize

systematics• Off-axis Gregorian optics design for clear

aperture• Three levels of sidelobe mitigation:

– under-illuminated primary – Co-moving ground shield – cold (10K) secondary

• 20 micron RMS surface accuracy (good up to ~ 450 um window)

• 1 arc-second relative pointing ⇒ <3" RMS absolute pointing

• Fast scanning (up to 4 deg/sec in azimuth) ⇒ no chopping

1st Generation Camera:• 1 sq. deg FOV ⇒ good for surveys, bad for

pointed observations• 960 TES coupled spiderweb bolometers read out

with SQUIDS and fMUXed• Modular focal plane observes simultaneously in 3

bands at 1.4, 2.0, 3.2 mm with 1.0, 1.5, 2.0 fλ pixel spacing

• Closed cycle He cryogenics

The South Pole Telescope (SPT)

Collaboration

SPT Team February 2007SPT Team February 2007

18

Survey Fields Completed• In 2008 mapped ~180

deg2 around 5hr and 23hrs to 18 uK/arcmin2 pixel. In 2009 we mapped ~ 550 deg2 to the same depth.

• BCS overlap and Magellan follow-up for optical confirmation and photo-z’s.

• Full survey will be ~2000 square degrees.

23hr 5hr30

Field used for recent results

T. Crawford, Recent Results from the South Pole Telescope, FNAL, March 30, 2009

Zoom in on 2 mm map~ 4 deg2 of actual data

T. Crawford, Recent Results from the South Pole Telescope, FNAL, March 30, 2009

Lots of bright emissive sources

~15-sigma SZ cluster detectionAll these “large-scale”

fluctuations are primary CMB.

Zoom in on 2 mm map~ 4 deg2 of actual data

21

Radio galaxy model is from de Zotti et al. (2005)

ULIRG/DSFG model modified from Negrello et al. (2007)

Source Count Data points are from SPT(Vieira et al. 2010)

ClPoisson = s S3 dN/dS d(lnS)

Figure is from Hall et al. (2010)

DSFG = Dusty Star-Forming Galaxy

Data points from counting point sources

22

Auto and Cross-Frequency Power Spectra: Data at l > 2000 (Hall et al. 2010)

Total observed signal

Need to develop model for CIB signal in these data

23

Auto and Cross-Frequency Power Spectra: Data and Model at l > 2000 (Hall et al. 2010)

Total observed signal

poisson term due to sources at S/N

< 5

Best-fit tSZ from L10

Best-fit DSFG-clustering termAssumed kSZ

24

Single-SED Model

Fiducial Model: Td = 34K, = 2, zc = 2, z = 2

Scale factor

= comoving distance

Dust emissivity index and temperature

*

*Planck function modified to power-law decline on Wien side with “mid-IR” index

Knox et al.

(2001)

Hall et al. (2010)

25

Redshift distribution of mean for Lagache, Dole

and Puget (2005) model and Hall et al. (2010) single-SED model

26

Auto and Cross-Frequency Power Spectra: Data and Model at l > 2000 (Hall et al. 2010)

Total observed signal

poisson term due to sources at S/N

< 5

Best-fit tSZ from L10

Best-fit DSFG-clustering term Assumed kSZ

27

With CMB and tSZ subtracted

28

Spectrum of Poisson Power

• Weak dependence on threshold

• LDP model too shallow -- spectrum is steeper than expected at low frequencies

• single-SED model is NOT fit to these data

BLAST: Viero et al. (2009), Spitzer: Lagache et al. (2007)

29

Large 150 to 220 spectral indexFor S proportional to about = 220 GHz we find = 3.86 § 0.26

from SPT dataIn RJ limit, = + 2

For Td = 34K and sources at z = 1 (or 2) we get

= + 1.7 (or 1.5)

Roughly expect for our single-SED model, =

1.38 + = 3.38

Theoretical models calibrated with astronomical and

laboratory data suggest ~ 2 (Gordon 1995).

Meny et al. (2007) claim effects of long-range

disorder in dust can lead to > 2

Silva et al. (1998) models

30

Spectrum of Poisson Power

Can get away with lower if assume higher Td or lower z, but then over-predict BLAST and Spitzer power.

BLAST: Viero et al. (2009), Spitzer: Lagache et al. (2007)

31

Auto and Cross-Frequency Power Spectra: Data and Model at l > 2000 (Hall et al. 2010)

Total observed signal

poisson term due to sources at S/N

< 5

Best-fit tSZ from L10

Best-fit DSFG-clustering term much stronger at 220x220 than

150x220 Assumed kSZ

32

Spectrum of Clustering Power

33

Clustering amplitudes at theoretically expected levels

Haiman & Knox (2000)

(RJ)

34

Clustering amplitudes at expected levels• Mean CIB inferred from FIRAS data

• a few arc minutes corresponds to several comoving Mpc

•variance in density fluctuations is order unity on Mpc scales

• line of sight probes a few hundred independent cells

• I/I = b/3000.5 = 0.1

Fixsen et al. (1998)

Puget et al. (1996)

Reproduces observed clustering power

35

Outline• Measurement in the confusion limit with

SPT*.

• Modeling the signals inferred from SPT, BLAST and Spitzer data.

• Future observational prospects.

• Future modeling challenges.

*Many slides in this part from J. Vieira

36

Clustering power will be measured with high precision by Planck very soon

Relevant Planck channels: 143, 217, 353, 545, 850 GHz

CIB is the dominant source of fluctuation power over large parts of sky, and a large range of

angular scales in the highest frequency channels of Planck

Knox et al. (2001)

37

Precision Measurement Expected from Planck

• F for FIRB = CIB

• Forecast for Planck 545 GHz shown

• In addition will have auto and cross-frequency power from 217, 353, 545, 850

Milky Way Dust

38

Cross-correlation opportunities• CIB anisotropies arise from a broad range in redshifts and therefore have cross correlations with other tracers of large-scale structure

• Can reconstruct the lensing potential from the lensed CMB and cross-correlate with CIB

Lensing-FIRB cross-power forecast for

Planck

Song et al. (2003)

39

Cross-correlate with CMB2!

Square of kSZ signal correlates with cosmic shear (Dore et al.

2003)

Should also correlate with CIB -- might be first way effect of

kSZ is detected

gas-rich merger

dusty star forming galaxy

AGN dominated phase

massive ellipticaldust from

SN + debris disks

Narayanan+2009

Slide from J. Vieira

Another model

QuickTime™ and a decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

Righi, Hernandez-

Monteagudo & Sunyaev (2008)Righi et al.

work out CIB power

spectrum predictions associating DSFGs with mergers

Righi model has lots of light from very high redshift

QuickTime™ and a decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

Righi et al. predictions

QuickTime™ and a decompressor

are needed to see this picture.

SPT detected

clustering power at 220 GHz

Phenomenology ripe for development

• Merger model of Righi et al. can accommodate data as well as the `light traces (halo) mass’ models.

• How do we discriminate?

• How do we parameterize the connection between star formation and dark matter evolution to help us interpret the forthcoming high-precision data?

• I am working on these questions with Z. Haiman (Columbia) and A. Benson (Caltech)

45

CIB as a Nuisance

4646

Best-fit tSZ

Assumed kSZPossible Patchy reionization signal (not included in

modeling)

Best-fit residual DSFG Poisson Power

Lueker et al. 2010 bandpowers from subtraction

Ts = 1/(1-0.325) (T150 - 0.325 T220)For

subtracting DSFGs(Dusty Star-Forming

Galaxies)

47

Summary• CIB offers us a probe of entire history of star formation• From SPT data, we have a first detection of the clustering

of CIB at millimeter wavelengths, at expected amplitudes.• A simple model can accommodate frequency dependence

of CIB anisotropy from 150 to 1900 GHz (with steep emissivity index)

• Observational progress in the confusion limit will be rapid and is driving the development of theoretical modeling to facilitate interpretation

• Phenomenology of the CIB is very ripe for further development, so that we can turn the observational signatures into interesting conclusions about the history of star formation in the Universe.

top related