lightoaks - courtyard buildings & external works to
Post on 25-Jan-2022
1 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
LIGHTOAKS - COURTYARD BUILDINGS & EXTERNAL WORKS TO LIGHTOAKS GROUNDS
HERITAGE STATEMENT & IMPACT ASSESSMENT
Prepared on behalf of Purple Circle Homes
29th July 2015
CONTENTS
Part 11. Introduction 12. Purpose of Report 13. Description of Courtyard Buildings 24. StatementofSignficance 55. DescriptionofCurrentSettingandContributiontoSignificance 66. ImpactAssssment 7 6.1 ImpactofExternalWorks 7 6.2 ImpactofProposedChangeofUsetoStableblocks 10 6.3 InternalAlterationstoStableblocks 12 TableofLetteredAlterations 167. CumulativeImpactandConclusions 19
Appendix1 Letteredplansandelevationsshowingalterations
Part 2 - Map Regression and Photographs
LIGHTOAKS - COURTYARD BUILDINGSSTATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE
Mel Morris Dip. Arch. Cons., IHBC, MRTPI
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1 LIGHTOAKSissituatedtothesouthofOakamoreRoad,atgridreference404668,344459,ontheoutskirtsofthevillageofOakamoor.
1.2 ThecomplexofcourtyardbuildingsfallwithinthecurtilageofLightoaks,agradeIIlistedbuilding,whichwasdesignedasaCottageOrnee,aretreatforJohnWilsonPatten,circa1823-27,withlateradditionsofca.1895forThomasBolton.Althoughnotidentifiedintheirownrightwithinthelistdescription,theancillarycourtyardbuildingsarepartofthelistedbuilding(bothattachedandwithinthecurtilage)andareofhighhistoricandarchitecturalinterest.
1.3 ThisStatementofSignificanceisproportionatetotheimportanceofthebuildingsandisdesignedtoinformallpartiesaboutthebuildingsandtheirdevelopmentsothatinformeddecisionscanbemade.
1.4 MelMorrisisanarchitecturalhistorianandafullmemberoftheInstituteofHistoricBuildingConservationandabidesbytheInstitute’scodeofconductandethics.Shehasworkedwithhistoricbuildingsfor27years,makingassessmentsofsignificance,undertakingdetailedanalysisofbuildingdevelopmentandadvisingontheirconservation.
2. PURPOSE OF REPORT
2.1 Thecurrentproposalisfortheconversionoftheformerstables,harnessroom,laundryandhayloftsintotwodwellingsandfortheincorporationoftheexistingduplexflatintooneofthesedwellings.
2.2 MelMorrisConservationhasbeenaskedtobothadviseonproposalsforconversionandtoprovideastatementofsignificanceandtocarryoutanImpactAssessmentinaccordancewiththeNationalPlanningPolicyFramework,inordertoestablishthesignificanceofthedesignatedheritageassetaffectedbytheproposals.Paragraph128states:
“In determining applications, local planning authorities should require an applicant to describe the significanceofanyheritageassetsaffected,includinganycontributionmadebytheirsetting.Thelevelofdetailshouldbeproportionatetotheassets’importanceandnomorethanissufficienttounderstandthepotentialimpactoftheproposalontheirsignificance.Asaminimumtherelevanthistoricenvironmentrecordshouldhavebeenconsultedandtheheritageassetsassessedusingappropriateexpertisewherenecessary.”
2.3 Thisreportsetsoutthehistoricdevelopmentofthebuildingandassessesthespecialarchitecturalandhistoricinterestofthebuilding.TheImpactAssessmentalsoconsidersthewiderimpactofthechangeofuseandrationalisationofsomeoftheoutbuildingsandcommunalandprivatespaces,andhistoricgardensonthesettingofthe listed buildings.
2.4 PhotographsofthebuildingsdescribedinthetextareincludedinPart2withcaptions.
3. DESCRIPTION OF COURTYARD BUILDINGS
3.1 ThebuildingsthatserveLightoakswerepurpose-builtasancillarystructuressupportingthelocalestateofawealthymanufacturingfamilyandforoccasionalleisureuse.Theywerenotusedasafarmandinsteadwereusedtosupportanowdefunctarrayofuses,incorporatingstablingforseventeenhorses,coach/carriageaccommodation,grooms’andstableboys’accommodationandlateralaundrytoservethehouse.DespitethepresenceofadairymaidandagriculturallabourersincensusrecordsatLightoaks,therearenosignsofadairyorcow-houseandtheseworkerswereprobablyworkingatBankFarmopposite.
3.2 ThecourtyardatLightoakswassplitintothenortherncoach-house,withaccommodationover(describedseparatelyintheMMCreportdated27thFebruary2015)andarangeoftwo-storeybuildingsandsingle-storey1
ancillarybuildingsontheopposite,southernsideoftheyard.Thesewereoriginallydesignedtoprovidestablingforsixteenhorses,withhayloftsover,andsomelimitedcartshed/storage,butwereadaptedduringthesecondhalfofthe19thcenturyandearly20thcenturytoprovidemoreservicespacesforthehouse:laundryandadditionalstaffaccommodation,aswellasaseparateharnessandtackroom.Thealterationsandadaptationcanbereadilyunderstood,astheywereingeneralpragmaticalterations,withlittleregardforaestheticappearance.Someofthealterationsareofnovalue,whilstothersareaestheticallypleasing,anditisdesirabletorestoresomeoftheGeorgiancharacter,andremovesomeofthelaterunsympatheticandmoredisfiguringalterations,asdiscussedlater.
3.3 AsagroupoflateGeorgianpurpose-builtstables,builtsimplyinredbrickofEnglishGardenWallbond,withsegmentalbrickarchesandstonecills,thebuildingsmakeanimportantcontributiontotheLightoakscomplex.Theyweredesignedandbuiltatthesametimeasthemainhouse,andhaveundergonerelativelylittlealterationtothecourtyardelevations.Theelevationwhichfacesthehouseincorporatesanunusualarchedendwall,maskingthepitchedrooffromtheeast.Thisseemstobepurelyornamental,andmayreflectanattempttoenhancethestatusofthisvisiblepartofthestableblockbyimbuingitwithamoreclassicalform.
3.4 Therearenoindicationsthatthebuildingswerebeinguseforanyfarmingpurposes,nolivestockaccommodation,cowhouses,orhen-housesorpiggeries/sties.Everythingwefindonthesiteappearstobededicatedtowardskeepinghorses,coachesandgigsandawell-appointedsuiteofassociatedstructuresforfeedinghorsesandmaintainingtheaccoutrements.Horsemanurewouldhavealsoprovidedanimportantfertiliserforthekitchengarden,whichwasimmediatelyadjacent.
3.5 Thecourtyardwassplitintotwoseparateareas,dividedbyatwo-storeybrickbuilding,almostperpendiculartothestables.Thetwospaceswereprobablyoriginallyseparatedbyagate.Thetwo-storeybrickbuildingwasinfactpartofanearlierphaseofbuildingonthesite,althoughthisistheonlysurvivingpart.TherearenobuildingsillustratedonYates‘s1775Countymap,soitisunlikelythattherewasacomplexorfarmhere,buttheremayhavebeenadetachedbarn.Thereisaninternalstonemasonrywalltothis‘wing’,knownasTheBothey,asectionofformeroutsidewallofanotherearlier18thcenturyphase.Atfirst,thebuildingwhichdividedthetwopartsofthecourtyardwasdetached(asillustratedbythe1844Tithemap),butby1874thishadbeenjoinedtothestableblockandthegapinfilledinbrickwork.
3.6 Itisnotclearwhythecourtyardwasoriginallysplitintotwospacesandmayhavesimplyrevolvedaroundthedecisiontokeeptheearlierbuildingonthesite.Theouteryardwasmoreaccessibleandwasclosertotheoutsidekennelsandworkingareas/pottingsheds,etc.Theinneryardwouldhavecontainedthemoreexpensivecarriageswithinthecoach-house.TowardstheCheadleRoadthereisadetached,enclosedyard,withapairofdogkennels(notpigsties)in-situandaformal,enclosedbrick-walleddetachedyard,allofwhichhadbeenbuiltby1874,alongwithalargebuilding,possiblyanancillarygigorcart-house.Mostkennelsforhoundscontainedanenclosurewithironrailings,butthismaybevariant.Itisunclearwhytherewasaneedfortwolargegatedopeningswithinthiswall,unlessitwastoaccommodatelargehorse-drawnvehiclesinthedetachedbuilding.Theenclosureseemstoosmallforahorsepaddockandthewallstoolowforadog-run.
Eastern Stable Block3.7 Theeasternstableblockwasdesignedtobeaworkingstableswithahayloftover.Thehayloftwasreachedbyanexternalflightofsteps,approachfromtheyard,stillin-situ.Thisstaircasealsoprovidedaccesstoafirstfloorroom,possiblyaformermixinghouseforstorageoffodderandformixingfeed/hotmash.
3.8 Theeasternblockwasoriginallydividedintotwoseparatestables,thebaytotheeastdividedintotwopairsofstalls,(toaccommodatefourhorses),andthebaytothewestoriginallylaidoutinthesameformation,butbythelate19thcenturytheinternalwallhadbeenremovedandthestableshadbeenadaptedforfourstalls,.Theoriginalbrickdividingwallwasremovedduringthisrefurbishmentandthebrickdividingwallatfirstfloorlevelwasalsoremovedandreplacedwithasmalltimbertruss,withawrought-ironverticaltierodandnewstrutsandcollar.Theoriginalarrangementsurvivesatfirstfloorleveltothetwoeasternbays,whilstthetwowesternbaysarenowonespace,withtheratheroddstruttrussandcollar.Inspectionofthefloorstructuresuggeststhatoriginallime-ashfloorswouldhavebeenremovedduringthisphaseofinternalreorganisation.Therearenownolime-ashfloorsinthiswingoftheblock,butallofthestableswouldhavehadplasteredceilingsandthecurrentarrangement,withplasteredceilings,reflectstheoriginalappearance.Plasteredwalls,probablyareplacementfortheoriginalplaster,survive.
3.9 Stableswerelaidoutsothateachsetoffourstallswasreachedbyawideexternaldoorandwaslitbyacast-ironwindowwithintegralhopperorventilation.Horsesfacedintothebuildingsanddidnothaveadirectview2
throughanywindows,theconventionduringthisperiodofGeorgianstablebuilding.Theoppositewallwasplainandoriginallyhadnoventilatorsorwindowsatgoundfloorlevel.Theplainbrickwallprovidedasouth-facingheatsinkfortrainingfruitinthekitchengarden.However,therewasonedistinctdoorwayinthiswallconnectingtheblockwiththekitchengarden(blockedupandchangedtoawindowinthe20thcentury).
3.10 Thecourtyardelevationscontainedasymmetricalarrangementofpaireddoors,withcast-ironwindowstoeitherside.Aswiththemainbuilding,cast-ironwindowswerearelativelylateGeorgianintroductionandthedateofthisphaseiscontemporarywiththecoach-houseandmainhouse,circa1823-27.Atfirstfloorlevelthehayloftswereservedbyslidingshutters,whicharestillin-situ,butmayhavereplacementtimbershutters,withintegralventilators.Theshuttersslidbetweentimberrailswithinrebatedbrickmasonry,whichallowedtheshutterstofinishneatlyflush.
3.11 Theoriginalearly19thcenturyfixturesandfittingswereremovedandreplacedwithnewpurpose-madefittings,castings,flooringandboardedliningprobablyduringthe1890s.Therefurbishmentofthestableswascomprehensive.Inadditiontoprovidingboardedliningstothestalls,andboardingthestalldivisions,eachhorsewasprovidedwithacast-ironwaterbowlandanironmanger.Onlyoneofthemangerssurvives(intheBotheystable),butanumberofthecast-ironwaterbowlssurviveintheeasternstalls.Theghostedlinesofthemangerscanstillbeseenintheboardedlining.Haywasdroppedfromthefirstfloorhayloftthroughahatchanddownintothemangersandaboarded,curvedbafflepreventedexcesshayfromdroppingontothestablefloor.Thefloors/ceilingshaveallbeenreplacedsononeoftheoriginalhatchessurviveintheeasternstableblock,althoughsomeoftheboardedcurvedbafflessurviveinthegarage.
Musgrave’s Stable Fittings3.12 Musgrave’sprovidedallofthestablefittingsintheEasternStableblockand‘wing’.Stableswerefittedoutwithcast-ironpostsandanumberofcastingsstampedwith‘Musgrave’sPatent(LondonandBelfast)’.ThiscompanyknownasMusgrave&Co.Limited,ofAnnStreetIronworks,Belfastalsohadanofficeaddressat97NewBondStreet,London.
3.13 ThecompanyfirstappearedintheBelfastDirectoryof1843-1844,whereitisenteredasMusgrave&Bros.HardwareMerchants,at99HighStreet.Bythe1850stheywerewellestablished,notonlyasHardwareMerchantsbutalsoasmanufacturersoftheirownpatentslowcombustionstovesandpatentstableandcow-housefittings.TheyexhibitedattheInternationalExhibitionof1862andduringthe1890sbecameprolificsuppliersoffittingsforstablesandestatefarms.Theywerestillrecordedasmanufacturersuntil1965,whenthebusinesswasliquidated.Between1890and1914largenumbersofstablesandstovesweresoldthroughouttheBritishIsles,EuropeandtheAmericas.ThecompanyhadashowroominParisandagenciesinmostprincipalEuropeancountries.TheywereresponsibleforfittingoutandfurnishingstablesfortheEmpressFrederickofGermany,HisMajestytheKingofSpain,aswellasforverymanymembersofthearistocracyoftheUnitedKingdomandEurope.(CIBSEreport)
3.14 AdvertisementsforMusgrave’sPatentStallsandLooseBoxescanbefoundwithengravedillustrationsdatingfromthe1860sonwards,showingsimilararrangementstothatatLightoaks.Theircatalogueshowspatenteddesignswithanumberofdevices,includingtheir“fresh-airinlets”and“stench-traps”.IllustrationsappearinTheArchitect’s,Surveyor’sandEngineer’sCompendium1892.
3.15 TheflooringandironworkatLightoaksisalsonotable,asthecast-irongratingsandgulleysarealmostidenticaltothoseillustratedinthecatalogues.‘Musgrave’sPatentStench-trap’wasprobablyusedatLightoaks.Thegulleysweredivertedintoearthenwaresewerage/drainagepieswhichledtotheoutsideofthebuilding.
3.16 Therearealargenumberofsmallfittingsfixedtotheboardedlinings–bridle,halter,andharnessbrackets,andmultipletetherrings,allprobablybyMusgrave’s.
Alterations and Restoration3.17 Inadditiontothelossoftheinternalbrickwallsatgroundandfirstfloorlevel,andthelossoftheoriginalfloorsandceilings,thestableswereadaptedduringthe20thcenturyforgaraging,byremovingoneofthecast-ironwindowstothestablesandinsertingthisinthesouth,kitchen-gardenelevation,andthenreplacingthiswindowwithalargesquaredopeningwithtimberlintelandtimberdoors(nowanup-and-overgaragedoor).Whilstchangestohistorybuildingscansometimeshavevalueintheirownright,thisparticularalterationisquitedisfiguringandcontributesnothingtothebuilding.Itisdesirable,iftheopportunityarises,thatitisreversedandtheoriginalGeorgiansymmetryreturnedtothiselevation,byreinstatingthecast-ironwindow,withaheader-coursesegmentalbricklintelandmatchingbrickworkandbond.Thiswillneedverycarefulcontroloverthespecificationand3
contractor to ensure details match.
Western Stable Block3.18 TheWesternStableBlockwasasisterblockofstables.Italsohadsymmetricalpaireddoorswithcast-ironwindowsanditoriginallyhadslidingshuttersatfirstfloorlevelservingthehayloft,whichwasreachedbyanindependentexternalflightofsteps.Theseshutterswerereplacedwithcast-ironfixedlights,withsmallhoppers,buttherebatedbrickworkfortheshutterssurvives.
3.19 Thestablesinthisrangeappeartohavebeenalwaysbuiltwithmuchtallerfloor-to-ceilingheightsthantheEasternBlock;possibleexplanationsforthiscouldbethatthisrangeneededtoaccommodatetallerhorses,stallionsorcart-horses.Theoriginallime-ashfloorofthe1820ssurvivesinthisrange,asdotheoriginalaccesshatchesandsomeofthehatchdoorsfordroppinghaythroughtothemangersforthehorses.ThearrangementwasidenticaltotheEasternBlock,withfeedhatchesplacedinthecornerofeachstalls,aseriesof8stalls,dividedintotwoblocksoffour,withadividingbrickwall,whichisstillin-situtothewesternbay.Theoriginalarrangementsurvivestothewesternmostbay,withthebrickdividingwallatgroundfloorlevel,althoughthishasaninsertedraisedsectionoffloor,withoutanyobviouspurposeorrationalexplanation,butunlikelytobeoriginalasitwouldhavebeenasignificantimpedimenttothemovementofhorses.
3.20 Theeasternbayofthisblockcontainsalarge,insertedcast-ironpostwhichsupportsatransverseoakspinebeamwhichenabledthewholespacetobeusedasalaundry.Thesewereinsertedbythesecondhalfofthe19thcenturyandtheoriginalbrickdividingwallwasreplacedwiththisoakbeamandcast-ironpost,whilstproppingtheremainingload-bearingbrickwallabove,ceilingjoistsandretainingthelime-ashfloor,afeatofsomecomplexity.
3.21 Thelaundrywaslaterfittedoutwithalargehigh-levelwindowtothesouthelevationandaninsertedhearthandaseparate‘copper’heatedbyasmallfireboxunderneath.Neitherthecoppernorthefireplacewereproperlytiedintotheoriginalbrickdividingwallandtheremainsarestructurallyunstable.Thegreaterpartofthechimneybreasthascollapsedatgroundlevel.Aseparate,smallstonesinksurvivesonthefrontwall.Thismaybeallthatremainsofamoreextensiverangeofsinks.
Alterations and Restoration3.22 The adaptation of the building during the mid 19th century to change the use from stables and hayloft involvedtheinsertionofcast-ironwindowstothecourtyardelevationintroduceadetailwhichisofvalue,aspartofthehistoryofthebuilding–small-panedcastironwindowsreplacedoriginalhorizontal-slidingshutters.Greatcarewastakentointroducewindowswhichmatchedtheoriginal.Thehayloftswereneverincorporatedintothebuildingandtheirlaterpurposeisunknown;theyweretoolightandairyforfruitstorage.Sadly,thesamecarewasnotappliedtofurther,lateralterations,whichareingeneralanassortmentofstyles,periodsanddetails.Inparticular,theintroductionofafurthercasementwindowintothecourtyardelevationhasspoilttheGeorgiansymmetryofthecourtyardelevationandifanopportunityarisesthisshouldberemovedandbrickedup.tomatchOnthesouthern,kitchengarden,elevationtheoriginalappearancehasbeenalteredandthewindowsizesandshapesvary;theyareaneclecticassortmentofcasementsintroducedintoaformerlyblankwall.Itwouldbefeasibletoregularisethese,astheyhaveindividuallylittlevalue,perhapsadoptingtheearliestsmall-panedcasementasapattern.Alternatively,thevarietyofwindowstylescouldbeleftasevidenceofbuildingchangesandevolution,perhapsadoptingadarkpaintedcolourforthejoinery,toreducetheimpact.
Northern Wing3.23 Sandwichedbetweenthetwostablerangesisalargesingle-bay,two-storeyelement.Theoriginaluseofthegroundfloorisnotknown,butitmayhavebeenoriginallyusedasharnessroomorasamixinghouse.Ithaddirectaccessontothekitchengarden.Itwascustomarytohaveatwo-storeymixinghouseandareawherehotfeedforhorsescouldbemixedwithhayandotherchoppedfeedanditwouldmakesenseforthistohavebeencarriedoutinthecentralbay,betweenthetwoblocksofstables,particularlyasthestablesatonetimeaccommodatedupto16horses.
3.24 Itwaslaterusedasaccommodationinthelate19thcenturyandisstillpartofaflatandinuseasadwelling.AtfirstfloorlevelaGothicktimberwindowwasinsertedintothesouthelevation.Thedatethatthiswasintroducedisnotknownanditisinconclusivewhetherthiswaspartofthefirstphaseoralatermodification,re-usinganearlierwindowinanewlocation,butitappearstobecontemporarywiththecreationofthefirstflooraccommodationandtheinsertionofafireplaceinthisroom,whichwasafter1874,whenthestableswerereducedtojusttheEasternBlock.4
3.25 Asmallhearthwasinsertedhereatfirstfloorlevel,inconjunctionwiththeinsertionofthechimneybreasttothelaundry.Theuseofthefirstfloorasstaffbedroomspaceinthelate19thcenturyisindicatedbytheplasterworkandfittings.
3.26 Thisbayofthebuildinghasstraightjointsbetweenitandtheeastandweststableblocks,withregularheaderandstretcherbrickstoeachcourseindicatingthatitpredatesthestables.Quitehowthisrelatedtotheother18thcenturybuildingintheyardisnotknown.
3.27 Tothenorthofthis‘bay’isanattachedtwo-storeywing,whichwasadaptedasaccommodationduringthesecondhalfofthe19thcentury,after1874.Thebuildinghasundergonemultiplealterationsandphasesandhasretainedasmallportionofastableinthenorthernbayaswellasalean-to,whichisillustratedin1844.Thebrickworkinthenortherngableandforashortsectionofthereturnwallcontainsnarrowgauge9’x2’bricks,laidinanirregularbond.Thispredatestherestofthebrickworkandisprobablymid18thcenturyinorigin.Thisearlierbuildingmayhavebeenasinglebaystructure.Aspartofthemainphaseofadaptationthebuildingwasre-roofedandgivendecorativescallopedbargeboards.Thebuildingappearstohavebeenadaptedasgroom’saccommodationorperhapsforthelaunderessandhertwochildren,whowasworkinginthelaundryinthe1881Census.Theoriginalgroundflooropening,whichcontainedawidesegmentalarch,withroundedbrickreveals,wasprobablyusedasacartshed.Thispartwasincorporatedintothedwellinginalaterphaseofearly20thcenturyadaptation.
Single Storey Harness Room3.28 Thesingle-storeylean-tobrickbuildingwhichformstheeasternsideofthecourtyardwasbuiltduringthe1880sor1890s,asmapregressionillustrates.Itwasfittedwithsimilarboardedliningtothestablerangesandmayhavehadmorefittings,suchassaddleracksandharnessracks,whichhavebeenremoved.TheGothick-archedwindowwasinsertedinthislean-toandre-locatedfromanotherpartofthemainhouseandhasintegralboardedlining,whichtogetherindicatealterationsofthe1890s.Thisspaceisheatedbyareasonable-sizedhearthandstove,whichsuggestitwasusedasancillaryspaceasaharnessroomortackroom/officeforstaffcleaningandmaintainingthe equipment.
4. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE
4.1 ThebasisofthiswrittenappraisalfollowstheEnglishHeritageConservationPrinciples(2008)appliedtounderstandingabuildinganditssetting.TheEnglishHeritageguidelinesforassessingsignificanceincludethefollowingvalues,anyoneormoreofwhichmaybecontainedwithinabuildingorhistoricsite:evidential,historical, aesthetic and communal.
Historic and Social Interest4.2 Thebuildingsrevealmuchaboutthesocialhistoryofthesiteandthestatusoftheoccupantsthroughoutthe19thcentury,thosewiththewealthandmeanstobeabletoemployalargenumberofstaffandtomaintainbuildingswhichwerelargelyforleisurepurposes.ThebuildingsarelargelyintactfromtheoriginallateGeorgianphaseofdevelopment,circa1823-27,andarguablyoflistablequalityintheirownright,withoriginalsymmetricalarrangementofpairedstableblockswithoriginalbrickwork,windowsanddoorstothecourtyardelevations.
Technological Interest4.3 Thefixturesandfittingsareofmoderatehistoricinterestalthoughtheyarerelativelylateindate.Musgrave’swereprolificsuppliersofstablefittingsandtherearelikelytobemanyinmuchbetterconditionandofbetterqualitymadeforthelargerestates,althoughasimplesearchoftheHistoricEnglanddatabaseprovidesonlyonebuildingwithnamedfittingsbythecompanyandthisislikelytobesimplydowntolackofdetailinlistdescriptions.Thefittingsarevulnerabletolossandmangersarepopularitemsforarchitecturalsalvageandreclamationyardsandhavebeenremovedinthepast,probablyasitemsofsalvage.
4.4 ThemainelementsofthefabricdatingfromthelateGeorgianphaseofthefabric(1823-27)are:thecast-irongroundfloorwindows,boardeddoors,lime-ashfloorsandjoists,feedhatchesandinternalbrickdividingwalls.Theseareofhighinterestastheyrevealthefloorplansandstructureandoriginal‘designed’formofthebuilding.Theinternalappearanceofthefinishesduringthisphaseisunknown,althoughtheinteriorwallsmayhavebeenplastered,asstableswereoftenplasteredtoreducedustforthehorses.Theceilingswerecertainlyoriginallyunderdrawninplasterratherthanleftwithexposedjoistsandthesestillsurviviveinthewesternstableblock.
5
4.5 Themainelementsdatingfromthe1890sphaseofrefurbishmentincludealloftheStablefittingsandthealterationstocreatetheLaundry.Theseareofmoderatehistoricandtechnologicalinterest.Unfortunately,therearenolocationswhereallofthefittingssurviveinoneplace,whichcouldberetainedasacompleteexample,andtheevidenceisspreadoutbetweenbothranges.ThestablefittingsintheEasternBlock,forexample,havelosttheiroriginalbaffles,ironmangersandtheoriginalceilingsandhatches,whilstthoseintheWesternBlockhaveretainedtheoriginalceilingsandhatchesofthe1820sbuthavelostthestallsandstablefittings.Boardedliningsaregenerallyinpoorconditionandthelowersectionshavebeeneatenawaybyrotandrodents,althoughsomesectionscanbesalvagedandmadegood.
Group Value4.6 ThebuildingshavehighgroupvaluewiththemainhouseandprovideevidenceofthelateGeorgianappearance,whilstmuchofthesimplercharacterhasbeenremovedinthehouse.
5. DESCRIPTION OF CURRENT SETTING AND CONTRIBUTION TO SIGNIFICANCE
5.1 ThegardensandgroundsofLightoaksweredevelopedduringtheearly19thcentury,circa1823-27,aspartofanestateinitiallyforthePattenfamilyandlater,after1874,fortheBoltonfamily.Thegardensettingislaidoutwithamaturegarden,whichhasdevelopedoveralmost200yearswithplantedbedsandborderstotheeastandsouth,matureparklandbelowthisandtothesouthofthegardens,andalargekitchengardenonthesouthsideofthestableblocks.Tothenorthcurvestheprivatecarriagedrive,whichisseparatedfromtheturnpikeroadbyabroadexpanseoflandscapedshrubberies.ThecarriagedrivewasoriginallybuiltforOakamoorLodge,thehouseinthevalleybottomoccupiedbyGeorgeWraggein1816,andisprobablylate18thcenturyinorigin.Butfollowingthesaleoftheestatein1874,ASBoltonacquiredtheexclusiverightstotheprivatecarriagedriveandtheareaaroundthemainentrancefromOakamoreRoad(sic)wasre-landscapedsothatthedriverelateddirectlytoLightOaks.ThedrivestillsnakespastthesiteofOakamoorLodge.
5.2 ThehousewasoriginallybuiltasaRetreat,forwhichprivacywasanessentialcriterion,andiscompletelyhiddenfromtheturnpikeroad,OakamoreRoad,(sic);ithasprivateviewsacrossthelandscapeoftheChurnetValley,enhancedbyusingtheborrowedlandscapefeatures,suchasadirectlineofsightviewtoAltonTowersinthedistance.
5.3 TherangeofbuildingsdevelopedonthesitesurviveslargelycompleteinitslateVictorianform,withaVictorianWinterGarden,outsideplungepoolandportecochère.
5.4 Themainelevationofthehouseisapproachedviaagatelodge,withtimbergatesaddedbytheBoltonfamilycirca1895,whichleadtothenorthern(front)entranceofthehouse,betweenornamentalearlyVictorianrockeries,wherethereisalaterVictorianportecochère,designedsothatthosealightingfromacarriagewouldnotgetwet.Thereisasecondaryentrancetothewest,whichservedtheancillarybuildingsoftheestateandtheserviceyard.
5.5 Theancillaryservicebuildings,whichcontainthe former coach-house and ranges of stables originally providedstablingfor17horses;thesearerangedaroundan inner courtyard and an outer yard. The outer yard is loosely connected to further ranges of horticultural buildings, potting sheds and structures supporting the kitchengardenandadetachedlate19thcenturyyard,probablya‘gigyard’withseparatedog-kennels,whichwasaddedbetween1844and1875.Thisyardoriginallycontainedabuildingwithinthenorthwall,illustratedonthe1875estatemap(demolished),anditseemsmostlikelythattheyardwasusedasasupplementaryenclosedsecureyardspace,withthedoublegatedentrances permitting easy access in and out for horses withtrapsorgigs,asdistinctfromcoachesorenclosedcarriages.Theoriginalbuildingwasprobably,therefore,
6 ‘Gig yard’ with one of the paired wide entrances behind the corrugated iron garage block
agighouse.Theenclosedinnercourtyardtothestableyardispreservedwithitsoriginalsettedsandstonesurface,hard-wearingandwell-preservedfinish,whichcomplementsandenhancesthebuildings.Theouteryardwouldhaveoncehadahard-wearingsurface,biuttheoriginalappearance,whichmayhavehadsettsorcompactedlimestone-pitching,isnowobscuredbytarmac.
5.6 Therehavebeenrelativelyfewalterationstothelandscape;a20thcenturytenniscourtandanextendedterracewereaddedtotheearlierplantedbordersandlawnsontheeastsideofthehouseandanearly20thcenturygreenhousewasaddedtothekitchengarden.Onthefunctionalsideofthekitchengardenwalls,anumberofthepottingshedswerealtered,adaptedandextendedtoprovidelargercapacitystorage.
5.7 Thesignificanceofthelandscapingandgardensisthattheyprovideawell-maintained,well-preservedandlushsettingforthehouseandtheworkingestatemakinganimportantcontributiontoitscharacter.
5.8 Thesitecurrentlyincorporatesafewunsightlystructures/elements,whichareharmfultothesettingofthelistedbuilding:
• Moderndetachedcorrugatedirongarageblockforfourcars• Aviariesagainstthekitchengardenwall• Tarmacsurfaces• Neglectedpottingshedsandstorage
5.9 Thefirstthreeoftheseelementsarebeingremovedwithintheproposedschemeandthisisaverypositiveoutcome.Thepottingshedsareveryextensiveandarebeingmothballedandarenotincludedinthecurrentscopeofworks.Fulldetailsoftheproposedlayoutareshownonthesiteplan–ref.TSGD-LIGHTOAKS-02C.
6. IMPACT ASSESSMENT
Theproposedalterationsinvolveseparationofthemainhousefromthe‘townhouses’,flatsandstableblockconversionsinasubtleway,whichhasbeendiscussedandrevisedindetailwithMelMorrisConservation,takingintoaccount future management and maintenance requirements. Details of operational management are summarised in the Design and Access Statement.
6.1 Impact Of External Works
DemolitionsThemoderngarageblockisbeingdemolished;itisnotbeingreplaced.Noadditional/replacementgaragingisproposed.Thiswillenabletheoriginaldouble-gatedentrancegatewaystothesmall‘gigyard’toberepairedandused.Thissmallwalledenclosurecontainsasetofdogkennels,accessedfromtheoutsidewalloftheyard,whichwillberepaired.Theproposeduseofthisspaceasanareaforvisitorcarparkinginvolvesnoalterationsbutitprovidesveryeffectivescreeningofcars.Wallswillberepairedandre-pointedandliftedcopingsre-bedded.
Late20thcenturyaviarieswillberemovedfromthekitchengardenwallsandtheseoriginalwallswillbesimplymadegood and restored to their original form.
Tarmacwillberemovedandreplacedwithasimplelandscapingschemetothenorthelevationof“Unit2”,self-7
Modern late 20th centuy aviaries built with reclaimed bricks, attached to the original kitchen garden wall.
compactinggravelandsimplelowshrubsandaplainlawn,whichwillsoftenthesettingandismoreappropriateforacountryestatethantarmac.Thisenablestheelevationoftheouterstablerangetobekeptopenandunclutteredfrom domestic paraphernalia.
Duringtheliftingofthetarmac,theoutsidespacetothesecondstableblock(Unit2)willbeinvestigatedtoidentifyanysurvivingcobbles/setts.Thesewillberecordedphotographically.Shouldtherebealargelycompletesectionofsettsin-situ,thelandscapingschemewillneedtoberevisedtoincorporatethesewhilstallowingsomeworkstocreateprivatespace,andseparateparking,asshowninthelandscapinglayout.Anyrevisionstothelandscapingwillneedtobecontrolledbyconditiontoavoiddisruptiontothecurrenttenant.
New BuildingAbiomassboilerwillbethemainsourceofheatforallbuildingsonthesiteandthisisalong-termsustainableinvestment,beingadoptedbymanyhistoricestates.Theboilerwillneedtobecontainedwithinabuildingwhichislargeenoughtocontaintheboilerandafuelstore/hoppersystemandneedstobeaccessiblefromthehighwaytoenablepellets/fueltobedeliveredonaregularbasiswithoutdisruptingresidents.Wehaveconsideredoptionsforthelocationofthebiomassboilerandoverallitisconcludedthatthebestplaceforthisiswithintheshrubberiesclose to the road. This is a considerable distance from the house and directly behind the footprint of the former buildinginthe‘gigyard’.Therearenosuitablelocationsclosetothebuildingsandnoneoftheexistingbuildingsaresuitableforconversiontothisuseorlargeenough.Existinglean-tostoragebuildingsattachedtotheformercoach-houseandstableblockaretoosmallandotherlocationswithinthetwo-storeybuildingswouldbebothhighlydisruptivetoresidentsandinvolvedamagingalterationstothebuildings.
Thenewbiomassstructurecanbeenhancedwithplantingtopartiallyhideitsform.Forthisreason,atimbercladstructurehasthetemporarycharacterwhichisappropriateinthissetting,willweatherquickly,andthereisnoconfusionaboutitsrelationshipwiththeoriginalplannedarrangementofbuildingsonthesite.Thetimber-boardinginredcedarwillweathertoasilver-greyfinishandtheproposedpitchroofingreenmineralfelt,willalsoblendintothegardenenvironment.
Access and entrancesTheprimaryentranceforthecourtyardbuildingsistheoriginalwesternbackentrancetothesite.Thisentrancedoesnotcontainagatelodgebutistheoriginalentrancegatewayforservicingthecourtyardandwesternpartofthesite.Astheentrancegatesarethesameasthosetotheothertwohistoricentrances,ithasbeendecidedtoretainthesein-situ,reflectingthefactthatthesiteremainsasonedesignedestate,evenwheresectionsaresplitintoseparatefreeholds.Inordertoenhancethesecurityoftheoccupiers,noneofwhomoverlookthisentrance,ithasbeendecidedtoprovideasecuregateway,andtosupplementtheoriginaltimbergateswithasecondarymetalgate,basedontheIAESterndaleestatetype,orsimilar ;thiswillseamlesslyblendwiththeothergatesandrailingsinthesamepatternchosenwithinthesite.Thelighterweightgatesarealsoeasiertoelectricallyoperate.
Thegatedentrancesweresupplementedinthelate19thcenturybytwogatelodgestothemoreformalentrances,ofwhichtheoneclosesttoOakamoorisnowentirelyremovedfromthe‘estate’.Theeasternentrancewillbecometheprimaryentranceforthemainhouseandwillnotbeshared,unlessemergencyvehiclesneedaccess.Thisreflectsthecurrentandhistorichierarchyofspacesandcarriagedrives.
Car parkingThemanagementofthegroundsisbeingcoordinatedtoprovidecarparkingspacesforalloftheusers;thesespaceshavebeenpulledawayfromthemainhouseelevations,providingamoreopencharacterforeachofthefrontages.ThecarparkinghasbeenremovedentirelyfromtheareainfrontoftheBilliardRoomwindows,restoringitsoriginaloutlook,andremovingsomeofthemoredenserhododendronatthispoint.TothenorthofTownhouse1,thecarparkinghasbeenremovedtoenabletheoccupierstohaveanopenareaofprivatespace.Onthenorthsideofthehouse,wherethereistheprimaryaccesstothecoach-housetownhousesandtheapartments,thecarparkinghasbeencreatedwithinthegardenspaceonthenorthsideofthedrive,betweenthehybridrhododendron,whichwillscreenthecarsfromthecarriagedrive.
ThecarparkingspacesforTownhouse1andStableblockUnit2arelocatedinthepositionswherethetenantscurrentlypark.
Themanagementofthesitewillneedcarefulcontrol,writtenintothedeedsofeachpropertyandmaintainedbytheestatemanagementcompanywherethereisacontributiontothemaintenanceofthecommunalspaces,sothat8
everyoccupierisawareoftheirparkingspacesandareaswheretheycannotpark.Thiswillavoidtheneedforlargeareasofsignage.Themanagementcompanywillalsoensurethatthegroundsarewell-maintainedtopreservethecharacter of the planting, maintain shrub planting and continuity of the larger landscaped spaces on the north side of thecarriagedrive.Thiswillavoidthepresenceofdomesticparaphernalia:sheds,washinglines,etc.Binstoragehasbeencreatedindiscreetareasfencedoffwithhazel-hurdlepanelfencingtocaterforthemultiplewheeliebinsintheStaffordshire Moorlands recycling scheme.
Thesoutherncourtyardisaveryfinespacewhichwewishtoseepreservedinitspresentform,retainingtheexistingcompletesettedsurfaceintact.Optionshavebeenconsideredtocreateparkingspaceshereandtoenablevehicularaccessto‘garages’withintheformercoach-house.However,ithasbeendecidedonbalancethatitisnotfeasibletopracticallymanagethis,whilstretainingtheexistingsettedcourtyardlandscaping,withoutcausingextensivedisruptiontotheresidentsofadjoiningproperties,particularlyatnight-time,manyofwhowillhavetheirlivingroomsfacingontothiscourtyard.Overall,itwillbeaconsiderableenhancement,andmuchsafer,withbetterresidentialamenity,toremovecarsfromthisspace.Vehicleparkinghasthereforebeenremovedfromthisspaceandvehiclemovementswillbelimitedtomaintenancevehiclesandemergencyvehicles.Maintenanceoftheyardwillneedtobeundertakenbythemanagementcompany,toensurecompletecontinuityofmaterials;whilstoccupierswillhaveapedestrianrightofwayoverthecourtyard,theywillnothaveresponsibilityformaintenance.
Car parking and storage for Lightoaks houseThemainhousewillutilisetheexistinglean-tocoveredwalkwaybetweenthehouseandtheWinterGardenforthestorageofgardenequipment,includinglawnmowerandbicycles.Theownerswillpark,astheycurrentlydo,underneaththeportecochere.Inadditiontothisarea,theexistingbasementprovidesgoodheadroomandaverylargeareaofstorageforthemainhouseandthiscanaccommodatealargeamountofequipment.ThiscoversthewholeofthefootprintoftheoriginalvillaandhasaseparateaccessfromthebasementareaunderneaththeDuplex.
Garden division and internal boundariesThenatureofthegardenisthatitalreadydividesintoareasofseparatecharacter.Therewillbeoverarchingmanagementofcommunalareas,includingthesettedcourtyard,thegigyard,theentrancecarriagedriveandthenortherngardensandshrubberies.ThecriticalviewsarethosefromthemainreceptionroomsoftheCottageOrnée,includingtheBilliardRoom,andthesewillbeunaffected.
Forthemostpart,theboundarieswithinthemanagementofthesitearebeingmaintainedashedgesandshrubsandtheseparationofspacesisreliantupontheexistingrhododendronanddenseornamentalshrubplantingtoprovidescreeningandprivacy.Itisproposedthatincertainkeyareasthenaturalisticlandscapingissupplementedwith1.2metrehighmetalestaterailings,suchasthosemanufacturedbyIAE(Sterndalepattern)toseparateareasthatrequireanadditionallevelofseparation.Theserailingsallowsignificantpermeabilitywithinthe‘estate’,contouraroundspaces and along gradients, and are particularly sympathetic to the 19th century character of the garden and historic estates,includingthosewithintheStaffordshireMoorlands.Theyareusedselectivelyonlywherenecessarytoclearlydelineateandphysicallyprivatespacefromsharedcommunalspaceandtoprovidesmallpedestriangatesbetweentheshrubberies.Therearethreeareaswhereestaterailingsareproposedtocreateenclosedprivateareas:• tothesouthoftheDuplex,wherethereisanexistingtimberfence,and• tothenorthofthestableblockUnit2,and• afurthershortsectionwhereitwillsplitthecarriagedriveintotwo.Theoriginalcarriagedrivesweptthroughthenorthpartofthegardenandtheviewsalongthisdriveandthispartofthesettingofthelistedbuildingwillbemaintainedbytheuseofthemoreopenestaterailingsandgatesofthesamefamilyalongtheboundarybetweenthesharedaccessdriveandtheprivatedriveofthemainhouse.
Theseparationofthewalledkitchengardenforthestableblocks(Unit1andUnit2)hasbeenachievedsimplybysupplementingtheexistingboxhedgingwithinfilledhedging.TheDuplexapartmentwithinthemainhousewillhaveasmallareaofprivatelawn,whichissurroundedbyahedgeandestaterailings,replacinganexistingtimberfence.Theseareasofformerkitchengardenonthesouthsideofthehouseareveryextensiveandbeinglargeareasanydomesticparaphernaliawillbespreadout,withminimalimpactonthesettingofthelistedgroup.Thesepartsofthesettingofthelistedbuildingareveryspecialandwell-maintainedandtherewillbenonotablechange.
Estate RailingsThedesignoftheestaterailingswillbebasedonthetraditionalhorizontalbarrailingswithmetalposts,roundbartothetoprailandflatbartothelowerrailsandstanchions.Thisverytraditionalformofestaterailingisproducedbyanumberofcompanies.Therailingsaresuppliedfinishedgalvanizedandinordertoblendintothegardensetting,they9
willneedtobetreatedwithanetchingprimerorT-washandthenpaintedinaglosspaint,toadarkfinish,suchasdarkgreen(BS12B29)ordarkgrey(BS00A13)orblack.
6.2 Impact of Proposed Change of Use to Stableblocks
Toaccompanythissectionthedrawingshavebeenannotatedandcolour-codedtoclearlyshoweachalteration.PleasereadthissectionwiththedrawingsinAppendix1.
Principle of conversion to residential useThestableblockswerepartconvertedintoresidentialuseforservantsduringthelate19thcentury.Thecentral‘wing’,knownas‘TheBothie’,wasconvertedintoresidentialaccommodationandalargeportionofthisisstillinresidentialuse;oneofthefirstfloorspaces,whichiscurrentlyreachedfromanoutsidestaircaseandlocatedovertheexistingdwelling,wasalsoconvertedintoresidentialuseforthestaff,andisplasteredandwasfittedoutwithafireplace(removed);thisspaceisvacantandhasnotbeenincorporatedintothemaindwellingforsometime,eventhoughthereisaconnectingdoorway.Inadditiontotheresidentialuseofthecentral‘wing’,theoutercourtyardbuildingwasadaptedandalteredfromitsoriginaldesignedpurposeasastables,andwasconvertedintoancillarydomesticserviceaccommodation–thehouselaundry.
Weconsiderthatasthebuildingswerealldevelopedtoprovideancillaryaccommodationandservicingforthemainhouse,andthattheyhistoricallycontainedalargenumberofservants,livingandworkinginthecourtyardbuildingsandabovethecoach-house,residentialoccupationwhichhasbeenmaintainedthroughoutthe20thcentury,thatthereisnologicalorjustifiablereasontochangetheexistingresidentialusetoholidayaccommodation.Tohavea combination of residents and holiday accommodation is generally poor management practice and can lead to considerableproblemsandconflicts,particularlywheretherelationshipsarecheek-by-jowl,astheyareatLightoaks.
WhilstthecurrentpolicyR1–RuralDiversificationintheSMCoreStrategygivesprioritytotheuseofruralbuildingsforcommercialenterprise,wecontendthat:
a)thesearenotruralbuildings,astheyarepartofacomplexassociatedwithahousewhichsitswithinagarden,notwithinthe‘countryside’;andb)thebuildingswereneverdesignedforagriculturaluseandthereisnoevidencethatthiscomplexwereusedforfarmingpurposes;anyuseforhaystoragewasincidentaltotheprovisionofhorsestabling,horticulturalpurposeswereincidentaltotheresidentialuseofthemainhouse;andc)themajorityoftheunits(includingtheCoach-house)arealreadyinpermanentresidentialuse;andd)thecombinationofresidentialuseandholidayaccommodationwouldnotbeinthebestinterestsofthe‘estate,eitherintermsofitscharacterormanagementfortheoccupationofresidents;ande)theNPPFprovidesthepoliciestoenableabalanceddecisiontobemadeinthebestinterestsofthesustainableuseofthewholeestate,animportantheritageasset,toavoidfragmentation.Intermsofownership,holidayaccommodationwouldcreatealong-termviabilityissuewiththeinherentadditionalcostofacommercial mortgage
TheconversionoftheStableblocksintotwodwellingsprovidesgenerousspaceandtherearerelativelyfewnewinternalwallsandsubdivisions.Whilstconversiondoesremovesomeoftherusticcharacteroftheinternalspaces,theplanformoftheoriginallayoutislargelyunchanged.Theexternalappearanceisalsolargelyunchangedandsomeworksofrestorationareproposedtosimplifyandenhancetheelevations.
Current condition of StableblocksThewesternstableblockisvacantandunusedandisinpoorcondition,withtherelativelyrecentcollapseofthechimneybreasttothelaundry.Theeasternstableblockhasbeenusedrecentlyasagarageandstore,althoughthefirstfloorisunused.Theformerharnessroomisunused.Thenorthern‘wing’iscurrentlyoccupiedasadwellingbutonlypartofthishasause.Ofthepresentfloorareaonly50%ofthegroundfloorisinuseandonly15%ofthefirstfloorisinuseandthisisnotsustainable.
Listedbuildingsneedviableeconomicusesand,asrecognisedintheStatementofSignificance,theseelementsofthesitehaveveryhighsignificanceandarearguablylistableintheirownright.Changeofuseofthesebuildingstocreateeconomicusesisimportantandjustifiable.WithintheNationalPlanningPolicyFrameworkthereisapresumptionforsustainabledevelopmentandlocalplanningauthoritiesshould“takeintoaccount:thedesirabilityofsustainingandenhancingthesignificanceofheritageassetsandputtingthemtoviableusesconsistentwiththeirconservation”(para.126).
10
RelevantpoliciesarealsoaddressedwithintheDesignandAccessStatement.
Restoration of elevations to the StableblocksThemaindistinctivecharacteristicofthestableblocksandthecourtyardelevationsisthesymmetricalGeorgiandesignwithpairedstablesandcast-ironwindowstoeitherside.Wherethishasbeenmodifiedinthepastthroughsomeunsympatheticalterations(theinsertionofagaragedoor,blockingofoneofthepaireddoorsandanextrawindow),Ihaverecommendedthatthesebereversed.Thisisonthegroundsthattheaestheticcharacteroftheelevationsareaveryimportantpartofthesignificanceofthebuildingandthelateralterationsareofnointerestorintrinsicvalueandshouldideallybereversed.Theoriginal‘missing’cast-ironwindowsurvivesinthekitchengardenelevationandthiswillbere-locatedinthecourtyardelevation,withanewsegmentalarchedlintelandbrickworkandmortartomatchtheoriginalbricksinbond,colour,sizeandtexture.Thisrequiresskilledandcarefulrestoration.Samplesofreplacementbrickswillbeprovidedfortheapprovaloftheconservationofficerandthedetailoftherestorationwillrequireanagreedmethodology/specification.
Theimpactofthisalterationisveryhighandpositive.
Openings to Kitchen Garden (south) elevation
Doors-Therearenonewopeningsproposedtothekitchengardenelevationbuttheproposalsinvolvetheadaptationoftwoexistingwindowstocreatetwo‘french’windows.Oneoftheseopeningsisthe‘missing’cast-ironwindow,whichisbeingre-locatedtothecourtyardelevation,whichhasasegmentalbrickarchofasingle-headercourse;here,themainalterationisinremovingapanelofbrickworkbelowthecillline.Thesecondnewdooropeningisanexistinghigh-levelwindowtothelaundry,whichishorizontallyproportioned.Thiswindowisatoddswiththeremainingwindowsandisofnointrinsicvalue;adoorwayisessentialtomakeaviabledwellingwithgoodaccesstotheirgarden;here,thealterationinvolvesinsertingasegmentalbrickarchinaheadercourse(tomatchtheexistinglinteltotheeast)andtheremovalofapanelofbrickworkbelowtheexistingcillline.Athirddoorway,thenarrowmiddledooropeninginthesouthelevation,isarestorationofanoriginaldoorway,whichhasbeenblockedupandreplacedwithasmall-panedwindowinthe20thcentury.Thesealterationscreatealinkbetweenthestableblockdwellingsandtheirprivateamenityspaceonthesouthsideofthestableblock.Thedivisionofthekitchengardenintotwodiscreet,longgardensprovidesalong-termandsustainableuseofthekitchengardenwithoutcompromisingitscharacter.Astherearenopermitteddevelopmentrights,neitherowner/occupierwillbeabletoinstalltallpanelfencestovisuallydividethekitchengardenandwhilsttherewillstillbecompartments,itsessencewillbepreserved;thekitchengardenwillremainwithitsformal,regularcharacter,withexistingbox-hedgingpreservedalong the boundary.
Aspartoftheproposedmanagementofthesite,thesplitofthesouthernkitchengardenandtheseparationofthisfromthemaingardenofthehouseisconsideredtobeaveryworkableandeffectivelong-termsolution,providingeachdwellinginthecourtyardstableblockwithagenerousgardenandincreasingtheviabilityofeachofthesedwellings,andtheviabilityoftheon-goinggardenmaintenance.Thelargerdwelling(Unit2)wouldhavesoleresponsibilityforthemaintenanceandrepairofthewesternkitchengardenwall.Astheoriginalkitchengardenelevationhasalreadybeensignificantlyalteredduringthe20thcenturywithinsertedwindows,onbalance,thesealterationsarefullyjustifiableaspartofthewholescheme.
Windows–alloftheproposedwindowswithinthekitchengardenelevationarecontainedwithinexistingopenings.Thecurrentglazingpatternsvaryandreflectcumulativelate19thand20thcenturychanges.Theoriginalkitchengardenelevationwasoriginallyalargelyblankwall,designedforgrowingfruit,withtheexceptionofthecentraldoorwayprovidingaccess,andperhapsthesinglesmallwindowtothewestofthis.Theonlywindowwhichhasintrinsichistoricorarchitecturalinterestisthefirstfloorpointed-archedwindow,withitsGeorgiangothicY-tracery.Thiswillberepairedandrestored.Itisproposedtosimplifytheremainingwindowstoprovidegreaterconsistencyandtoreducetheimpactoftheseonwhatwasformerlyablankelevationthroughpaintingthemavisuallyrecessivecoloursuchasdarkgrey.Eachwindowwillneedtobemadetoatraditionalform,withflushfittingcasementsandframesbutasthereareonlysinglehorizontalglazingbars,itisfeasibletodouble-glazedthesewith‘slimline’units.FulldetailsofreplacementwindowswillneedtobethesubjectofaconditionofLBC.
Pierced ventilators to elevations-thepiercedventilatorswillbepreservedontheouterelevations.Theywillbepreservedinternallybutblockedupfromtherearbysimpleinsulatedpanels,toavoidinterstitialcondensationwithinthe internal dry-lining.11
Roofights–theproposedconversionofUnit1reliesuponretentionoftheoriginalsimple,backelevation,thekitchengardenwall,whichsurviveslargelyuninterrupted.Toavoidinsertinganynewwindowsintothiselevation,itisessentialthatsomerooflightsbeprovidedtolightthefirstflooraccommodation.Theexistingpairofopeningstothecourtyardelevationarenotsufficientontheirowntoprovideenoughlight.Theuseofrooflightsisinthespiritofthepreviousalterationstothelaundry.Thesewerecommonlyaddedtoancillarybuildingsandwereusedextensivelyonthemainhouse,althoughanumberhavebeenremoved.Highquality,conservation-typeflush-fittingrooflightswillberequiredandtheexistingrooflightstothelaundryareproposedtobere-located.
Doors in GeneralThedetaileddesignofallnewdoorswillneedtobethesubjectofaconditionofLBC.However,therearefourprinciplesthathavebeenadopted:• Forconsistency,andtomaintaintheunifiedGeorgiancharacter,allofthedoorswillbepaintedthesamedark
‘estate’ colour• Doorstothepairedstableentrances–thesewillberetainedlargelyascurrentlyseenwithoneoriginaldoor
preservedin-situandanewdoormadetotherighttocopytheoriginaldoorindetailbuttobemadewithalltheappropriateframe,weatherchecksandsealsfordomesticuse.
• Doorstodomesticaccommodationwillbefourpanelwiththeuppertwopanelsglazed,madeindetailtomatchthemouldingsandproportionsoftheexistingfour-paneldoorB1–theseare:B1,B2andB8
• Fully-glazeddoorswillbecreatedwherelightiscriticalandwhereamodernsolutionisachievablewithoutcompromisingcharacter–theseare:B4,B5,B6andB10
Windows in GeneralUnit2retainscast-ironwindowstothecourtyardelevation.Thesefirstfloorwindowsarenotsuitableasameansofescapefrombedroomsandthemeansofescapewillneedtobefromexistingwindowsonthesouthernelevation.Thislimitsthenumberofhabitableroomsatthislevel,withoutfurtherinsertionsintothesouthelevation.Inordertoavoidfurtheropenings,Unit2haslargelandingareasandalobbyservingBedroom1.
WithinUnit1theexistingslidingshuttersatfirstfloorlevelwillberetainedinanopenpositionandtheopeningswillbeglazed.Astheseopeningswereneverglazed,itwillbeimportanttopreserveasmuchofthis‘hayloft’characteraspossible.Optionsfordifferentwindowtypeshavebeenconsideredbutahorizontally-slidingcasementoraside-hingedcasementistheonlypracticalsolution,bothofwhichwillrequireacentralmullion.Theproposedwindowswillneedtobepaintedavisuallyrecessivecolourandsetbackwithinthereveal,atthebackoftheopening,toreducetheirvisualimpact-adarkgreyissuggested.FulldetailsofthesewindowswillneedtobeprovidedasaconditionofLBC.
Theremainingcourtyardwindowswillberetainedin-situandrepaired.
6.3 Internal Alterations to Stableblocks
MasonryTherearerelativelyfewalterationsproposedtothemasonryandtheschemeworkswithintheexistingconstraints.Ontheplanthereareafewnewdoorwaysproposedwhichremovesmallsectionsofbrickwork,identifiedonmydrawingsbytheletter‘H’.Thesehavebeenlimitedtoareaswheretheheadroomrequiresanewopeningorwherealinkisrequiredtoconnectspaceswhichneedtofunctiontogether.Thishasonlyaminorimpact.
Dry-liningTheproposeddry-liningofanumberofthewallsfollowsapatternwhichwasestablishedinthe1890sstableadaptations.Fewofthewallswereoriginallyplastered.Thedry-liningofthewallscanbesupportedonthegroundsthatitiscreatingthermallyefficienthomes,wherethereisnoplasterwork.Itdoesnotremoveplasterworkofvalueandthereareveryfeworiginalwindowordoorrevealsaffected.Thenorthernwallsofbothstablerangesareplasteredatgroundfloorlevelandcontainsegmentalarchedwindows,withplasteredarchesandcurvedplasterarrises,andcast-ironfixedlights.Thefirstfloornorthernwallsalsocontainrebatedbrickworkdesignedtocontainshutters.Inviewofthesensitivityoftheseelevations,nodry-liningisproposedonthesewalls.Thebrickworkwillbemaintainedatfirstfloorlevel,withshuttersfixedwithintherebatedrevealsor,wheretheshuttershavebeenremovedinthecaseofthewesternstableblock,therebatedbrickworkwillbeleftexposed.ThiswillrequireaflexibleapproachonthepartoftheBuildingInspector.Thereisalsohighpotentialforcondensationonthecast-ironwindowsasthesewallswillbethecoldestones,beingbothun-insulatedandlocatedonthenorthernelevation,althoughthemasonryisthick.Itmaybefeasibleinthefuturetointroducesecondaryglazing,asthebrickworkisrebatedandthereisspaceavailablefortheframes,whichwouldnotbevisiblefromtheexterior.
12
Fixtures and Fittings
Floor coveringsExistingbrickfloorsatgroundfloorlevelcontainamixtureofpatternsreflectingthedifferentchangestothefunctionsofthespaces.Anumberoftheblue-brickfloorssurvivein-situinthestableranges,andthemajorityofthesewillbeliftedandre-laidwheretheyprovideadurablefinishtotheproposeduse,suchaskitchen/breakfastroomspace.Thebricksaredamagedinplaces,asaresultofwearandtearandimpactdamageandthereareinsufficientbrickstore-layallofthefloors.Livingroomsandbedroomswillnotbefinishedinblue-brick.Inordertoprovidesufficientthermalinsulationandtoremovetheundergrounddrainagepipeworkfromthetimethatstableswereinuse,itislikelythatthebrickfloorswillbeliftedandre-laidontoanewinsulatedbreathablefloor(suchasSublime™orLimecrete™byTyMawr).Thisiscompatiblewithbluebrick.
Atfirstfloorlevel,theoriginallime-ashfloorwithinUnit1hasbeenremoved.Thelime-ashfloorwithinUnit2issetatamuchhigherlevelthantheadjoiningfloorlevelsinthenorthern‘wing’,byapproximately1metre–seeinsetphotoabove.Thedifferenceinlevelissogreatthatitisnotfeasibletosimplystepuptothislevelandtheproposalisforthepartialremovalofthelime-ashfloor.TolinkthetwopartsofUnit2,severaloptionshavebeenconsideredincluding:
(i)thecreationoftwoseparatestaircasesandindependentaccommodationwithinthetwoseparatepartsofthe building(ii)theprovisionofalongstaircaseandcorridorwithinthe‘wing’toaccommodatethelevelchanges(iii)notlinkingthespaces,andthecreationofthreeunitsinthebarnIneachcasethestumblingblockistheviabilityoftheunits.13
Above right - Blue brick flooring to Unit 2, which will be re-laid
Above left - front walls to the courtyard at first floor level will not be dry-lined or plastered. The brickwork wil be cleaned and re-painted.
Left - Central first floor room with opening in the wall in thefar corner showing the floor level of the adjoining range
Optioni)involvesseparatingthebuildingintotwohalves;thelayoutisconsiderednottobeviableforafamilydwelling,anditresultsinaseriesoflongcorridors.Thiswouldmakethehousedisjointedwithaverylengthywalkpotentiallyfromaparent’sbedroomtoachild’s(via2staircasesandalmosteveryroomdownstairs).Optionii)involvessignificantlossoffloorspaceandaffectsthecirculationpattern,withthelossofoneensuitebathroom,andpotentiallytwo,anditstilldoesnotovercometheheadroomproblem,withouteitherthelossofasectionofthelime-ashfloororthelossofthechimneybreast.Optioniii)createssmallerunits,whichincreasestheoveralldensityonthesite,withhighwaysimplicationsandalargernumberofcarparkingspacesrequired,theamountofamenityspacerequired,andthesubdivisionofthekitchengarden.TheexistingBothieflatwithinthenorthwingisquitesmall;thiswouldposeproblemsinmaintainingthekitchengardenandfragmentingthesite.Itisalsoparticularlyproblematicincreatingaviabledwellingwithinjustthewesternstablewing,becauseonlytwobedroomsareviableatfirstfloorlevelwiththecurrentwindowdistributionandcast-ironwindows.
Anotheroptionwhichwasconsideredwaslinkingtheeasternwingtothenorthwingbutthiswasdiscountedbecauseofthepotentialdamagetothestonestaircasebetweenthetwounitsandtheconvolutedarrangementofspaceandunlitcorridors;theareaunderthesestairsiscurrentlywithintheBothie(northwing)intheexistinglayout.Italsoresultsinproblemsofcreatingaviableunitinthewesternwingbecauseoftheinabilitytocreatemorethantwobedrooms.
Thesolutionwehavearrivedatinvolvesretentionofhalfthelime-ashfloorwithinthewesternstableblock,wherethestaircaseininserted,asatthispointthestaircasecanaccommodatethechangesinfloorlevel.Thiswillcausesomeharmandlossoforiginalfabrictotheceilingabovethekitchen/breakfastspace;lime-ashfloor,floorjoistsandceilingplasterandfloorhatchesforthehaydrop.Atgroundfloorlevelthereisaninsertedtransverseoakbeam.Thisisalateraddition,insertedwhentheoriginaldividingwallwasremovedtocreatethelaundry,andiscontemporarywiththecastironpost.Thecurrentproposalistolowertheceilingandfloorandtoreinstatetheoakbeam,inaslightlylowerposition,butthiswillrequiretheremovalofthecastironpost.
CeilingsTheceilingswithinthegroundfloorofthestableblockwereallplastered.WhilsttheoriginalceilingswithinUnit1andthenorthern‘wing’havebeenreplacedinplasterboardandskim,theceilingswithinUnit2,thewesternwing,areoriginal.Theceilingswithinthetwobayswherethelime-ashfloorisbeingretainedwillbepreservedin-situandrepaired,withaslotcreatedforthestaircase.Therewillbesomelossofjoists,lime-ashfloorandceilingplastertothesebays,about15%oftheareaaffected.Theceilings,joistsandlime-ashfloorwithintheremaininghalfofthewesternstableblockarebeingremoved(seefloorcoverings).
Internal DoorsFulldetailsofnewinternaldoorshavenotbeenprovidedatthisstageandwillneedtobeaconditionofLBC.Whereverpossibleexistinginternaldoorswillbere-usedin-situ.Theaccompanyingcolour-codeddrawingsshownewdoorsinyellow.AscheduleofexistingandproposeddoorswillbeproducedtomeetanyconditionofListedBuildingConsentalongwithelevationsofnewdoors.
Wall panellingWithinUnit1the1890sboardedpanellingsurvivesinsectionsofthestables.Theproposedconversionretainsalargepartofthispanellingoninternalwalls,whicharenotbeingupgraded,wherethisispracticalandachievablewithintheconstraintsofnormallivingconditions.TheseareillustratedontheaccompanyingdrawingsinAppendix1.
Theboardedpanellingvariesincondition,withsomeareasdamagedbyhorsesandrepairedovertheyearsandotherareasrottenordamagedbyrodents.Existingpanelling,asidentifiedontheplansunderitem‘F’,willberepairedandanylossesordamagemadeupwiththesectionsofpanellingthatarebeingremoved.
Therearetwooutsidewallswhereitisproposedthatthepanellingisretained.Thewalltotheharnessroomcontainspanellingwhichhasbeenverycarefullyfittedaroundthewindow.14 Boarded panelling lining the stabling and baffle
for the ‘haydrop’, which will be preserved in-situ
15
Thiswillberetainedin-situ.Thepanellingtothesouthsideofthekitchen/breakfastroomwillberepairedand,iffeasiblewithoutcausingdamage,thewallbehindthepanellingwillbethermallyinsulated.Bothsetsofsurvivingtimberbafflesforthehaydropwillbepreservedin-situwithinthepanelling.
TheretentionofpanellingwillrequireaflexibleapproachonthepartoftheBuildingInspector.ThefinalfinishofallthepanellingwillneedtobeagreedwiththeconservationofficeranditisrecommendthatthisbeaconditionofLBC,oncetheappearanceoftherepairedpanellingisknown.Thismayneedtobepaintedorstainedandvarnished.Itisconsideredthatuntiltheseareasarerepairedandthefinalappearanceknown,apre-commencementconditionisinappropriateanda‘priortooccupation’conditionwouldbemoreappropriate.
Cast-iron fittingsUnit1-Thecast-ironstablefittingscomprisingwaterbowlsormashbowlscannotberetainedwithintheschemeandthesewillbesetasideforpotentialuseassmallplantingtroughswithinthecourtyard.Oneofthepostsandthestalldivisionwillberemoved;theotherpostwillberetainedin-situ,atthebaseoftheproposedstaircasewithasectionofthepanelledstall.Thetallcast-ironpostandthesurroundingpanellingonthisinternalwallwillbepreservedin-situandthepanellingrepaired.Otherstablefittingswillbepreservedwheretheysurviveontheremainingpanelling.
Unit2–theexistingcastironmangerandwaterbowl,whichsurviveinthesinglestable,cannotberetainedin-situwithintheschemeandtherearenoothersuitablelocationswherethesecanbere-used.Thelossofthesewillneedtobeweighedagainstthebenefitsofthescheme.
Chimney Breast to LaundryAlargepartoftheoriginalchimneybreasttothelaundryhascollapsedbuthaslefttheoriginalfirehoodtothecopperandthefirebox.Theproposalistopinandproptheremainingbrickworkandchimneybreastwhichisstillintactatfirstfloorlevel,andprovidetemporarysupportwhilsttheceilingisremoved.Theremainingchimneybreastwillbepermanentlyrepairedwithnewsteelsupport,theceilingwillbeunderdrawnandtheplasterworkmadegood.Thesurvivingfirehoodopeningforthecopperwillberetainedandrepairedin-situ,thenowexposedflankofrawbrickworkwillbemadegoodandre-plasteredandthefireboxwillbecleanedandthecast-irondoorpreserved.Unfortunatelythe‘copper’bowlwillneedtoberemovedasthemetalbottomhascorrodedandthestonecappinghascrackedandcannotbere-used.Arubbedsandstoneslabofthesamedepthastheexistingwillbemadetofitthetop of the hearth.
Late 19th century laundry with copper and remains of chimney breast. the main hearth has collapsed,leaving only a fragment of the original chimney breast at ground level
16
Alteration on Plan Purpose Significance & ImpactA1-removalofstallpartitionA2–removalofinternaltruss
Tocreateaworkablelivingspace A1-Highinterest–partofacom-pletestableinteriorwithfittingsofthe1890sA2–lowinterest–alate1C9ad-aptation of the original plan form, by removalofthebrickwall
B–replacementoforiginaldoororinsertionofnewdoor
Toachievesufficientlightlevelsandtoprovideminimalconnectionsbetweenthestableblockconversionsand their amenity space on the south sideB1.Part-glazed4-paneldoor,withmouldedprofilestomatchtheorig-inal doorB2.Replaceboardeddoorwithapart-glazeddoortoprovidelighttothe lobby. 4-panel door to match that at B1.B3. Boarded door to be pur-pose-madewiththesameboardingpatternastheoriginaldooradjacent(D)butinhardwoodwithafulltim-ber door frame, seals, stone thresh-old,andMacclesfieldstepB4.Fully-glazeddoortoprovideac-cess to the amenity garden (half the kitchengarden),utilisingtheexistingarchedwindowopening.B5.Fully-glazeddoorinsertedintooriginal door opening (currently a window).B6.Fully-glazeddoor–anewopen-ing.Toprovideaccesstotheamenitygarden(halfthekitchengarden).B7.Part-glazedboardeddoor,withnarrowglazedpanelforlightingthekitchen.B8.Replaceexistingmoderndoorwithapart-glazeddoor-4-paneldoor to match that at B1B9. Boarded door to be pur-pose-madewiththesameboardingpatternastheoriginaldooradjacent(D)butinhardwoodwithafulltim-ber door frame, seals, stone thresh-old,andMacclesfieldstepB10.Amodernglazeddoorprovideslighttoabedroomwheretheexist-ingwindowisbeingremovedtothecourtyard
Moderateinterest–anumberofthedoors are replacements for the 19th century doors. The paired doors to the courtyard elevations(D,B3andB9)willbetreatedasapair,withoneoriginaldoor to the left of each pair set on its hinge pins, retained in-situ but blockedupfrombehind;theotherdoortotherightofeachpairwillbemadewiththesameboardeddetailsandsetwithinthebrickrebate,butmadetofitsnuglywithinadoorframe and to become a principal doorwayintotheproperty.DoorwaysB4,B5andB6ontothekitchengardenelevationwilleachhaveasegmentalbrickarchofasingle header course, to match the existinglinteltoB4andwillbeglazedsimplyincleartoughenedglass;theframeswillbesetinrevealof50-75mm.Thesedoorswillbepaintedavisuallyrecessivedarkgreycolourandwillbeclearlymodernadditions.DoorwaysB1,B2andB8allaffectareaswherethereisadomesticcharacter, either as original or as altered in the late 19th century. Thesedoorswillbefour-panel,withtheupperpanelsglazed.ThepatternforthedoorswillbebasedontheexistingdoortoB1.
C–removeinternaldoor Requiredtocreateaworkablefloorareaandflow
Lowinterest.Lowimpact.
Table of Lettered Alterations
17
Alteration on Plan Purpose Significance & ImpactD–blockingupofexternaldoors Originaldoorswhicharenolonger
requiredwillbepreservedin-situ.High interestMitigation–carefullyretainoriginaldoorin-situandblockupinternalbrickrevealinwithdry-lining.Theoriginaldoorwillberetainedandpreservetheoriginalappearancefrom the courtyard.
E–dry-lining RequiredtocomplywithBuildingRegulationsExistingwallswhicharelargelyun-plastered or currently lined in timber boarding.
The loss of boarding and the paired stallstothelivingroomofUnit1isrequiredtomakeahabitableandthermallyefficientroom.The loss of boarding to the Harness RoomisUnit1isrequiredtomakeahabitableandthermallyefficientroom.
Bothlowandmoderateinterest.ThegroundfloorofthestableblockswithinUnit1wereeffectivelydry-linedwithverticalboarding,duringthe1890srefurbishment,withonlythecourtyardwallmaintainedinplaster. ThegroundfloorofUnit2(thelaun-dry)wasplasteredinthelate19thcentury but this has largely become detached and deteriorated.Thefirstfloorswereunplastered.The proposed dry-lining repeats the same principle but is limited in scope. Brickworkwasgenerallynotexposedwithinthegroundfloor
F–re-locatedsectionsofboard-ed panelling and original panelling repaired in-situ
Retention of some of the character oftheoriginalstableblockfittings
Moderate interestMitigation–lossofpanellingtosomewallsisoff-setbyretentionofpanellingtointernalwallswhereverfeasible.Therewillbeadegreeofcompromise to create rooms that are comfortable.
G–removalorreinstatementoforiginalfloorcovering
Requiredtocreatewell-insulatedhomes,tocomplywithbuildingregs.G1–existingbluebrickfloortoberemovedG2–existingbluebrickfloortobere-laidinbrickbondG3–existingblueandredtiledfloortoberemovedG4–Existingblue-brickfloortobere-laidinbrick-bondG5-Existingblue-brickfloortobere-laidinbrick-bondG6–removaloflime-ashfloor
Moderate interestMitigation:brickfloorswillbere-laidintheexistingStaffordshirebluebrickinbrickbondtoG2,G4andG5.Mitigation:thelime-ashfloors(G7)willberetainedin-situ
H–creationofnewopeninganddoor to connect rooms
To connect internal spaces and roomsaspartoftheconversion
Lowinterest.The loss of small sections of inter-nalwallarelimitedtotheminimumnecessary,door-sizedopenings
18
Alteration on Plan Purpose Significance & ImpactI–insertionofnewpartition Internalnewdividingwallstocreate
corridors, ensuite bathrooms and utilityroomsandWCs
The creation of a utility room to Unit1involvesthelossofastable/stallfittings,ofmoderateinterest.Thisismitigatedtoasmallextentby the retention of part of the stallandtheboardedliningwithinthe staircase lobby. The remaining partitionshavenoimpactonfixturesorfittingsbutarerequiredtomakeworkablefloorplanswithintheexistingconstraints
J–removaloflime-ashfloorandcast-iron post
Tofacilitatetheconnectionatfirstfloorlevelbetweenthewesternstableblockandthenorth‘wing’
Moderatesignificance–partoftheoriginal structure of the Georgian Stableblocks.Mitigation:theremaining40%ofthelime-ashfloorandplasterceilingwillbe retained and the ‘haydrop’ hatches willbepreserved.
K–alterationsto‘copper’ Torepairandconsolidatethesurviv-ing fragment of the chimney breast and‘copper’withinthelate19thcentury laundry
Moderate interest as part of the historyofthebuildingevolution.The‘copper’bowliscorrodedandbeyond repair and the stone slab is cracked.
L1–restorationofcast-ironwindow To reinstate the symmetrical Georgianelevation
Elevationofhighsignificance,disfig-ured by insertion of garage doorHighpositiveimpact
M–newwindows Regularisewindowstoreducevisualimpactof20thcenturywindowsM1–remove6x6panedwindowandreplacewithsimpler2x2case-mentM2–remove6x6panedwindowandreplacewithsimpler2x2case-mentM3–insertwindowwithnoglazingbarsM4–insertwindowwithnoglazingbarsM5–removeexistingmulti-panedwindowandreplacewithsimpler2-paned casementsM6–repair/replaceexisting2x2window
Thewindowsaffectedarealllate19th century and 20th century additions,oflowornointerest
N–removecastandwrought-ironstablefittings
Tofacilitatetheconversionofthestabletoakitchenetteandbathroom
Moderate interest as part of the 1890sstableadaptations
O–removewindowandrestorebrickwork
To restore the original Georgian symmetricalelevation
Theexistingwindowmayhavebeenadded around the turn of the 20th century.Itisoflowinterestandhasdamaged the designed character of theelevation.TherestorationoftheGeorgianformtothiselevationwillbeahighpositiveenhancement
19
7 CUMULATIVE IMPACT AND CONCLUSIONS
TheconversionoftheStableblocksbringsintofulluseagroupofbuildingsofhighsignificance,partoftheGeorgianancillaryestatebuildings.Thesehavehadamixtureofusesovertheyearssincetheywerefrstbuilt;theiroriginaluseasacomplexofstablingfor17horseswasrelativelyshort-livedbeforetheywereadaptedintopartlaundryandpartdomestic accommodation, and later adapted for garaging.
Residentialuseistheoptimumviableusebecausetheoriginalfunctionsforwhichtheyweredesignedareredundantandthecomplexisalreadylargelyinpermanentresidentialuseandoccupation.Weconsiderholidayaccommodationtobeinappropriate,forthereasonsgiveninthisreport;thiswouldinanyeventresultinsimilarlevelsofalteration.
ThechangeofusepreservestheexternalappearanceoftheStableblockslargelyintheirpresentformandwehavetakentheopportunitytoenhancethecharacterbyrestoringsomeelementsoftheoriginaldesignedcomposition;bothpairedblocksofstableswillberestoredtotheiroriginalsymmetricalform.Alongsidetheseworkstherewillbesomeminoralterationsthatarenecessary,suchastheglazingofthehayloftpitchingopenings.Overalltheimpactontheexternalappearanceofthecourtyardandyardelevationsispositive.
Thekitchengardenelevationwillchange,butonlyslightly,asthealterationshavebeenkepttotheminimumnecessarytoachieveaviableuse;itisimportantthatthedwellingsaredesirableforkeengardenerstoengagewiththegarden,tooverlookandwanttomaintaintheirrespectivesidesofthekitchengarden.Eachhalfofthekitchengardenisalargegardeninitsownright.Theseminoralterationshavetobeseenagainstthefactthatthiselevationwaslargelywithoutanyopeningsuntiltheturnofthe20thcenturyandthatthereforetherehasalreadybeensomeloss of historic interest.
Intermsofthesettingofthelistedbuildings,thereareanumberofsignificantimprovements,includingtherepairandre-useofthe‘gigyard’,theremovalofthetarmac,andtheremovalofthecorrugatedirongarageblock.Inaccordancewithparagraph137oftheNPPF:
137. Local planning authorities should look for opportunities for new development within Conservation Areas and World Heritage Sites and within the setting of heritage assets to enhance or better reveal their significance. Proposals that preserve those elements of the setting that make a positive contribution to or better reveal the significance of the asset should be treated favourably.
Theschemeachievesanumberofbenefitstothesettingofthelistedbuilding.Therearenoworkswithinthegroundswhichcouldbesaidtoharmthesettingofthelistedbuildingandonbalancethealterationsarepositiveandwillenablethesitetobemanagedinacohesiveandsustainableway.Whilstthepreviousownermaintainedthegardensandgroundsquitewell,therewaslessfocusontheresidentialaccommodationandthiswasnotsustainable.Thecurrentownershaveinheritedaseriesofad-hocalterationstosubdividethehousefortenantsoverseveraldecades.Therehasbeennofirecompartmentation,amajorthreattotheoccupiers,fabricandcontents,andtheheatingandservicesarequitebasic.
Thereareanumberofinternalalterationsrequiredforthechangeofuse.Themostsignificantofthesearethelossofhalfofthelime-ashfloortooneofthewingsandthelossofalargenumberofthesurvivingstablefittingstotheotherwing.Thesealterationsare‘lessthansubstantial’and,inviewofthis,thecorrecttesttobeappliedisparagraph134oftheNPPFwhchstates:
134. Where a development proposal will lead to less than substantial harm to the significance of a designated heritage asset, this harm should be weighed against the public benefits of the proposal, including securing its optimum viable use.
Itisconsideredthatthesealterationsarenecessaryforthereasonsidentifiedinthisreportinordertoachieveaviableschemeandtheselossesneedtobeseeninthecontextofthesignificantpositiveimpactsofrestorationandinsecuringtheoptimumviableuseofthebuildings.
Wehaveworkedwiththeownerstoconsideralternativeoptionsandmeasuresofmitigationandtheschemehasbeenimproveddurngthedevelopmentofthedesign,initiallyfollowingdiscussionwithGillBaylissandsubsequentlyindiscussionwithMelMorris.Whenconsideredinconjunctionwiththealterationsthatthebuildinghasalreadyundergone,thepublicbenefitsofre-useoftheentirebuildingsignificantlyoutweightheslightharmandwefullysupport the scheme.
top related