lennart soder presentation nordic regulators 140625
Post on 15-Sep-2015
221 Views
Preview:
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
-
Challenges in the Nordic Power system
NordREG meeting, Arlanda, June 25, 2014
Lennart SderProfessor in Electric Power Systems, KTH
Electric Power Systems
Power System Dynamics and Control
Smart Transmission Systems
Power System Operation and Planning
Electricity Market analysis
Electric Power Systems
Power System Dynamics and Control
MehrdadRobert (pd)MohamadrezaAminMohammad Na.MarinaAfshinHaroldOmar
Smart Transmission Systems
LuigiRaphael (pd)Rujiroj (pd)AlmasTetianaYuwaWeiVedranDoan TuJan
Power System Operation and Planning
LennartLars (pd)PiaCamilleYalinAngelaGermanIlanDesta
ElectricityMarket analysis
MohammadHector (pd)EkatrinaMahirRichardYaserKristinaYelenaEzgi
MikaelEbrahimIliasRichard
Some Nordic Power System Challenges
A. Pricing challengesB. High share of
variable renewablesC. Smart-grids: Consu-
mer interactionD. Covering Peak load
Discussion:1. DSO role and responsibility2. Information exchange TSO role and
responsibility, access betweenhubs/information-exchange systems
3. Market rules for demand response4. Market rules energy services5. Market rules micro-production6. Market rules for charging electrical
vehicles7. Unbundling etc
-
Pricing challenges in the future Nordic Power Market with large
amounts of renewable low marginal cost units.
Nordic Power SupplyTWh 2012
Country Nuclear Hydro Fossil Wind Bio Total
Norway 0 142,9 2,4 1,6 0 147,8Finland 22,1 16,6 17,9 0,5 9,9 67,7Sweden 61,2 77,7 4,6 7,1 10,8 161,6Denmark 0 0,02 16,3 10,2 2,3 29,4
In 2012 the Nordic hydro power production was 237 TWh.
This corresponds to an inflow of around 4,5 TWh/week
A heavy rain every second week implies 9 TWh
Nordic hydro power New Nordic interconnections. ENTSO-E: Ten-Year Network Development Plan 2012
2012-2016 2017-2022
-
Energy is produced where the resource isThe energy has to be transported to consumption centerThe energy inflow varies, which requires storage and/or flexible system solutions
This is valid for hydro power, wind power, and solar power
Renewable energy systems Example
Nordic hydro power (inflow) can vary 86 TWh between different years (2001 to 1996)Transport from NV to SE + continent Energy balancing with thermal power in i Dk+F+Ge+Pl+NL+Ee
Wind power gives the same variations/uncertainties (and solutions) as hydro power.But: time perspective is much shorter!
Transmission capacity plansfor Sweden
Sweden-neighbours: ca 10100 MW(continuously 88 TWh/year)Nordel-neighbours: ca 5500 MW (DC!)
Plans:Jrpstrmmen-Nea, S-N, ~1000 MW(South-West link, S-N, 2x600 MW -cancelled)Nordbalt, S-L, ~600 MWNew line to GotlandStrengthening North to FinlandNew cut 2 line, ev. DC Sweden-neighbors: +~1600 MW
Pricing in power systems
Thermal power systems: Price is set by marginal costHydro power: Price is set by the water value = the expected marginal cost in the future to which the water could be stored.Wind power: Price is set by marginal cost = negative subsidy, since subsidy is only obtained at production (e.g. -2 Euro-cent if certificate price is 2 Euro-cent.)
-
Pricing in power systems:Norway
Nearly only hydro power (97%)Price is set by the water value = the expected marginal cost in the future to which the water could be stored. Price is not set in Norway!
Pricing in power systems:Sweden
Hydro + Nuclear + wind (90%)Large part of the rest is CHP (industrial and distr. heat) Price is set by the water value = the expected marginal cost in the future to which the water could be stored. Price is not set in Sweden!
Pricing in power systems:Denmark
2020: High wind power (50%)A part of the rest is CHP (industrial and distr. heat) When it is windy, then the prices will be low
High prices are often not set in Denmark!
Pricing in power systems:Finland
Nuclear + hydro + wind (58%-now)CHP + more nuclear in the futureAt wind and low demand, then the prices will be low
Prices are then often not set in Finland!
-
Pricing in future Nordic power systems:
Much more often: Prices are not set by Nordic power plants.At wind and low demand, then the prices can be really low There is then a challenge to get prices that are high enough to finance all power plant.Enough transmission to high MC areas essential
Identified wind power projects in Sweden:
Identified wind power projects: 45000 MW ( 100 TWh/year)
Today capacities: Hydro Power: 16000 MW ( 65
TWh) Nuclear power: 9000 MW ( 65
TWh) total of 25000 MW
Results from new Swedish studies on larger amounts of wind power
Lennart Sder, KTH
IEA Wind, Task 25, MeetingGolden/Denver/NREL, April 9, 2014
Swedish production: Total: 145,6 TWh(same as 2011)
-
Current (2011) Swedish Power System
Source TWh -2011
Energy % -2011
MW-capacity -2011
Hydro 66,0 44,9 16197Nuclear 58,0 39,5 9363Wind 6,1 4,2 2899Solar 0 0 0CHP-Ind 6,4 4,4 1240CHP-distr. 9,4 6,4 3551Condens 1,01 0,7 3197Total 146,9 100 36447
Studied Swedish Power System
Source TWh Energy % MW-max
Hydro 64,9 44,5 12951Nuclear 0 0 0Wind 46,7 32,1 15633Solar 12,6 8,6 9849CHP-Ind 6,4 4,4 1240CHP-distr. 13,9 9,5 4126Other 1,3 0,9 5081Total 139,9 100 48180
Hydro power: Duration curve
Min level: 1875 MW: Needed during 860 hoursMax level: 12951 MW: Needed during 765 hours
Deficit situation
High wind decrease in CHP
50 100 150 200 250 300 350 4000
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
x 104
M
W
h
/
h
Consumption from 14 January to 30 January
ConsumptionHydro powerWind powerSolar powerCHP
-
Deficit situation (yearly basis)Assumed need of OCGT
Cost for this: 2 re/kWh = 0,2 Eurocent/kWh
0 500 1000 15000
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
Number of hours with need of more production
E
n
e
r
g
y
l
e
v
e
l
[
M
W
h
/
h
]
Max level: 5081 MW
Number of hours with need: 765 h
Energy: 1.259 TWh
Surplus situation (August)
Not OK: 83% limit, min-hydro, min-CHP
20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 2200
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
16000
M
W
h
/
h
Consumption from 1 August to 10 August
ConsumptionHydro powerWind powerSolar powerCHP
Now OK: 83% limit, min-hydro, min-CHP
Surplus situation (August)
20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 2200
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
16000
M
W
h
/
h
Consumption from 1 August to 10 August
ConsumptionHydro powerWind powerSolar powerCHP
Surplus during a year
0 200 400 600 800 1000 12000
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
Number of hours with surplus/possible export
E
n
e
r
g
y
l
e
v
e
l
[
M
W
h
/
h
]
Energy volume: 1.63 TWh
Max level: 9510 MWNumber of surplus hours: 860 h
-
General transmission challenge
A. Voltage stability limits betweenareas
B. Q-control importantC. More transmission required, but
low utilization timeD. Challenge to identify future
transmission capacity with less nuclear
E. Detailed hydro simulation takes10 minutes per week.
Surplus situation (August 1-10)
Wind Power production
Surplus situation (August 1-10) Surplus situation (August 1-10)
-
Transmission situation (Jan 21 Feb 1)
Wind Power production
Transmission situation (Jan 21 Feb 1)
Transmission: Yearly duration : today 7000 MW On transmission needs
A. Increase production in receivingend (= thermal, currently OCGT)
B. Capacity is available, small energy increase for first GW.
C. Since limit is voltage stability, SVC may be enough
D. Discussion on exchange of AC toDC
E. Optimization approach may be interesting
-
Pricing in power systems
With an assumption of perfect competition:Prices are based on production marginal costsLow costs units are used firstHigher load higher prices:
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
1 10 19 28 37 46 55 64 73 82 91 100 109 118 127 136 145 154 163
Weekly demand
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
1 13 25 37 49 61 73 85 97 109 121 133 145 157 169
E
u
r
o
/
M
W
h
Pricing
Pricing in presence of variable sources (e.g. wind)
Wind power has a marginal cost zeroThe production level is depending on wind speedIt is not easy to make good long term (hours) forecastsOther units have to cover the net load = demand - wind
0500
1000150020002500300035004000
1 13 25 37 49 61 73 85 97 109 121 133 145 157 169
M
W
h
/
h
Weeklydemand+ wind
-5000
500100015002000250030003500
1 13 25 37 49 61 73 85 97 109 121 133 145 157 169
M
W
h
/
h Weeklynetdemand
W Denmark 10/1-17/1 2005
Pricing in presence of variable sources
-5000
500100015002000250030003500
1 13 25 37 49 61 73 85 97 109 121 133 145 157 169
M
W
h
/
h Weeklynetdemand
Thermalpricing
0
20
40
60
80
100
1 13 25 37 49 61 73 85 97 109 121 133 145 157 169
E
u
r
o
/
M
W
h
Other units have to cover the net load = demand windThe other units production is controlled by price! more volatile prices
Note: This is independent of fixed price etc
0
20
40
60
80
100
1 13 25 37 49 61 73 85 97 109 121 133 145 157 169
E
u
r
o
/
M
W
h
Solutions and competition
Assume a system with large pricevariation: Three types of business opportunities
More trading with neighbors Flexible plantsDemand side management
There is a competition between these methods. Much transmission reduces price changes less interest in DSM
-
Peak capacity responsibilities
Norway: TSO-Statnet is responsible for enough capacityFinland: TSO-Fingrid is NOT
responsible for enough capacitySweden: TSO-Svenska Kraftnt is
NOT responsible for enough capacity. But: up to 2000 MWDenmark: TSO-Energinet.dk is
responsible for enough capacity
Peak capacity responsibilitiesexample 1
1. Assume that there is a capacity problem in South Sweden and Denmark exports 1000 MW to Sweden.
2. Assume that there is an outage in Denmark so they have to decrease consumption.
3. According to EU legislation non-discrimination Denmark cannot prioritize Danish consumers before Swedish ones.
4. Does this has as a consequence that Denmark is also responsible for Sweden?
Peak capacity responsibilitiesexample - 2
1. There are discussions of capacity payments to a rather large volume in UK
2. Probably this then leads to comparatively low energy prices compared to a case with no cap. payments
3. Both Norway and Denmark plan new cables to UK.
4. Does this mean that Denmark and Norway can import and only pay the energy price?
Peak loads in Sweden 1992-2011
Year 1992 - 2011
M
W
h
/
h
-
High load reserves in SwedenSelective capacity market
TSO responsible to purchase up to 2000 MW of reserves for peak load situations.There is a bidding process where the cheapest offers are accepted.Pricing:The bids are placed on Nordpool spot. They are only used if all other bids are accepted.The Net Regulation Price should not be allowed to exceed 5,000 Euro/MWh.TSO can immediately impose a Disconnection Price in The event of Critical Power Shortage of 20 000 SEK/MWh 2300 Euro/MWhAustralia: Max price 12000 AUD 9000 Euro/MWh
Reserves in Sweden 2012-13Consumers accepted to reduce consumption
Company Area MWStora Enso AB 3-4 210Hgans Sweden AB 4 25Rottneros Bruk AB 3 27Befesa Scandust AB 4 18Vattenfall AB 3-4 92Gteborg Energi AB 3 25AV Reserveffekt 3-4 + 67TOTAL 464
Risk for prices so low so power plants cannotbe financedLarge amounts of renewables often verylow pricesBut still other units are needed need of either (very) high prices or somekind of capacity payment mechanism.Large amount of transmission is one part solution, but perhaps also large amounts ofsolar/wind power on the other end?
Summary of (some) Nordic market challenges
There should be a (renewable) unit (biogas?) with MC as
Idea to market solution to last unit
Call it a market maker unit reduced need of cap. payment. If DSM is cheaper then it will be used instead As low LOLP as requested can be obtained (= size of unit)
High operation cost (or bidprice) essential
-
How high costs should we allow tomake market work:Costs for market-making plantsCosts for new lines are needed toincrease the number of participants and to decrease risk of use of market powerCosts for IT solutions for consumerflexibility since this is essential to make the market work.
Comments toNordic market challenges
How high costs should we allow tomake market work:Costs for market-making plantsCosts for new lines are needed toincrease the number of participants and to decrease risk of use of market powerCosts for IT solutions for consumerflexibility since this is essential to make the market work.(But what is the alternative?)
Comments toNordic market challenges
Some Nordic Power System Challenges
A. Pricing challengesB. High share of
variable renewablesC. Smart-grids: Consu-
mer interactionD. Covering Peak load
Discussion:1. DSO role and responsibility2. Information exchange TSO role and
responsibility, access betweenhubs/information-exchange systems
3. Market rules for demand response4. Market rules energy services5. Market rules micro-production6. Market rules for charging electrical
vehicles7. Unbundling
1. DSO role and responsibility- More distributed power production,- PV voltage control (rules or market?)- Supply voltage to feeding grid- Coordination with retailer concerning DSM- Grid planning? (if DG pays connection, then why plan?)2. Information exchange TSO role and responsibility, access between hubs/information-exchange systems- DSO:s possibility to help TSO- Peak capacity: Market? Tender? Rely on neighbours?
Comments to someNordic market challenges - 1
-
3. Market rules for demand response- Contract with DSO and/or retailer?- React on prices and/or externally controlled?- Time frame: minutes/hours- How long time in advance are one informed?4. Market rules energy services- DSO:s possibility/responsibility to help TSO (Q-support)- DG ancillary services requires ICT technology
Comments to someNordic market challenges - 2
5. Market rules micro-production- How to handle voltage control at large scale?- React on prices and/or externally controlled?- Time frame: minutes/hours- 100% access to grid or less? (cheaper)6. Market rules for charging electrical vehicles- Possibility to have same price everywhere?- Different price/taxes special meter ?- Externally controllable? If so: How?
Comments to someNordic market challenges - 3
7. Unbundling etc- Not so rational if TSO should plan for all possible
expansion of wind power- Off-shore grids- How much should Swedish grid-users pay for power
transferred through Sweden?- More detailed DSO-regulation?- How to allow TSO:s to take risks for long-term
investments?- How to make neighbor TSO:s to think about total social
surplus
Comments to someNordic market challenges - 4 Reserve slides
Lennart Sder, KTH
Arlanda, June 25, 2014
-
What is a good market? - 1
Static allocation efficiency (=are available resources used as efficient as possible? E.g. in deficit situations)Management efficiency (= is the administrative organization efficient?)Plant operation efficiency (= is each plant operated in an efficient and reliable manner?)Production optimization (= correct merit order = is cheapest possible operation, including externalities, applied?)
What is a good market? - 2
Transaction cost efficiency (= the amount of transactions costs, as measurements, spread of information and contracts)Dynamic investment efficiency (= are the correct investments done at the right time?)Risk management efficiency (= are risks and uncertainties handled in an efficient way?)System reliability (= is it on a correct level?)
C2: Surplus at 55 TWh wind+solarDifferent assumptions on wind/solar 70-90% of consumption
0 500 1000 15000
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
10000
Antal timmar som verskottsproduktion i Exempel 2a-2c verskrids
E
f
f
e
k
t
n
i
v
[
M
W
]
Exempel 2a ej fjrrvrmeExempel 2a med fjrrvrmeExempel 2b ej fjrrvrmeExempel 2b med fjrrvrmeExempel 2c ej fjrrvrmeExempel 2c med fjrrvrme
Solution:- Export- District heating- Other head- El. vehicles- Etc- Inertia?
Max ca 90 percent ofconsumption- No distr. heat.- surplus:- 0,61 TWh/year
(no nuclear)Model of CHP and district heating
a. In Part 2 there is the assumption that one canuse surplus electricity (MC=0) in the districtheating instead of spillage.
b. In Part 3 there is the assumption that one can use surplus electricity (MC=0) to replace CHP instead of spillage.
c. Reality is probably both with some limitations.
-
Model of district heating - 1
a. Total district heating in Stockholm during 2012 per hour (City-Sder, including Sderenergi and Nordvstra including E.ON Jrflla)
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 90000
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
Stockholm fjrrvremeleverens under 2012
[
M
W
]
Model of district heating - 2
a. Amount of excess of wind+solar > 75% ofdeman.
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 90000
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
Timme p ret med niv ver 75 procent av frbrukning
E
f
f
e
k
t
n
i
v
[
M
W
]
januari februari mars april maj juni juli augusti september oktober november december
Model of district heating - 3
Assumptions:a. Swedish yearly disstrict heating same profile as
in Stockholmb. Same level of fuel waste as today (18%) which
is not replace (negative MC)c. Heat spillage or rkgaskondensering not
replaced with electricity.
Model of district heating - 4
a. Result for the potential of heat replacement
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 90000
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
16000
18000
Vrmebehov under 2012
[
M
W
]
AvfallsfrbrnningSpillvrme
-
Model of district heating - 5
a. Result for the replacement: 1.2 TWh used (out of3,0 TWh available surplus)
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 90000
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
Mjlig elfrbrukning (trappstegskurva) och tillgnglig elproduktion
[
M
W
]
Model of CHP- 1
a. Yearly CHP production in 20110,00
500,00
1000,00
1500,00
2000,00
2500,00
3000,00
3500,00
4000,00
4500,00
DataKraftvrme:1Januari 31December
Model of CHP - 2
Model:a. 50% more CHP than today (from Profu report)b. It is possible to decrease CHP down to 25% of
its original value during each hourc. But the total amount of hydro + CHP muast be
17% of production (synchronous machinerequirement)
d. Excel sheet available to change these data.
Model of CHP- 3
a. Example of resulting CHP decrease:
50 100 150 200 250 300 350 4000
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
x 104
Frbrukning frn 14 januari till 30 januari
M
W
h
/
h
ElfrbrukningVattenkraftVindkraftSolkraftVrmekraft
-
Model of CHP- 4
a. Resulting CHP decrease: 0,79 TWh = 5,4%0,00
500,00
1000,00
1500,00
2000,00
2500,00
Resultatkraftvrmeminskning:1Januari 31December
Model of CHP- 5
a. Resulting CHP decrease: 0,79 TWh = 5,4%
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000
Resultatkraftvrmeminskning:Varaktighetskurva;Max=2267MW;Energi=0,79TWh
Questions on CHP + District heating
a. Amount of waste etc (MC
-
Simulation method (Sweden isolated)2: Detailed simulation
a. Objective function:
b. where Hspill(k)= hydro spillage during hour k, Vspill(k) = Wind spillage during hour k, EXP(k) = extra export during hour k, IMP(k) = extra import during hour k, K = number of hours in the studied period (=168).
Preliminary simulation for a January week
20 40 60 80 100 120 140 1600
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2
x 104
Frbrukning frn 1 november till 7 november
M
W
h
/
h
ElfrbrukningVattenkraftVindkraftSolkraftVrmekraft
Result after detailed simulation (normal inflow)
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 1600
0.5
1
1.5
2
x 104
Timme under studerad vecka
M
W
h
/
h
FrbrukningVattenkraftVind + solvrig produktion
Result after detailed simulation (160% ofnormal inflow)
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 1600
0.5
1
1.5
2
x 104
Timme under studerad vecka
M
W
h
/
h
FrbrukningVattenkraftVind + solvrig produktion
top related