least restrictive environment (lre) indicator target
Post on 03-Jan-2016
16 Views
Preview:
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATIONTom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction
Least Restrictive Environment (LRE)
Indicator Target
TOM TORLAKSONState Superintendent of Public Instruction
Indicator 5a, 5b, and 5c
Indicator 5: Percent of children with
IEPs aged 6 through 21 served:•A. Inside the regular class 80% or more of the day;•B. Inside the regular class less than 40% of the day; and•C. In separate schools, residential facilities, or homebound/hospital placements.•(20 U.S.C. 1416(a)(3)(A))
TOM TORLAKSONState Superintendent of Public Instruction
Measurement
• 5a-Percent = [(# of children with IEPs served inside the regular class 80% or more of the day) divided by the (total # of students aged 6 through 21 with IEPs)] times 100.
• 5b-Percent = [(# of children with IEPs served inside the regular class less than 40% of the day) divided by the (total # of students aged 6 through 21 with IEPs)] times 100.
TOM TORLAKSONState Superintendent of Public Instruction
Measurement
• 5c-Percent = [(# of children with IEPs served in separate schools, residential facilities, or homebound/hospital placements) divided by the (total # of students aged 6 through 21 with IEPs)] times 100.
TOM TORLAKSONState Superintendent of Public Instruction
Examining LRE Target
• Reviewed other states’ data on LRE;
• Reviewed target achievements of other SPP indicators;
• Reviewed the reporting requirements on CASEMIS; and
• Reviewed data in categories of high schools, elementary, county offices of education, charter schools and unified school districts.
TOM TORLAKSONState Superintendent of Public Instruction
LRE Data 2006-2011
2006 2007 2008
Target Actual Target Actual Target Actual
5a 53% 49.5% 57% 52.3% 62% 51.6%
5b 23% 25.6% 21% 22.6% 18% 25.5%
5c 4.2% 4.1% 4.1% 4.3% 4% 4.5%
TOM TORLAKSONState Superintendent of Public Instruction
LRE Data 2006-2011 (cont.)
2009 2010 2011Target Actual Target Actual Target Actual
5a 68% 51.4% 76% 52.5% 76% 52.3%
5b 14% 22.7% 9% 22.4% 9% 22.1%
5c 3.9% 4.6% 3.8% 4.0% 3.8% 4.2%
TOM TORLAKSONState Superintendent of Public Instruction
Indicator 5a Target and Actual
TOM TORLAKSONState Superintendent of Public Instruction
Indicator 5b Target and Actual
TOM TORLAKSONState Superintendent of Public Instruction
Indicator 5c Target and Actual
TOM TORLAKSONState Superintendent of Public Instruction
Time in Reg. Ed.
5a80%≥
5b40-79%
5c<40%
SeparateSchools
OHI 8.9% 10.1% 7.4% 5.9%
SLD 42.3% 62.6% 26.6% 11.3%
Deaf-Blind 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.1%
Multi Dis 0.1% 0.2% 2.1% 2.7%
Autism 5.5% 7.5% 17.8% 17.3%
Tr. Brain Inj 0.2% 0.3% 0.4% 0.4%
11
TOM TORLAKSONState Superintendent of Public Instruction
Time in Reg. Ed.
5a80%≥
5b40-79%
5c<40%
SeparateSchools
I. D. 0.9% 4.2% 16.9% 15.1%
H of H 1.4% 0.9% 1.9% 0.8%
Deafness 0.2% 0.4% 1.0% 3.6%
Sp/L Impair 37.1% 8.8% 15.4% 3.7%
Visual Impair 0.5% 0.4% 0.8% 1.2%
E.D. 2.0% 3.5% 5.4% 31.5%
Ortho Impair 0.9% 1.1% 4.1% 6.4%
12
TOM TORLAKSONState Superintendent of Public Instruction
Special Education Students
ELA Proficiency 2011 (DRAFT)<40% 40-79% 80%+ Separate
SchoolTotal
Far Below Basic
6% 7.62% 10.17% 0.97% 24.76%
Below Basic 5.09% 6.81% 13.42% 0.59% 25.91%
Proficient 2.93% 2.22% 9.19% 0.48% 14.82%
Advanced 3.02% 1.43% 5.76% 0.5% 10.71%
Did not attempt 0.14% 0.13% 0.16% 0.07% 0.5%
Total 20.44% 22.62% 53.8% 3.15% 100%
13
TOM TORLAKSONState Superintendent of Public Instruction
CA Statewide AYP2010-11 2011-12
Target CA Actual Target CA Actual
ELA All
Students
67.0% 56.3% 78.0% 58.5%
ELA SWD 34.6% 36.6%
Gap 21.7 21.9
Math All Students
67.3% 58.1% 78.2% 59.5%
Math SWD 35.7% 37.2%
Gap 22.4 22.3
TOM TORLAKSONState Superintendent of Public Instruction
CA LRE Targets
15
2010-11 2011-12Total # of LEAs in dataset 1023 895# of LEAs who met all 3 targets 222 86
# of LEAs who did not meet any of the 3 targets
110 158
# of LEAs who met all 3 LRE targets and are at state AYP for achievement (ELA & Math) for SWD
77 28
# of LEAs who did not meet any of the 3 LRE targets and did not meet the achievement targets for SWD
107 120
TOM TORLAKSONState Superintendent of Public Instruction
LRE Data Trends 2011
16
CATarget
CAActual
New YorkTarget
New YorkActual
TexasTarget
TexasActual
5a 80% ≥
76% 52.3% 57% 56.9% 68% 51.6%
5b <40% 9% 22.1% 22% 22% 10% 22.5%
5cSeparateSchools
3.8% 4.2% 6% 6.4% 1% 4.5%
FloridaTarget
FloridaActual
OhioTarget
OhioActual
IllinoisTarget
IllinoisActual
5a80%≥
70% 69.3% 76% 52.5% 76% 52.3%
5b<40%
14% 13.9% 9% 22.4% 9% 22.1%
5cSeparateSchools
3% 3.0% 3.8% 4.0% 3.8% 4.2%
TOM TORLAKSONState Superintendent of Public Instruction
Trends from CA’s High Percentage District’s
• Emphasis on inclusion and access to the core curriculum
• Culture and practices that support high standards and student achievement
• Unified practice supported by targeted professional development
17
TOM TORLAKSONState Superintendent of Public Instruction
Trends from CA’s High Percentage District’s (cont’d)
• Effective leadership
• Collaboration between special and general education teachers
top related