language testing regimes in europe gabrielle hogan-brun university of bristol, uk metropolis...

Post on 31-Dec-2015

213 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

TRANSCRIPT

Language Testing

Regimes in Europe

Gabrielle Hogan-Brun

University of Bristol, UK

Metropolis Policy-Research Seminar, Ottawa, 22 Oct. 20091

EU member states2

Migration: issues

• Population count• Economic impact; contribution of migrants • Needs of migrants, action plans and good

practice in meeting those needs• Impacts (services; infrastructure)• Communication; co-existence; cohesion.

Metropolis Policy-Research Seminar, Ottawa, 22 Oct. 2009 3

Migration: positions

• EU: Respect for linguistic and cultural diversity

• Diverse national discourses: multiculturalism as a social resource; moral position; problem

• Challenges & positions:

multiculturalism & civil rights

interculturalism - equality of cultures

assimilation - mainstreaming in schools.

Metropolis Policy-Research Seminar, Ottawa, 22 Oct. 20094

Measures for (im)migrants

National gate-keeping measures include:

• integration programmes

• language tests

• knowledge of society tests

Adoption of points system under

consideration in UK.

Metropolis Policy-Research Seminar, Ottawa, 22 Oct. 20095

Measures: rationale

Official discourses:

• social justice & cohesion (moral)

• active citizenship ( political)

• means for newcomers to adapt

• democratic way to include them in public life.

Metropolis Policy-Research Seminar, Ottawa, 22 Oct. 20096

Testing regimes

Articulated at different policy levels:

• Immigration and entry

• Integration and residence

• Citizenship.

Variation nationally; no EU framework.

Metropolis Policy-Research Seminar, Ottawa, 22 Oct. 20097

Testing regimes: critique

• Use of tests as a means to control migration flows

• reliability, validity, relevance of tests

• appropriateness of tests on ethical, legal & linguistic grounds

• suitable to measure degree of integration?

Metropolis Policy-Research Seminar, Ottawa, 22 Oct. 20098

Measures: criticisms

Underlying purpose:

• Reasserted idea of integrity of nation rooted in stable monolingualism

• national means to deal with supposedly divisive multilingualism.

Complexity of procedures in expanding

EU. Is a more centralised approach needed?

Metropolis Policy-Research Seminar, Ottawa, 22 Oct. 2009 9

Literature

Extra, G., Spotti M., and P. Van Avermaet (eds). 2009. Testing regimes: Cross-National Perspectives on Language, Migration & Citizenship. Advances in Sociolinguistics. London/New York: Continuum.

Hogan-Brun, G., C. Mar-Molinero & P. Stevenson (eds). 2009. Discourses on Language and Integration: Critical Perspectives on Language Testing Regimes in Europe. Amsterdam: J.Benjamins.

Metropolis Policy-Research Seminar, Ottawa, 22 Oct. 2009

Merci.

Thank you.

top related