kraft case
Post on 14-Apr-2018
218 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/29/2019 Kraft Case
1/2
Case
Despite speculation that offers from U.S.-based candy company Hershey and the Italian
confectioner Ferreiro would be forthcoming, Krafts bid on January 19, 2010, was accepted
unanimously by Cadburys board of directors. Kraft, the worlds second (after Nestl) largest
food manufacturer (after Nestl), raised its offer over its initial September 7, 2009, bid to
$19.5 billion to win over the board of the worlds second largest candy and chocolate
maker. Kraft also assumed responsibility for $9.5 billion of Cadburys debt.
Krafts initial bid evoked a raucous response from Cadburys chairman Roger Carr, who
derided the offer that valued Cadbury at $16.7 billion as showing contempt for his firms well-
known brand, and dismissed the hostile bidder as a low-growth conglomerate. Immediately
following the Kraft announcement, Cadburys share price rose by 45% (7 percentage points more
than the 38% premium implicit in the Kraft offer). The share prices of other food manufacturers
also rose due to speculation that they could become takeover targets.
The ensuing four-month struggle between the two firms was reminiscent of the highly
publicized takeover of U.S. icon Anheuser-Busch in 2008 by Belgian brewer InBev. The Kraft-
Cadbury transaction stimulated substantial opposition from senior government ministers and
trade unions over the move by a huge U.S. firm to take over a British company deemed to be a
national treasure. However, like InBevs takeover of Anheuser-Busch, what started as a
donnybrook ended on friendly terms, with the two sides reaching final agreement in a singleweekend.
Determined to become a global food and candy giant, Kraft decided to bid for Cadbury after
the U.K.-based firm spun off its Schweppes beverages business in the United States in 2008. The
separation of Cadburys beverage and confectionery units resulted in Cadbury becoming the
worlds largest pure confectionery firm following the spinoff. Confectionery companies tend to
trade at a higher value, so adding the Cadburys chocolate and gum business could enhance
Krafts attractiveness to competitors. However, this status was soon eclipsed by Marss
acquisition of Wrigley in 2008.
A takeover of Cadbury would help Kraft, the biggest food conglomerate in North America,
to compete with its larger rival, Nestle. Cadbury would strengthen Krafts market share in Britain
and would open India, where Cadbury is among the most popular chocolate brands. It would also
expand Krafts gum business and give it a global distribution network. Nestle lacked a gum
-
7/29/2019 Kraft Case
2/2
business and was struggling with declining sales as recession-plagued consumers turned away
from its bottled water and ice cream products. Cadbury and Kraft fared relatively well during the
20082009 global recession, with Cadburys confectionery business proving resilient despite
price increases in the wake of increasing sugar prices. Kraft had benefited from rising sales of
convenience foods because consumers ate more meals at home during the recession.
The differences in the composition of the initial and final Kraft bids reflected a series of
crosscurrents. Irene Rosenfeld, Kraft CEO, not only had to contend with vituperative comments
from Cadburys board and senior management, but also was soundly criticized by major
shareholders who feared Kraft would pay too much for Cadbury. Specifically, the firms largest
shareholder, Warren Buffetts Berkshire Hathaway with a 9.4% stake, expressed concern that the
amount of new stock that would have to be issued to acquire Cadbury would dilute the
ownership position of existing Kraft shareholders. In an effort to placate dissident Kraft
shareholders while acceding to Cadburys demand for an increase in the offer price, Ms.
Rosenfeld increased the offer by 7% by increasing the cash portion of the purchase price.
The new bid consisted of $8.17 cash and 0.1874 new Kraft shares, compared to Krafts
original offer of $4.89 cash and 0.2589 new Kraft shares for each Cadbury share outstanding.
The change in the composition of the offer price meant that Kraft would issue 265 million new
shares compared with its original plan to issue 370 million. The change in the terms of the deal
meant that Kraft would no longer have to get shareholder approval for the new share issue,
since it was able to avoid the NYSE requirement that firms issuing shares totaling more
than 20% of the number of shares currently outstanding must receive shareholder
approval to do so.
top related