kpi framework for nz mental health and addiction services · kpi 16a. ngo services investment...
Post on 08-Aug-2020
13 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
1
KPI Framework for NZ Mental Health
and Addiction Services
July 2011
Outline
• Background• KPIs and targets defined • Published KPI data• Outcomes • Project milestones
Background
• Shift from information collection to information use• Provider led initiative since 2006• KPIs for quality improvement purposes• Sector-wide benchmarking • Long term view:
– benchmarking across the mental health and addiction sector
– Embedded in local, regional and national activity – Peer groupings between providers formed based
on issues of common interest
Use the information to…
• Understand their organisation’s comparative performance
• Introduce data and service improvement initiatives
• Improve outcomes for service users
The KPI project lifecycle
Special projects
• Special projects in progress:– Development of new/and or replacement KPIs– Comparative consumer profiles – Data impact of regional service provision– NGO engagement in benchmarking
• Sub-groups of interested participants• Make recommendations to the wider project group
KPIs and targets defined
KPIs defined
• KPIs function as a yardstick for performance• They provide information about how well a service
is performing• KPIs are most meaningful when interpreted in
groups or clusters such as continuity of care, productivity and efficiency
Targets developed during Phase II
• Considerable discussion and debate • Provisional only, will require further testing • Focus on any one indicator and its target could
provide a distorted view of performance• Interrelationships between the indicators and their
targets are important• Targets are most meaningful when they are applied
to clusters of indicators
Targets may be expressed in different ways
• They may be:– Minimum performance (incorporates alarm concept)– Optimum performance or ‘good practice’– Alarm or alert targets
• They may be expressed as:– Equal to ‘x’– Threshold values – either ‘greater than’ or ‘less
than’– A range
Published KPI data
• 10 Test Phase indicators (13 in Phase III)• 40 + supplementary indicators • Stratified by ethnicity – Maori, Pacific, Other• Grouped in themes:
– Access to service– Continuity of care– Productivity– Efficiency– Organisational health
13
Core indicators
1. Inpatient change in the total HONOS scale (now percentage of HoNOS compliant discharges)
2. 28 day acute inpatient readmission rate
3. Average length of acute inpatient stay
4. Weekly community treatment days per clinical FTE
5. Community treatment days per service user
6. NGO services investment
7. Pre-admission community care
8. Post-discharge community care
9. Total staff turnover
10.Sick leave usage
Sub-set of supplementary indicators
Community service user-related timeSupp 44.
Percentage of HoNOS compliant dischargesSupp 27.
Percentage of total cost that is acute inpatient costSupp 29.
Percentage of total cost that is community care costSupp 30.
Pop 06 access to serviceSupp 31.
DHB adult funding per head of populationSupp 35.
Cost per acute inpatient bed ($000)Supp 16.
Cost per contact hourSupp 17.
Community care cost per contactSupp 13.
Acute inpatient unit beds per 100,000 population Supp 4.
Published data with agreed targets
KPI 2. 28 day acute inpatient readmission rate
KPI 8. Average length of acute inpatient stay
KPI 16a. NGO services investment - Adult
KPI 19. Post-discharge community care
KPI 28. Total staff turnover
KPI 29. Sick leave usage
KPI 1. Total HoNOS score (inpatient) Effect size large (simulated data)
Continuity of care spider web cluster 2007/2008
KPI 18. Pre-admission community care
KPI 19. Post-discharge community care
KPI 8. Average length of acute inpatient stay
KPI 28. Acute inpatient readmissions rate
Continuity of care spider web cluster 2008/2009
KPI 8. Average length of acute inpatient stay
KPI 18. Pre-admission community care
KPI 28. Acute inpatient readmissions rate
KPI 19. Post-discharge community care
Supplementary indicators with averages
Supp 4. Acute inpatient unit beds per 100,000 population
Supp 13. Community care cost per contact
Supp 17. Cost per contact hour
Supp 18. DHB NGO funding per head of population
Supp 21. Median length of stay
Supp 26. Percentage of discharges greater than 35 days
Supp 30. Percentage of total cost that is community care cost
Supp 31. POP 06 access to service
Supp 44. Community service user-related time
Data stratified by ethnicity
KPI 2. 28 day acute inpatient readmission rate Māori
KPI 2. 28 day acute inpatient readmission rate Pacific
KPI 8. Average length of acute inpatient stay Māori
KPI 8. Average length of acute inpatient stay Pacific
Supp 26. Percentage of discharges greater than 35 days - Māori
41
Outcomes
• Effective use of data to build the indicators at provider level
• Provider capability to collect, report and use data
• Indication of the Framework’s effectiveness to measure performance and improve quality
• Established benchmarking forums and resultant use of information for quality improvement
• Recommendations for whole of sector
implementation
Sustainability/Future direction
top related