kira matus harvard university green chemistry and...

Kira Matus

Harvard University

Green Chemistry and Engineering Conference

June 25, 2009

� Increasing Levels of Regulation

� Renewed attention to uncertain hazards

� New concern regarding efficacy of existing

chemical regulation

� Heated discussions around climate, energy,

renewable resources

AMFAARPAA

AJAASBCAA

ESAA-AECAFFRAA

FEAPRAIRA

NWPAACODRA/NMSPAA

FCRPAMMPAA

120

110

100

90

EPACTFFCACERFACRAAPPAPPVAIEREAANTPAGLCPAABACZARAWRDAEDPOPARECACAAAGCRAGLFWRAHMTUSANEEA

SDWAASARA

AQA

NAWCA

WQA

NWPA

RCRAAWLDI

APASWDA

CERCLACZMIA

COWLDAFWLCA

AMFAARPAA

AJAASBCAA

ESAA-AECAFFRAA

FEAPRAIRA

NWPAACODRA/NMSPAA

FCRPAMMPAA

120

110

100

90

EPACTFFCACERFACRAAPPAPPVAIEREAANTPAGLCPAABACZARAWRDAEDPOPARECACAAAGCRAGLFWRAHMTUSANEEA

SDWAASARA

AQA

NAWCA

WQA

NWPA

RCRAAWLDI

APASWDA

CERCLACZMIA

COWLDAFWLCA

80

70

60

50

40

30

20

10

0

1870 1880 1890 1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000

SARA

BLRAERDDAAEAWANOPPAPTSAUMTRCAESAAQGANCPA

TSCAFLPMARCRANFMACZMAA

NEPAEQIACAAEPAEEAOSHAFAWRAANPAA

FRRRPASOWADPA

WSRAEARCFHSA

MPRSAAARPA

HMTA

FCMHSA

NHPA

WLDAFWCAA

FWAAEA

AEPA FIFRA PAA

FAWRAMBCANPSWA

IA

NBRA

AARHA

YA

TAFWCABPA

NLRAWPA

AQAFOIA

WRPAAFCA

FHSANFMUA

BLBAFWPCAMPRSACZMANCA

FEPCAPWSAMMPA

ESATAPA

COWLDAFWLCA

MPRSAA

CAAACWA

SMCRASWRCASDWAA

Number of Laws 80

70

60

50

40

30

20

10

0

1870 1880 1890 1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000

SARA

BLRAERDDAAEAWANOPPAPTSAUMTRCAESAAQGANCPA

TSCAFLPMARCRANFMACZMAA

NEPAEQIACAAEPAEEAOSHAFAWRAANPAA

FRRRPASOWADPA

WSRAEARCFHSA

MPRSAAARPA

HMTA

FCMHSA

NHPA

WLDAFWCAA

FWAAEA

AEPA FIFRA PAA

FAWRAMBCANPSWA

IA

NBRA

AARHA

YA

TAFWCABPA

NLRAWPA

AQAFOIA

WRPAAFCA

FHSANFMUA

BLBAFWPCAMPRSACZMANCA

FEPCAPWSAMMPA

ESATAPA

COWLDAFWLCA

MPRSAA

CAAACWA

SMCRASWRCASDWAA

Number of Laws

• EU• Canada• China, India• US Federal Government• US State Governments• US State Governments

▫ Massachusetts

▫ California

▫ Michigan

▫ Maine

▫ Texas• US Municipalities

▫ San Francisco

� Major “crises”� Food supply incidents

� Toy incidents

� Chemical incidents � Chemical incidents

� High costs of energy

� Competition for feedstocks, materials

� Increased awareness� Climate change

� Energy issues- including security

� Several Major Streams of “Chemical Policy”

� Safety policies

� Energy policies

� Environmental Policies

▪ Chemical policies

▪ Climate Change policies

� Innovation Policies

� Health Policies

� Green Chemistry Policies

� All of them impact green chemistry, even if

not “Green Chemistry Policy”

� Affect different aspects of the chemical enterprise

� Interactions

▪ Can be synergistic

▪ Can also increase burden, make impact less than any

one on its own

� Improve the overall public good

� Maximize the social benefits

� Minimize economic costs

From GC perspective : � From GC perspective :

� Use policy to lower barriers to implementing

green chemistry

• State Level:

▫ Educational Initiatives

▫ Economic Incentives

▫ Regulatory Controls ▫ Regulatory Controls

▫ Data Collection

▫ Knowledge Creation

▫ Dissemination- scientific, technical

▫ Market creation/expansion

▫ Awareness campaigns

• Federal Level:

▫ Green Chemistry Policy (HR 2850)

� Research funding

� Education� Education

▫ Climate Change Policy

▫ Green Economy

▫ Environmental Policy- air, water, chemicals

▫ Energy Policy

▫ Health and Safety Policy

▫ Agricultural Policy

• Increasing “Command and Control”-style

regulation

▫ REACH as de facto global norm▫ REACH as de facto global norm

• Regional (as opposed to international)

agreements in trade, environment

• Education and research as GC Policy focus

▫ Relationship with industry (China)

• Systematic (and Systemic) Policy Thinking

Fundamental Risk Discussion• Fundamental Risk Discussion

• Agreement on Broader Goals

• Coordination

• Strong economic incentives- loan funds, tax credits

• Coordination- among states, other regions, etc…• Coordination- among states, other regions, etc…

• Small business considerations

• Fundamental risk discussion

• Metrics and goals

• Money

• Regulatory Mapping

• State-level consortium

• Availability of capital

• Tax breaks

• Regulatory incentives (ie fast-tracking, lower

fees, Super fund, etc…)

• Standards, Metrics and Certifications

• What are the actual policies being discussed and

implemented at the state level?implemented at the state level?

• Maine

• Michigan

• California