june 16th, 2009 christian pagé, cerfacs laurent terray, cerfacs - ura 1875 julien boé, u...

June 16th, 2009

Christian Pagé, CERFACS

Laurent Terray, CERFACS - URA 1875

Julien Boé, U California

Christophe Cassou, CERFACS - URA 1875

Weather typing approachfor seasonal forecasts?

HEPEX09 - COST731 Workshop - Toulouse - 15-19 June 2009

1. Motivations

• Difficult to forecast precipitation adequately at long range and at monthly/seasonal timescales

• Even more at higher spatial resolution (hydrological applications)

• Numerical Models and Ensemble Forecast Systems have more abilities to forecast Large-Scale Circulation than fine-scale local variables at these timescales

• Downscaling techniques based on statistical relationships between the Large-Scale Circulation and local scale fields have proven significant abilities in climate sciences (Boe and Terray, 2007)

• Weather-typing approach

• A sort of extended analog methodology with dynamical and local variable constraints

• Can process a large number of simulations, such as large ensemble forecasts systems of atmospheric and/or hydrological models (low CPU cost)

Monthly/Seasonal forecasts applications?

3

Downscaling2. Background

Local fields(precipitations, temperature)

Local geographiccharacteristics

(topography, rugosity)Large-ScaleCirculation

Statistical downscaling

Build a statistical model linking the large-scale circulation and local

precipitation

Statistical Downscaling

From Global OR Regional

Models! (e.g. ARPEGE)

4

Classification3. Methodology

Daily Mean Sea-Level Pressure

Clusters group #1

Clusters group #2

Cluster composite:

Average of the variable which is

classified withina group

Each cluster is defined by:- its composite- the days’ distribution within the cluster

Classification: main concepts as inBoe and Terray (2007) statistical downscaling methodology

Composite

Composite

Based on Michelangeli et al, 1995

• Precipitation observations are used in the classification learning phase (multi-variate): discriminant

• Temperature (model AND observations) is also used when selecting analog day

• Distances to all clusters (inter-types) are also consideredPictures by Julien Najac, Cerfacs

5

Weather types3. Methodology

NCEP MSLP anomalies (hPa) Weather types examples Winter

Methodology produces Weather types discriminant for precipitation

Related precipitation anomaliesfrom Météo-France 8-kmmesoscale analysis SAFRAN (%)

6

3. Methodology Validation

Weather types occurrence validation 1950-1999

7

3. Methodology Validation

Downscaled NCEP reanalysisvs SAFRAN analysis

Downscaled ARPEGE V4 vsNCEP reanalysis

1981-2005 Validation Period

Annual total mean precipitation 1981-2005Differences in %

8

3. Methodology Validation

Precipitation Time Tendencies Validation

=> Seasonal Cumulated Precipitation (NDJFM) reconstructed by multiple regression using weather types occurrence and clusters’ distances

Correlation observation

/reconstruction1900/2000

1 point=1 station, color: latitude=> blue=south, red=north

Time Tendencies Pr

1951-2000 observation

vs reconstruction

9

The Météo-France SIM model for hydrological simulations(Habets et al., 2008)

SAFRAN : meteorological parameters: mesoscale analysis at 8-km resolution

ISBA : water flux andground surface energy fluxes

(evaporation, snow,runoff, water infiltration)

MODCOU : hydrological model(river flows)

Dailyriver flows

•

Latent

Sensible

Snow

Atmosphere

Source: Météo-France

3. Methodology Validation

Habets, F., et al. (2008), The SAFRAN-ISBA-MODCOU hydrometeorological model applied over France, J. Geophys. Res., 113, D06113, doi:10.1029/2007JD008548.

10

3. Methodology Validation

River flow Validation using the SIM hydrometeorological model

Winter MeanOBSNCEP (0.85)SAFRAN (0.97)20101960

500

0

• Precipitation and other meteorological variables reconstructed at 8-km using:

• NCEP reanalysis data (Large-Scale Circulation and Temperature) • Statistical downscaling methodology (SAFRAN analysis used for analog daily data)

• Good agreement of downscaled NCEP data vs SAFRAN and observations

SIM simulations by Eric Martin, Météo-France

Could this kind of statistical downscaling weather typing methodology be used for Monthly/Seasonal forecasts?

• Predictability of Weather Regimes at Monthly/Seasonal scales

• Very preliminary and exploratory studies have already been done (Chabot et al., 2008, 2009)

• 4 Standard weather regimes, large North Atlantic Domain

• Many questions still to be addressed !

• Weather types

• Are some weather types more predictable than others at monthly/seasonal scale ? Increase in predictability ?

• If yes, what would be the forcings responsible for the most predictable weather types ?

• Which region and large-scale variable(s) to use ? How many weather types to use ?

• Some questions should be explored by doing a hindcast experiment 11

4. Perspectives

12

Thanks for your attention!

Christian Pagé, CERFACSChristian Pagé, CERFACSchristian.page@cerfacs.fr

Laurent Terray, CERFACS - URA1875Laurent Terray, CERFACS - URA1875Julien BoJulien Boé, U Californiaé, U California

Christophe Cassou, CERFACS - URA1875Christophe Cassou, CERFACS - URA1875

HEPEX09 - COST731 Workshop - Toulouse - 15-19 June 2009

13

4. Monthly/Seasonal Methodology Facts

BUT! Numerical models have forecasts performances at monthly timescales which are much better than at seasonal timescales(4 weeks lead time)

Ridge

• A previous preliminary and exploratory study (Chabot et al., 2008) showed that:

• Weather regimes predictability at seasonal timescales is low

• Except when strong oceanic forcing (ENSO, Tropical Atlantic)

• This study used:

• Geopotential Height at 500 hPa (Z500) for Large-Scale Circulation classification (tendencies problems)

• A Large North Atlantic Domain

• Four Standard Weather Types Blocking

14

4. Monthly/Seasonal Methodology Facts

• A monthly extension to the Chabot et al., 2008 study shows (Chabot et al., 2009) :

• Good predictability for weather types anomaly sign (60 to 80 % of correct forecasts)

Percentage of correct forecasts for the most probable weather type

Percentage of correct forecasts for the least probable weather type

days days30 30

15

3. Methodology Validation

Flow Validation

Winter MeanOBSNCEP (0.85)SAFRAN (0.97)

Annual CycleOBSNCEP ARPEGE-VR

CDFOBSNCEP ARPEGE-VR

Jan Dec Jan Dec Jan Dec

0 1 0 1 0 1

ARIEGE (Foix)

ARIEGE (Foix)

LOIRE(Blois)

LOIRE (Blois)

SEINE (Poses)

SEINE (Poses)

VIENNE (Ingrandes)

0

2500

000

0 0

1200

2500250

150 800

20101960

500

0