joint meeting ediscovery joint session with the association of records managers and administrators,...

Joint MeetingeDiscovery Joint Sessionwith the Association of

Records Managers and Administrators, NYC Chapter (ARMA), Paralegals and Litigation

Support Working Group (PALS) and Women in eDiscovery (WIE)

Moderator: Joe Bartolo, J.D.

Joint MeetingThe Use of TAR and Predictive

Coding in eDiscovery and Information Governance

Panelist:Alan Winchester, Esq.

Joint MeetingThe Use of TAR and Predictive

Coding in eDiscovery and Information Governance

Panelist:Rudy Moliere

Joint MeetingThe Use of TAR and Predictive

Coding in eDiscovery and Information Governance

Panelist:Hon. Ronald J. Hedges

(retired)

Joint MeetingThe Use of TAR and Predictive

Coding in eDiscovery and Information Governance

Panelist:Salvatore Mancuso

Topic 1:

Predictive Coding (PC) as an emerging trend ("buzzword") - what's all the buzz about?

What is PC exactly, and how does it fit into TAR (Technology Assisted Review) a/k/a CAR (Computer Assisted Review) - or does it?

WWW.EDRM.NET

Topic 2:

What are the benefits of using processes such as TAR/CAR or PC versus a traditional linear review?

Topic 3:What are some of the differences in

using TAR/CAR for various purposes:

(a) records management;

(b) investigations and early case assessment; and

(c) Litigation (civil or criminal).

Is there is downstream use for PC for Information Governance Purposes? (Predictive Filing?) 

WWW.EDRM.NET

WWW.EDRM.NET

Topic 4:Have paralegals been placed on

remediation projects of large data sets, and can they see this as a tool?

If paralegals are in the position where they will be asked to interact with this technology, are TAR/CAR and PC white horses for potential challenges?

Topic 5:

•What is involved in the process of generating a random “Sample”?

•What are some best practices regarding “Sampling” of the “Active” and “Null” sets to validate the results of TAR and “Clustering”?

eDISCOVERY TEAM®

Topic 6:CAR/TAR (and PC) have not been

accepted in any litigation other than at a threshold level. Should there be "transparency?

What does that mean in actual litigation practice?

Topic 7:

How should attorneys defend the process of using TAR/CAR (and/or PC), if challenged?

Concluding Remarks

Questions & Answers

Thank You for AttendingSpecial thanks to

NYCPA;ARMA;Women in eDiscovery – New York Chapter;PALS;

Event Sponsors: Polygon and

Subject Matter Expert Panelists;All those who participated in planning;NBC Studios.