isabell-a. melzer-pellmann ilc-tech meeting, 24.8.2006 status report of offset and angle studies...
Post on 14-Dec-2015
217 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
Isabell-A. Melzer-Pellmann ILC-tech meeting, 24.8.2006
Status report of Status report of offset and angle studies offset and angle studies
with Guinea-Pig with Guinea-Pig
Isabell-Alissandra Melzer-PellmannIsabell-Alissandra Melzer-Pellmann
ILC tech meetingILC tech meeting
July 11July 11thth, 2006, 2006
2Isabell-A. Melzer-Pellmann ILC-tech meeting, 24.8.2006
Offset and angle scanfrom TESLA TDR
Luminosity drops fast with small change of offset and/or angle
TESLA parameters: y = 5nm , y = 12 rad
How is the luminosity change for the ILC parameters?
Results frombeam-beamsimulation with GUINEA-PIGfrom TESLA TDR
3Isabell-A. Melzer-Pellmann ILC-tech meeting, 24.8.2006
Offset scan with ILC parameters
ILC parameters: ILC 500 NOM: y = 5.7nmILC 500 LOW Q: y = 3.5nmILC 500 LARGE Y:y = 8.1nmILC 500 LOW P: y = 3.8nmILC 500 HIGH L: y = 3.5nm
ILC 1000 NOM: y = 3.5nmILC 1000 LOW Q: y = 2.5nmILC 1000 LARGE Y:y = 7.0nmILC 1000 LOW P: y = 2.7nmILC 1000 HIGH L: y = 2.5nm
Loss of luminosity falls not so steep,for y/y=±1 O(30%) (TESLA: for y/y=±1 O(40%))
4Isabell-A. Melzer-Pellmann ILC-tech meeting, 24.8.2006
Offset scan with ILC parameters
ILC parameters: ILC 500 NOM: y = 5.7nmILC 500 LOW Q: y = 3.5nmILC 500 LARGE Y:y = 8.1nmILC 500 LOW P: y = 3.8nm
ILC 1000 NOM: y = 3.5nmILC 1000 LOW Q: y = 2.5nmILC 1000 LARGE Y:y = 7.0nmILC 1000 LOW P: y = 2.7nm
Loss of luminosity falls not so steep,for y/y=±1 O(30%) (TESLA: for y/y=±1 O(40%))
5Isabell-A. Melzer-Pellmann ILC-tech meeting, 24.8.2006
Angle scan with ILC parameters
ILC parameters: ILC 500 NOM: y = 14.3radILC 500 LOW Q: y = 17.5radILC 500 LARGE Y:y = 20.2radILC 500 LOW P: y = 18.9radILC 500 HIGH L: y = 17.5rad
ILC 1000 NOM: y = 11.7radILC 1000 LOW Q: y = 12.4radILC 1000 LARGE Y:y = 11.7radILC 1000 LOW P: y = 13.4radILC 1000 HIGH L: y = 12.4rad
Changing variable angle_y in Guinea-Pigresults in almost no change (tested alsowith TESLA parameters) - contactedDaniel Schulte… waiting for response
6Isabell-A. Melzer-Pellmann ILC-tech meeting, 24.8.2006
Next step: include ‘banana effect’
Banana effect: internal bunch deformations, induced by single-bunch wakefields in the linac.
TESLA TDR: single bunch correlated emittance growth expected to be 6% in average.
Results frombeam-beamsimulation with GUINEA-PIGfrom TESLA TDR
7Isabell-A. Melzer-Pellmann ILC-tech meeting, 24.8.2006
Next step: include ‘banana effect’
For these plots a ‘banana shape’ beam needs to be feeded into Guinea-Pig• Simulated ‘banana’ from MERLIN not yet available.• Idea: just generate beam with ILC parameters and change it linearly by average of 6% (number from TESLA TDR)
• Status: generated beam (without change yet) fed into Guinea-Pig, compared beam generated by Guinea-Pig with my generated beam
after interaction (output from Guinea-Pig) - see next pages differences observed need to check this before further simulation can be run.• wrong calculation of x’, y’?
x/m
y/m
z/m
8Isabell-A. Melzer-Pellmann ILC-tech meeting, 24.8.2006
Comparison: Guinea Pig generated beam vs my generated beam (after interaction)
Guinea-Pig generated With root random number generatorgenerated beam.
z/mx/m
y/m
z/m
y/m
x/m
9Isabell-A. Melzer-Pellmann ILC-tech meeting, 24.8.2006
Comparison: Guinea Pig generated beam vs my generated beam (after interaction)
Guinea-Pig generated With root random number generatorgenerated beam.
x/m x/m
y/m y/m
10Isabell-A. Melzer-Pellmann ILC-tech meeting, 24.8.2006
Comparison: Guinea Pig generated beam vs my generated beam (after interaction)
Guinea-Pig generated With root random number generatorgenerated beam.
x/m x/m
z/m z/m
z-distribution seems okx-distribution seems ok exept around 0
top related