investor uncertainty november 2008. k peter kolf general manager & ceo economic regulation...
Post on 19-Jan-2016
224 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
Investor Uncertainty November 2008
• K Peter Kolf• General Manager & CEO• Economic Regulation Authority
• 25 November 2008
Investor UncertaintyWA Energy 2008 – Tonkin Corporation
Important Notice
• This presentation has been made available in good faith by the Economic Regulation Authority (Authority). This presentation is not a substitute for professional advice. No person or organisation should act on the basis of any matter contained in this document without obtaining appropriate professional advice.
• The Authority and its staff members make no representation or warranty, expressed or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, reasonableness or reliability of the information contained in this document, and accept no liability, jointly or severally, for any loss or expense of any nature whatsoever (including consequential loss) arising directly or indirectly from any making available of this document, or the inclusion in it or omission from it of any material, or anything done or not done in reliance on it, including in all cases, without limitation, loss due in whole or part to the negligence of the Authority and its employees. This notice has effect subject to the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cwlth) and the Fair Trading Act 1987 (WA), if applicable, and to the fullest extent permitted by law.
• Any summaries of legislation, regulations or codes in this presentation do not contain all material terms of those laws or obligations. No attempt has been made in the summaries, definitions or other material to exhaustively identify and describe the rights, obligations and liabilities of any person under those laws or provisions.
Introduction
Reflect on experience to date
Not offering advice or policy prescriptions
Overview
1 Regulator’s perspective
2 The role of markets & their impact on investors
3 Investor uncertainty
4 The importance of gas to the WA economy
5 Managing risks in the energy sector
6 The future for investment – a positive outlook?– Challenge for the future
Part 1: The Economic Regulation Authority
Functions:• Administers access to monopoly infrastructure• Licenses service providers• Monitors & regulates markets• Carries out inquiries (referred by government)
Key features:• Independence• Transparency• Consultation
Objectives of Independent Economic Regulation
• Facilitate private sector provision of services
• Make best use of monopoly infrastructure
• Enhance competition upstream/downstream
• Consumer Protection and Fair Trading
– Interface with Energy Ombudsman
Part 2: Economic Efficiency & the Role of Markets
• Productive efficiency• Allocative efficiency• Dynamic efficiency (long run)
– Inefficient markets waste resources– Singularity– Does not address the distribution of income or wealth
Electricity
All other commodities
Long Term Interests of Consumers
Optimum
Max π
The Objective Function
Maximise:• Long term interests of consumers
Subject to:• Social advancement• Environmental protection• Economic prosperity• Interests of investors & service providers• Re-elect Minister
Economic Prosperity
Environmental Protection
Election of Minister Long Term Interests
of Consumers
Interests of Investors
Part 3: Investor Uncertainty
• What a time for a talk on investor uncertainty!
Source: Australian Securities Exchange Web Site
XJO, S&P/ASX 200
Investor Uncertainty
• Classic bubble to bust
• Each phase self propelled:
– Bubble: Low interest, increased appetite for risk, higher asset prices
– Bust: Reduced appetite for risk, lower asset prices, default
• Was regulatory failure involved?
– Short term borrowing for long term investment
• Does every generation need to learn it over again?
Investor Uncertainty
• Uncertainty is core concern for regulators
• What do we mean by investor?
• Examples:
– Market risk premium
– Regulatory risk
– Systematic/diversifiable risks
Market Risk Premium
Market Risk Premium = Broad-based stock index - Risk-free rate (Bonds)
References:• Bishop Steven (2007), Capital Value Pty Ltd, “A review of market risk premium and
commentary on two recent papers” Oct 2007• Brailsford Tim, Handley John C and Maheswaran Krishnan (2007): “A re-examination
of the historical equity risk premium in Australia” April 2007• Gray and Officer (2005): Gray Stephen and R R Officer, “A review of market risk
premium and commentary on two recent papers: A report prepared for the Energy Networks Association” August 2005
• Hancock (2005): The South Australian Centre for Economic Studies, “The Market Risk Premium for Australian Regulatory Decisions: Preliminary Report” April 2005
• Hathaway (2005): Capital Research Pty Ltd, “Australian Market Risk Premium” January2005
Market Risk Premium Australia 1883-1998
-35
-25
-15
-5
5
15
25
35
45
55
1888
1893
1898
1903
1908
1913
1918
1923
1928
1933
1938
1943
1948
1953
1958
1963
1968
1973
1978
1983
1988
1993
1998
Data Year
Value [%]
Premium
Linear Trend
Power Trend
Source: Stephen Grey’s data
Regulatory Risk
• Regulatory risk high on companies’ risk barometer• Few would argue that regulation is unnecessary• However, regulatory risk ill defined:
– Emanates from new legislation (uncertainty)– Or changes to legislation (unintended consequences)– Can be the result of regulatory discretion (uncertainty)– New legislation can take decades to settle– Can be associated with compliance cost– Can be associated with complexity
• Regulators should be predictable• Regulatory risk is diversifiable• Need to differentiate from sovereign risk
Systematic/diversifiable risks
• CAPM (WACC) compensates for Systematic Risk• CAPM provides market returns (opportunity cost of capital):
– Above market returns are a matter for government policy
• Incentive regulation seeks to avoid limiting returns• Project specific risks covered through diversification and:
– Long term contracts– Take or pay contracts– Tariff design to mitigate risk– Other forms of hedging– Accelerated depreciation (risk of stranding)
Reference: “Review of Rate of Return Methodologies and Practices” IRIC, 2003, ERA Web Site
Part 4: The Importance of Gas to the WA Economy
• Natural gas around 50% of primary energy in WA• Verve Energy (3240 MW):
– natural gas generates 35% of Verve’s electricity
• Currently gas for local use in short supply• Gas price exceptionally high (up to around $12/GJ based on
US$60 bbl oil price)• Oil price down US$55 from US$147, 11 July 2008, West
Texas Intermediate (WTI)• Gas prices expected to settle in medium term
Industry mainlymineral processing 35%
Mining 34%
Electricity Generation 26%
OtherCarnarvon110.8 PJ 33%
Perth9.9 PJ 3%
SUPPLY
Commercial & Residential 5%
DEMAND
NWS213.8 PJ 64%
Gas Supply and DemandWestern Australia Domestic Market ~ Year to Sept 2007
Sources: ABARE & Energy Quest, Energy Quarterly Nov 2008 Note: Supply excludes gas used for LNG production but is included in demand
Part 5: Managing Risks in the Energy Sector
• Things happen• Varanus Island Incident costly ~ $2bn• Could have been much worse:
– No loss of life– No widespread power outages– Incident appears to have been managed well– No emergency powers called on
STEM and Balancing Prices
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
Sep-0
6
Oct-06
Nov-0
6
Dec-0
6
Jan-
07
Feb-0
7
Mar
-07
Apr-0
7
May
-07
Jun-
07
Jul-0
7
Aug-0
7
Sep-0
7
Oct-07
Nov-0
7
Dec-0
7
Jan-
08
Feb-0
8
Mar
-08
Apr-0
8
May
-08
Jun-
08
Jul-0
8
Aug-0
8
$/M
Wh
Weekly Average Volume Weighted Balancing Demand Price
Weekly Average Volume Weighted Balancing Supply Price
Weekly Average Volume Weighted STEM Price
Varanus IslandImpact3 June 08
Regional Quarterly Volume Weighted Average Spot PricesNational Electricity Market
0
50
100
150
200
250
Mar
-99
Sep-9
9
Mar
-00
Sep-0
0
Mar
-01
Sep-0
1
Mar
-02
Sep-0
2
Mar
-03
Sep-0
3
Mar
-04
Sep-0
4
Mar
-05
Sep-0
5
Mar
-06
Sep-0
6
Mar
-07
Sep-0
7
Mar
-08
Sep-0
8
$/MWh
Queensland
New South Wales
Victoria
South Australia
Tasmania
13 Sept 08
Managing Risks in the Energy Sector
• Impact of Ike – on Houston & Galveston– ~ 400 lives– Mass evacuations– Military control– No electricity 10 days +– No water 3 days +– Nightly curfews 7 days +– Most petrol stations & stores closed – no power– Communications down, can’t charge mobiles– Cost $???bn
Managing Risks in the Energy Sector
• Multi level contingency planning:– Industry needs to take responsibility for its commercial wellbeing– Government focus on community wellbeing– Well developed markets likely to be helpful– Fuel diversification– Fuel storage and transport contingency planning– Recovery plans
Part 6: The future for investment – a positive outlook
An investment of $1 in stocks at the end of 1882 and rolled over at the end of each year, stocks would have grown to $273,466 at the end of 2005.
A similar investment in bills would have grown to $539 and a similar investment in bonds would have grown to $834.
Brailsford Tim, Handley John C and Maheswaran Krishnan (2007), p16
Challenge for the future
The challenge is to develop rules that promote efficient decentralised decisions harmonising personal and public interests (Adam Smith’s invisible hand).
Need to avoid intrusive information intensive and administratively costly approaches through the development of market based systems.
Investor Uncertainty November 2008
top related