introduction to seamcat european communications office jean-philippe kermoal - seamcat manager (eco)...

Introduction to SEAMCATIntroduction to SEAMCAT

European Communications OfficeJean-Philippe Kermoal - SEAMCAT Manager (ECO)

October 2010

EUROPEANCOMMUNICATIONSOFFICE

Nansensgade 19DK-1366 CopenhagenDenmark

Telephone: + 45 33 89 63 00Telefax: + 45 33 89 63 30

E-mail: ero@ero.dkWeb Site: http://www.ero.dk

SEAMCAT WorkshopJean-Philippe Kermoal / ECO

05 October 2010

OutlineOutline

• Part 1 - Why SEAMCAT?• Part 2 - SEAMCAT-3 software tool• Part 3 - Principles of modelling various systems:

– Traditional – SEAMCAT 3.2.X– CDMA – SEAMCAT 3.2.X

• Part 4 - SEAMCAT information• Conclusions

05 October 2010

Part 1: Part 1: Why SEAMCAT?Why SEAMCAT?

05 October 2010

Spectrum engineering Spectrum engineering challengeschallenges

The requirement for global compatibility amongst many radio systems within a congested radio spectrum

introduction of new radio applications

technological

regulatory

economic considerations

increasing penetration of the existing radio applications

05 October 2010

• There are no more “empty” spectrum• Proposed new systems have to find way of

“sharing” with some of existing systems• Thus the need for spectrum engineering and

optimisation:– to find which existing radio systems are easiest to

share with, and then– determine the “sharing rules”

Need for spectrum sharingNeed for spectrum sharing

05 October 2010

• Spacing radio systems in frequency– Using the gaps between existing channels

• Spacing geographically– Using the gaps between intended deployment areas

(e.g. cities vs. rural areas)

• Time sharing– Exploiting different work time (day vs. night)

• Working at different power levels– E.g. “underlay” spectrum use by UWB

Sharing methodsSharing methods

05 October 2010

• Agile (cognitive) radio systems require minimum sharing rules as they could be adapting dynamically– Simple example: finding free channel in a given

geographic area

• Traditional rigid-design radio system will require precisely defined sharing rules– Maximum transmit power, guard-bands to existing

systems, etc

Sharing implementationSharing implementation

05 October 2010

• Analytical analysis, usually by worst-case approach:– Minimum Coupling Loss (MCL) method, to establish

rigid rules for minimum “separation”

• Statistical analysis of random trials:– The Monte-Carlo method, to establish probability of

interference for a given realistic deployment scenario– That is where SEAMCAT comes into picture!

Defining the sharing rulesDefining the sharing rules

05 October 2010

• The stationary worst-case is assumed

Wanted Signal

Victim

Interferer

Dmin, or minimum frequency separation for D=0

– However such worst-case assumption will not be permanent during normal operation and therefore sharing rules might be unnecessarily stringent – spectrum use not optimal!

The MCL approachThe MCL approach

05 October 2010

• Repeated random generation of interferers and their parameters (activity, power, etc…)

– After many trials, not only unfavourable, but also favourable cases will be accounted, the resulting rules will be more “fair” – spectrum use optimal!

Wanted Signal

InactiveInterferer

Victim

ActiveInterferer

t=t1t=ti

Monte-Carlo approachMonte-Carlo approach

05 October 2010

• User will need to define the distributions of various input parameters, e.g.:– How the power of interferer varies (PControl?)– How the interferer’s frequency channel varies– How the distance between interferer and victim

varies, and many others

• Number of trials has to be sufficiently high (many 1000s) for statistical reliability:– Not a problem with modern computers

Monte-Carlo AssumptionMonte-Carlo Assumption

05 October 2010

Part 2: Part 2: SEAMCAT-3 Software toolSEAMCAT-3 Software tool

05 October 2010

HistoryHistory

• Developed in CEPT as a co-operation between National Regulatory Administrations, ERO, industry

• First released in Jan-2000, then gradually developed in several phases

• Freely downloadable from ERO website (www.ero.dk/seamcat)

05 October 2010

• SEAMCAT is designed for:– Generic co-existence studies between different

radiocommunications systems operating in same or adjacent frequency bands

– Evaluation of transmitter and receiver masks– Evaluation of various limits:

unwanted emissions (spurious and out-of-band), blocking/selectivity, etc.

• Not designed for system planning purposes

PurposePurpose

05 October 2010

SEAMCAT toolSEAMCAT tool

• Used for analysis of a variety of radio compatibility scenarios:– quantification of probability of interference between various

radio systems– consideration of spatial and temporal distributions of the

received signals

• Can model any type of radio systems in terrestrial interference scenarios

• Based on Monte-Carlo generation

05 October 2010

• Mobile:– Land Mobile Systems– Short Range Devices– Earth based components of satellite systems

• Broadcasting:– terrestrial systems– DTH receivers of satellite systems

• Fixed:– Point-to-Point and Point-to-Multipoint

Typical examples of Typical examples of modelled systemmodelled system

05 October 2010

Installing SEAMCATInstalling SEAMCAT

On-line Webstart: Internet connection is needed at least for the installation; during later runs Internet used (if available) to check for updated version

Off-line

(Windows, Linux etc...)

(Windows only)

• No special processor/memory needs• Java RTE should be installed on your PC, at least version 1.6 required

05 October 2010

Software architectureSoftware architecture

Technical Library Workspace (.sws)

ResultsXML File

Event Generation Engine EGE Display

CDMA Engine

Interference Calculation Engine

CDMA Display

Display

User InterfacePlug-ins

ReportsXML stylesheets

Future Calculation Engine

ICE Display

05 October 2010

• Windows-oriented• Data exchange via XML files• Main element – workspace:

– Simulations input data – scenario: equipment parameters, placement, propagations

settings, etc. etc.

– Simulation controls: number of events etc– Simulation results: signal vectors, Pinterference

– Physically - an XML file with “sws” extension

Main interfaceMain interface

05 October 2010

SEAMCAT-3 softwareSEAMCAT-3 software

• Conceived in early 2003• Conceptually the same interface structure as in

SEAMCAT-2: workspace based, dialogue views• Main reason: need to model CDMA• Also: improvement of user interfacing and

general use convenience• Implemented in Java• Source code available upon request

05 October 2010

Graphic interfaceGraphic interface

• Shows positions of generated transceivers in victim and interfering systems;

• Overview of results (dRSS, iRSS)• Intuitive check of simulation scenario;• Detailed insight into simulated data for

modelled CDMA system (last snapshot only);

05 October 2010

Extra featuresExtra features

• Propagation model plug-in API(Application Programing Interface)

• Post processing plug-in API • Batch simulation format (Automation of repetitive

compatibility studies to be run at once)

• Remote computing (Public use of a powerful server at ERO and possibility to set-up local SEAMCAT server)

• Custom simulation report (XSLT->XML style sheet)

05 October 2010

• A plug-in is a (little) software programme, which may be developed by the user

• Written using standard Java language, compiled using open development tools

• The pre-compiled code may be then “plugged-in” at certain “insertion points” of SEAMCAT simulation flow to produce the desired “user-defined” functionality

• No perceivable impact on simulation speed

Plug-in Plug-in

05 October 2010

• This plug-in may be used to define ANY kind of propagation model, no complexity limit

• The plug-in may be inserted at any point where propagation model is defined in the scenario:– Victim link– Interfering link– Interference path– CDMA/OFDMA modules

Propagation Propagation model plug-inmodel plug-in

05 October 2010

• This plug-in is invoked at the end of the snapshot generation and may be used e.g.:– Powerful API– Introduce user-defined consistency checks– Model some special system design features, e.g.

Smart Antennas, etc.– Account for any additional environment features, e.g.

terrain/clutter impact, etc– To save intermediate results into external files for

signal processing in other tools (Matlab, etc)– not applicable to CDMA (victim)

Post-processing plug-inPost-processing plug-in

05 October 2010

• To ease carrying out lengthy simulations

Remote computingRemote computing

05 October 2010

• “Batch” function allows automation of repetitive compatibility studies by scheduling several SEAMCAT simulations to be done in one run of the programme

• Typical case – to study the impact of change of any one (or few) scenario parameters on the probability of interference

• Since version 3, any parameter (and any number of them) could be varied in batch

Batch simulationBatch simulation

05 October 2010

Part 3:Part 3:Principles of modelling various Principles of modelling various systemssystems

- ”Traditional” system- CDMA system

05 October 2010

Main elements of Main elements of SEAMCAT scenarioSEAMCAT scenario Start

While i=1,N

Generate position data of Wt, Vr

Calculate dRSSi

dRSS vector

While i=1,N

Generate position data of It j, Wrj

Calculate iRSSi,j

iRSS vector

While j=1,M

Calculate iRSSiSUM

dRSS, iRSS to ICE

Wanted Transmitter

Victim Receiver

Wanted Receiver

Interfering Transmitter

Victim link

Interfering link

05 October 2010

Creating simulations Creating simulations scenarioscenario

• User defines a scenario, describing mutual positioning of two systems in geographical domain…

5 km MS-Iti

Wr BS-Vr

…as well as many other parameters

05 October 2010

• Positioning of two systems in frequency• Powers• Masks• Activity• Etc.

Scenario parametersScenario parameters

05 October 2010

• Random generation of transceivers• Link budget• Signal values

Event generationEvent generation

05 October 2010

• Succession of snapshots…

1) Calculate d, Ptx, GaTx, GaRx, L

2) Calculate dRSSi

Snapshot#iRSS

Snapshot#

2) Calculate received signal, if PC, adjust Ptx

2) Calculate iRSSi VR

How event generation How event generation works*works*

(*) Except CDMA/OFDMA systems

05 October 2010

• Vectors for useful and interfering signals:

Results of event Results of event generationgeneration

05 October 2010

Evaluating probability Evaluating probability of interferenceof interference

- For each random event where dRSS>sensitivity:

Noise Floor (dBm)

Desired signal value (dBm)

Interfering signal (dBm) C/Itrial > C/Itarget?

Interference (dB)

- If C/Itriali >C/Itarget: “good” event

- If C/Itriali <C/Itarget: “interfered”

- Finally, after cycle of Nall events: Overall Pinterference= 1- (Ngood/Nall)dRSS>sens

dRSS -> (C)

iRSS -> (I)

05 October 2010

CDMA modellingCDMA modelling

• Modelling of CDMA systems as victim, interferer, or both:– Voice traffic only;– Quasi-static time within a snapshot;– One direction at a time (uplink or downlink);– Particular CDMA standard defined by setting Link Level

Data (CDMA2000-1X, W-CDMA/UMTS)

• Impact of interference measured by excess outage (capacity loss due to interference)

05 October 2010

CDMA procedureCDMA procedure

This part of the GUI is used to assist the user when configuring the workspace. All CDMA specific GUI elements are available as part of either VictimLink or InterferingLink configuration dialogs.

Pre-simulation1

The simulation GUI elements are shown during the simulation and are used to provide information about what SEAMCAT is doing. Since CDMA simulation can take much longer than non-CDMA simulations, there are special GUI parts used to provide information to the user.

Simulation2

After a simulation these GUI parts are used to provide access to calculated results but also detailed insight into the last snapshot of the simulation. Inspecting the last snapshot is considered a good way to validate the configuration of the simulated workspace.

Detailed information on the last snapshot4

3 Results

05 October 2010

• First a succession of snapshots are run without interference, gradually loading the system to find the target non-interfered capacity per cell

• Then the standard range of EGE snapshots is applied to generate the derived number of “target” users

• apply interference and note the impact in terms of how many of initial users were disconnected Generate position data of Wtj, Vrj

While j=1, L

Iterative process of power balancing in CDMA cells

Record dRSSi or other parameter, e.g. non-interfered CDMA capacity

While i=1, N

Generate position data of Itk, Wrk

Calculate iRSSi,k

While k=1, M

Repeat iterative process of power balancing in victim CDMA cells, now with iRSS present as external impact

(N) records of interference impact

Record impacti of interference, e.g. loss of CDMA capacity

To further engines

CDMA as victim

Generate position data of It j, Wrj

While j=1, M

Iterative process of power balancing in CDMA cells

Calculate iRSSi,j

While j=1, M

CDMA as interferer

05 October 2010

CDMA: Power ControlCDMA: Power Control

• Modelled CDMA cell is surrounded by two tiers of auxiliary cells, and total cluster of 19 (57 for three-sector deployment option) is considered in power control tuning

• Application of Wrap-Around technique for calculation of distance to closest BS produces effect of “endless” uniform network

05 October 2010

Modelled CDMA cellModelled CDMA cell

Modelled CDMA cell

Two auto-generated tiers of auxiliary CDMA cells

Other radio system, counter-

part in interference simulation

Interferer-Victim distance

05 October 2010

Last snapshot displayed

BS or MS info display

BS antenna display

General system infoCell specific infoConnected - voice active userActive linkInactive linkDropped userCDMA interferer

Clear legend

05 October 2010

CDMA network-edge caseCDMA network-edge case

• Instead of centre cell, takes the cell at the edge of CDMA PC cluster as a reference cell, wrap-around formulas adjusted as if no other cells are located beyond that cell

• This should be useful for e.g. cross-border or similar interference scenarios

05 October 2010

Setting Network edge caseSetting Network edge case

05 October 2010

CDMA resultsCDMA results

• Initial capacity: Number of connected UEs before any external interference is considered.

• Interfered capacity: Results after external interference is applied.• Excess outage, users: How many UEs were dropped due to external interference.• Outage percentage: Percentage of UEs dropped due to external interference.

Number of connected UE

Interfered capacity(blue)

Non-interfered capacity(red)

Difference(green)

05 October 2010

CDMA resultsCDMA results

05 October 2010

Part 4:Part 4:SEAMCAT informationSEAMCAT information

05 October 2010

On-line manualOn-line manual

www.ero.dk/seamcat

www.seamcat.org/xwiki

05 October 2010

CEPT SEAMCAT workspace CEPT SEAMCAT workspace publicly availablepublicly available

• Existing .sws files which have been generated as part of some ECC report or CEPT reports activities can be found at www.erodocdb.dk

05 October 2010

Reference material and Reference material and workspacesworkspaces

05 October 2010

ConclusionsConclusions

• Sharing rules are important element of spectrum optimisation process

• Unless some intelligent interference avoidance is implemented in radio systems, the careful choice of sharing conditions is the only means for achieving successful co-existence and optimal spectrum use

• Statistical tool SEAMCAT is a powerful tool for such analysis

• On-line manual• Existing CEPT SEAMCAT workspaces are publicly available

05 October 2010

Thank you - Any questions?Thank you - Any questions?

introduction to seamcat european communications office jean-philippe kermoal - seamcat manager (eco)...

traditional seamcat

existing radio systems

x cdma seamcat

minimum sharing rules

existing systems

spacing radio systems

implementation slide

way of sharing

Documents

kermoal cv 2015€¦ · institute of scientific research....

european communications office nansensgade 19 dk-1366...

quick start in seamcat

setting emission and blocking masks european communications...

principle of monte-carlo in a seamcat environment

basic examples of setting simulations european...

advanced statistical techniques for spectrum engineering...

satellite monitoring mou in the framework of the cept...

modeling of unwanted and blocking interference modes...

introduction to seamcat

enhanced multicarrier techniques for professional ad hoc...

seamcat user's documentation -...

quick start in seamcat european communications office...

introduction to seamcat example of mca study

introduction to seamcat example of mca study stella...

introduction in seamcat -...

coexistence between wireless fidelity and wireless...

seamcat handbook january 2010

doc.: ieee 802.19-07/0003r0 submission january 2007 mark...

overview of systems in seamcat