international workshop: istanbul – twente – sarajevo group 2 mees beeker sibel kirca

International Workshop: Istanbul – Twente – Sarajevo GROUP 2

Mees BeekerSibel Kirca

Serdar KöroğluAida Kulenović

Mirjan MehmedinovićTjark van de Merwe

Burcu Ölez

THREE CONCEPTS

developed concepts:1. Plain & Easy

THREE CONCEPTS1. Plain & Easy

Plain and simple market stallEasy to install, maintain, disassemble and useVery light and permeable pavilion

01 Construction and floor plan02 Possible usage of pavilion03 Pavilion in its environment, connected

01 02 03

THREE CONCEPTS2. Open & Closed

THREE CONCEPTS

developed concepts:1. Plain & Easy

2. Open & Closed

Patterns from the areaMoveable façades

Extendable area

01 Extending pavilion02 Pavilion in its environment03 Possibility for façade material

01 02 03

01 Unit mass02 Outer shell03 Structure04 The core

01 02

All functionalities are in the coreEasily extendable

03

THREE CONCEPTS

developed concepts:1. Plain & Easy

2. Open & Closed3. Static & Dynamic

THREE CONCEPTS3. Static & Dynamic

04

KEY CRITERIA COMPARISATIONTHREE CONCEPTS

developed concepts:1. Plain & Easy

2. Open & Closed3. Static & Dynamic

key criteria comparisonPoint of view of Municipality

Point of view of tenant

Point of view of visitor

SafeCleanUniformHistorical contextFast assemblyMultifunctional

Safe/SecureCleanWorkableMake moneyCooperate with other tenant

Safe/secureEnjoy festivalCleanEat/Drink/Buy/Sit

Plain & Easy Open & Closed Static & Dynamic

Architectural quality +/- + +

Multi-Functionality + + +

Transformability - +/- +

Sustainability +/- +/- +/-

Comfort and health +/- +/- +/-

Constructability and handling of components

+ - +/-

Cultural identity and local context

- - -

Score indecisive…Static & Dynamic has most potential

Plain & Easy Open & Closed Static & Dynamic

Architectural quality +/- + +

Multi-Functionality + + +

Transformability - +/- +

Sustainability +/- +/- +/-

Comfort and health +/- +/- +/-

Constructability and handling of components

+ - +/-

Cultural identity and local context

- - -

Potential - - +

Maximum capacity of the trams is estimated at 12000 visitors/hrFour axes in areaDesign will be permeable to discourage people to stay to long in entrance area

CONTEXT OF SITEorientation / approach / accessibility routing / zoning / relation

to adjacent buildings / scale/proportion

01 amount of people entering the park02 analyses of the park03 demand for permeability in the new design

01 02 03

THREE CONCEPTS

developed concepts:1. Plain & Easy

2. Open & Closed3. Static & Dynamic

key criteria comparison

CONTEXT OF SITE

CONTEXT OF SITEorientation / approach / accessibility routing / zoning / relation

to adjacent buildings / scale/proportion

01 Arrangement of functions to the area02 Possible arrangement of pavilions03 Key to simbols/lines of picture two

01 02

Functions of pavilions will be divided to maintain and boost the flow of people towards the desired area.The minimum street width at maximum capacity is 10 m.Configuration of pavilions will help steering visitors to desired areas.

03

THREE CONCEPTS

developed concepts:1. Plain & Easy

2. Open & Closed3. Static & Dynamic

key criteria comparison

CONTEXT OF SITE

BUILDING CONCEPTScenario 1 fast food restaurant, scenario 2 restaurant with seating; Scenario 3 tea room; Scenario 4 shop;

5 exhibition space, scenario

01

THREE CONCEPTS

developed concepts:1. Plain & Easy

2. Open & Closed3. Static & Dynamic

key criteria comparison

CONTEXT OF SITE

BUILDING CONCEPT

01 Unit mass02 Outer shell03 Structure04 The core

01 02

All functionalities are in the coreEasily extendable

03 04

01 02 03

SCENARIOSScenario 1 fast food restaurant, scenario 2 restaurant with seating; Scenario 3 tee room; Scenario 4 shop;

5 exhibition space, scenario

THREE CONCEPTS

developed concepts:1. Plain & Easy

2. Open & Closed3. Static & Dynamic

key criteria comparison

CONTEXT OF SITE

BUILDING CONCEPT

scenarios 1, 2, 3, 4 & 5

Text

SCENARIOSScenario 1 fast food restaurant, scenario 2 restaurant with seating; Scenario 3 tee room; Scenario 4 shop;

5 exhibition space, scenario

THREE CONCEPTS

developed concepts:1. Plain & Easy

2. Open & Closed3. Static & Dynamic

key criteria comparison

CONTEXT OF SITE

BUILDING CONCEPT

scenarios 1, 2, 3, 4 & 5

3D DIGITAL / PHYSICAL MODELS

01 Building level02 Articulated level03 Urban level

02 03

THREE CONCEPTS

developed concepts:1. Plain & Easy

2. Open & Closed3. Static & Dynamic

key criteria comparison

CONTEXT OF SITE

BUILDING CONCEPT

scenarios 1, 2, 3, 4 & 53D digital / physical models

CONCEPT OF CONSTRUCTION

01 Possibility of stretching the pavilion02 Concept of closed and opened wall03 Concept of closed and opened pavilion

01 02

Text

03

THREE CONCEPTS

developed concepts:1. Plain & Easy

2. Open & Closed3. Static & Dynamic

key criteria comparison

CONTEXT OF SITE

BUILDING CONCEPT

scenarios 1, 2, 3, 4 & 53D digital / physical models

CONCEPT OF CONSTRUCTION

CONCEPT OF MATERIALIZATIONTHREE CONCEPTS

developed concepts:1. Plain & Easy

2. Open & Closed3. Static & Dynamic

key criteria comparison

CONTEXT OF SITE

BUILDING CONCEPT

scenarios 1, 2, 3, 4 & 53D digital / physical models

CONCEPT OF CONSTRUCTION

CONCEPT OF MATERIALIZATION

KEY CRITERIA – MULTI FUNCTIONALITY & TRANSFORMABILITY

01 Multifunctional components

01

THREE CONCEPTS

developed concepts:1. Plain & Easy

2. Open & Closed3. Static & Dynamic

key criteria comparison

CONTEXT OF SITE

BUILDING CONCEPT

scenarios 1, 2, 3, 4 & 53D digital / physical models

CONCEPT OF CONSTRUCTION

CONCEPT OF MATERIALIZATION

KEY CRITERIA

Multi functionality & Transformability

Building: restaurant, bookshopSystem: coreComponent: combine floor & roof

KEY CRITERIA – MULTI FUNCTIONALITY & TRANSFORMABILITY

01 Multifunctional components

01

THREE CONCEPTS

developed concepts:1. Plain & Easy

2. Open & Closed3. Static & Dynamic

key criteria comparison

CONTEXT OF SITE

BUILDING CONCEPT

scenarios 1, 2, 3, 4 & 53D digital / physical models

CONCEPT OF CONSTRUCTION

CONCEPT OF MATERIALIZATION

KEY CRITERIA

Multi functionality & Transformability

Building: restaurant, bookshopSystem: coreComponent: combine floor & roof

KEY CRITERIA – SUSTAINABILITY

• Design for Disassembly• Seperated garbage collecting by tenants and visitors• Using solar energy for lighting

01 Functional Levels – Duffy and Brand02 Recycling bins, seperated garbage03 Solar panels, possibly installed at central area

01 02 03

THREE CONCEPTS

developed concepts:1. Plain & Easy

2. Open & Closed3. Static & Dynamic

key criteria comparison

CONTEXT OF SITE

BUILDING CONCEPT

scenarios 1, 2, 3, 4 & 53D digital / physical models

CONCEPT OF CONSTRUCTION

CONCEPT OF MATERIALIZATION

KEY CRITERIA

Multi functionality & Transformability

Sustainability

KEY CRITERIA – COMFORT & HEALTH

Sub-criteria

01 Phase Changing Material for roof by Alderman, Robert J.02 Design to realize hygiene

01 02

THREE CONCEPTS

developed concepts:1. Plain & Easy

2. Open & Closed3. Static & Dynamic

key criteria comparison

CONTEXT OF SITE

BUILDING CONCEPT

scenarios 1, 2, 3, 4 & 53D digital / physical models

CONCEPT OF CONSTRUCTION

CONCEPT OF MATERIALIZATION

KEY CRITERIA

Multi functionality & Transformability

SustainabilityComfort & health

Questions?

THREE CONCEPTS

developed concepts:1. Plain & Easy

2. Open & Closed3. Static & Dynamic

key criteria comparison

CONTEXT OF SITE

BUILDING CONCEPT

scenarios 1, 2, 3, 4 & 53D digital / physical models

CONCEPT OF CONSTRUCTION

CONCEPT OF MATERIALIZATION

KEY CRITERIA

Multi functionality & Transformability

SustainabilityComfort & health

QUESTIONS?